1,439
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Why cylindrical screens in the Columbia River (USA) entrain few fish

Pages 43-54 | Received 31 Mar 2020, Accepted 12 Oct 2020, Published online: 18 Jan 2021

References

  • Alam S, Parkinson FE, Hausser R. 1974. Hanford nuclear project no. 2. Air and hydraulic model studies of the perforated pipe inlet and protective dolphin. LHL-599. Washington Public Power Supply System and Burns and Roe, Inc. Energy Northwest. www.energy-northwest.com.
  • Albayrak I, Boes RM, Kriewitz CR, Peter A, Tullis BP. 2020a. Fish guidance structures: hydraulic performance and fish guidance efficiencies. J Ecohydraulics.
  • Albayrak I, Kriewitz CR, Hager WH, Boes RM. 2018. An experimental invesrigtion of louvres and angled bar racks. J Hydraul Res. 56(1):59–75. DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2017.1289265.
  • Albayrak I, Maager F, Boes RM. 2020b. An experimental investigation on fish guidance structures with horizontal bars. J Hydraul Res. 58(3): 516–530.DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2019.1625818.
  • Amiri MM, Esperança PT, Vitola MA, Sphaier SH. 2018. How does the free surface affect the hydrodynamics of a shallowly submerged submarine? App Ocean Res. 76:34–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.04.008.
  • ASA Analysis & Communication, Inc. and Normandeau Associates, Inc. (ASA and NAI). 2012. 2012 wedgewire screen in-river efficacy study at Indian Point Energy Center. Buchanan, NY: Prepared for Indian Point Energy Center.
  • Beck C, Albayrak I, Meister J, Boes RM. 2020. Hydraulic performance of fish guidance structures with curved bars—Part 2: flow fields. J Hydraul Res. 58(5):819–830. DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2019.1671516.
  • Bell MC. 1991. Fisheries handbook of engineering requirements and biological criteria. 2nd ed. Portland, Oregon: Prepared for the North Pacific Division of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  • Bevelhimer MS, Coutant CC. 2008. Light tags for observing behavior of surface-oriented migrating salmonids. Amer Fish Soc Symp. 61:231–239.
  • Blaxter JHS. 1986. Development of sense organs and behavior of teleost larvae with special reference to feeding and predator avoidance. Trans Am Fish Soc. 115:98–114.
  • Bleckmann H. 2007. The lateral line system of fish. Sensory Systems Neuroscience. London: Elsevier. Vol. 25, Fish physiology; p. 411–453.
  • Coutant CC. 1999. Think like a fish! Emphasizing the “behavior” in behavioral guidance systems. Hydro Rev. 18(3):18–24.
  • Coutant CC, Genoway RG. 1968. Final report on an exploratory study of interaction of increased temperature and nitrogen supersaturation on adult salmonids. Report for U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Seattle. Richland, Washington: Washington by Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest Laboratory.
  • Coutant CC, Whitney RR. 2000. Fish behavior in relation to passage through hydropower turbines: A review. Trans Am Fish Soc. 129(2):351–380.
  • Dauble DD, Page TL, Hanf RW. Jr1989. Spatial distribution of juvenile salmonids in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River. Fishery Bulletin, US. 87:771–790.
  • Dawley EM, Ebel WJ. 1975. Effects of various concentrations of dissolved atmospheric gas on juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Fishery Bulletin, US. 73:787–796.
  • de Bie J, Peirson G, Kemp PS. 2018. Effectiveness of horizontally and vertically oriented wedge-wire screens to guide downstream moving juvenile chub (Squalius cephalus). Ecol Eng. 123:127–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.07.038.
  • Easterbrooks JA. 1984. Juvenile fish screen design criteria: a review of the objectives and scientific data base. Olympia (WA): Department of Fisheries, State of Washington.
  • Enercon (Enercon Services, Inc.). 2010. Evaluation of Alternative Intake Technologies at Indian Point Units 2 & 3. Buchanan, NY: Prepared for Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML14008A285.pdf.
  • Energy Northwest. 2020. Final Fish Entrainment Characterization report. Project Number 171376-01.01. Richland, Washington. Energy Northwest. www.energy-northwest.com.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2014. Regulations implementing Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. Washington, DC. (epa.gov).
  • Gessler D, Laumbay RS. 2012. Determination of Number of “Screens Encountered by Average Particle in Support of CWW Screen Design at Indian Point Energy Center.” Prepared for Indian Point Energy Center by Alden Research Laboratory, Inc. Report 1-12-1117IPLIT-R1.
  • Hanson BN. 1979. Studies of three cylindrical profile-wire screens mounted parallel to flow direction. Passive Intake Screens Workshop, Chicago, Illinois, December 1979. New Brighton, Minnesota, USA: Johnson Division UOP Inc., Surface Water Screen Department; p. 97–107.
  • Hassan ES, et al. 1989. Chapter 10. Hydrodynamic imaging of the surroundings by the lateral line of the blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani. In: Combs S, editor. The mechanosensory lateral line. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hassan ES. 1992. Mathematical description of the stimuli to the lateral line system of fish derived from a three-dimensional flow field analysis. II. The case of an oscillating sphere near the fish. Biol. Cybern. 66(5):453–461.
  • Hassan ES. 1993. Mathematical description of the stimuli to the lateral line system of fish derived from a three-dimensional flow field analysis. III. The case of gliding alongside or above a plane surface. Biol Cybern. 69(5–6):525–538.
  • Heuer JH, Tomljanovich DA. 1979. A further study on the protection of fish larvae at intakes using wedge-wire screening. Norris (TN): Division of Water Resources, Tennessee Valley Authority. Tech. Note B33. (TVA.com)
  • Karchesky CM, McDonald RD. 2007. Evaluation of a cylindrical wedge-wire screen system at Beal Lake, Arizona 2006. Phase II testing. Boulder City (NV): US Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/quagga/docs/BORBealScreenTest.pdf
  • Liao JC. 2006. The role of the lateral line and vision on body kinematics and hydrodynamic preference of rainbow trout in turbulent flow. J Exp Biol. 209(Pt 20):4077–4090.
  • Liao JC. 2007. A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 362(1487):1973–1993.
  • Liao JC, Beal DN, Lauder GV, Triantafyllou MS. 2003. Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science. 302 (5650):1566–1569.
  • Mignot E, Riviere N. 2010. Bow-wave-like hydraulic jump and horseshoe vortex around an obstacle in a supercritical open channel flow. Physics of Fluids. American Institute of Physics. 22:117105.
  • Mudge JE, Jeane GS, Campbell KP, Eddy BR, Foster LE. 1981. Evaluation of a perforated pipe intake structure for fish protection. Proceedings, Advanced Intake Technology Workshop, 115–127. www.energy-northwest.com.
  • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2011. Anadromous salmonid passage facility design. Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon: NMFS. www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/passage/docs/fish
  • Normandeau Associates, Inc. and ASA Analysis & Communications, Inc. (NAI and ASA). 2011a. 2010 IPEC wedgewire screen laboratory study. Buchanan, NY: Indian Point Energy Center. Report R-21825.002.
  • NAI and ASA. 2011b. 2011 IPEC wedgewire screen laboratory study. Buchanan, NY: Indian Point Energy Center. Report R-21825.004.
  • Raissi M, Yazdani A, Karniadakis GE. 2020. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations. Science. 367(6481):1026–1030.
  • Rajaratnam N, Sadeque MAF, Katopodis C. 2006. A simple method to predict flow distribution at vertical angled screens in open channels. Can J Civ Eng. 33(8):982–988. Doi: 10.1139/L06-053.
  • Raynal S, Chatellier L, Courret D, Larinier M, David L. 2013. An experimental study on fish-friendly trash racks—Part 2: Angled trash racks. J Hydraul Res. 51(1):67–75.
  • Seiff A, Whiting EE. 1962. A correlation study of the bow wave profiles of blunt bodies. Washington (DC): National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Report NASA TN D-1148. www.books.google.com
  • Stewart WJ, Nair A, Jiang H, McHenry MJ. 2014. Prey fish escape by sensing the bow wave of a predator. J Exp Biol. 217(Pt 24):4328–4336.
  • Taylor EB, McPhail JD. 1985. Ontogeny of the startle response in young Coho Salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. Trans Am Fish Soc. 114(4):552–557.
  • Teyke T. 1985. Collision with and avoidance of obstacles by blind cave fish Anoptichthys jordani (Characidae). J Comp Physiol A. 157(6):837–843.
  • Teyke T. 1988. Flow field, swimming velocity and boundary layer: parameters which affect the stimulus for the lateral line organ in blind fish. J Comp Physiol A. 163(1):53–61.
  • Turnpenny AWH, O’Keeffe N. 2005. Screening for intake and outfalls: a best practice guide. Science Report SC030231. Environment Agency, England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291568/scho0205bioc-e-e.pdf
  • US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). 2006. Fish protection at water diversions—a guide for planning and designing fish exclusion facilities. Denver (CO): US Department of the Interior.
  • Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS). 1985. Operational ecological monitoring program for nuclear plant 2 1985 annual report. Richland, Washington. Report No. 850377. www.energy-northwest.com
  • Weisberg SB, Burton WH, Jacobs F, Ross EA. 1987. Reductions in ichthyoplankton entrainment with fine-mesh, wedge-wire screens. N Am J Fish Mgmt 7(3):386–393. Doi:101577/1548-8659(1987)7<386:RIIEWF>2.0.CO;2
  • Willard DE. 1980. Ecologists, environmental litigation, and forensic ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Amer. 61(1):14–18.
  • Windsor SP, SE, Norris SE, Cameron SM, Mallinson GD, Montgomery JC. 2010a. The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part I: open water and heading towards a wall. J Exp Biol. 213(Pt 22):3819–3831.
  • Windsor SP, Norris SE, Cameron SM, Mallinson GD, Montgomery LC. 2010b. The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part II: gliding parallel to a wall. J Exp Biol. 213(Pt 22):3832–3842.