Congested metro materialities: how platform escalators afford “friction” in the Copenhagen Metro

References

• Bissell, D. 2018. Transit Life – How Commuting Is Transforming Our Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. B. 2019. “Kaleidoscopic Understandings of Mobile Embodied Situations – Or What Makes the Metro Possible.” In Design Research Epistemologies III – Research in Architectural Design, A&D Files, 121, edited by O. B. Jensen, A. V. H. Bueno, and E. M. Christiansen, 87–102. Aalborg: Department of Architecture, Design & Media Technology, Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. B. 2020. “Moving Underground – Understanding Mobile Embodied Situations in the Copenhagen Metro.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move – Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 28 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2014. “Friction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, edited by P. Adey, D. Bissel, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, and M. Sheller, 107–115. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., and C. Martin. 2012. “On Turbulence: Entanglements of Disorder and Order on a Devon Beach.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Social Geografie 103 (5): 516–529. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00734.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dant, T. 2005. Materiality and Society. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., and V. Cuzzocrea. 2015. “Cities and Mobilities.” City & Society 27 (1): 4–8. doi:10.1111/ciso.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2016. Vertical. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and A. Reijndorp. 2001. In Search of New Public Domain. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2008. “European Metroscapes: The Production of Lived Mobilities within the Socio-technical Metro Systems in Copenhagen, London and Paris.” Paper presented at Mobility, the City and STS, DTU, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2009. “Flows of Meaning, Cultures of Movement – Urban Mobility as Meaningful Everyday Life Practice.” Mobilities 4 (1): 139–158. doi:10.1080/17450100802658002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2012. “Metroens Arkitektur Og Bevægelser.” In Byen I Bevægelse, edited by J. Andersen, M. Freudendal-Pedersen, L. Koefoed, and J. Larsen, 40–60. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2013. Staging Mobilities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2014. Designing Mobilities. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2016. “Of ‘Other’ Materialities: Why (Mobilities) Design Is Central to the Future of Mobilities Research.” Mobilities 11 (4): 587–597. doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1211826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., A. V. H. Bueno, S. Smith, and C. B. Christensen. 2020. “Methods of Mobilities Design Research.” In Handbook on Research Methods and Applications for Mobilities, edited by M. Büscher, M. Freudendal-Pedersen, and S. Kesselring, 354–364. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., and D. B. Lanng. 2017. Mobilities Design – Urban Design for Mobile Situations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., D. B. Lanng, and S. Wind. 2017. “Artefacts, Affordances and the Design of Mobilities.” In Mobilising Design, edited by J. Spinney, S. Reimer, and P. Pinch, 143–154. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. 2017. “Urban Mobilities and Materialities – A Critical Reflection of A ‘Sustainable’ Development Project.” Applied Mobilities 2 (1): 32–49. doi:10.1080/23800127.2017.1285169.
   Google Scholar
• Koolhas, R. 2014. “AMO, Harvard Graduate School of Design and I. Boom.” In “Escalator”. In Elements of Architecture – 14. International Architecture Exhibition, 1303–1388. la Biennale di Venezia, Italy: Marsilio.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and A. Yaneva. 2008. ““Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move”: An ANT’s View of Architecture.” In Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research, edited by R. Geiser, 80–89. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2014. “Evaluating Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 53–88. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854698.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. 2001. “The ‘Cultural Turn’ in Social Theory: Towards a Theory of Cultural Politics.” Sociology 35 (1): 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikstyrelsen (Danish Transport Authority). 2014. “Optimering Af Stationsstrukturen.” Accessed at: https://www.trafikstyrelsen.dk/DA/Kollektiv-Trafik/Trafikale-analyser/Optimering-af-stationsstrukturen.aspx on 14th September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond Societies – Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. 2012. Ferry Tales – Mobility, Place and Time on Canada’s West Coast. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2009. “Making the Social Hold: Towards an Actor-Network Theory of Design.” Design and Culture 1 (3): 273–388. doi:10.1080/17547075.2009.11643291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar