The Impact of Spatial Changes on the Assessment of CCTV Effects: An Example of the Green Light Project in Detroit

References

• Barr, R., and K. Pease. 1990. Crime placement, displacement, and deflection. Crime and Justice 12:277–318. doi: 10.1086/449167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. J., and S. D. Johnson. 2003. Measuring the geographical displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of crime prevention activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19 (3):275–301. doi: 10.1023/A:1024909009240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, J. M., L. W. Kennedy, and G. Petrossian. 2011. Police-monitored CCTV cameras in Newark, NJ: A quasi-experimental test of crime deterrence. Journal of Experimental Criminology 7 (3):255–74. doi: 10.1007/s11292-011-9125-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerezo, A. 2013. CCTV and crime displacement: A quasi-experimental evaluation. European Journal of Criminology 10 (2):222–36. doi: 10.1177/1477370812468379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Circo, G., and E. McGarrell. 2021. Estimating the impact of an integrated CCTV program on crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology 17 (1):129–50. doi: 10.1007/s11292-019-09404-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Detroit. 2017. Project Green Light Detroit—About. Accessed January 5, 2018. http://www.greenlightdetroit.org/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., M. Gill, S. J. Waples, and J. Argomaniz. 2007. The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: Meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology 3 (1):21–38. doi: 10.1007/s11292-007-9024-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gerell, M. 2016. Hot spot policing with actively monitored CCTV cameras: Does it reduce assaults in public places? International Criminal Justice Review 26 (2):187–201. doi: 10.1177/1057567716639098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerell, M. 2021. CCTV in deprived neighbourhoods—A short-time follow-up of effects on crime and crime clearance. Nordic Journal of Criminology 22 (2):221–39. doi: 10.1080/2578983X.2020.1816023.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M., and A. Spriggs. 2005. Assessing the impact of CCTV (Vol. 292): Home Office Research study. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2004. The validity and usefulness of laws in geographic information science and geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2):300–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402008.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., and S. Gopal, eds. 1989. The accuracy of spatial databases. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., and L. Liu. 2009. Cops and robbers in Cincinnati: A spatial modeling approach for examining the effects of aggressive policing. Annals of GIS 15 (1):61–71. doi: 10.1080/19475680903271158.
   Google Scholar
• Hino, K. 2022. Changes in public attitudes toward CCTV installations in residential areas between 2008 and 2019. Cities 128:103810. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., R. T. Guerette, and K. Bowers. 2014. Crime displacement: What we know, what we don’t know, and what it means for crime reduction. Journal of Experimental Criminology 10 (4):549–71. doi: 10.1007/s11292-014-9209-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronkvist, K. 2022. The effect of target, catchment, and comparison site operationalization on CCTV impact evaluations: Methodological considerations from a case study. Journal of Experimental Criminology 18 (4):765–82. doi: 10.1007/s11292-021-09468-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahtinen, M. 2017. The perception of surveillance cameras (CCTV) and privacy among the general public in Sweden. Lund, Sweden: LUSAX-Research Group, Lund University School of Economics and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M., Y. Xu, L. Ouellet, and C. F. Klahm, IV. 2019. Exploring the impact of 9398 demolitions on neighborhood-level crime in Detroit, Michigan. Journal of Criminal Justice 60:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Vigne, N. G., S. S. Lowry, J. A. Markman, and A. M. Dwyer. 2011. Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Liedka, R. V., A. J. Meehan, and T. W. Lauer. 2019. CCTV and campus crime: Challenging a technological “fix.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 30 (2):316–38. doi: 10.1177/0887403416664947.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, H., C. Kim, J. E. Eck, and J. Kim. 2016. The crime-reduction effects of open-street CCTV in South Korea. Security Journal 29 (2):241–55. doi: 10.1057/sj.2013.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, H., and P. Wilcox. 2017. Crime-reduction effects of open-street CCTV: Conditionality considerations. Justice Quarterly 34 (4):597–626. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2016.1194449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., L. Li, H. Zhou, C. Jiang, and M. Lan. 2020. The effects of police CCTV camera on crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A case study from Gusu District in Suzhou, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica 40:1601–1609.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., H. Zhou, and M. Lan. 2022. Agglomerative effects of crime attractors and generators on street robbery? An assessment by luojia 1-01 satellite nightlight. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112 (2):350–67. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1933888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D., L. Liu, M. Xu, J. Feng, J. Chen, and L. He. 2021. Ambient population and surveillance cameras: The guardianship role in street robbers’ crime location choice. Cities 115:103223. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madero-Hernandez, A., R. Deryol, M. M. Ozer, and R. S. Engel. 2017. Examining the impact of early childhood school investments on neighborhood crime. Justice Quarterly 34 (5):759–87. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2016.1226935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matczak, P., A. Wójtowicz, A. Dąbrowski, M. Leitner, and N. Sypion-Dutkowska. 2021. Effectiveness of CCTV systems as a crime preventive tool: Evidence from eight Polish cities. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 47 (1):37–56. doi: 10.1080/01924036.2021.1976237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. 2004. Understanding psychology and crime: Perspectives on theory and action. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, S. J., R. E. Worden, and M. Kim. 2013. Here’s looking at you: An evaluation of public CCTV cameras and their effects on crime and disorder. Criminal Justice Review 38 (3):303–34. doi: 10.1177/0734016813492415.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. H., G. S. Oh, and S. Y. Paek. 2012. Measuring the crime displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of open-street CCTV in South Korea. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 40 (3):179–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2012.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prenzler, T., and E. Wilson. 2019. The Ipswich (Queensland) safe city program: An evaluation. Security Journal 32 (2):137–52. doi: 10.1057/s41284-018-0152-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piza, E. L. 2018. The crime prevention effect of CCTV in public places: A propensity score analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice 41 (1):14–30. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2016.1226931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piza, E. L., B. C. Welsh, D. P. Farrington, and A. L. Thomas. 2019. CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: A 40‐year systematic review with meta‐analysis. Criminology & Public Policy 18 (1):135–59. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J. H., and C. Breen. 2011. Crime diffusion and displacement: Measuring the side effects of police operations. The Professional Geographer 63 (2):230–43. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2010.547154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J. H., and E. R. Groff. 2019. A longitudinal quasi-experimental study of violence and disorder impacts of urban CCTV camera clusters. Criminal Justice Review 44 (2):148–64. doi: 10.1177/0734016818811917.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J. H., T. Taniguchi, and R. B. Taylor. 2009. The crime reduction effects of public CCTV cameras: A multi‐method spatial approach. Justice Quarterly 26 (4):746–70. doi: 10.1080/07418820902873852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. A., and M. A. Andresen. 2014. An evaluation of CCTV in a car park using police and insurance data. Security Journal 27 (1):55–79. doi: 10.1057/sj.2012.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, D. H. 2017. Externalities of public housing: The effect of public housing demolitions on local crime. Regional Science and Urban Economics 62:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauter, M. B., S. Stebbins, and T. C. Frohlich. 2016. The most dangerous cities in America. USA Today, October 1.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, S. Z., and M. A. Ismail. 1984. K-means-type algorithms: A generalized convergence theorem and characterization of local optimality. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1):81–87. doi: 10.1109/tpami.1984.4767478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbeek, W., and D. Weisburd. 2016. Where the action is in crime? An examination of variability of crime across different spatial units in The Hague, 2001–2009. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 32 (3):449–69. doi: 10.1007/s10940-015-9276-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (Supp1. 1):234–40. doi: 10.2307/143141.
   Google Scholar
• Vilalta, C., P. Lopez-Ramirez, and G. Fondevila. 2023. Testing the local and spatial spillover effects of police monitored CCTV systems on crime. Applied Geography 151:102873. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilalta, C. J., T. W. Sanchez, G. Fondevila, and M. Ramirez. 2019. A descriptive model of the relationship between police CCTV systems and crime: Evidence from Mexico City. Police Practice and Research 20 (2):105–21. doi: 10.1080/15614263.2018.1473770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ways, B., and B. C. Pearson. 2018. Assessing the usefulness of CCTV in Baltimore City, Maryland. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability 13 (5):127–40.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D. 2015. The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology 53 (2):133–57. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, B. C., and D. P. Farrington. 2009. Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly 26 (4):716–45. doi: 10.1080/07418820802506206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, A. P., and J. H. Ratcliffe. 2018. A simple weighted displacement difference test to evaluate place based crime interventions. Crime Science 7 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s40163-018-0085-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, S. M., and I. C. Jen. 2018. An evaluation of displacement and diffusion effects on eco-terrorist activities after police interventions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 34 (4):1103–23. doi: 10.1007/s10940-017-9367-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., L. Cai, G. Song, L. Liu, and C. Zhu. 2022. From residential neighborhood to activity space: The effects of educational segregation on crime and their moderation by social context. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112 (8):2393–2412. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2060793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., W. Li, H. Deng, and Y. Li. 2020. Evaluation of public transport-based accessibility to health facilities considering spatial heterogeneity. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/7645153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar