203
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A global health crisis with divided research traditions? A comparative review of Brazilian and international research in communication on the COVID-19 pandemic

Pages 479-496 | Received 05 Dec 2022, Accepted 20 Jul 2023, Published online: 02 Aug 2023

References

  • Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921030516003
  • Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254
  • Ansmann, L., Flickinger, T. E., Barello, S., Kunneman, M., Mantwill, S., Quilligan, S., Zanini, C., & Aelbrecht, K. (2014). Career development for early career academics: Benefits of networking and the role of professional societies. Patient Education and Counseling, 97(1), 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.013
  • Arroyave-Cabrera, J., & Gonzalez-Pardo, R. (2022). Communication bibliometric research in Latin American scientific journals (2009–2018). Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 30(70), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.3916/C70-2022-07
  • Aschidamini, I. M., & Saupe, R. (2004). Grupo focal estratégia metodológica qualitativa: Um ensaio teórico. Cogitare Enfermagem, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v9i1.1700
  • Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2012). Communication studies beyond the national: Connections and disconnections between research communities and How to study them. Global Media Journal - German Edition, 2(2), Article 2. https://www.globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/article/view/113
  • Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2013). Pathways of intercultural communication research. How different research communities of communication scholars deal with the topic of intercultural communication. Communications - The European Journal of Communication Research, 38(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0017
  • Barranquero, A. (2019). Praxis in Latin American communication and thought: A critical appraisal. In H. C. Stephansen & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen Media and Practice: Currents, Connections and Challenges (pp. 57–72). London: Routledge.
  • Belli, S., Mugnaini, R., Baltà, J., & Abadal, E. (2020). Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, Is access to this knowledge open to society? Scientometrics, 124(3), 2661–2685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7
  • Bethell, L. (2010). Brazil and ‘Latin America’. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X1000088X
  • Borde, E., Akerman, M., & Pellegrini Filho, A. (2014). Mapping of capacities for research on health and its social determinants in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30(10), 2081–2091. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00162513
  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (R. Nice, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Bou Zeineddine, F., Saab, R., Lášticová, B., Kende, A., & Ayanian, A. H. (2021). ““Some uninteresting data from a faraway country”: Inequity and coloniality in international social psychological publications. Journal of Social Issues, 78 320 345. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12481
  • Breilh, J. (2008). Latin American critical ('Social') epidemiology: New settings for an old dream. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(4), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn135
  • Cardoso, G., Lapa, T., & Fátima, B. D. (2016). People are the message? Social mobilization and social media in Brazil. International Journal of Communication, 10, 22. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3301
  • Chagas, E. T. C., Barros, P. H., Cardoso-Pereira, I., Ponte, I. V., Ximenes, P., Figueiredo, F., Murai, F., da Silva, A. P. C., Almeida, J. M., Loureiro, A. A. F., & Ramos, H. S. (2021). Effects of population mobility on the COVID-19 spread in Brazil. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0260610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260610
  • Chamberlain, S., Zhu, H., Jahn, N., Boettiger, C., & Ram, K. (2022). Rcrossref: Client for Various “Crossref” “Apis”. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rcrossref
  • Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
  • Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research (1.3.4). https://igraph.org
  • Curtin, P. A., Russial, J., & Tefertiller, A. (2018). Reviewers’ perceptions of the peer review process in journalism and mass communication. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017736031
  • de Melo, J. M. (2006). Communication research: New challenges of the Latin American school. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01319.x
  • Demeter, M. (2017). The core-periphery problem in communication research: A network analysis of leading publication. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(4), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9535-2
  • Demeter, M. (2018a). Changing center and stagnant periphery in communication and media studies: National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication from 2013 to 2017. International Journal of Communication, 12, 29. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9122
  • Demeter, M. (2018b). Theorizing international inequalities in communication and media studies. A field theory approach. KOME. 6, 92–110. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.75692.94
  • Demeter, M. (2019a). So Far, Yet So close: International career paths of communication scholars from the global south. International Journal of Communication, 13, 25. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10181
  • Demeter, M. (2019b). The winner takes It All: International inequality in communication and media studies today. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018792270
  • Demeter, M. (2020). Academic knowledge production and the global south. Springer International Publishing. Doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52701-3
  • de Oliveira, T. M., Marques, F. P. J., Veloso Leão, A., de Albuquerque, A., Prado, J. L. A., Grohmann, R., Clinio, A., Cogo, D., & Guazina, L. S. (2021). Towards an inclusive agenda of open science for communication research: A Latin American approach. Journal of Communication, 71(5), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab025
  • Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … de Vreese, C. (2021). An agenda for open science in communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052
  • Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12
  • Donoso, C. V., Marroquín Velásquez, L., & Angel Botero, A. (2018). In search of a Latin American approach to organizational communication: A critical review of scholarship (2010–2014). Communication Theory, 28(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx010
  • Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761676
  • Enghel, F., & Becerra, M. (2018). Here and there: (Re)situating Latin America in international communication theory. Communication Theory, 28(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty005
  • Englander, K., & López-Bonilla, G. (2011). Acknowledging or denying membership: Reviewers’ responses to non-anglophone scientists’ manuscripts. Discourse Studies, 13(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611403261
  • Esparcia, A. C., Martínez, A. A., & Nobell, AÁ. (2014). Investigación Latinoamericana En Comunicación. Estudio Bibliométrico De Revistas Científicas. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias de La Comunicación, 9(16). Retrieved from http://revista.pubalaic.org/index.php/alaic/article/view/79
  • Freimuth, V. S., Massett, H. A., & Meltzer, W. (2006). A Descriptive Analysis of 10 Years of Research Published in the Journal of Health Communication. Journal of Health Communication, 11(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500461042
  • Funkhouser, E. (1996). The evaluative Use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00379.x
  • Ganter, S. A., & Ortega, F. (2019). The invisibility of Latin American scholarship in European media and communication studies: Challenges and opportunities of de-westernization and academic cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Communication, 13, 24. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8449
  • Gardner, P. M. (2018). Diversifying ICA: Identity, difference, and the politics of transformation. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy050
  • Goyanes, M. (2020). Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization? International Communication Gazette, 82(4), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518825322
  • Grenfell, M. (2009). Applying Bourdieu’s field theory: The case of social capital and education. Education, Knowledge and Economy, 3(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496890902786812
  • GROBID (0.7.1). (2008). GitHub. https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid
  • Günther, E., & Domahidi, E. (2017). What communication scholars write about: An analysis of 80 years of research in high-impact journals. International Journal of Communication, 11, 21. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6989
  • Gwet, K. L. (2008). Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600
  • Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Majumdar, S., & Tatlow, H. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker). Nature Human Behaviour, 5(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
  • Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6), Article 6. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/260207/.
  • Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020950735
  • Haug, S., Braveboy-Wagner, J., & Maihold, G. (2021). The ‘Global South’ in the study of world politics: examining a meta category. Third World Quarterly, 42(9), 1923–1944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1948831
  • Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, V. V., Munoz-Najar Galvez, S., He, B., Jurafsky, D., & McFarland, D. A. (2020). The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9284–9291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117
  • Hoppe, T. A., Litovitz, A., Willis, K. A., Meseroll, R. A., Perkins, M. J., Hutchins, B. I., Davis, A. F., Lauer, M. S., Valantine, H. A., Anderson, J. M., & Santangelo, G. M. (2019). Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances, 5(10), eaaw7238. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238
  • Hu, Y. (2015). Health communication research in the digital Age: A systematic review. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 8(4), 260–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2015.1107308
  • Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
  • Khan, G. F., Lee, S., Park, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2016). Theories in communication science: A structural analysis using webometrics and social network approach. Scientometrics, 108(2), 531–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1822-0
  • Krause, M. (2016). ‘Western hegemony’ in the social sciences: Fields and model systems. The Sociological Review Monographs, 64(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12008
  • Lachapelle, F. (2020). COVID-19 preprints and their publishing rate: An improved method (p. 2020.09.04.20188771). medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.04.20188771
  • Lasco, G. (2020). Medical Populism and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Global Public Health, 15(10), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1807581
  • Lauf, E. (2005). National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02663.x
  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614
  • Lin, T., & Nan, X. (2022). A scoping review of emerging COVID-19 health communication research in communication and media journals. Health Communication, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2091916
  • Liu, Y.-L., Yuan, W.-J., & Zhu, S.-H. (2022). The state of social science research on COVID-19. Scientometrics, 127(1), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04206-4
  • Löblich, M., & Scheu, A. M. (2011). Writing the history of communication studies: A sociology of science approach. Communication Theory, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01373.x
  • Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Shamsi, A., Abdullahi, J., Awojobi, E. A., Borgohain, D. J., Bueno de la Fuente, G., Huerta, G. P., Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Islam, Md. A., Khasseh, A. A., Lamba, M., Mannan, E. F., Manyonga, D., Nan, B., Nie, B., Raju N., V., Pineda, E. U., Shukla, R., … Yusuf, A. O. (2021). Barriers to scholarly publishing among library and information science researchers: International perspectives. Information Development, 39, 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211052522
  • Mangiafico, S. S. (2022). Summary and Analysis of Extension Program Evaluation in R (2.4.18). https://rcompanion.org
  • Martin, J. L. (2003). What Is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/375201
  • McManus, C., & Baeta Neves, A. A. (2021). Funding research in Brazil. Scientometrics, 126(1), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03762-5
  • Mcmanus, C., Neves, A. A. B., Diniz Filho, J. A., Maranhão, A. Q., & Souza Filho, A. G. (2021). Profiles not metrics: The case of Brazilian universities. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93(4), e29290261. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120200261
  • Mei, J., Islam, A., Wu, Y., Moh’d, A., & Milios, E. E. (2016). Statistical Learning for OCR Text Correction (arXiv:1611.06950). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.06950
  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
  • Nasir, A., Shaukat, K., Hameed, I. A., Luo, S., Alam, T. M., & Iqbal, F. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of corona pandemic in social sciences: A review of influential aspects and conceptual structure. IEEE Access, 8, 133377–133402. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008733
  • Nemer, D. (2016). Online favela: The Use of social media by the marginalized in Brazil. Information Technology for Development, 22(3), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1011598
  • Neuman, W. R., Davidson, R., Joo, S.-H., Park, Y. J., & Williams, A. E. (2008). The seven deadly sins of communication research. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00382.x
  • Ng, E., White, K. C., & Saha, A. (2020). #Communicationsowhite: Race and power in the academy and beyond. Communication, Culture and Critique, 13(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa011
  • Nielsen, M. W., & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118
  • Niemczyk, E. K. (2018). Developing globally competent researchers: An international perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(4), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.20853/32-4-1602
  • Odone, A., Salvati, S., Bellini, L., Bucci, D., Capraro, M., Gaetti, G., Amerio, A., & Signorelli, C. (2020). The runaway science: A bibliometric analysis of the COVID-19 scientific literature. Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis, 91(9-S), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10121
  • O’Neill, J., Small, B. B., & Strachan, J. (1999). The Use of focus groups within a participatory action research environment. In M. Kopala & L. Suzuki (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225487
  • Onyeaka, H., Anumudu, C. K., Al-Sharify, Z. T., Egele-Godswill, E., & Mbaegbu, P. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the global lockdown and Its Far-reaching effects. Science Progress, 104(2), 003685042110198. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504211019854
  • Passos, M. J., Matta, G., Lyra, T. M., Moreira, M. E. L., Kuper, H., Penn-Kekana, L., & Mendonça, M. (2020). The promise and pitfalls of social science research in an emergency: Lessons from studying the Zika epidemic in Brazil, 2015–2016. BMJ Global Health, 5(4), e002307. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002307
  • Pearce, N., Lawlor, D. A., & Brickley, E. B. (2020). Comparisons between countries Are essential for the control of COVID-19. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(4), 1059–1062. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa108
  • Pedersen, T. L. (2021). ggraph: An implementation of grammar of graphics for graphs and networks (2.0.5). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggraph.
  • Peres-Cajías, G. (2015). ¿Podemos Seguir Hablando De Un Pensamiento Comunicacional Latinoamericano? Análisis Crítico Del Desarrollo Teórico Y Metodológico En Nuestro Campo. Journal de Comunicación Social, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.35319/jcomsoc.201531063
  • Petteway, R., Mujahid, M., Allen, A., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2019). Towards a people’s social epidemiology: Envisioning a more inclusive and equitable future for social Epi research and practice in the 21st century. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), Article 3983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203983
  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
  • Quintana Pujalte, L. (2020). Communication of non-governmental organizations in Latin American scientific journals: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus and Latindex. Inmediaciones de La Comunicación, 15(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2020.15.2.3023
  • Ramassa, P., Avallone, F., & Quagli, A. (2023). Can “publishing game” pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers. Journal of Management and Governance, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09667-8
  • Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2018). The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals. Scientometrics, 114(3), 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2612-7
  • Ruiz-Real, J. L., Nievas-Soriano, B. J., & Uribe-Toril, J. (2020). Has COVID-19 gone viral? An overview of research by subject area. Health Education & Behavior, 47(6), 861–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120958368
  • Ryan, J. M. (2020). Introduction. In J. M. Ryan (Ed.), COVID-19: Social consequences and Cultural adaptations (1st edition, pp. 1–8). Routledge.
  • Sahoo, S., & Pandey, S. (2020). Evaluating research performance of coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic using scientometric indicators. Online Information Review, 44(7), 1443–1461. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0252
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009
  • Saucedo Añez, P. C. (2020). Die lateinamerikanische Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft zwischen ideologischer Prägung und begrenzter Internationalisierung: Zeit für Selbstkritik. Global Media Journal. https://doi.org/10.22032/DBT.40625
  • Schindler, M., & Domahidi, E. (2021). The growing field of interdisciplinary research on user comments: A computational scoping review. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2474–2492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821994491
  • Segado-Boj, F., Prieto-Gutiérrez, J.-J., & Díaz-Campo, J. (2021). Redes de coautorías de la investigación española y latinoamericana en Comunicación (2000–2019): Cohesión interna y aislamiento transcontinental. Profesional de la información, 30, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.05
  • Silva, L., Figueiredo Filho, D., & Fernandes, A. (2020). The effect of lockdown on the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil: Evidence from an interrupted time series design. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 36, e00213920. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311 ( 00213920
  • Silveira, P. S. P., & Siqueira, J. O. (2022). Better to be in agreement than in bad company. Behavior Research Methods, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01950-0
  • Simonson, P., Peck, J., Craig, R. T., & Jackson, J. P. (2012). The history of communication history. In P. Simonson, J. Peck, R. T. Craig, & J. P. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of communication history (pp. 13–57). Routledge.
  • Sinnenberg, L., Buttenheim, A. M., Padrez, K., Mancheno, C., Ungar, L., & Merchant, R. M. (2017). Twitter as a tool for health research: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 107(1), e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303512
  • Skafle, I., Nordahl-Hansen, A., Quintana, D. S., Wynn, R., & Gabarron, E. (2022). Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines on social media: Rapid review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(8), e37367. https://doi.org/10.2196/37367
  • Song, H., Eberl, J.-M., & Eisele, O. (2020). Less fragmented than We thought? Toward clarification of a subdisciplinary linkage in communication science, 2010–2019. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa009
  • Sott, M. K., Bender, M. S., & da Silva Baum, K. (2022). COVID-19 outbreak in Brazil: Health, social, political, and economic implications. International Journal of Health Services, 52(4), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207314221122658
  • Sturgis, P., & Luff, R. (2021). The demise of the survey? A research note on trends in the use of survey data in the social sciences, 1939 to 2015. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1844896
  • Suzina, A. C. (2020). English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957906
  • Swartz, D. (1998). Culture and power: The sociology of pierre bourdieu. University of Chicago Press. http://qut.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3038498
  • Thiollent, M., & Colette, M. M. (2017). Action research and participatory research in Brazil. In L. L. Rowell, C. D. Bruce, J. M. Shosh, & M. M. Riel (Eds.), The palgrave international handbook of action research (pp. 161–176). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_10
  • Thomson, P. (2012). Field. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (1. publ) (pp. 65–80). Acumen Publishing.
  • Tisdell, C. A. (2020). Economic, social and political issues raised by the COVID-19 pandemic. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.08.002
  • Tkaczyk, D., Collins, A., Sheridan, P., & Beel, J. (2018). Machine learning vs. rules and out-of-the-box vs. retrained: An evaluation of open-source bibliographic reference and citation parsers. Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3197048
  • Trad, L. A. B. (2009). Grupos focais: Conceitos, procedimentos e reflexões baseadas em experiências com o uso da técnica em pesquisas de saúde. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 19(3), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312009000300013
  • Trepte, S., & Loths, L. (2020). National and gender diversity in communication: A content analysis of Six journals between 2006 and 2016. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1804434
  • Voegel, J., & Wachsman, Y. (2021). The effect of culture in containing a pandemic: The case of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 25(0), 1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1986566
  • Waaijer, C. J. F., Teelken, C., Wouters, P. F., & van der Weijden, I. C. M. (2018). Competition in science: Links between publication pressure, grant pressure and the academic Job market. Higher Education Policy, 31(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0051-y
  • Waisbord, S. (2016). Communication studies without frontiers? Translation and cosmopolitanism across academic cultures. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3483
  • Waisbord, S. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. Polity.
  • Waisbord, S., & Mellado, C. (2014). De-westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12044
  • Waisbord, S., & Obregon, R. (2012). Theoretical divides and convergence in global health communication. In R. Obregon, & S. Waisbord (Eds.), The handbook of global health communication ((1st ed, pp. 7–33). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118241868.ch1
  • Waitzkin, H., Iriart, C., Estrada, A., & Lamadrid, S. (2001). Social medicine in Latin America: Productivity and dangers facing the major national groups. The Lancet, 358(9278), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05488-5
  • Walter, N., Cody, M. J., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2018). The Ebb and flow of communication research: Seven decades of publication trends and research priorities. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx015
  • Wehner, L. (2022). Stereotyped images and role dissonance in the foreign policy of right-wing populist leaders: Jair bolsonaro and donald trump. Cooperation and Conflict, https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367221108814
  • Xu, X., Tan, A. M., & Zhao, S. X. (2015). Funding ratios in social science: The perspective of countries/territories level and comparison with natural sciences. Scientometrics, 104(3), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1633-3
  • Yin, Y., Gao, J., Jones, B. F., & Wang, D. (2021). Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic. Science, 371(6525), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3084
  • Yu, J., & Muñoz-Justicia, J. (2022). Free and Low-cost twitter research software tools for social science. Social Science Computer Review, 40(1), 124–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320904318
  • Zhang, Y., Liu, S., & Jun, J. (2022). A comparative study on the cultural dimensions and health perception of the COVID-19 pandemic between China and the United States. Healthcare, 10(6), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061081
  • Zhao, C., & Sahni, S. (2019). String correction using the Damerau-Levenshtein distance. BMC Bioinformatics, 20(11), 277. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2819-0

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.