Making post-war urban neighbourhoods healthier: involving residents’ perspectives in selecting locations for health promoting urban redesign interventions

References

• Amiour, Y., Waygood, E.D., and van den Berg, P.E.W., 2022. Objective and perceived traffic safety for children: a systematic literature review of traffic and built environment characteristics related to safe travel. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19 (5), 2641. doi:10.3390/ijerph19052641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsas, C.J.L., 2019. Walkable cities: revitalization, vibrancy and sustainable consumption across the Atlantic ocean. New York: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., 2017. The double bind of social innovation: relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. Urban studies, 54 (16), 3789–3805. doi:10.1177/0042098016682935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J., et al., 2016. Green exercise: linking nature, health and well-being. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, H., Grant, M., and Guise, R., 2021. Shaping neighbourhoods for local health and global sustainability. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E.L., et al., 2018. Built and natural environment planning principles for promoting health: an umbrella review. BMC public health, 18 (1), 930. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5870-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blitz, A. and Lanzendorf, M., 2020. Mobility design as a means of promoting non-motorised travel behaviour? A literature review of concepts and findings on design functions. Journal of transport geography, 87, 102778. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, G., et al., 2020. Impact of the built environment and the neighborhood in promoting the physical activity and the healthy aging in older people: an umbrella review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17 (17), 6127. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonevski, B., et al., 2014. Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC medical research methodology, 14, 42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma, L., 2011. The relationship between the urban structure of post-war neighbourhoods and their liveability. Groningen: Spatial Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Cerin, E., et al., 2022. Determining optimal thresholds for spatial indicators of healthy and sustainable cities: findings from the IPEN adult study. The lancet global health, 10 (6), e895–906. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00068-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, A., 1985. Utopia on trial; vision and reality in planned housing. London: Hillary Shipman.
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., et al., 2016. City planning and population health: a global challenge. The lancet, 388 (10062), 2912–2924. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., et al., 2022. What next? Expanding our view of city planning and global health, and implementing and monitoring evidence-informed policy. The Lancet global health, 10 (6), e919–926. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00066-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, R.F., et al., 2019. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: a meta-narrative evidence synthesis. Environment international, 130, 104923. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., et al., 2018. From broken windows to perceived routine activities: examining impacts of environmental interventions on perceived safety of urban alleys. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2450. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuliga, S.F., et al., 2015. Virtual reality as an empirical research tool – exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Computers Environment Urban Systems (CEUS), 54, 363–375. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenbach, J.P., 2020. A history of population health; rise and fall of disease in Europe. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., and Sicilia, M., 2017. Varieties of participation in public services: the who, when, and what of coproduction. Public administration review, 77 (5), 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, S. and Bechky, B.A., 2008. Boundary organizations: enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative science quarterly, 53 (3), 422–459. doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, K.S. and Feldman, M.S., 2014. Boundaries as junctures: collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience. Journal of public administration research and theory, 24 (3), 673–695. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, J., 2013. Food deserts and access to food in the United States. New York: Nova Science Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S.I. and Rosen, W., 2015. Street smart: the rise of cities and the fall of cars. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Stauskis, G., 2014. Development of methods and practices of virtual reality as a tool for participatory urban planning: a case study of Vilnius City as an example for improving environmental, social and energy sustainability. Energy, sustainability and society, 4 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/2192-0567-4-7.
   Google Scholar
• van Beckhoven, E., Bolt, G., and van Kempen, R., 2009. Theories of neighbourhood change and decline: their significance for post-WWII large housing estates in European cities. In: R. Rowlands, S. Musterd, and R. van Kempen, eds. Mass housing in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 20–50.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, J.P., et al., 2018. Effectiveness of virtual reality in participatory urban planning: a case study. In: MAB18: proceedings of the 4th media architecture biennale conference, Beijing China, 128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., and Tummers, L.G., 2015. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public management review, 17 (9), 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, C., 2015. Town planning in the Netherlands since 1800; responses to enlightenment ideas and geopolitical realities. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, F. and Caves, R., 2019. Community livability: issues and approaches to sustaining the well-being of people and communities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, 2022a. How to develop and sustain healthy cities in 20 steps. Geneva: WHO Europe, Healthy Cities.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, 2022b. Urban design for health: inspiration for the use of urban design to promote physical activity and healthy diets in the WHO European region. Geneva: WHO Europe.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, 2022c. Urban planning for resilience and health: key messages. Geneva: WHO Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., et al., 2018. The Tsinghua–Lancet commission on healthy cities in China: unlocking the power of cities for a healthy China. The Lancet, 391 (10135), 2140–2184. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30486-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., et al., 2022. The impact of interventions in the built environment on physical activity levels: a systematic umbrella review. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 19 (1), 156. doi:10.1186/s12966-022-01399-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar