Walking through the abstract[ed] city and co-creating urban space

References

• Allen, L. 2011. “Picture This”: Using Photo-Methods in Research on Sexualities and Schooling.” Qualitative Research 11:487–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoroso, N. 2010. The Exposed City: Mapping the Urban Invisibles. New York: Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 2004. “Talking Whilst Walking: A Geographical Archaeology of Knowledge.” Area 36 (3): 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotti, L. 2000. “Play-Tactics of the ‘Internationale Situationniste.” JSTOR JSTOR October 91:37–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/779148.
   Google Scholar
• Aroles, J., and W. Küpers. 2022. “Flânerie as a Methodological Practice for Explorative Re-search in Digital Worlds.” Culture and Organization 28 (5): 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2022.2042538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, C. E., R., Kearns, and D. Collins. 2008. “Exploring Social Mobilities: Narratives of Walking and Driving in Auckland, New Zealand.” Urban Studies 45 (13): 2829–2848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkouri, D., D. B. Lanng, and R. Laing. 2022. “Being There: Capturing and Conveying Noisy Slices of Walking in the City.” Mobilities 17 (6): 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2045871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenboim, A., M. Dijst, D. Ettema, J. de Kruijf, G. de Leeuw, and N. Dogterom. 2019. “The Utilization of Immersive Virtual Environments for the Investigation of Environmental Preferences.” Landscape and Urban Planning 189 (May): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.011.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing, G., C., Higgs, S., Liu, B., Giles-Corti, J. F., Sallis, E. Cerin, and M. Lowe. 2022. “Using Open Data and Open-Source Software to Develop Spatial Indicators of Urban Design and Transport Features for Achieving Healthy and Sustainable Cities.” The Lancet Global Health 10 (6): e907–e918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, A., C., Pole, and Mizen P. 2001. “Picture This: Researching Child Workers.” Sociology 35 (2): 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000244.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, T. 2015. “An Exploration of the Urban Pedestrian Experience, Including How it is Affected by the Presence of Motor Traffic.” PhD diss., University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Careri, F. 2002. Walkscapes: Walking as an Aesthetic Practice. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. 1998. The Fate of Place, a Philosophical History. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. 2001. “Between Geography and Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be in the Place-World?” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4): 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, P., D. Mitchell, C. Mcgregor, and A. Rawlinson, eds. 2018. Art of Point Cloud. Celebration of Some of the Most Beautiful and Striking 3d Scans from Around the World. Glasgow: Wild Harbour Books.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M.1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon, J. P., and J. H. Cohen 2005. “Object and Walking Probes in Ethnographic Interviewing.” Field Methods 17 (2): 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05274733.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2010. “Walking in Rhythms: Place, Regulation, Style and the Flow of Experience.” Visual Studies 25 (1): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725861003606902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, J., and S. Chambers. 2021. “Longing for the Past, Lost Cities on Social Media.” In People-Centred Methodologies for Heritage Conservation, Exploring Emotional Attachments to Historic Urban Places, edited by R. Madgin and J. Lesh, 41–64. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345807-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, J. R., J. Evans, and P. Jones. 2008. “Mobile Methodologies: Theory, Technology and Practice.” Geography Compass 2 (5): 1266–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. A., and O. A. Ogunseitan. 2011. “Effect of Environmental Conditions on Perceived Psychological Restorativeness of Coastal Parks.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (4): 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. B., and A. Sussman, eds. 2021. Urban Experience and Design. Contemporary Perspectives on Improving Public Realm. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Islington, C. 2007. Walking Islington: Explore the Unexpected. London: Islington Council.
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, M., M. Johansson, D. Lindelöw, and A. Ferreira. 2014. “Interseriality and Different Sorts of Walking: Suggestions for a Relational Approach to Urban Walking.” Mobilities 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.969596.
   Google Scholar
• Kasraian, D., S., Adhikari, D., Kossowsky, M., Luubert, B., Hall, J. Hawkins, K., Nurul Habib, and M. Roorda. 2021. “Evaluating Pedestrian Perceptions of Street Design with a 3D Stated Preference Survey.” Environment and Planning B 48 (7): 1787–1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320946050.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. 2017. “Urban Mobilities and Materialities – a Critical Reflection of “Sustainable” Urban Development.” Applied Mobilities 2 (1): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1285169.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R., A.-M. Davies, D. Miller, A. Conniff, S. Scott, and J. Morrice. 2009. “The Application of Visual Environmental Economics in the Study of Public Preference and Urban Greenspace.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36 (2): 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33140.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and T. Ingold. 2006. “Fieldwork on Foot: Perceiving, Routing, Socializing.” In Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology, edited by S. Coleman and P. Collins, 67–86. Palo Alto, CA: Ebrary.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., D. D’Uva, A. Scandiffio, and A. Rolando. 2022. “The More Walkable, the More Livable? – Can Urban Attractiveness Improve Urban Vitality?” Transportation Research Procedia 60:322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.042.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, B., P. E. W. van den Berg, P. J. V. van Wesemael, and T. A. Arentze. 2022. “Individuals’ Perception of Walkability: Results of a Conjoint Experiment Using Videos of Virtual Environments.” Cities 125:103650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesey, G. 2004. Passages. Explorations of the Contemporary City. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyu, K., A. Brambilla, A. Globa, and R. de Dear. 2023. “An Immersive Multisensory Virtual Reality Approach to the Study of Human-Built Environment Interactions.” Automation in Construction 150:104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca, F., N. Daina, A. Sivakumar, J. Wee Xin Yi, K. Zavitsas, G. Gemini, I. Vegetti, L. Dargan, and F. Marchet. 2022. “Using Digital Social Market Applications to Incentivise Active Travel: Empirical Analysis of a Smart City Initiative.” Sustainable Cities and Society 77:103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannay, D. 2015. Visual, Narrative and Creative Research Methods: Application, Reflection and Ethics. 1st ed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. 2010. “Sense and the City: Exploring the Embodied Geographies of Urban Walking.” Social and Cultural Geography 11 (6): 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.497913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondschein, A. 2021. “Cognitive Mapping, Mobility Technologies and the Decoupling of Imageability and Accessibility.” In Urban Experience and Design. Contemporary Perspectives on Improving Public Realm, edited by J. B. Hollander and A. Sussman, 123–139. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. 2016. “Built environment, causality and urban planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 17 (1): 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1127994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M., and P. Hubbard. 2010. “Walking, Sensing, Belonging: Ethno-Mimesis as Performative Praxis.” Visual Studies 25:46–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725861003606878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppezzo, M., and D. Schwartz. 2014. “Give Your Ideas Some Legs: The Positive Effect of Walking on Creative Thinking.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., P. Hubbard, M. O’Neil, and A. Radley. 2010. “Walking Across Disciplines: From Ethnography to Arts Practice.” Visual Studies 25 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725861003606670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts Hein, J., J. Evans, and P. Jones. 2008. “Mobile Methodologies: Theory, Technology and Practice.” Geography Compass 2 (5): 1266–1285 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, S. 1998. The Situationist City. Cambridge: The Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. 1999. “Emotion and Movement. A Beginning Empirical-Phenomenological Analysis of Their Relationship.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (11–12): 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shr, Y. H. J., R. Ready, B. Orland, and S. Echols. 2019. “How Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure.” Ecological Economics 156 (C): 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.015.
   Google Scholar
• Smalley, A. J., M. P. White, R. Sandiford, N. Desai, C. Watson, N. Smalley, J. Tuppen, L. Sakka, and L. E. Fleming. 2023. “Soundscapes, Music, and Memories: Exploring the Factors That Influence Emotional Responses to Virtual Nature Content.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 89:102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. 2001. Wanderlust. History of Walking. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Su, S., H. Zhou, M. Xu, H. Ru, W. Wang, and M. Weng. 2019. “Auditing Street Walkability and Associated Social Inequalities for Planning Implications.” Journal of Transport Geography 74:62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabrizian, P., P. K. Baran, W. R. Smith, and R. K. Meentemeyer. 2018. “Exploring Perceived Restoration Potential of Urban Green Enclosure Through Immersive Virtual Environments.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 55 (Feb): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, E., R. Laing, A. Grinnall, S. J. Burnett, and J. Isaacs. 2016. “(Re)presenting Heritage: Laser Scanning and 3D Visualisations for Cultural Resilience and Community Engagement.” Journal of Information Science 42 (3): 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551516636306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E., and J. Koschinsky. 2013. “The Walkable Neighbourhood: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning 1 (1): 42–63. https://doi.org/10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C., and K. T. Wolff. 2023. “Weird Winter Weather in the Anthropocene: How Volatile Temperatures Shape Violent Crime.” Journal of Criminal Justice 87:102090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. R. 1997. Visual Explanations. Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire Connecticut: Graphic Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNITED NATIONS. 2018. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. Economic and Social Affairs. [Accessed June 6, 2022]. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/.
   Google Scholar
• URBAN EARTH. (2007). “(Re)presenting our habitat.” [Online]. [Accessed June 8, 2022]. http://www.urbanearth.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. 2015. “Non-Representational Ethnography: New Ways of Animating Lifeworlds.” Cultural Geographies 22 (2): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014555657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2018. “Cities and the Politics of Gamification.” Cities 74:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallmann, B., J. Bucksch, and I. Froboese. 2012. “The Association Between Physical Activity and Perceived Environment in German Adults.” The European Journal of Public Health 22 (4): 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckr069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-M., and L. H. Vu. 2023. “The Integration of Digital Twin and Serious Game Framework for New Normal Virtual Urban Exploration and Social Interaction.” Journal of Urban Management 12 (2): 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., and Y. Yang. 2019. “Neighbourhood Walkability: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis.” Cities 93:43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRIGHTS & SITES. 2006. “A Manifesto for a New Walking Culture: ‘Dealing with the city’.” Performance Research 11 (2): 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528160600812083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., S. Guo, and J. Zhao. 2020. “Planning participants’ Preferential Differences Under Immersive Virtual Reality and Conventional Representations: An Experiment of Street Renewal.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48 (7): 1755–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320942776.
   Google Scholar