Beauty and the Anthropocene: A Case for How Experiences of Beautiful Places in Nature Can Contribute to Emancipation from Instrumental Rationality

References

• Adams, P. C., and J. Kotus. 2022. Place dialogue. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (4):1090–1103. doi: 10.1111/tran.12554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. 1970. Aesthetic theory, trans. R. Hullot-Kentor. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. 2005. The secret power of beauty. London: Penguin Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J., and P. Simpson. 2016. Geography and post-phenomenology. Progress in Human Geography 40 (1):48–66. doi: 10.1177/0309132514544806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., and P. Simpson. 2019. Postphenomenology and method: Styles for thinking the (non)human. GeoHumanities 5 (1):139–56. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2018.1543553.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, T. 2019. Alaska’s shipshape(d) economy. Alaska Business Magazine. https://www.akbizmag.com/industry/tourism/alaskas-shipshaped-economy/.
   Google Scholar
• Bawaka Country, S. Wright, S. Suchet-Pearson, K. Lloyd, L. Burarrwanga, R. Ganambarr, M. Ganambarr-Stubbs, B. Ganambarr, and D. Maymuru. 2015. Working with and learning from country: Decentring human author-ity. Cultural Geographies 22 (2):269–83. doi: 10.1177/1474474014539248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazinet, T., and L. Van Vliet. 2019. Affect. In International encyclopedia of human geography, 2nd ed., ed. A. Kobayashi, 47–52. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, K. S. 2002. Colorado fourteeners and the nature of place identity. Geographical Review 92 (2):155–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2002.tb00002.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2003. “On the raggedy edge of risk”: Articulations of race and nature after biology. In Race, nature, and the politics of difference, ed. D. S. Moore and J. Kosek, 175–203. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. 1923. I and Thou. Trans. R. G. Smith. Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. S. 2005. Society, biology, and ecology: Bringing nature back into sociology’s disciplinary narrative through critical realism. Organization & Environment 18 (4):393–421. doi: 10.1177/1086026605281697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catton, T. 1997. Inhabited wilderness: Indians, Eskimos, and national parks in Alaska. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, N., and B. Szerszynski. 2020. Planetary social thought: The Anthropocene challenge to the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, N., and B. Szerszynski. 2022. Thinking through the earth: Surviving and thriving at a planetary threshold. Dialogues in Human Geography 12 (3):488–91. doi: 10.1177/20438206221129204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D., B. Roscoe, and S. Rycroft. 1996. Landscape and identity at Ladybower Reservoir and Rutland Water. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 21 (3):534–51. doi: 10.2307/622595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1996. The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature, 69–90. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Danto, A. C. 2003. The abuse of beauty: Aesthetics and the concept of art. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. B. Massumi, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denevan, W. M. 1992. The pristine myth: The landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82 (3):369–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01965.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2006. “Because it is beautiful”: New feminist perspectives on beauty. Feminist Theory 7 (2):273–82. doi: 10.1177/1464700106064424.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, C. 2014. Black faces, White spaces: Reimagining the relationship of African Americans to the great outdoors. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, J. 2022. Places of memory, historic preservation, and place attachment in Nazi Germany. Geographical Review 112 (1):147–70. doi: 10.1080/00167428.2020.1799711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlick, D. 2006. Reconsidering wilderness: Prospective ethics for nature, technology, and society. Ethics, Place & Environment 9 (1):47–62. doi: 10.1080/13668790500512563.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology, and other essays, trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, R. W. 1996. Landscape and the metaphysical imagination. Environmental Values 5 (3):191–204. doi: 10.3197/096327196776679320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. 1947. Eclipse of reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1790. Critique of judgement, ed. N. Walker, trans. J. C. Meredith, revised ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. C., and J. T. Johnson. 2016. The agency of place: Toward a more-than-human geographical self. GeoHumanities 2 (1):149–66. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2016.1157003.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A. 2018. The progress of this storm: Nature and society in a warming world. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C. C. 2006. 1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbus. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 2002. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, D. J. 2013. “All the beautiful things”: Trauma, aesthetics and the politics of Palestinian childhood. Space and Polity 17 (1):53–73. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2013.780713.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. 1990. The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: HarperOne.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. 2003. Shades of darkness: Race and environmental history. Environmental History 8 (3):380–94. doi: 10.2307/3986200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. C., and A. Das. 2021. Post-phenomenology, consumption and warfare on the urban leisure path, USA. Geoforum 126 (November):394–402. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, P. V. 2007. Nature naturalized: A Darwinian defense of the nature/culture distinction. Environmental Ethics 29 (3):227–46. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics20072932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I. 1970. The sovereignty of good. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nehamas, A. 2007. Only a promise of happiness: The place of beauty in a world of art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olstad, T. A. 2018. Visitor perception, place attachment, and wilderness management in the Adirondack High Peak. In Explorations in place attachment, ed. J. S. Smith, 133–48. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Outka, P. 2008. Race and nature from transcendentalism to the Harlem renaissance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. n.d. beauty, I.1.d. http://www.oed.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G. 2008. Aesthetics and nature. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2001. Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. 2019. Resituating post-phenomenological geographies: Deleuze, relations and the limits of objects. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (3):542–54. doi: 10.1111/tran.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2019. Resonance: A sociology of our relationship to the world, trans. J. C. Wagner. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H., C. Henning, and A. Bueno, eds. 2021. Critical theory and new materialisms. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M., and J. Wylie. 2006. Animating landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (4):475–79. doi: 10.1068/d2404ed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T. 2019. Repeat photography, post‐phenomenology and “being‐with” through the image (at the First World War cemeteries of Asiago, Italy). Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (1):125–40. doi: 10.1111/tran.12261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., and G. Peterle. 2021. Buildings as non-human narrators: Between post-phenomenological and object-oriented architectural geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (3):642–58. doi: 10.1111/tran.12457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartwell, C. 2006. Six names of beauty. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sartwell, C. 2017. Beauty. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beauty/
   Google Scholar
• Scarry, E. 1999. On beauty and being just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. 2009. Beauty: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smiles, N. D. 2023. Reflections on the (continued and future) importance of Indigenous geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography. pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1177/20438206231179229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space, 3rd ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, K. 1995. What is nature? Culture, politics and the non-human. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. D. 2000. Dispossessing the wilderness: Indian removal and the making of the national parks, revised ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, W. 2002. Venus in exile: The rejection of beauty in twentieth-century art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchet-Pearson, S., S. Wright, K. Lloyd, and L. Burarrwanga, on behalf of the Bawaka Country. 2013. Caring as country: Towards an ontology of co-becoming in natural resource management. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54 (2):185–97. doi: 10.1111/apv.12018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1991. The ethics of authenticity, reprint ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. 2009. Performance affects: Applied theatre and the end of effect. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2022. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Juneau City and Borough, Alaska. http://www.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. 1996. Against nature: The concept of nature in critical theory. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. 2016. Thinking like a mall: Environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1921. Economy and society, trans. K. Tribe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zank, M., and Z. Braiterman. 2022. Martin Buber. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buber/
   Google Scholar