Receiving forgiveness in the presence of an attentive audience

References

• Adams, G. S., & Mullen, E. (2013). Increased voting for candidates who compensate victims rather than punish offenders. Social Justice Research, 26(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0179-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, G. S., Zou, X., Inesi, M. E., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Forgiveness is not always divine: When expressing forgiveness makes others avoid you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Chen, H., Radke, H. R. M., Harding, J. F., & Fasoli, F. (2013). Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212471205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). TARGET ARTICLE: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombari, D., Schmid Mast, M., Canadas, E., & Bachmann, M. (2015). Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: Virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candini, M., Giuberti, V., Manattini, A., Grittani, S., diPellegrino, G., & Frassinetti, F. (2017). Personal space regulation in childhood autism: Effects of social interaction and person’s perspective. Autism Research, 10(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• DiDonato, T. E., McIlwee, L. J., & Carlucci, M. E. (2015). The fallout of forgiveness: How forgiveness predicts third-party perceptions of the forgiver and the forgiver’s relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514536291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotsch, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2008). Virtual prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enright, R. D., Freedman, S., & Rique, J. (1998). The psychology of interpersonal forgiveness. In R. D. Enright & J. North (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness (pp. 46–62). University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., Andersson, P. A., & Strimling, P. (2016). Moderators of the disapproval of peer punishment. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., Twardawski, M., Strelan, P., & Gollwitzer, M. (2022). Victims need more than power: Empowerment and moral change independently predict victims’ satisfaction and willingness to reconcile. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95
   Google Scholar
• Funk, F., McGeer, V., & Gollwitzer, M. (2014). Get the message: Punishment is satisfying if the transgressor responds to its communicative intent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214533130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. (1983). The experience of personal space: Perception of interpersonal distance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7(3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillath, O., Mccall, C., Shaver, P. R., & Blascovich, J. (2008). What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychology, 11(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260801906489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2021). Downstream consequences of post-transgression responses: A motive-attribution framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 49(5), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211007021
   Google Scholar
• Gooley, S. L., Zadro, L., Williams, L. A., Svetieva, E., & Gonsalkorale, K. (2015). Ostracizing for a reason: A novel source paradigm for examining the nature and consequences of motivated ostracism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(5), 410–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1060933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, C. I., Strube, M. J., & Myers, R. A. (1980). A multitrait-multimethod investigation of interpersonal distance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, B. J., Cowden, R. G., & Shawkey, L. (2020). Bibliography of narrative reviews and meta-analyses on forgiveness (2004-2018). In E. L. Worthington & N. G. Wade (Eds.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 335–344). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2014). Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on peer reintegration. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20147814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnett, J. J., Bailey, K. G., & Hartley, C. S. (1974). Body height, position, and sex as determinants of personal space. The Journal of Psychology, 87(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1974.9915683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 293–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P. L., Heffernan, M. E., & Allemand, M. (2015). Forgiveness and subjective well-being: Discussing mechanisms, contexts, and rationales. In Forgiveness and health (pp. 155–169). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9993-5_11
   Google Scholar
• Kane, H. S., McCall, C., Collins, N. L., & Blascovich, J. (2012). Mere presence is not enough: Responsive support in a virtual world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassner, M. P., Wesselmann, E. D., Law, A. T., & Williams, K. D. (2012). Virtually ostracized: Studying ostracism in immersive virtual environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(8), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khooshabeh, P., Gandhe, S., McCall, C., Gratch, J., Blascovich, J., & Traum, D. (2011). The effects of virtual agent humor and gaze behavior on human-virtual agent proxemics. In H. H. Vilhjálmsson, S. Kopp, S. Marsella, & K. R. Thórisson (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 458–459). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_61
   Google Scholar
• Kiyonari, T., & Barclay, P. (2008). Cooperation in social dilemmas: Free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothgassner, O. D., Kafka, J. X., Rudyk, J., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Felnhofer, A. (2014). Does social exclusion hurt virtually like it hurts in real-life? The role of agency and social presence in the perception and experience of social exclusion. Proceedings of the International Society on Presence Research, Vienna. (Vol. 15, 45–56).
   Google Scholar
• Legate, N., DeHaan, C. R., Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Hurting you hurts me too: The psychological costs of complying with ostracism. Psychological Science, 24(4), 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. (2019). SoSci survey. (version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. https://www.soscisurvey.de
   Google Scholar
• Llobera, J., Spanlang, B., Ruffini, G., & Slater, M. (2010). Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1857893.1857896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, C., Blascovich, J., Young, A., & Persky, S. (2009). Proxemic behaviors as predictors of aggression towards black (but not white) males in an immersive virtual environment. Social Influence, 4(2), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802517418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, C., & Singer, T. (2015). Facing off with unfair others: Introducing proxemic imaging as an implicit measure of approach and avoidance during social interaction. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, J. M., van der Heijden, E. C. M., & Potters, J. J. M. (2020). (Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer. Experimental Economics, 23(4), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09644-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2014). Faktorenstruktur, psychometrische Eigenschaften und Messinvarianz der deutschsprachigen Version des 60-Item HEXACO Persönlichkeitsinventars. Diagnostica, 60(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ok, E., Qian, Y., Strejcek, B., & Aquino, K. (2021). Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of dark triad personalities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1634–1661. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2010). The symbolic identity implications of inter and intra-group transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 552–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persky, S., Ferrer, R. A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2016). Nonverbal and paraverbal behavior in (simulated) medical visits related to genomics and weight: A role for emotion and race. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 39(5), 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9747-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertaub, D. P., Slater, M., & Barker, C. (2001). An experiment on fear of public speaking in virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 81, 372–378. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-925-7-372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pochwatko, G., Karpowicz, B., Chrzanowska, A., & Kopeć, W. (2021). Interpersonal distance in VR: Reactions of older adults to the presence of a virtual agent. In C. Biele, J. Kacprzyk, J. W. Owsinski, A. Romanowski, & M. Sikorski (Eds.), Digital interaction and machine Intelligence (pp. 91–100). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74728-2_9
   Google Scholar
• Pronin, E. (2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320(5880), 1177–1180. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siem, B., & Barth, M. (2019). (Not) thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self-focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. Dialogue: The Official Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M., Antley, A., Davison, A., Swapp, D., Guger, C., Barker, C., Pistrang, N., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Rustichini, A.2006. A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000039
   Google Scholar
• Strelan, P., Van Prooijen, J. W., & Gollwitzer, M. (2020). When transgressors intend to cause harm: The empowering effects of revenge and forgiveness on victim well-being. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takada, N., & Ohbuchi, K. (2013). True and hollow forgiveness, forgiveness motives, and conflict resolution. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(2), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061311316799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppenberg, H. L., Bos, A. E. R., Ruiter, R. A. C., Wigboldus, D. H. J., & Pryor, J. B. (2015). HIV-related stigma in social interactions: Approach and avoidance behaviour in a virtual environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2003). Attribution and person perception. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 176–194). Sage Publications Inc London.
   Google Scholar
• Twardawski, M., Gollwitzer, M., Altenmüller, M. S., Kunze, A. E., & Wittekind, C. E. (2021). Imagery rescripting helps victims cope with experienced injustice. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 229(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tongeren, D. R., Green, J. D., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Davis, J. L., & Ramos, M. (2015). Forgiveness increases meaning in life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614541298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedekind, C., & Braithwaite, V. A. (2002). The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Current Biology, 12(12), 1012–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00890-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Williams, K. D. (2013). When do we ostracize? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612443386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Williams, K. D. (2015). The role of burden and deviation in ostracizing others. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(5), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1060935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold, B. K., & Bouchard, S. (2014). Advances in virtual reality and anxiety disorders. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8023-6
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, E. L., Griffin, B. J., & Provencher, C. (2018). Forgiveness. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Subjective well-being and life satisfaction (pp. 148–167). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Worthington, E. L., & Wade, N. G. (2020). A new perspective on forgiveness research. In E. L. Worthington & N. G. Wade (Eds.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 345–355). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Yaremych, H. E., & Persky, S. (2019). Tracing physical behavior in virtual reality: A narrative review of applications to social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar