Hungarian Geography between 1870 and 1920: Negotiating Empire and Coloniality on the Global Semiperiphery

References

• Ablonczy, B. 2022. Go East! A history of Hungarian Turanism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, W., R. Roque, and R. Ventura Santos, eds. 2019. Luso-tropicalism and its discontents: The making and unmaking of racial exceptionalism. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1912. A Magyar Birodalom közjogi térképe (advertisment) [Constitutional map of the Hungarian Empire (advertisement)]. Földrajzi Közlemények 40:184.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. 1999. Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bakić-Hayden, M. 1995. Nesting orientalisms: The case of former Yugoslavia. Slavic Review 54 (4):917–31. doi: 10.2307/2501399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogh, P. 2021. The concept of the Carpathian Basin: Its evolution, counternarratives, and geopolitical implications. Journal of Historical Geography 71 (1):51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2020.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, K. 2014. The semiperiphery of academic writing: Discourses, communities and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bertényi, I. 2005. Tisza István és az első világháború [István Tisza and The First World War]. In Mítoszok, legendák és tévhitek a 20. századi magyar történelemről, ed. I. Romsics, 28–86. Budapest, Hungary: Osiris.
   Google Scholar
• Boatcă, M. 2006. Semiperipheries in the world-system: Reflecting Eastern European and Latin American experiences. Journal of World-Systems Research 12 (1):321–46. doi: 10.5195/jwsr.2006.362.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, T., and C. Chase-Dunn. 2000. The spiral of capitalism and socialism: Toward global democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Bottlik, Z., and M. Kőszegi. 2018. A magyar földrajztudomány Balkán-képe a XX. század elején [The image of the Balkans in Hungarian geography in the early 20th century]. In FUT: Földrajz–Utazás–Történelem, ed. E. Lendvai Timár, E. Berta, Zs. Lehoczki and B. Pravecz, 115–22. Budapest, Hungary: Martin Opitz.
   Google Scholar
• Butlin, R. A. 2009. Geographies of empire: European empires and colonies c. 1880–1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelo, C. 1999. “O Modo Português de estar no Mundo”: O luso-tropicalismo e a ideologia colonial portuguesa (1933–1961) [“The Portuguese way of being in the world”: Luso-tropicalism and the ideology of Portuguese colonialism (1933–1961)]. Porto, Portugal: Afrontamento.
   Google Scholar
• Chase-Dunn, C. 1989. Global formation: Structures of the world-economy. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chase-Dunn, C. 2005. Social evolution and the future of world society. Journal of World-Systems Research 23 (1):171–92. doi: 10.5195/jwsr.2005.385.
   Google Scholar
• Cholnoky, J. 1912. Társaságunk Gazdasági Szakosztálya [The economic geographical section of the Hungarian Geographical Society]. Földrajzi Közlemények 40:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cholnoky, J. 1915. Magyarország természetes déli határa [The natural borders of Hungary in the South]. Külügy–Hadügy (Heti Szemle), October 31.
   Google Scholar
• Clerc, P. 2020. Do not cross. The “North/South” divide: A means of domination? In Decolonising and internationalising geography: Essays in the history of contested science, ed. B. Schelhaas, F. Ferretti, A. R. Novaes, and M. Schmidt di Friedberg, 47–56. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, A. L. 1997. A mission to civilize: The republican idea of empire in France and West Africa, 1895–1930. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craggs, R., and H. Neate. 2019. What happens if we start from Nigeria? Diversifying histories of geography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (3):899–916. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1631748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csaplár-Degovics, K. 2022. Nekünk nincsenek gyarmataink és hódítási szándékaink: Magyar részvétel a Monarchia gyarmatosítási törekvéseiben a Balkánon (1867–1914) [“We have neither colonies nor intentions of conquest” ngarian participation in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy’s colonial ambitions in the Balkans, 1867–1914]. Budapest, Hungary: ELKH Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Történettudományi Intézet.
   Google Scholar
• Deák, I. 1990. Beyond nationalism: A social and political history of the Habsburg Officer Corps, 1848–1918. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demeter, G., and K. Csaplár-Degovics. 2018. A study in the theory and practice of destabilization: Violence and strategies of survival in Ottoman Macedonia, 1903–1913. Istanbul, Turkey: Isis.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa Santos, B. 2017. A non-occidentalist West? In Towards a just curriculum theory, ed. J. Paraskeva, 67–89. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donia, R. 2014. Bosnia and Herzegovina: The proximate colony in the twilight of empire. Godišnjak Centra za Balkanološka Ispitivanja 42:197–202. doi: 10.5644/Godisnjak.CBI.ANUBiH-40.30.
   Google Scholar
• Donia, R. 2015. The proximate colony: Bosnia-Hercegovina under Austro-Hungarian rule. In WechselWirkungen: Austria-Hungary, Bosnia-Hercegovina, and the Western Balkans, 1878–1918, ed. C. Ruthner, D. Reynolds Cordileone, U. Reber, and R. Detrez, 67–82. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Elsenhans, H. 2018. World-systems analysis and political economy. In Global inequalities in world-systems perspective: Theoretical debates and methodological innovations, ed. M. Boatcă, A. Komlosy, and H. H. Nolte, 18–32. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erődi, B. 1874. A Riló-dag és vidéke [Rilo-dag and its region]. Földrajzi Közlemények 2:276–85.
   Google Scholar
• Erődi, B. 1875. Herczegovina. Földrajzi Közlemények 3:326–50.
   Google Scholar
• Erődi, B. 1876a. Albánia és az albánok [Albania and the Albanians]. Földrajzi Közlemények 4:201–18.
   Google Scholar
• Erődi, B. 1876b. Montenegró. Földrajzi Közlemények 4:201–23, 241–51.
   Google Scholar
• Esson, J., P. Noxolo, R. Baxter, P. Daley, and M. Byron. 2017. The 2017 RGS-IBG chair’s theme: Decolonising geographical knowledges, or reproducing coloniality? Area 49 (3):384–88. doi: 10.1111/area.12371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F. 2019. Rediscovering other geographical traditions. Geography Compass 13 (3):e12421. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F. 2020. History and philosophy of geography I: Decolonising the discipline, diversifying archives and historicising radicalism. Progress in Human Geography 44 (6):1161–71. doi: 10.1177/0309132519893442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F. 2021. History and philosophy of geography II: Rediscovering individuals, fostering interdisciplinarity and renegotiating the “margins.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (4):890–901. doi: 10.1177/0309132520973750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, F. 2022. History and philosophy of geography III: Global histories of geography, statues that must fall and a radical and multilingual turn. Progress in Human Geography 46 (2):716–25. doi: 10.1177/03091325211062170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, F. 1917. Botanikai kirándulások, 1917 [Botanical excursions, 1917]. Manuscript H-20/1 28-97. 3/8, 1917. Esztergom, Hungary: Magyar Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Múzeum, Dokumentációs Gyűjtemény.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, F. 2006. A magyar földrajztudomány története [The history of Hungarian geography]. Budapest, Hungary: MTA FKI.
   Google Scholar
• Ginelli, Z. 2018a. Critical remarks on the “Sovietization” of Hungarian human geography. In Social sciences in the “other Europe” since 1945, ed. A. Hincu and V. Karády, 52–89. Budapest, Hungary: CEU.
   Google Scholar
• Ginelli, Z. 2018b. Hungarian experts in Nkrumah’s Ghana: Decolonization and semiperipheral postcoloniality in socialist Hungary. Mezosfera 5.
   Google Scholar
• Górny, M. 2019. Science embattled: Eastern European intellectuals and the Great War. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. 2004. The colonial present. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. 2011. Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political-economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1 (1):4. doi: 10.5070/T411000004.
   Google Scholar
• György, A. 1883. A művelődés terjedése Közép-Afrikában [The spread of civilization in Central Africa]. Földrajzi Közlemények 11:93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Győri, R., and F. Gyuris. 2013. The Sovietisation of Hungarian geography, 1945–1960. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 154:107–28. doi: 10.1553/moegg154s107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Győri, R., and F. Gyuris. 2015. Knowledge and power in Sovietized Hungarian geography. In Geographies of knowledge and power, ed. P. Meusburger, D. Gregory, and L. Suarsana, 203–33. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Győri, R., and F. Gyuris. Forthcoming. From nation-building and imperialism to disaster recovery: The first 50 years of the Hungarian Geographical Society. In Geographical societies in the long 19th century: Case studies and comparisons, ed. M. Georg and U. Wardenga. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Győri, R., and C. W. J. Withers. 2019. Trianon and its aftermath: British geography and the “dismemberment” of Hungary, c.1915-c.1922. Scottish Geographical Journal 135 (1–2):68–97. doi: 10.1080/14702541.2019.1668049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyuris, F. 2018. Problem or solution? Academic internationalisation in contemporary human geographies in East Central Europe. Geographische Zeitschrift 106 (1):38–49. doi: 10.25162/gz-2018-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Gyuris, F. 2019. Ideology, spatial planning, and rural schools: From interwar to communist Hungary. In Geographies of schooling, ed. H. Jahnke, C. Kramer, and P. Meusburger, 97–124. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gyuris, F. 2020. Variációk egy témára: Hunfalvy, Lóczy és Czirbusz földrajz-felfogásának nemzetközi kap-csolódásai. [Variations on a theme: The international links of Hunfalvy’s, Lóczy’s, and Czirbusz’s approaches to geography] Földrajzi Közlemények 144:396–410.
   Google Scholar
• Gyuris, F. 2022. Multivariate functions: Heterogeneous realities of quantitative geography in Hungary. In Recalibrating the quantitative revolution in geography: Travels, networks, translations, ed. F. Gyuris, B. Michel, and K. Paulus, 80–101. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gyuris, F., and R. Győri. 2013. Sovietized science at the service of “socialist national economy”: The example of Hungarian geography, 1945–1960. Berichte: Geographie und Landeskunde 87 (1):7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Haesbert, R. 2022. Foreword: Decolonizing in a North–South dialogue. In Decolonizing geography: An introduction, ed. S. A. Radcliffe, xiii–xviii. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdú, Z. 2007. Hungarian researches on the Southeast-European space (the Balkans): Continuity, interruption or permanent re-start. In Southeast-Europe: State borders, cross-border relations, spatial structures, ed. Z. Hajdú, I. Illés, and Z. Raffay, 10–45. Pécs, Hungary: Centre for Regional Studies, HAS.
   Google Scholar
• Havass, R. 1898. Dalmáczia Magyarországhoz való vonatkozásaiban tekintettel Fiumére [Dalmatia’s relations to Hungary with regard to Fiume]. Földrajzi Közlemények 26:52–78.
   Google Scholar
• Havass, R. 1907. A trializmus földrajzi szempontból [Trialism from a geographical point of view]. Földrajzi Közlemények 37:380–90.
   Google Scholar
• Havass, R. 1909. A Magyar Birodalom közjogi térképe [Constitutional map of the Hungarian Empire], Budapest, Hungary: Magyar Földrajzi Intézet Rt.
   Google Scholar
• Havass, R. 1912. Magyar gazdasági és hatalmi törekvések a tengeren [Hungary’s economic and political goals on the sea]. Földrajzi Közlemények 40:185–93.
   Google Scholar
• Havass, R. 1913. Magyarország és a Balkán: Szerbia, Bulgária, Románia [Hungary and the Balkans: Serbia, Bulgaria, and Romania]. Földrajzi Közlemények 41:153–216.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, M. 2000. Mars and Minerva: Centres of geographical calculation in an age of total war. Erdkunde 54 (4):320–33. doi: 10.3112/erdkunde.2000.04.03.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Geographical Society (HGS). 1876. A belga király megnyitó beszédje a Brüsszelben tartott kong-resszuson [The King of Belgium's opening address at the Brussels Congress]. Földrajzi Közlemények 4:284–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Geographical Society (HGS). 1877. Die Völker des Osmanischen Reiches. (Recenzió.) [The peoples of the Ottoman Empire. (Book review.)] Földrajzi Közlemények 5.8:280–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Geographical Society (HGS). 1918. A Magyar Földrajzi Társaság szózata a világ Földrajzi Társaságaihoz [Manifesto of the Hungarian geographical society to the geographical societies of the world]. Földrajzi Közlemények 46:289–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, J., S. Legg, and M. Heffernan. 2015. Introduction: Historical geographies of internationalism, 1900–1950. Political Geography 49:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, C., S. Hunt, and A. Piedalue. 2014. Violence, colonialism and space: Towards a decolonising dialogue. ACME 14 (2):539–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hunfalvy, J. 1874. Jelentés a földrajz körében 1873-ban tett munkálatokról [A report on the geographical works and achievements of 1873]. Földrajzi Közlemények 2:1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hunfalvy, J. 1875. Jelentés a földrajzi tudományok párizsi kongressusának tárgyalásairól [A report on the International Geographical Congress in Paris]. Földrajzi Közlemények 2:252–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hunfalvy, J. 1876. Hunfalvy János tanévnyitó beszéde [János Hunfalvy’s opening of the academic year address]. In Egyetemi beszédek, 1875–1876. tanév, ed. Királyi Magyar Tudományegyetem, 73–86. Budapest, Hungary: Magyar Királyi Egyetemi Könyvnyomda.
   Google Scholar
• Janos, A. 1982. The politics of backwardness in Hungary, 1825–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, M. 1911. The culture of the nations. Bulletin of the American Geographical Society 43 (4):241–65. doi: 10.2307/200432.
   Google Scholar
• Jobbitt, S. 2015. Fodor’s field diary and the writing of the Hungarian imperial self during World War I. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 17 (3):19. doi: 10.7771/1481-4374.2719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobbitt, S., and R. Győri. 2020. East Central Europe. In The Sage handbook of historical geography, Vol. 1, ed. M. Domosh, M. Heffernan, and C. W. J. Withers, 75–99. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jöns, H., P. Meusburger, and M. Heffernan, eds. 2017. Mobilities of knowledge. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, P. 2016. The Habsburg Empire: A new history. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Kelliher, D. 2018. Historicising geographies of solidarity. Geography Compass 12 (9):e12399. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemény, G. 1916. Szerbia: Gazdaságföldrajzi ismertetés [Serbia: An economic geographical review]. Földrajzi Közlemények 44:65–108.
   Google Scholar
• Király, P. 1875. Dalmácziáról [On Dalmatia]. Földrajzi Közlemények 3:204–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kompolthy, T. 1879. Uj-Guinea s népe [New Guinea and its people]. Földrajzi Közlemények 7 (350–358):384–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, and A. Acosta. 2019. Pluriverse, a post-development dictionary. New Delhi, India: Tulika Books and Authorsupfront.
   Google Scholar
• Laky, D. 1876. Ausztráliáról [On Australia]. Földrajzi Közlemények 4 (41–53):89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. N. 1995. The spaces of knowledge: Contributions towards a historical geography of science. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13 (1):5–34. doi: 10.1068/d130005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. N. 2003. Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. N. 2010. Landscapes of knowledge. In Geographies of science, ed. P. Meusburger, D. N. Livingstone, and H. Jöns, 3–22. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lóczy, L. 1920. Nyugat-szerbiai tanulmányutam [My field trip to western Serbia]. Földrajzi Közlemények 48:82–84.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, N. 2007. On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3):240–70. doi: 10.1080/09502380601162548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, D. 2016. Arminius Vambéry and the British Empire: Between East and West. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Márki, S. 1889. Hunfalvy János (1820–1888). Földrajzi Közlemények 17 (2):65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, J. 2020. Imperial science, unified forces and boundary-work: Geographical and geological societies in Vienna (1850–1925). Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 162:155–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, R. J., and C. W. J. Withers. 2020. Geographies of knowledge: Science, scale, and spatiality in the nineteenth century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2019. Rift. In Keywords in radical geography, ed. Antipode Editorial Collective, 243–47. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meusburger, P., D. N. Livingstone, and H. Jöns, eds. 2010. Geographies of science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2000. Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2007. Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3):449–514. doi: 10.1080/09502380601162647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D., and A. Escobar, eds. 2010. Globalization and the decolonial option. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D., and C. E. Walsh. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, H. 1874. A földrajzi viszonyok befolyása Magyarország történetére [The influence of geography on the history of Hungary]. Földrajzi Közlemények 2:319–67.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva, D., and F. Roque de Oliveira. 2021. Luso-Brazilian geographies? The making of epistemic communities in semi-peripheral academic human geography. Progress in Human Geography 45 (3):489–512. doi: 10.1177/0309132520923062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palavestra, A. 2014. Arheološki izlet u pograničnu koloniju [Archaeological excursion into a proximal colony]. Етноантрополошки проблеми 9 (3):669–95.
   Google Scholar
• Petrović, T. 2010. Nesting colonialisms: Austria, Slovenia, and discourses on the Western Balkans in the context of the EU enlargement. In Do good fences make friendly neighbors? Inclusion and exclusion in and on the borders of Europe, ed. L. Kreft and J. Benderly, 1–12. Ljubljana, Slovenia: The Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: View from the South 1 (3):533–80.
   Google Scholar
• Rac, K. 2014. Orientalism for the nation: Jews and oriental scholarship in modern Hungary. PhD dissertation. University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. 2017. Decolonising geographical knowledges. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (3):329–33. doi: 10.1111/tran.12195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. 2022. Decolonizing geography: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Schelhaas, B., F. Ferretti, A. R. Novaes, and M. Schmidt di Friedberg, eds. 2020. Decolonising and internationalising geography: Essays in the history of contested science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W., and Z. Hajdú. 2022. The Carpathian Basin as a “Hungarian neighbourhood”: Imaginative geographies of regional cooperation and national exceptionalism. Eurasian Geography and Economics 63 (6):753–78. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2022.2082995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seegel, S. 2018. Map men: Transnational lives and deaths of geographers in the making of East Central Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. A. 2018. World-system zones in the 21st century: Beyond core and periphery, who fits where? In Global inequalities in world-systems perspective: Theoretical debates and methodological innovations, ed. M. Boatcă, A. Komlosy, and H. H. Nolte, 3–17. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solarz, M. W. 2014. The language of global development: A misleading geography. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–331. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason: Towards a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strausz, A. 1885. Keleti kereskedelmünk és egy magyar ke-reskedelmi muzeum [Hungary’s oriental trade and the idea of a Museum of Hungarian Commerce]. Nemzetgazdasági Szemle 9:233–67.
   Google Scholar
• Tanárky, G. 1875. Üdvözlő beszéd a Magyar Földrajzi Társulat 1875. október 28-i közgyűlésén [Address to the assembly of the Hungarian Geographical Society, 28 October 1875]. Földrajzi Közlemények 3:290–93.
   Google Scholar
• Timár, J. 2004. More than “Anglo-American,” it is “Western”: Hegemony in geography from a Hungarian perspective. Geoforum 35 (5):533–38. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ureña Valerio, L. 2019. Colonial fantasies, imperial realities: Race science and the making of Polishness on the fringes of the German empire, 1840–1920. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vámbéry, A. 1883. Jelentés a földrajz körében 1882-ben tett munkálatokról [A report on the geographical works and achievements of 1882]. Földrajzi Közlemények 11:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 1974. The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 1979. The capitalist world-economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 2004. World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zichy, Á. 1877. A németalföldi gyarmatok és gyarmat-rendszer Kelet-Indiában [Dutch colonies and the colonial system in East India]. Földrajzi Közlemények 5:113–27.
   Google Scholar