76
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Factors that Impact Proceedings in the Courtroom

ORCID Icon
Pages 39-58 | Published online: 15 May 2018

References

  • Ahern, E. C., & Lamb, M. E. (2016). Children’s reports of disclosure recipient reactions in forensic interviews: Comparing the NICHD and MoGP protocols. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 85–93.
  • Alaggia, R. (2004). Many ways of telling: Expanding conceptualizations of child sexual abuse disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 1213–1227.
  • Alonzo-Proulx, A., & Cyr, M. (2016). Factors predicting central details in alleged child sexual abuse victims’ disclosure. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practise, 16, 129–150.
  • American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1997). Guidelines for psychosocial evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in young children. Chicago: American Professional Society of the Abuse of Children.
  • American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (2012). Practice guidelines: Investigative interviewing in cases of alleged child abuse. Retrieved from http://www.apsac.org/
  • Andrews, S. J., Ahern, E. C., Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2015). The productivity of wh- prompts when children testify. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 341–349.
  • Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2016). How do lawyers examine and cross-examine children in Scotland? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 953–971.
  • Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2018). Cross-examining young alleged complainers in Scottish criminal cases. Criminal Law Review.
  • Andrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Lyon, T. D. (2015a). Question types, responsiveness and self-contradictions when prosecutors and defense attorneys question alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 253–261.
  • Andrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Lyon, T. D. (2015b). The effects of question repetition on responses when prosecutors and defense attorneys question children alleging sexual abuse in court. Law and Human Behaviour, 39, 559–570.
  • Arata, C. M. (1998). To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization. Child Maltreatment, 3, 63–71.
  • Bala, N. M., Mitnick, M., Trocmé, N., & Houston, C. (2007). Sexual abuse allegations and parental separation: Smokescreen or fire? Journal of Family Studies, 13, 26–56.
  • Beckett, H., Brodie, I., Factor, F., Melrose, M., Pearce, J., Pitts, J., … Warrington, C. (2013). “It’s wrong…but you get used to it” a qualitative study of gang-associated sexual violence towards, and exploitation of young persons in England. University of Bedfordshire/London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner. Retrieved from http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_745
  • Bjorklund, D. F., Bjorklund, B., Brown, R., & Cassel, W. (1998). Children’s susceptibility to repeated questions: How misinformation changes children’s answers and their minds. Applied Developmental Science, 2(2), 99−111.
  • Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.
  • Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419–439.
  • Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Principe, G. F. (2006). The child and the law. In K. A. Renninger, I. E. Sigel, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, 6th ed., pp. 776–816)). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Bruer, K., & Pozzulo, J. D. (2014). Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision-making. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 332–348.
  • Burrows, K., & Powell, M. (2014). Prosecutors’ recommendations for improving child witness statements about sexual abuse. Policing and Society, 24, 189–207.
  • Casey, L. (2015). Reflections on child sexual exploitation. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/23762/1/Louise_Casey_report_into_CSE_template_format__4_.pdf
  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304–320.
  • Cossins, A., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & O’Brien, K. (2009). Uncertainty and misconceptions about child sexual abuse: Implications for the criminal justice system. Psychology, Psychiatry and Law, 16, 1–18.
  • Dale, P. S., Loftus, E. F., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question on eye witness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 269–277.
  • Davies, E., Henderson, E., & Hanna, K. (2010). Facilitating children to give best evidence: Are there better ways to challenge children’s evidence? Criminal Law Journal, 34, 347–362.
  • Davies, E., Henderson, E., & Seymour, F. W. (1997). In the interests of justice? The cross-examination of child complainants in criminal proceedings. Psychology, Psychiatry and Law, 2, 1–13.
  • Eastwood, C., & Patton, W. (2002). The experiences of child complainants of sexual abuse in the criminal justice system. Report to the Criminology Research Council. Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/crc/reports/eastwood.html
  • Eisen, M. L., Goodman, G. S., Qin, J., Davis, S., & Crayton, J. (2007). Maltreated children’s memory: Accuracy, suggestibility, and psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1275–1294.
  • Eisen, M. L., Qin, J., Goodman, G. S., & Davis, S. (2002). Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children: Age, stress arousal, dissociation, and psychopathology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 167–212.
  • Elliott, M., Browne, K., & Kilcoyne, J. (1995). Child sexual abuse prevention: What offenders tell us. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 579–594.
  • Evans, A. D., Lee, K., & Lyon, T. D. (2009). Complex questions asked by defense lawyers but not prosecutors predicts convictions in child abuse trials. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 258–264.
  • Fisher, R. P., Brewer, N., & Mitchell, G. (2009). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470747599.ch8
  • Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a five-month delay on children’s and adults’ eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 323−336.
  • Fogliati, R., & Bussey, K. (2014). The effects of cross-examination on children’s reports of neutral and transgressive events. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 296–315.
  • Garven, S., Wood, J. M., & Malpass, R. S. (2000). Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children’s mundane and fantastic claims. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 38–49.
  • Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347–359.
  • Goodman, G. S., & Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 1–19.
  • Goodman, G. S., & Reed, D. S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10(4), 317−332.
  • Goodman-Brown, T. B., Edelstein, R. S., Goodman, G. S., Jones, D. P., & Gordon, D. S. (2003). Why children tell: A model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 525–540.
  • Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice: The prosecution of child sexual abuse. New York, NY: Free Press. doi:10.1007/BF02233969
  • Green, A. H. (1991). Factors contributing to false allegations of child sexual abuse in custody disputes. Child & Youth Services, 15, 177–189.
  • Hayes, D., & Bunting, L. (2013). ‘Just be brave’: The experiences of young witnesses in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland. Child Abuse Review, 22, 419–431.
  • Henderson, E. (2015). Communicative competence? Judges, advocates and intermediaries discuss issues in the cross examination of vulnerable witnesses. Criminal Law Review, 659, 664–667.
  • Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. E. (2005). Trends in children’s disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 1203–1214. PMid:16260036.
  • Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 336–344.
  • Hershkowitz, I., Lanes, O., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 111–123.
  • Home Office. (2011). Achieving the best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures. Retrieved from http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/best_evidence_in_criminal_proceedings.pdf
  • Jack, F., & Zajac, R. (2014). The effect of age and reminders on witnesses’ responses to cross-examination-style questioning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 1–6.
  • Jones, D. P., & McGraw, J. M. (1987). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse to children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 27–45.
  • Keary, K., & Fitzpatrick, C. (1994). Children’s disclosure of sexual abuse during formal investigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 543–548.
  • Kendall-Tacket, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164–180.
  • Klemfuss, J., Quas, J., & Lyon, T. D. (2014). Attorneys’ questions and children’s productivity in child sexual abuse criminal trials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 780–788.
  • Kogan, S. M. (2004). Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: Results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 147–165.
  • Lamb, M. E., & Fauchier, A. (2001). The effects of question type on self-contradictions by children in the course of forensic interviews. Applied Cognitive Development, 15, 483–491.
  • Lamb, M. E., La Rooy, D., Katz, C., & Malloy, L. C. (2011). Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practise. Hoboken: United States John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Lamb, M. E., Malloy, L. C., Hershkowitz, I., & La Rooy, D. (2015). Children and the law. In R. M. Lerner & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed.), Volume 3, Social, emotional and personality development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1080/10888691.2016.1158652
  • Lamb, M. E., & Sim, M. P. Y. (2013). Developmental factors affecting children in legal contexts. Youth Justice, 13(2), 131–144.
  • Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1998). Conducting investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 813–823.
  • Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Stewart, H., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Age differences in young children’s responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 926−934.
  • Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers’ reports. Developmental Psychology, 31, 568–578.
  • London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 194–226.
  • London, K., & Kulkofsky, S. (2010). Factors affecting the reliability of children’s reports. In G. M. Davies & D. B. Wright (Eds.), New frontiers in applied memory (pp. 119–141). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Long, J., Wilkinson, J., & Kays, J. (2011). Ten strategies for prosecuting child sexual abuse at the hands of a family member. The Prosecutors’ Newsletter on Violence against Women, 5, 1–8.
  • Lyon, T. D., Malloy, L. C., Quas, J. A., & Talwar, V. (2008). Coaching, truth induction, and young maltreated children’s false allegations and false denials. Child Development, 79, 914–929.
  • Malloy, L. C., Brubacher, S. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Because she’s one who listens!: Children discuss recipients in forensic interviews. Child Maltreatment, 18, 245–251.
  • Malloy, L. C., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 162–170.
  • McElvaney, R. (2013). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: Delays, non-disclosure and partial disclosure. What the research tells us and implications for practice. Child Abuse Review, 24, 159–169.
  • Moossy, R. (2009). Sex trafficking: Identifying cases and victims. National Institute of Justice Journal, 262, 2–12. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov
  • Myers, J. E. (1994). Adjudication of child sexual abuse cases. Future of Children, 4, 84–101.
  • Myers, J. E. B. (1992). Legal issues in child abuse and neglect. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Myers, J. E. B., Redlich, A. D., Goodman, G. S., Prizmich, L. P., & Imwinkelried, E. (1999). Jurors’ perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 388–419.
  • Neimark, E. D., & Lewis, N. (1967). The development of logical problem-solving strategies. Child Development, 38(1), 107−117.
  • O’Donohue, W., Benuto, L. T., Fondren, R. N., Tolle, L., Vijay, A., & Fanetti, M. (2013). Dimensions of child sexual abuse allegations: What is unusual and what is not? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practise, 13(5), 456–475.
  • Ornstein, P. A., Gordon, B. N., & Larus, D. M. (1992). Children’s memory for a personality experienced event: Implications for testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 49–60.
  • Paz-Alonso, P. M., & Goodman, G. S. (2016). Developmental differences across middle childhood in memory and suggestibility for negative and positive events. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 34, 30–54.
  • Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1995). Interviewing preschoolers: Effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching, and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 129–154.
  • Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1998). Assessing the accuracy of young children’s reports: Lessons from the investigation of child sexual abuse. Applied & Preventative Psychology, 7, 1–26.
  • Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2001). Children’s eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 27–50.
  • Priebea, G., & Svedin, C. G. (2008). Child sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society: An epidemiological study of adolescents’ disclosures. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1095–1108.
  • Quas, J. A., Davis, E. L., Goodman, G. S., & Myers, J. E. (2007). Repeated questions, deception, and children’s true and false reports of body touch. Child Maltreatment, 12, 60–67.
  • Quas, J. A., Thompson, W. C., & Clarke-Stewart, A. (2005). Do jurors “know” what isn’t so about child witnesses? Law and Human Behavior, 29, 425–456.
  • Quinn, K. M., White, S., & Santilli, G. (1989). Influences of an interviewer’s behaviour in child sexual abuse investigations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 17, 45–52.
  • Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behaviour, 27, 141–157.
  • Roesler, T. A., & Wind, T. (1994). Telling the secret: Adult women describe their disclosures of incest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 327–338.
  • Rouhanian, A. (2017). A call for change: The detrimental impacts of Crawford v. Washington on domestic violence and rape prosecutions. George Washington University Law School, 37, 1–73. Retrieved from http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/jlsj/vol37/iss1/2
  • Rush, E., Lyon, T. D., Ahern, E. C., & Quas, J. A. (2014). Disclosure suspicion bias and abuse disclosure: Comparisons between sexual and physical abuse. Child Maltreatment, 19, 113–118.
  • Saarni, C. I. (1973). Piagetian operations and field independence as factors in children’s problem-solving performance. Child Development, 44(2), 338−345.
  • Sauzier, M. (1989). Disclosure of child sexual abuse. Psychiatric Clinics of America, 12, 455–469.
  • Schaeffer, P., Leventhal, J. M., & Asnes, A. G. (2011). Children’s disclosures of sexual abuse: Learning from direct inquiry. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 343–352.
  • Schuman, J., Bala, N., & Lee, K. (1999). Developmentally appropriate questions for child witnesses. Queen’s Law Journal, 25, 251–304.
  • Semmler, C., & Brewer, N. (2002). Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 423–436.
  • Shackel, R. (2009). Understanding children’s medium for disclosing sexual abuse: A tool for overcoming potential misconceptions in the courtroom. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16, 379–393.
  • Skinner, G. C. M., Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2018, Accepted). The disclosure of alleged child sexual abuse: An investigation of criminal court transcripts in Scotland. Psychology, Crime & Law.
  • Smallbone, S. W., & Wortley, R. K. (2001). Child sexual abuse: Offender characteristics and modus operandi. Australian Institute of Criminology Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No. 193.
  • Smeaton, E. (2013). Running from hate to what you think is love: The relationship between running away and child sexual exploitation. Barkingside: Barnardo’s. Retrieved from http://www.barnardos.org.uk/15505_cse_running_from_hate_2l_web.pdf
  • Smith, B. E., & Elstein, S. G. (1993). The prosecution of child sexual abuse cases: Final report. Washington, DC: National Center for Child Abuse & Neglect.
  • Smith, D. W., Letourneau, E. J., Saunders, B. E., Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., & Best, C. L. (2000). Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 273–287.
  • Spencer, J. R., & Lamb, M. E. (2012). Children and cross-examination: Time to change the rules? Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing plc.
  • Srikantiah, J. (2007). Perfect victims and real survivors: The iconic victim in domestic human trafficking law. Boston University Law Review, 87, 157–211. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org
  • Stilling, K. B. (2008). Developing the defense in child sexual abuse cases. The Wisconsin Defender, 16, 1–13.
  • Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2014). How attorneys question children about the dynamics of sexual abuse and disclosure in criminal trials. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 20, 19–30.
  • Szojka, Z. A., Andrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2017). Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 23, 200–210.
  • Wade, A. (2002). New measures and new challenges: Children’s experiences of the court process. In H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 219–232). New York: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470713679.ch14
  • Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2001). Interviewing children and adults: The effect of question format on the tendency to speculate. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(5), 521−531.
  • Westcott, H. L., & Page, M. (2002). Cross-Examination, sexual abuse and child witness identity. Child Abuse Review, 11, 137–152.
  • Wheatcroft, J. M., & Walklate, S. (2014). Thinking differently about ‘false allegations’ in cases of rape: The search for truth. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3, 239–248.
  • Wood, J. M., & Wright, L. (1995). Evaluation of children’s sexual behaviours and incorporation of base rates in judgements of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 1263–1273.
  • Yamamoto, K., Solman, A., Parsons, J., & Davies, O. (1987). Voices in unison: Stressful events in the lives of children in six countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 855–864.
  • Yozwiak, J. A., Golding, J. M., & Marsil, D. F. (2004). The impact of type of out-of-court disclosure in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 9, 325–334.
  • Zajac, R. (2009). Investigative interviewing in the courtroom: Child witnesses under cross-examination. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 161–180). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470747599.ch10
  • Zajac, R., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (2003). Asked and answered: Questioning children in the courtroom. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10, 199–209.
  • Zajac, R., O’Neill, S., & Hayne, H. (2012). Disorder in the courtroom? Child witnesses under cross-examination. Developmental Review, 32, 181–204.
  • Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934–945.
  • Zydervelt, S., Zajac, Kaladelfos, A., & Westera, N. (2016). Lawyers’ strategies for cross-examining rape complainants: Have we moved beyond the 1950s? British Journal of Criminology. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw023

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.