Quantifying fluvial habitat changes due to multiple subsequent floods in a braided alpine reach

References

• Adamczyk M, Parasiewicz P, Vezza P, Prus P, De Cesare G. 2019. Empirical validation of mesoHABSIM models developed with different habitat suitability criteria for bullhead cottus gobio l. as an indicator species. Water. 11(4):726. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agisoft Metashape Professional. 2020. Agisoft Metashape professional (version 1.6.4). https://www.agisoft.com/downloads/installer/.
   Google Scholar
• Amt für Natur und Umwelt. 2006–2021. Seba internetmodul. https://www.seba-hydrocenter.de/projects/index.php?user=anuchurpub.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE Task Committee on Sediment Transport and Aquatic Habitats, Sedimentation Committee. 1992. Sediment and aquatic habitat in river systems. J Hydraulic Engin. 118(5):669–687. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:5(669).
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore P. 1991. Channel morphology and bed load pulses in braided, gravel-bed streams. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Phys Geograph. 73(1):37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.1991.11880331.
   Google Scholar
• Barillier A, Beche L, Malavoi JR, Gouraud V. 2021. Identification of effective hydropeaking mitigation measures: are hydraulic habitat models sufficient in a global approach? J Ecohydraulics. 6(2):172–185.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann P, Kirchhofer A, Schälchli U. 2012. Sanierung Schwall/Sunk – Strategische Planung. Ein Modul der Vollzugshilfe Renaturierung der Gewässer. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern Umwelt-Vollzug. 1203; p. 126. https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home/themen/wasser/publikationen-studien/publikationen-wasser/sanierung-schwall-sunk.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff A, Wolter C. 2001. The flood of the century on the river order: effects on the 0+ fish community and implications for floodplain restoration. Regul Rivers: Res Mgmt. 17(2):171–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.612.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan SR, Schindler DE, Cline TJ, Walsworth TE, Buck G, Fernandez DP. 2019. Shifting habitat mosaics and fish production across river basins. Science. 364(6442):783–786. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav4313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner GW. 2016. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual - Hydraulic Reference Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, report number: CPD-69. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documentation/HEC-RAS%205.0%20Reference%20Manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU. 2020. Hydrologische daten und vorhersagen; https://www.hydrodaten.admin.ch/de/2420.html. [accessed 2020 December 15].
   Google Scholar
• Carline RF, McCullough BJ. 2003. Effects of floods on brook trout populations in the Monongahela national forest, West Virginia. Trans Am Fish Soc. 132(5):1014–1020. https://doi.org/10.1577/T02-112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro JM, Thorne CR. 2019. The stream evolution triangle: Integrating geology, hydrology, and biology. River Res Applic. 35(4):315–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos T, Sanz-Ronda FJ, Ruiz-Legazpi J. 2013. Breaking the speed limit—comparative sprinting performance of brook trout (salvelinus fontinalis) and brown trout (salmo trutta). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 70(2):280–293. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2012-0186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote D, Kehler DG, Bourne C, Wiersma YF. 2009. A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landscape Ecol. 24(1):101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9283-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotel AJ, Webb PW, Tritico H. 2006. Do brown trout choose locations with reduced turbulence? Trans Am Fish Soc. 135(3):610–619. https://doi.org/10.1577/T04-196.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jalón DG, Gortazar J. 2007. Evaluation of instream habitat enhancement options using fish habitat simulations: case-studies in the river pas (Spain). Aquatic Ecol. 41(3):461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-006-9030-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolloff CA, Flebbe PA, Owen MD. 1994. Fish habitat and fish populations in a southern appalachian watershed before and after hurricane Hugo. Trans Am Fish Soc. 123(4):668–678. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1994)123<0668:FHAFPI>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dönni W, Boller L, Zaugg C. 2016. Mindestwassertiefen für See-und Bachforellen biologische Grundlagen und Empfehlungen. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Umwelt. Schweiz: Fischwerk.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott J, Elliott J. 2010. Temperature requirements of Atlantic salmon salmo salar, brown trout salmo trutta and arctic charr salvelinus alpinus: predicting the effects of climate change. J Fish Biol. 77(8):1793–1817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02762.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood JW, Waters TF. 1969. Effects of floods on food consumption and production rates of a stream brook trout population. Trans Am Fish Soc. 98(2):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1969)98[253:EOFOFC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farò D, Zolezzi G, Wolter C. 2021. How much habitat does a river need? A spatially-explicit population dynamics model to assess ratios of ontogenetical habitat needs. J Environ Manage. 286:112100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glova GJ, Duncan MJ. 1985. Potential effects of reduced flows on fish habitats in a large braided river, New Zealand. Trans Am Fish Soc. 114(2):165–181. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1985)114<165:PEORFO>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostner W, Alp M, Schleiss AJ, Robinson CT. 2013. The hydro-morphological index of diversity: a tool for describing habitat heterogeneity in river engineering projects. Hydrobiologia. 712(1):43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1288-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostner W, Annable W, Schleiss A, Paternolli M. 2021. A case-study evaluating river rehabilitation alternatives and habitat heterogeneity using the hydromorphological index of diversity. J Ecohydraulics. 6(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2019.1680320.
   Google Scholar
• Greimel F, Schülting L, Graf W, Bondar-Kunze E, Auer S, Zeiringer B, Hauer C. 2015. Hydropeaking impacts and mitigation. Riverine Ecosystem Manage. 8:91–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2653.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdukiewicz H, Wyżga B, Mikuś P, Zawiejska J, Radecki-Pawlik A. 2016. Impact of a large flood on mountain river habitats, channel morphology, and valley infrastructure. Geomorphology. 272:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halleraker J, Saltveit S, Harby A, Arnekleiv J, Fjeldstad HP, Kohler B. 2003. Factors influencing stranding of wild juvenile brown trout (salmo trutta) during rapid and frequent flow decreases in an artificial stream. River Res Applic. 19(5–6):589–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison L, Legleiter C, Wydzga M, Dunne T. 2011. Channel dynamics and habitat development in a meandering, gravel bed river. Water Resour Res. 47(4):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008926.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison LR, Pike A, Boughton DA. 2017. Coupled geomorphic and habitat response to a flood pulse revealed by remote sensing. Ecohydrol. 10(5):e1845. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes DS, Moreira M, Boavida I, Haslauer M, Unfer G, Zeiringer B, Greimel F, Auer S, Ferreira T, Schmutz S. 2019. Life stage-specific hydropeaking flow rules. Sustainability. 11(6):1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohensinner S, Egger G, Muhar S, Vaudor L, Piégay H. 2021. What remains today of pre-industrial alpine rivers? census of historical and current channel patterns in the alps. River Res Applic. 37(2):128–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel P, Leitner P, Habersack H, Graf W, Hauer C. 2017. Evaluation of hydropeaking impacts on the food web in alpine streams based on modelling of fish-and macroinvertebrate habitats. Sci Total Environ. 575:1489–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong LB, Davies T. 1979. A study of stream braiding. Geol Soc Am Bull. 90(12_Part_II):1839–1859. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAB-P2-90-1839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huusko A, Greenberg L, Stickler M, Linnansaari T, Nykänen M, Vehanen T, Koljonen S, Louhi P, Alfredsen K. 2007. Life in the ice lane: the winter ecology of stream salmonids. River Res Applic. 23(5):469–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A. 2010. Data clustering: 50 years beyond k-means. Pattern Recog Lett. 31(8):651–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakober MJ, McMahon TE, Thurow RF. 2000. Diel habitat partitioning by bull charr and cutthroat trout during fall and winter in rocky mountain streams. Environ Biol Fishes. 59(1):79–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007699610247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson B, Jonsson N. 2009. A review of the likely effects of climate change on anadromous atlantic salmon salmo salar and brown trout salmo trutta, with particular reference to water temperature and flow. J Fish Biol. 75(10):2381–2447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02380.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judes C, Gouraud V, Capra H, Maire A, Barillier A, Lamouroux N. 2021. Consistent but secondary influence of hydropeaking on stream fish assemblages in space and time. J Ecohydraul. 6(2):157.
   Google Scholar
• Junk WJ. 2005. Flood pulsing and the linkages between terrestrial, aquatic, and wetland systems. Int Vereinigung Für Theoretische Und Angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen. 29(1):11–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2005.11901972.
   Google Scholar
• Kurth AM, Schirmer M. 2014. Thirty years of river restoration in Switzerland: implemented measures and lessons learned. Environ Earth Sci. 72(6):2065–2079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3115-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen LG, Woelfle-Erskine C. 2018. Groundwater is key to salmonid persistence and recruitment in intermittent mediterranean-climate streams. Water Resour Res. 54(11):8909–8930. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liébault F, Lallias-Tacon S, Cassel M, Talaska N. 2013. Long profile responses of alpine braided rivers in SE France. River Res Applic. 29(10):1253–1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner AM, Robertson AL, McDermott MJ, Klaar MJ, Brown LE. 2013. Major flood disturbance alters river ecosystem evolution. Nature Clim Change. 3(2):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niayifar A, Oldroyd HJ, Lane SN, Perona P. 2018. Modeling macroroughness contribution to fish habitat-suitability curves. Water Resour Res. 54(11):9306–9320. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi GJ, DeVore P, Detenbeck N, Taylor D, Lima A, Pastor J, Yount JD, Naiman RJ. 1990. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ Manage. 14(5):571–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Null S, Mouzon N, Elmore L. 2017. Dissolved oxygen, stream temperature, and fish habitat response to environmental water purchases. J Environ Manage. 197:559–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasiewicz P, King EL, Webb JA, Piniewski M, Comoglio C, Wolter C, Buijse AD, Bjerklie D, Vezza P, Melcher A, et al. 2019. The role of floods and droughts on riverine ecosystems under a changing climate. Fish Manag Ecol. 26(6):461–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasiewicz P, Ryan K, Vezza P, Comoglio C, Ballestero T, Rogers J. 2013. Use of quantitative habitat models for establishing performance metrics in river restoration planning. Ecohydrol. 6(4):668–678. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack GB, Wyrick JR. 2017. Flood-driven topographic changes in a gravel-cobble river over segment, reach, and morphological unit scales. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 42(3):487–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszti P. 2019. Study of fish mesohabitat dynamics in the moesa river. [Master thesis]. ETH Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Pearsons TN, Li HW, Lamberti GA. 1992. Influence of habitat complexity on resistance to flooding and resilience of stream fish assemblages. Trans Am Fish Soc. 121(4):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1992)121<0427:IOHCOR>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Person E. 2013. Impact of hydropeaking on fish and their habitat. EPFL-LCH. ISSN 1661–1179.
   Google Scholar
• Person E, Bieri M, Peter A, Schleiss AJ. 2014. Mitigation measures for fish habitat improvement in alpine rivers affected by hydropower operations. Ecohydrol. 7(2):580–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pix4dMapper. 2021. Pix4dMapper. https://www.pix4d.com/product/pix4dmapper-photogrammetry-software.
   Google Scholar
• Rachelly C, Mathers KL, Weber C, Weitbrecht V, Boes RM, Vetsch DF. 2021. How does sediment supply influence refugia availability in river widenings? J Ecohydraulics. 6(2):121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2020.1831415.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves GH, Benda LE, Burnett KM, Bisson PA, Sedell JR. 1995. A disturbance-based ecosystem approach to maintaining and restoring freshwater habitats of evolutionarily significant units of anadromous salmonids in the Pacific Northwest. In American Fisheries Society Symposium. 17: p. 334–349.
   Google Scholar
• Roghair CN, Dolloff CA, Underwood MK. 2002. Response of a brook trout population and instream habitat to a catastrophic flood and debris flow. Trans Am Fish Soc. 131(4):718–730. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<0718:ROABTP>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde S, Kienast F, Bürgi M. 2004. Assessing the restoration success of river widenings: a landscape approach. Environ Manage. 34(4):574–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0158-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld J, Leiter T, Lindner G, Rothman L. 2005. Food abundance and fish density alters habitat selection, growth, and habitat suitability curves for juvenile coho salmon (oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 62(8):1691–1701. https://doi.org/10.1139/F05-072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer AM, Pasternack GB, Moir HJ, Fulton AA. 2010. Riffle-pool maintenance and flow convergence routing observed on a large gravel-bed river. Geomorphology. 114(3):143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutz S, Jurajda P, Kaufmann S, Lorenz AW, Muhar S, Paillex A, Poppe M, Wolter C. 2016. Response of fish assemblages to hydromorphological restoration in central and northern European rivers. Hydrobiologia. 769(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2354-6 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stähly S, Franca MJ, Robinson CT, Schleiss AJ. 2019. Sediment replenishment combined with an artificial flood improves river habitats downstream of a dam. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41575-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanford JA, Lorang M, Hauer F. 2005. The shifting habitat mosaic of river ecosystems. Int Vereinigung Für Theoretische Und Angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen. 29(1):123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2005.98111901979 .
   Google Scholar
• Tamminga A, Eaton B. 2018. Linking geomorphic change due to floods to spatial hydraulic habitat dynamics. Ecohydrology. 11(8):e2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson J, Taylor M, Fryirs K, Brierley G. 2001. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 11(5):373–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner MG, Dale VH. 1998. Comparing large, infrequent disturbances: what have we learned? Ecosystems 1998:493–496. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3658750.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Nat D, Tockner K, Edwards PJ, Ward J, Gurnell AM. 2003. Habitat change in braided flood plains (tagliamento, ne-italy). Freshwater Biol. 48(10):1799–1812. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01126.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooijen E, Vanzo D, Vetsch DF, Boes RM, Siviglia A. 2021. Enhancing an unsupervised clustering algorithm with a spatial contiguity constraint for river habitat analysis. Ecohydrology. 14(4):e2285. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanzo D, Peter S, Vonwiller L, Bürgler M, Weberndorfer M, Siviglia A, Conde D, Vetsch DF. 2021. Basement v3: a modular freeware for river process modelling over multiple computational backends. Environ Modell Software. 143:105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanzo D, Zolezzi G, Siviglia A. 2016. Eco-hydraulic modelling of the interactions between hydropeaking and river morphology. Ecohydrol. 9(3):421–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezza P, Parasiewicz P, Calles O, Spairani M, Comoglio C. 2014a. Modelling habitat requirements of bullhead (cottus gobio) in alpine streams. Aquat Sci. 76(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-013-0306-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezza P, Parasiewicz P, Spairani M, Comoglio C. 2014b. Habitat modeling in high-gradient streams: the mesoscale approach and application. Ecol Appl. 24(4):844–861. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-2066.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vismara R, Azzellino A, Bosi R, Crosa G, Gentili G. 2001. Habitat suitability curves for brown trout (salmo trutta fario l.) in the river adda, northern italy: comparing univariate and multivariate approaches. Regul Rivers: Res Mgmt. 17(1):37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200101/02)17:1<37::AID-RRR606>3.0.CO;2-Q.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton J, Davies T, Mandl M. 1993. A meso-scale field investigation of channel change and floodplain characteristics in an upland braided gravel-bed river, New Zealand. SP. 75(1):241–255. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1993.075.01.15.
   Google Scholar
• Weng Z, Mookerji N, Mazumder A. 2001. Nutrient-dependent recovery of atlantic salmon streams from a catastrophic flood. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 58(8):1672–1682. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton JM, Brasington J, Darby SE, Merz J, Pasternack GB, Sear D, Vericat D. 2010. Linking geomorphic changes to salmonid habitat at a scale relevant to fish. River Res Applic. 26(4):469–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl E, Lane SN, Wilcox AC. 2015. The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resour Res. 51(8):5974–5997. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodworth KA, Pasternack GB. 2022. Are dynamic fluvial morphological unit assemblages statistically stationary through floods of less than ten times bankfull discharge? Geomorphology. 403:108135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolezzi G, Bellin A, Bruno M, Maiolini B, Siviglia A. 2009. Assessing hydrological alterations at multiple temporal scales: Adige River, Italy. Water Resour Res. 45(12):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007266.
   Google Scholar