Retribution versus rehabilitation as motives for support of offender’s punishment: the moderating role of mindsets about malleability

References

• Altemeyer, B. (1973). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Winnipeg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., & Nielsen, H. S. (2016). Reading intervention with a growth mindset approach improves children’s skills. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 113(43), 12111–12113‏.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. 1948. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation Original work published 1843. Blackwell Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, R. S. (1991). Beliefs about intelligence and achievement related behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M., Kenney, M., Martin, B. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2019). Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment. Research Policy, 48(2), 401–413‏. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025
   Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, A. P., Hambrick, D. Z., & Macnamara, B. N. (2020). How firm are the foundations of mind-set theory? The claims appear stronger than the evidence. Psychological Science, 31(3), 258–267‏. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619897588
   Google Scholar
• Burkley, E., Curtis, J., & Hatvany, T. (2017). The social contagion of incremental and entity trait beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 100(108), 45–49‏. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.063
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L. (2010). Implicit theories of body weight: Entity beliefs can weigh you down. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 119–137‏. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0068-x
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. W., & Wink, K. (2012). The relationship between political ideology and punishment: What do jury panel members say? Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 8(2), 130–146.
   Google Scholar
• Colémont, A., Van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2011). Five-Factor Model personality dimensions and right-wing attitudes: Psychological bases of punitive attitudes? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(4), 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté-Lussier, C., & Carmichael, J. T. (2018). Public support for harsh criminal justice policy and its moral and ideological tides. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24(6), 659–683. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005552203727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. 690 Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 391–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, -Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (1993). Implicit theories individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(5), 644–656‏. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293195015
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 391–394‏. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00612.x
   Google Scholar
• Erdley, C. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children’s implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64(3), 863–878‏. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131223
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160‏. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, F., McGeer, V., & Gollwitzer, M. (2014). Get the message: Punishment is satisfying if the transgressor responds to its communicative intent. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 986–997‏. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214533130
   Google Scholar
• Gabbioneta, C., Faulconbridge, J. R., Currie, G., Dinovitzer, R., & Muzio, D. (2019). Inserting professionals and professional organizations in studies of wrongdoing: The nature, antecedents and consequences of professional misconduct. Human Relations, 72(11), 1707–1725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718809400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M. M., & Jackson, J. (2013). Retribution as revenge and retribution as just deserts. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 61–80‏. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0174-7
   Google Scholar
• Gervey, B. M., Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Differential use of person information in decisions about guilt versus innocence: The role of implicit theories. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 17–27‏. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025001002
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, A., Cohen-Chen, S., Goyer, J. P., Dweck, C. S., Gross, J. J., & Halperin, E. (2018). Testing the impact and durability of a group malleability intervention in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 115, 696–701.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. P., & Gromet, D. M. (2014). Punishment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 5(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2009). Punishment and beyond: Achieving justice through the satisfaction of multiple goals. Law & Society Review, 43(1), 1–38‏. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00365.x
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588‏. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
   Google Scholar
• Huang, N., Zuo, S., Wang, F., Cai, P., & Wang, F. (2017). The dark side of malleability: Incremental theory promotes immoral behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. S. (2015). Support for the domain specificity of implicit beliefs about persons, intelligence, and morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwai, T., & de França Carvalho, J. V. (2020). Can a leopard change its spots? The effects of implicit theories of personality on forgiveness via attributions of behavioral stability. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, D. T., Tagar, M. R., Halperin, E., Bäckström, M., Vitriol, J. A., & Liberman, V. (2018). If They Can’t Change, Why Support Change? Implicit Theories About Groups, Social Dominance Orientation and Political Identity. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.752
   Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1952 [1790]). Critique of Judgement (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, L. B., Oswald, M. E., Stucki, I., & Gollwitzer, M. (2010). A closer look at an eye for an eye: Laypersons’ punishment decisions are primarily driven by retributive motives. Social Justice Research, 2(2–3), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0113-4
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kershnar, S. (2001). Desert, retribution, and torture. University Press of America.‏.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A., & Tidwell, N. (2014). Examining the impact of sexism on evaluations of social scientific evidence in discrimination litigation. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., & Maruna, S. (2009). Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment & Society, 11(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508101490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levontin, L., Halperin, E., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Implicit theories block negative attributions about a longstanding adversary: The case of Israelis and Arabs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 670–675‏. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.74.6.1421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Bates, T. C. (2019). You can’t change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that’s how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(9), 1640–1655. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüftenegger, M., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Implicit theories: International perspectives from multiple domains. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & King, A. (2009). Once a Once a Once public Once. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1–2), 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascini, P., & Houtman, D. (2006). Rehabilitation and repression: Reassessing their ideological embeddedness. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0066-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 18–36‏. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02039.x
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2014). Punishment as rehabilitation. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 4195–4206). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Burgoon, J. K., & Hall, J. R. (2007). The effects of implicit theories of moral character on affective reactions to moral transgressions. Social Cognition, 25(6), 819–832‏. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.819
   Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, S. A., Lee, E., Berman, A., & Rung, D. (2019). When do people value rehabilitation and restorative justice over the punishment of offenders? Victims & Offenders, 14(1), 32–51‏. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1539688
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children's Motivation and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzio, D., Faulconbridge, J., Gabbioneta, C., & Greenwood, R. (2016). Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: A ‘boundaries’ perspective on professional misconduct. In D. Palmer, K. Smith-Crowe, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), Organizational Wrongdoing (pp. 141–175). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T., Heshmati, S., Kaplan, D., & Nichols, S. (2013). Folk retributivism and the communication confound. Economics and Philosophy, 29(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267113000217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 23, pp. 1–42). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth, U. (2003). Punishment goals of crime victims. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022547213760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27‏. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Paul, G. D. (2019). The Influence of Belief in Offender Redeemability and Decision-Making Competence on Receptivity to Restorative Justice. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research?. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12176
   Google Scholar
• Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Lay theories of personality: Cornerstones of meaning in social cognition. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00222.x
   Google Scholar
• Rade, C. B., Desmarais, S. L., & Burnette, J. L. (2018). Implicit theories of criminal behavior: Fostering public support for ex-offender community reentry. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 14(1), 14–36‏.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21(7), 952–959‏. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610374740
   Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., & Georgeac, O. A. (2017). Understanding intergroup relations through the lens of implicit theories (mindsets) of malleability. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(4), e12305. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynor, P., & Robinson, G. (2009). Rehabilitation, Crime and Justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (2007). Intuitions of justice: Implications for criminal law and justice policy. S. CaL. L. Rev, 81, 1‏.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seron, C., Pereira, J., & Kovath, J. (2006). How citizens assess just punishment for police misconduct. Criminology, 44(3), 925–960. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00068.x
   Google Scholar
• Shuman, E., Halperin, E., & Reifen Tagar, M. (2018). Anger as a catalyst for change? Incremental beliefs and anger’s constructive effects in conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(7), 1092–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217695442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Silver, E. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowell, T. (2002). A conflict of visions: The ideological origins of political struggles. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P., Shu, T. M., Ng, H. K. S., & Tong, Y. Y. (2013). Belief about immutability of moral character and punitiveness toward criminal offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevino, L. K. (1992). The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 647–676. https://doi.org/10.2307/258803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, A. (1986). Past or future crimes: Deservedness and dangerousness in the sentencing of criminals. Manchester University Press.‏‏.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2010). Is offender rehabilitation a form of punishment? British Journal of Forensic Practice, 12(4), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.5042/bjfp.2010.0610
   Google Scholar
• Weimann-Saks, D., Peleg-Koriat, I., & Halperin, E. (2019). The Effect of Malleability Beliefs and Emotions on Legal Decision Making. Justice System Journal, 40(1), 21–38‏. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1590264
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Klayman, N., Hameiri, B., & Halperin, E. (2020). Group-based guilt and shame in the context of intergroup conflict: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs about group malleability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(4), 213–227‏. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12651
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S. (1984). Left–right ideological differences in blaming victims. Political Psychology, 5(4), 537–581. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791228
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., Miu, A. S., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: A meta‐analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention. Child Development, 84(5), 1651–1667‏. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12062
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Adolescents’ implicit theories predict desire for vengeance after peer conflicts: Correlational and experimental evidence. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1090–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar