826
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scholarship - Empirical

‘We are developing our bubble’: role of the built environment in supporting physical and social activities in independent-living older adults during COVID-19

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 171-184 | Received 02 Jul 2021, Accepted 21 Mar 2023, Published online: 08 May 2023

References

  • Alidoust, S., Bosman, C., and Holden, G., 2019. Planning for healthy ageing: how the use of third places contributes to the social health of older populations. Ageing & society, 39 (7), 1459–1484. doi:10.1017/S0144686X18000065.
  • Attia, M. and Edge, J., 2017. Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: a developmental approach to research methodology. Open review of educational research, 4 (1), 33–45. doi:10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068.
  • Bereitschaft, B. and Scheller, D., 2020. How might the COVID-19 pandemic affect 21st century urban design, planning, and development? Urban science, 4 (56), 56. doi:10.3390/urbansci4040056.
  • Bigonnesse, C. and Chaudhury, H., 2020. The landscape of “aging in place” in gerontology literature: emergence, theoretical perspectives, and influencing factors. Journal of aging and environment, 34 (3), 233–251. doi:10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875.
  • Brown, L., et al., 2021. Life in lockdown: a telephone survey to investigate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on the lives of older people (≥75 years). Age & ageing, 50 (2), 341–346. doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa255.
  • Chalmin-Pui, L.S., et al., 2021. “It made me feel brighter in myself”- the health and well-being impacts of a residential front garden horticultural intervention. Landscape and urban planning, 205, 103958. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103958.
  • Chang, P.J., 2020. Effects of the built and social features of urban greenways on the outdoor activity of older adults. Landscape and urban planning, 204, 103929. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103929.
  • Chen, J., Nguyen, H., and Comaroff, J., 2021. The neighbourhood as a fitness circuit: a Singaporean case study of designing for active ageing. Cities & health, 5 (3), 224–233. doi:10.1080/23748834.2021.1930980.
  • CMOH, 2020. Order 10-2020. Available from: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/cmoh-order-10-2020-2020-covid-19-response
  • Cunningham, C. and O’sullivan, R., 2020. Why physical activity matters for older adults in a time of pandemic. European review of aging and physical activity, 17 (1). doi:10.1186/s11556-020-00249-3.
  • Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., 2000. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  • Eltarabily, S. and Elghezanwy, D., 2020. Post-pandemic cities – the impact of COVID-19 on cities and urban design. Architecture research, 10 (3), 75–84. doi:10.5923/j.arch.20201003.02.
  • Gardner, P.J., 2011. Natural neighborhood networks — important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place. Journal of aging studies, 25 (3), 263–271. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.007.
  • Gibson, S.C., 2018. “Let’s go to the park.” an investigation of older adults in Australia and their motivations for park visitation. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 234–246. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.019.
  • Grigoriadou, E.T., 2020. The urban balcony as the new public space for well-being in times of social distancing. Cities & health, 5 (sup1), S208–211. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1795405.
  • Grittner, A.L. and Burns, V.F., 2020. Enriching social work research through architectural multisensory methods: strategies for connecting the built environment and human experience. Qualitative social work, 20 (3), 792–812. doi:10.1177/1473325020924456.
  • Gupta, N., 2020. From “normal” to “new normal” and from “social isolation” to “social bubbles”: the impact of COVID-19. Indian journal of social psychiatry, 36 (5), 1–5. doi:10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_350_20.
  • Hale, E.D., Treharne, G.J., and Kitas, G.D., 2008. Qualitative methodologies II: a brief guide to applying interpretative phenomenological analysis in musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal care, 6 (2), 86–96. doi:10.1002/msc.113.
  • Hall, E.T. and Hall, E.T., 1966. The hidden dimension (Vol. 609). Anchor.
  • Hamidi, S., Ewing, R., and Sabouri, S., 2020. Longitudinal analyses of the relationship between development density and the COVID-19 morbidity and mortality rates: early evidence from 1,165 metropolitan counties in the United States. Health & place, 64, 102378. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102378.
  • Jacobs, J., 2011. The death and life of great American cities (50th anniversary ed., 2011 Modern Library ed.). New York: Modern Library.
  • Kordshakeri, P. and Fazeli, E., 2020. How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the lack of accessible public spaces in Tehran. Cities & health, 5 (sup1), S220–222. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1817690.
  • Kotwal, A.A., et al., 2021. Social isolation and loneliness among San Francisco Bay area older adults during the COVID‐19 shelter‐in‐place orders. Journal of the American geriatrics society, 69 (1), 20–29. doi:10.1111/jgs.16865.
  • Larkin, M. and Thompson, A., 2011. Interpretative phenomenological analysis in mental health and psychotherapy research. In: A. Thompson and D. Harper, eds. Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 99–116.
  • Lee, K.K., et al., 2012. Promoting routine stair use: evaluating the impact of a stair prompt across buildings. American journal of preventive medicine, 42 (2), 136–141. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.005.
  • Lehning, A.J., 2012. City governments and aging in place: community design, transportation and housing innovation adoption. The gerontologist, 52 (3), 345–356. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr089.
  • Leng, T., et al., 2020. The effectiveness of social bubbles as part of a Covid-19 lockdown exit strategy, a modelling study [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome open research, 5, 213. doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16164.2.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., 1985. Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry, 289 (331), 289–327.
  • Low, S.M., 2003. Embodied space(s): anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and culture, 6 (1), 9–18. doi:10.1177/1206331202238959.
  • Low, S. and Smart, A., 2020. Thoughts about public space during Covid‐19 pandemic. City & society, 32 (1), 1–5. doi:10.1111/ciso.12260.
  • Lynch, K., 1964. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • McFarlane, C., 2021. Repopulating density: COVID-19 and the politics of urban value. Urban studies, 00420980211014810. 10.1177/00420980211014810.
  • Mehta, V., 2020. The new proxemics: cOVID-19, social distancing, and sociable space. Journal of urban design, 25 (6), 669–674. doi:10.1080/13574809.2020.1785283.
  • Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J., 2016. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Nicoll, G. and Zimring, C., 2009. Effect of innovative building design on physical activity. Journal of public health policy, 30 (S1), S111–123. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.346.
  • Nielson, L., Wiles, J., and Anderson, A., 2019. Social exclusion and community in an urban retirement village. Journal of aging studies, 49, 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2019.03.003.
  • Promislow, D.E.L. and Anderson, R., 2020. A geroscience perspective on COVID-19 mortality. Journals of gerontology - series a biological sciences and medical sciences, 75 (9), e30–33. doi:10.1093/gerona/glaa094.
  • Radwan, E., Radwan, A., and Radwan, W., 2020. Challenges facing older adults during the COVID-19 outbreak. European journal of environment and public health, 5 (1), em0059. doi:10.29333/ejeph/8457.
  • Robalo Nunes, T., et al., 2022. Can long-term care facilities remain a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-free bubble? An outbreak report. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 43 (3), 410–411. doi:10.1017/ice.2020.1432.
  • Ruff, R.R., et al., 2014. Associations between building design, point-of-decision stair prompts, and stair use in urban worksites. Preventive medicine, 60, 60–64. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.006.
  • Schneider, A.E., et al., 2014. Predictors of senior center use among older adults in New York City public housing. Journal of urban health, 91 (6), 1033–1047. doi:10.1007/s11524-014-9906-3.
  • Schon, D., 1984. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Shippee, T.P., 2012. On the edge: balancing health, participation, and autonomy to maintain active independent living in two retirement facilities. Journal of aging studies, 26 (1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2011.05.002.
  • Shortt, S., et al., 2021. How big is your bubble? Characteristics of self-isolating household units (‘bubbles’) during the COVID-19 alert level 4 period in New Zealand: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ open, 11 (1), e042464. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042464.
  • Smith, J.A., Larkin, M.H., and Flowers, P., 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.
  • Statistics Canada, 2017. 48110844 [dissemination area], Alberta and Edmonton, CY [census subdivision], Alberta (table). Census profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa, 29 Nov. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E [Accessed 14 Feb 2022].
  • Stearns, J.A., et al., 2021. Protocol for an evaluation of the Designing Communities to Support Healthy Living in Aging Residents Study. Archives of Public Health, 79, 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13690-021-00691-4.
  • Steiner, F., 2002. Habitat: home is where we start from. In: Human ecology: following nature’s lead. Island Press: USA, 39–54.
  • Vargo, D., et al., 2021. Digital technology use during COVID‐19 pandemic: a rapid review. Human behavior & emerging technologies, 3 (1), 13–24. doi:10.1002/hbe2.242.
  • WHO, 2020. Coronavirus. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1
  • Yin, R.K., 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.