How to build vegetation patches in hydraulic studies: a hydrodynamic-ecological perspective on a biological object

References

• Aberle J, Järvelä J. 2013. Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation. J Hydra Res. 51(1):33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma T, De Vries M, Low E, Peralta G, Tánczos I, van de Koppel J, Herman PMJ. 2005. Trade‐offs related to ecosystem engineering: a case study on stiffness of emerging macrophytes. Ecology. 86(8):2187–2199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma T, Friedrichs M, Van Wesenbeeck B, Temmerman S, Graf G, Herman P. 2009. Density‐dependent linkage of scale‐dependent feedbacks: a flume study on the intertidal macrophyte Spartina anglica. Oikos. 118(2):260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma TJ, Temmerman S, van Duren LA, Martini E, Vandenbruwaene W, Callaghan DP, Balke T, Biermans G, Klaassen PC, van Steeg P, et al. 2013. Organism traits determine the strength of scale-dependent bio-geomorphic feedbacks: a flume study on three intertidal plant species. Geomorphology. 180–181:57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Jiang C, Nepf H. 2013. Flow adjustment at the leading edge of a submerged aquatic canopy. Water Resour Res. 49(9):5537–5551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Ortiz A, Zong L, Nepf H. 2012. The wake structure behind a porous obstruction and its implications for deposition near a finite patch of emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res. 48(9):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cornacchia L, Folkard A, Davies G, Grabowski RC, Koppel J, Wal D, Wharton G, Puijalon S, Bouma TJ. 2019a. Plants face the flow in V formation: a study of plant patch alignment in streams. Limnol Oceanogr. 64(3):1087–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacchia L, Licci S, Nepf H, Folkard A, Wal D, Koppel J, Puijalon S, Bouma TJ. 2019b. Turbulence‐mediated facilitation of resource uptake in patchy stream macrophytes. Limnol Oceanogr. 64(2):714–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacchia L, Licci S, Van De Koppel J, Van Der Wal D, Wharton G, Puijalon S, Bouma TJ. 2016. Flow velocity and morphology of a submerged patch of the aquatic species Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. Hydrodynamic and mass transport at freshwater aquatic interfaces. Cham: Springer; p. 141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Cornacchia L, Riviere N, Soundar Jerome JJ, Doppler D, Vallier F, Puijalon S. 2022. Flow and wake length downstream of live submerged vegetation patches: how do different species and patch configurations create sheltering in stressful habitats? Water Resour Res. 58(3):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacchia L, van de Koppel J, van der Wal D, Wharton G, Puijalon S, Bouma TJ. 2018. Landscapes of facilitation: how self-organized patchiness of aquatic macrophytes promotes diversity in streams. Ecology. 99(4):832–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornacchia L, Lapetoule G, Licci S, Basquin H, Puijalon S. 2023. Data underlying the publication: how to build vegetation patches in hydraulic studies: a hydrodynamic-ecological perspective on a biological object [Data Set]. 4TU.ResearchData. https://doi.org/10.4121/21786434
   Google Scholar
• De Lima PH, Janzen JG, Nepf HM. 2015. Flow patterns around two neighboring patches of emergent vegetation and possible implications for deposition and vegetation growth. Environ Fluid Mech. 15(4):881–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkard AM. 2011. Flow regimes in gaps within stands of flexible vegetation: laboratory flume simulations. Environ Fluid Mech. 11(3):289–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkard AM. 2019. Biophysical interactions in fragmented marine canopies: fundamental processes, consequences, and upscaling. Front Mar Sci. 6:279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca MS, Cahalan JA. 1992. A preliminary evaluation of wave attenuation by four species of seagrass. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 35(6):565–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman RT. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol. 10(3):133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin P, Dunbar M, Whitehead P. 2008. Flow controls on lowland river macrophytes: a review. Sci Total Environ. 400(1–3):369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessner F. 1955. Hydrobotanik, Die Physiologischen Grundlagen der Pflanzenverbreitung in Wasser. I. Berlin: Energiehaushalt. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisalberti M, Nepf H. 2006. The structure of the shear layer in flows over rigid and flexible canopies. Environ Fluid Mech. 6(3):277–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann E, Puijalon S. 2013. Biomechanical responses of aquatic plants to aerial conditions. Ann Bot. 112(9):1869–1878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam SM. 1978. River plants: The macrophytic vegetation of watercourses. Cambridge University Press; p. 396.
   Google Scholar
• Kondziolka JM, Nepf HM. 2014. Vegetation wakes and wake interaction shaping aquatic landscape evolution. Limnol Oceanogr Fluids Environ. 4(1):106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kouwen N, Unny TE. 1973. Flexible roughness in open channels. J Hydr Div. 99(5):713–728.
   Google Scholar
• Licci S, Delolme C, Marmonier P, Philippe M, Cornacchia L, Gardette V, Bouma T, Puijalon S. 2016. Effect of aquatic plant patches on flow and sediment characteristics: the case of Callitriche platycarpa and Elodea nuttallii. Hydrodynamic and mass transport at freshwater aquatic interfaces. Cham: Springer; p. 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Licci S, Nepf H, Delolme C, Marmonier P, Bouma TJ, Puijalon S. 2019. The role of patch size in ecosystem engineering capacity: a case study of aquatic vegetation. Aquat Sci. 81(3):41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Nepf H. 2016. Sediment deposition within and around a finite patch of model vegetation over a range of channel velocity. Water Resour Res. 52(1):600–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łoboda A, Bialik RJ, Karpiński M, Przyborowski Ł. 2018a. Seasonal changes in the biomechanical properties of Elodea canadensis Michx. Aquat Bot. 147:43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łoboda A, Przyborowski Ł, Karpiński M, Bialik R, Nikora V. 2018b. Biomechanical properties of aquatic plants: the effect of test conditions. Limnol Oceanogr Methods. 16(4):222–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhar M, Nepf HM. 2011. Flow‐induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr. 56(6):2003–2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin‐Diaz B, Bouma TJ, Infantes E. 2020. Role of eelgrass on bed‐load transport and sediment resuspension under oscillatory flow. Limnol Oceanogr. 65(2):426–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion A, Nikora V, Puijalon S, Bouma T, Koll K, Ballio F, Tait S, Zaramella M, Sukhodolov A, O'Hare M, et al. 2014. Aquatic interfaces: a hydrodynamic and ecological perspective. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 52(6):744–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjoribanks TI, Hardy RJ, Lane SN, Tancock MJ. 2017. Patch‐scale representation of vegetation within hydraulic models. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 42(5):699–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjoribanks TI, Lague D, Hardy R, Boothroyd R, Leroux J, Mony C, Puijalon S. 2019. Flexural rigidity and shoot reconfiguration determine wake length behind saltmarsh vegetation patches. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. 124(8):2176–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meire DW, Kondziolka JM, Nepf HM. 2014. Interaction between neighboring vegetation patches: impact on flow and deposition. Water Resour Res. 50(5):3809–3825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray A, Knaapen M, Tal M, Kirwan M. 2008. Biomorphodynamics: physical‐biological feedbacks that shape landscapes. Water Resour Res. 44(11):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ. 1992. Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul M, Bouma T, Amos CL. 2012. Wave attenuation by submerged vegetation: combining the effect of organism traits and tidal current. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 444:31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przyborowski Ł, Łoboda AM, Bialik RJ, Västilä K. 2019. Flow field downstream of individual aquatic plants – experiments in a natural river with Potamogeton crispus L. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. Hydrol Processes. 33(9):1324–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puijalon S, Bornette G. 2004. Morphological variation of two taxonomically distant plant species along a natural flow velocity gradient. New Phytol. 163(3):651–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puijalon S, Bouma TJ, Douady CJ, van Groenendael J, Anten NP, Martel E, Bornette G. 2011. Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance–tolerance trade‐off. New Phytol. 191(4):1141–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puijalon S, Bouma TJ, Van Groenendael J, Bornette G. 2008a. Clonal plasticity of aquatic plant species submitted to mechanical stress: escape versus resistance strategy. Ann Bot. 102(6):989–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puijalon S, Léna JP, Rivière N, Champagne JY, Rostan JC, Bornette G. 2008b. Phenotypic plasticity in response to mechanical stress: hydrodynamic performance and fitness of four aquatic plant species. New Phytol. 177(4):907–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietkerk M, van de Koppel J. 2008. Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol. 23(3):169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rominger JT, Nepf HM. 2014. Effects of blade flexural rigidity on drag force and mass transfer rates in model blades. Limnol Oceanogr. 59(6):2028–2041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand-Jensen K, Mebus JR. 1996. Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos. 76(1):169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand‐Jensen K. 1998. Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near‐bed flow in lowland streams. Freshwater Biol. 39(4):663–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand‐Jensen K, Madsen TV. 1992. Patch dynamics of the stream macrophyte, Callitriche cophocarpa. Freshwater Biol. 27(2):277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoelynck J, Creëlle S, Buis K, De Mulder T, Emsens W-J, Hein T, Meire D, Meire P, Okruszko T, Preiner S, et al. 2018. What is a macrophyte patch? Patch identification in aquatic ecosystems and guidelines for consistent delineation. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 18(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoelynck J, Meire D, Bal K, Buis K, Troch P, Bouma T, Meire P, Temmerman S. 2013. Submerged macrophytes avoiding a negative feedback in reaction to hydrodynamic stress. Limnologica. 43(5):371–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siniscalchi F, Nikora VI, Aberle J. 2012. Plant patch hydrodynamics in streams: mean flow, turbulence, and drag forces. Water Resour Res. 48(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhodolov A, Sukhodolova T, Aberle J. 2022. Modelling of flexible aquatic plants from silicone syntactic foams. J Hydrau Res. 60(1):173–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhodolova T. 2008. Studies of turbulent flow in vegetated river reaches with implications for transport and mixing processes. Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät II: Humboldt-Universität zu.
   Google Scholar
• Temmerman S, Meire P, Bouma TJ, Herman PM, Ysebaert T, De Vriend HJ. 2013. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature. 504(7478):79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinoco RO, Coco G. 2016. A laboratory study on sediment resuspension within arrays of rigid cylinders. Adv Water Resour. 92:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschisgale S, Löhrer B, Meller R, Fröhlich J. 2021. Large eddy simulation of the fluid–structure interaction in an abstracted aquatic canopy consisting of flexible blades. J Fluid Mech. 916:A43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbruwaene W, Temmerman S, Bouma TJ, Klaassen PC, de Vries MB, Callaghan DP, van Steeg P, Dekker F, van Duren LA, Martini E, et al. 2011. Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape. J Geophys Res. 116(F1):n/a–n/a.
   Google Scholar
• Vettori D, Nikora V. 2018. Flow–seaweed interactions: a laboratory study using blade models. Environ Fluid Mech. 18(3):611–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettori D, Nikora V. 2019. Flow-seaweed interactions of Saccharina latissima at a blade scale: turbulence, drag force, and blade dynamics. Aquat Sci. 81(4):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettori D, Rice SP. 2020. Implications of environmental conditions for health status and biomechanics of freshwater macrophytes in hydraulic laboratories. J Ecohydraul. 5(1):71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Chung H, Nepf H. 2016. The onset of sediment transport in vegetated channels predicted by turbulent kinetic energy. Geophys Res Lett. 43(21):11,261–211,268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Nepf H. 2022. Reconfiguration of and drag on marsh plants in combined waves and current. J Fluids Struct. 110:103539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar