How to design mediated contact against anti-immigrant prejudice: a systematic review

References

• Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M., & Preiss, R. W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 14(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388654
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, N. P., Yogeeswaran, K., Walker, M. J., & Hewstone, M. (2018). Effect of valenced vicarious online contact on out-group prejudice and perceived out-group variability: A study of online poker. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(10), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, G. (2021). Collective memory and attitudes toward asylum seekers: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(5), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1572499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwell Seate, A. (2017). Intergroup communication: Media influence on. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. Zoonen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1–13). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0158
   Google Scholar
• Atwell Seate, A., & Mastro, D. (2015). Exposure to immigration in the news: The impact of group-level emotions on intergroup behavior. Communication Research, 44(6), 817–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215570654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwell Seate, A., & Mastro, D. (2016). Media’s influence on immigration attitudes: An intergroup threat theory approach. Communication Monographs, 83(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1068433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., & Massey, Z. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice. Human Communication Research, 46(2–3), 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2020). Changing prejudiced attitudes, promoting egalitarianism, and enhancing diversity through fundamental processes of persuasion. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 350–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1798102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, N. A., & Koper, R. J. (1998). The efficacy of powerful/powerless language on attitudes and source credibility. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 203–215). Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Cadenas, G. A., Cisneros, J., Todd, N. R., & Spanierman, L. B. (2018). DREAMzone: Testing two vicarious contact interventions to improve attitudes toward undocumented immigrants. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister, M. A., & Stern, L. A. (2007). The role of visual hyperbole in advertising effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 29(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2007.10505212
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77(5), 1208–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., & Henningsen, D. D. (2011). The effects of passive verb-constructed arguments on persuasion. Communication Research Reports, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.541358
   Google Scholar
• Cea D’Ancona, Á, & Valles Martínez, M. S. (2014). Evolución del racismo, la xenofobia y otras formas conexas de intolerancia en España (Informe-encuesta 2014) (978-84-8417-486–8). Ministerio de empleo y seguridad social de España. https://www.inclusion.gob.es/oberaxe/ficheros/ejes/informes/2014_Evolucion_racismo.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cea D’Ancona, M. Á. (2016). Immigration as a threat: Explaining the changing pattern of xenophobia in Spain. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17(2), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-015-0415-3
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Bell, R. A., & Taylor, L. D. (2017). Persuasive effects of point of view, protagonist competence, and similarity in a health narrative about type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Communication, 22(8), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1341568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, A. H., & Slater, M. D. (2013). Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives: Perspective-taking and in-group perception. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M. (1998). Explicit and implicit conclusions in persuasive messages. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 217–230). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, A., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H. (2016). Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: A review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88–131. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (2014). Language, style, and persuasion. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 177–187). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (2019). Currents in the study of persuasion. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects (4th ed., pp. 115–129). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491146-8
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Pfau, M. (2002). The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Sage. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10372817
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Eller, A., & Hewstone, M. (2011). Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findor, A., Hruška, M., Jankovská, P., & Pobudová, M. (2021). Re-examining public opinion preferences for migrant categorizations: ‘Refugees’ are evaluated more negatively than ‘migrants’ and ‘foreigners’ related to participants’ direct, extended, and mass-mediated intergroup contact experiences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 80, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschke, D., Sassenberg, K., Ruhrmann, G., & Sommer, D. (2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers’ attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(3), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000014
   Google Scholar
• Graf, S., Linhartova, P., & Sczesny, S. (2020). The effects of news report valence and linguistic labels on prejudice against social minorities. Media Psychology, 23(2), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1584571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Martín, I., & Igartua, J.-J. (2021). Reduction of prejudice toward unaccompanied foreign minors through audiovisual narratives. Effects of the similarity and of the narrative voice. El Profesional de la Información, 30(2), e300203. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. (2015). Intergroup contact theory. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, S. R. Wilson, J. P. Dillard, J. Caughlin, & D. Solomon (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–9). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic189
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. (2017). Indirect and mediated intergroup contact. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp. 1–9). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0161
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Tausch, N. (2013). Intergroup contact: An integration of social psychological and communication perspectives. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 55–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679126
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J., Joyce, N., Chen, C.-Y., Paolini, S., Xiang, J., & Rubin, M. (2017). Effects of past and present intergroup communication on perceived fit of an outgroup member and desire for future intergroup contact. Communication Research, 44(4), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J. (2005). A review of experimental research on the relative persuasiveness of anecdotal, statistical, causal, and expert evidence. Studies in Communication Sciences, 5(1), 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J. (2010). Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications, 35(4), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.019.
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., & Cheng, L. (2009). Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration: Is the framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication, 59(4), 726–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., & Frutos, F. J. (2017). Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: Mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 158–177. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5779.
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., Wojcieszak, M., Cachón-Ramón, D., & Guerrero-Martín, I. (2017). “If it hooks you, share it on social networks”. Joint effects of character similarity and imagined contact on the intention to share a short narrative in favor of immigration. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1209en.
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., Wojcieszak, M., & Kim, N. (2018). How the interplay of imagined contact and first-person narratives improves attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A conditional process model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, J. J., Wojcieszak, M., & Kim, N. (2019). The joint effects of imagined contact and similarity with the protagonist of testimonial messages through identification and transportation. Cuadernos.Info, 45(45), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1584
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., Wojcieszak, M., Kim, N. ; J.-J., Wojcieszak, M., & Kim, N. (2018). How the interplay of imagined contact and first-person narratives improves attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A conditional process model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperato, C., Schneider, B. H., Caricati, L., Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Mancini, T. (2021). Allport meets internet: A meta-analytical investigation of online intergroup contact and prejudice reduction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 81, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, N. (2017). Mediated contact. In N. Joyce (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication (pp. 1–14). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.456.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, H., Park, S.-Y., Shim, J. C., & Ku, Y. (2016). Mediated contact, intergroup attitudes, and ingroup members’ basic values: South Koreans and migrant workers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1640–1659. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Kim, H. K., Wojcieszak, M., Igartua, J.-J., & Lim, C. M. (2020). The presence of the protagonist: Explaining narrative perspective effects through social presence. Media Psychology, 23(6), 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1665548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., & Wojcieszak, M. (2018). Intergroup contact through online comments: Effects of direct and extended contact on outgroup attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebkind, K., Mähönen, T. A., Solares, E., Solheim, E., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2014). Prejudice-reduction in culturally mixed classrooms: The development and assessment of a theory-driven intervention among majority and minority youth in Finland. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, P. J., Baird, J., Arai, L., Law, C., & Roberts, H. M. (2007). Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535–b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Goldman, S. K. (2010). Mass media. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 241–258). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919
   Google Scholar
• O’Barr, W. M. (1998). Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom (2nd pr). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1997). Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying conclusion articulation in persuasive messages. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1997.11978023
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 22(1), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1999.11678963
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory & research (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2008). Persuasion. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 3590–3592). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp031.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2016a). Communicator factors. In D. J. O’Keefe (Ed.), Persuasion: Theory and research (Third ed., pp. 130–157). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2016b). Persuasion and social influence. In K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley, & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–19). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect067
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2006.11679054
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701849388
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolini, S., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., Husnu, S., Joyce, N., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present: Past contact moderates negative contact effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.-Y. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). The elaboration likelihood and meta-cognitive models of attitudes: Implications for prejudice, the self, and beyond. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 172–187). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In R. E. Petty, & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., & White, P. H. (1999). Stigmatized sources and persuasion: Prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 323–390). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Americans’ views of immigrants marked by widening partisan, generational divides. http://pewrsr.ch/1W2OHVc
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2021). Key facts about the changing U.S. unauthorized immigrant population. https://pewrsr.ch/3uNwX5s
   Google Scholar
• Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. A., & Reynolds, J. L. (2002). Evidence. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 427–444). Sage Publications. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10372817
   Google Scholar
• Rogozen-Soltar, M. H. (2017). Spain unmoored: Migration, conversion, and the politics of Islam. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zxz187
   Google Scholar
• Schemer, C., & Meltzer, C. E. (2020). The impact of negative parasocial and vicarious contact with refugees in the media on attitudes toward refugees. Mass Communication and Society, 23(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1692037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, K. (2020). Meta-analysis on visual persuasion– does adding images to texts influence persuasion? Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 6(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.6-3-3
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (2013). The effects of message framing and visual image on persuasion. Communication Quarterly, 61(5), 564–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2013.822403
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Bigsby, E. (2013). The effects of message features. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 20–35). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shevy, M., & Hung, K. (2013). Music in television advertising and other persuasive media. In S.-L. Tan, A. J. Cohen, S. D. Lipscomb, & R. A. Kendall (Eds.), The psychology of music in multimedia (pp. 315–338). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608157.003.0014
   Google Scholar
• Sikkink, D. E. (1956). An experimental study of the effects on the listener of anticlimax order and authority in an argumentative speech. The Southern Speech Journal, 22(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417945609371433
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponberg, H. (1946). A study of the relative effectiveness of climax and anti-climax order in an argumentative speech∗. Speech Monographs, 13(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637754609374898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G., Lausanne Renfro, C., Esses, V. M., White Stephan, C., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN DESA. (2021). International Migrant Stock 2020. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock
   Google Scholar
• Vezzali, L., Di Bernardo, G. A., Stathi, S., Visintin, E. P., & Hewstone, M. (2019). Using intercultural videos of direct contact to implement vicarious contact: A school-based intervention that improves intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(7), 1059–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218809885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2012). Indirect contact through book Reading: Improving adolescents’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants: Indirect contact and attitudes. Psychology in the Schools, 49(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E. (2015). The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice: Harry Potter and attitudes toward stigmatized groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Murphy, S. T., & Gillig, T. K. (2017). To walk a mile in someone else’s shoes: How narratives can change causal attribution through story exploration and character customization. Human Communication Research, 44(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication and virtual groups: Applications to interethnic conflict. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903025937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Kim, N. (2016). How to improve attitudes toward disliked groups: The effects of narrative versus numerical evidence on political persuasion. Communication Research, 43(6), 785–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., Kim, N., & Igartua, J.-J. (2020). How to enhance the effects of mediated intergroup contact? Evidence from four countries. Mass Communication and Society, 23(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1630444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, N. C. H., Massey, Z. B., Barbarti, J. L., Bessarabova, E., & Banas, J. A. (2022). Theorizing prejudice reduction via mediated intergroup contact: Extending the intergroup contact theory to media contexts. Journal of Media Psychology, 34(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakushko, O. (2018). Modern-day xenophobia: Critical historical and theoretical perspectives on the roots of anti-immigrant prejudice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zebregs, S., van den Putte, B., Neijens, P., & de Graaf, A. (2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 30(3), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.842528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, J., & Guidry, A. (2022). Does storytelling reduce stigma? A meta-analytic view of narrative persuasion on stigma reduction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 44(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2022.2039657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar