202
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scholarship - Evidence Review

Technological devices to help older people beyond the home: an inventory and assessment focusing on the neighborhood and city scales

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 91-106 | Received 29 Nov 2021, Accepted 23 Jun 2022, Published online: 27 Jul 2022

References

  • Alidoust, S., Bosman, C., and Holden, G., 2019. Planning for healthy ageing: how the use of third places contributes to the social health of older populations. Ageing & society, 39 (7), 1459–1484. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18000065.
  • Araral, E., 2020. Why do cities adopt smart technologies? Contingency theory and evidence from the United States. Cities, 106, 102873. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102873
  • Aurigi, A. and Odendaal, N., 2020. From “Smart in the Box” to “Smart in the City”: rethinking the socially sustainable smart city in context. Journal of urban technology, 0 (0), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10630732.2019.1704203
  • Awesome Car Gadgets for Seniors in 2020. 2019. EasyTechSeniors. 18 Apr. Available from: https://www.easytechseniors.com/12-great-gadgets-to-make-your-car-more-comfortable-to-ride/
  • Baltes, P.B., 1997. On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. The American psychologist, 52 (4), 366–380. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366.
  • Binette, J., 2021. 2021 AARP home and community preferences survey. AARP. doi:10.26419/res.00479.001
  • Blackman, S., et al., 2016. Ambient assisted living technologies for aging well: a scoping review. Journal of intelligent systems, 25 (1), 55–69. doi:10.1515/jisys-2014-0136.
  • Brüchert, T., Baumgart, S., and Bolte, G., 2021. Social determinants of older adults’ urban design preference: a cross-sectional study. Cities & health, 0 (0), 1–15. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1870845.
  • Bruno, A., et al. 2012. Smart street lighting [2012]. EETimes. 12 Jun. Available from: https://www.eetimes.com/smart-street-lighting/
  • Carroll, L.S.L., 2017. A comprehensive definition of technology from an ethological perspective. Social sciences, 6 (4), 126. doi:10.3390/socsci6040126.
  • CDC. 2020. Deaths from older adult falls | home and recreational safety | CDC Injury Center. 9 Jul. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/falls/data/deaths-from-falls.html
  • Chamoso, P., et al., 2018. Tendencies of technologies and platforms in smart cities: a state-of-the-art review. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2018. ( ArticleID 3086854), 17. doi:10.1155/2018/3086854.
  • Chen, J., Nguyen, H., and Comaroff, J., 2021. The neighbourhood as a fitness circuit: a Singaporean case study of designing for active ageing. Cities & health, 5 (3), 224–233. doi:10.1080/23748834.2021.1930980
  • Constitution. n.d. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution [ Accessed 5 Apr 2021].
  • Dalton, D.S., et al., 2003. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. The Gerontologist, 43 (5), 661–668. doi:10.1093/geront/43.5.661.
  • Deary, I.J., et al., 2009. Age-Associated cognitive decline. British medical bulletin, 92 (1), 135–152. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldp033.
  • Dellinger, A.M., Boyd, R.M., and Haileyesus, T., 2008. Fall injuries in older adults from an unusual source: entering and exiting a vehicle. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56 (4), 609–614. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01638.x.
  • Driving Simulator for Rehabilitation, Aging and Human Factors Research. n.d. Drive square. Available from: https://www.drivesquare.com/research/ [Accessed 19 Feb 2021].
  • Drone Delivery. 2020. Fehr & Peers. 16 Sep. Available from: https://www.fehrandpeers.com/drone-delivery/
  • Eby, D.W., et al., 2016. Use, perceptions, and benefits of automotive technologies among aging drivers. Injury epidemiology, 3. doi:10.1186/s40621-016-0093-4
  • Elsom, D. 2018. This is what zebra crossings will look like in the future. The Sun. 2 Mar. Available from: https://www.thesun.co.uk/motors/5708869/this-is-what-pedestrian-crossings-will-look-like-in-the-future-with-light-up-strips-on-the-road/
  • Esposito, R., et al., 2016. Supporting active and healthy aging with advanced robotics integrated in smart environment. In: Optimizing assistive technologies for aging populations. IGI Global, 46–77. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9530-6.ch003
  • Faber, K. and van Lierop, D., 2020. How will older adults use automated vehicles? Assessing the role of AVs in overcoming perceived mobility barriers. Transportation research part A: Policy and practice, 133, 353–363. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.022
  • Forsyth, A. and Molinsky, J., 2021. What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing policy debate, 31 (2), 181–196. doi:10.1080/10511482.2020.1793795.
  • Franklin, U., 1992. The real world of technology. Toronto: Anansi.
  • Galbraith, J.K., Wilentz, S., and Galbraith, J.K., 2015. The new industrial state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Grossi, G., et al., 2020. Positive technology for elderly well-being: a review. Pattern recognition letters, 137, 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2019.03.016
  • GSMA Smart Cities Guide: Street Lighting. 2017. Internet of Things. 31 Mar. Available from: https://www.gsma.com/iot/resources/gsma-smart-cities-guide-street-lighting/
  • Hakobyan, L., et al., 2013. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Survey of ophthalmology, 58 (6), 513–528. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004.
  • Harkey, D.L., et al. 2007. NCHRP Web-Only Document 117A: Accessible pedestrian signals: A guide to best practice. 428. National Cooperative Highway Research Program; Transportation Research Board of The Nantional Academies. Available from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w117a.pdf
  • Harvard Office of Technology Development. 2016. Collaboration with ReWalk Robotics to develop wearable exosuits for patients with limited mobility. Harvard Office of Technology Development. 17 May. Available from: https://otd.harvard.edu/news/collaboration-with-rewalk-robotics-to-develop-wearable-exosuits-for-patient/
  • How search algorithms work. (n.d.) Google. Available from: https://www.google.com/search/howsearchworks/algorithms/ [Accessed 6 May 2021].
  • Hughes, T.P. 2001. History of technology. In: N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes, eds. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Oxford; Pergamon, 6852–6857. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02648-6
  • Kadam, A.J., et al., (2018). Developing a smart bus for smart city using IOT technology. 2018 Second International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), 1138–1143. doi:10.1109/ICECA.2018.8474819
  • Kang, H.G., et al., 2010. In situ monitoring of health in older adults: technologies and issues. Journal of the American geriatrics society, 58 (8), 1579–1586. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02959.x.
  • Kaplan, S. and Tripsas, M., 2008. Thinking about technology: applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research policy, 37 (5), 790–805. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002.
  • Keller, R. 2017. The portable (and more effective) alternative to hearing loops—Eversound. 3 Mar. Available from: https://eversoundhq.com/blog/portable-effective-alternative-hearing-loops/
  • Kim, S.Y. and Cho, K., 2013. Usability and design guidelines of smart canes for users with visual impairments. International Journal of Design, 7 (1), 99–110.
  • Koetteritzsch, A. and Weyers, B., 2016. Assistive technologies for older adults in urban areas: a literature review. Cognitive computation, 8 (2), 299–317. doi:10.1007/s12559-015-9355-7.
  • Lehnert, T., et al., 2019. Stated preferences for long-term care: a literature review. Ageing & Society, 39 (9), 1873–1913. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18000314.
  • Lin, F.R., et al., 2011. Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. The journals of gerontology: Series A, 66A (5), 582–590. doi:10.1093/gerona/glr002.
  • Liu, L., et al., 2016. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 91, 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.007
  • Lyu, Y. and Forsyth, A., 2022. Planning, aging, and loneliness: reviewing evidence about built environment effects. Journal of planning literature, 37 (1), 28–48. doi:10.1177/08854122211035131.
  • Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., and Alamanos, E., 2019. A systematic review of the smart home literature: a user perspective. Technological forecasting and social change, 138, 139–154. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015
  • Millonig, A., 2019. Connected and automated vehicles: chances for elderly travellers. Gerontology, 65 (5), 571–578. doi:10.1159/000498908.
  • Mitchell, C.G.B. and Suen, S.L., 1998. Urban travel, intelligent transportation systems, and the safety of elderly and disabled travelers. Journal of urban technology, 5 (1), 17–43. doi:10.1080/10630739883976.
  • Moravec, H.P. (2021. Robot. Britannica. 4 Feb. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/robot-technology
  • Mueller, T. 2017. Smart urban street furniture solutions in smart cities. Bee Smart City. 31 Aug. Available from: https://hub.beesmart.city/en/solutions/smart-urban-street-furniture-solutions
  • Pacey, A., 1983. The culture of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Padrón Nápoles, V.M., et al., 2020. Smart bus stops as interconnected public spaces for increasing social inclusiveness and quality of life of elder users. Smart cities, 3 (2), 430–443. doi:10.3390/smartcities3020023.
  • Peek, S.T.M., et al., 2014. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 83 (4), 235–248. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004.
  • Pu, L., et al., 2019. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. The Gerontologist, 59 (1), e37–e51. doi:10.1093/geront/gny046.
  • Ram, S., et al. 2016. SMARTBUS: a web application for smart urban mobility and transportation. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 363–368. doi:10.1145/2872518.2888613.
  • Reeder, B., et al., 2013. Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: a systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 82 (7), 565–579. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.007.
  • Satariano, W.A., Scharlach, A.E., and Lindeman, D., 2014. Aging, place, and technology: toward improving access and wellness in older populations. Journal of aging and health, 26 (8), 1373–1389. doi:10.1177/0898264314543470.
  • Schulz, R., et al., 2015. Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55 (5), 724–734. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu071.
  • Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., and Blake, J., 2018. A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart health, 7–8, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2018.03.002
  • Silva, B.N., Khan, M., and Han, K., 2018. Towards sustainable smart cities: a review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable cities and society, 38, 697–713. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
  • Sohrabi, S., Khreis, H., and Lord, D., 2020. Impacts of autonomous vehicles on public health: a conceptual model and policy recommendations. Sustainable cities and society, 63, 102457. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102457
  • Technology. n.d. New World Encyclopedia. Available from: https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Technology [Accessed 29 Mar 2021].
  • Tomor, Z., et al., 2019. Smart governance for sustainable cities: findings from a systematic literature review. Journal of urban technology, 26 (4), 3–27. doi:10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178.
  • Traverso, V. n.d. The cities designing playgrounds for the elderly. BBC. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20191028-the-cities-designing-playgrounds-for-the-elderly [Accessed 10 Mar 2021].
  • Wagner, F., Basran, J., and Bello-Haas, V.D., 2012. A review of monitoring technology for use with older adults. Journal of geriatric physical therapy, 35 (1), 28–34. doi:10.1519/JPT.0b013e318224aa23.
  • Ward, G., et al., 2012. Fall detectors: a review of the literature. Journal of assistive technologies, 6 (3), 202–215. doi:10.1108/17549451211261326.
  • Whittemore, A.S., 1981. Air pollution and respiratory disease. Annual review of public health, 2 (1), 397–429. doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.02.050181.002145.
  • Xie, M., et al., 2020. Trends in prevalence and incidence of chronic respiratory diseases from 1990 to 2017. Respiratory research, 21 (1), 49. doi:10.1186/s12931-020-1291-8.
  • Yusif, S., Soar, J., and Hafeez-Baig, A., 2016. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 94, 112–116. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004
  • Zandieh, R. and Acheampong, R.A., 2021. Mobility and healthy ageing in the city: exploring opportunities and challenges of autonomous vehicles for older adults’ outdoor mobility. Cities, 112, 103135. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103135

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.