Automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, dysfunctional attitudes, core beliefs, and ruminative response styles in unipolar major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: a comparative study

References

• Abramson LY, Metalsky GI, Alloy LB. Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychol Rev. 1989;96(2):358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Urosevic S, et al. The psychosocial context of bipolar disorder: environmental, cognitive, and developmental risk factors. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(8):1043–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT. Depression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT. Cognitive models of depression. J Cogn Psychother. 1987;1(1):5–37.
   Google Scholar
• Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Neeren AM, et al. The psychology of bipolar disorder, new developments and research strategies. In: Jones S, Bentall R, editor. Psychosocial risk factors for bipolar disorder: current and early environment and cognitive styles. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 11–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hollon SD, Kendall PC, Lumry A. Specificity of depressotypic cognitions in clinical depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95(1):52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Kaymak SU, Soygur AH, et al. The distinction between unipolar and bipolar depression: a cognitive theory perspective. Compr Psychiatry. 2013;54(7):740–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Colis MJ, Steer RA, et al. Cognition checklist for mania-revised. Psychiatry Res. 2006;145:233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin R, Dozois DJA, Ogniewicz A, et al. Measuring cognitive errors: initial development of the Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS). Int J Cogn Ther. 2011;4:297–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdel K, Taymur I, Guriz SO, et al. Measuring cognitive errors using the Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS): psychometric properties in clinical and non-clinical samples. PloS One. 2014;9(8):e105956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Kocbiyik S, Yuncu OA. Turkish version of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire: psychometric properties. Depress Res Treat. 2015;2015: 694853.
   Google Scholar
• Simona CK, Amanda SM, Philippe RG, et al. The Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest): validation in a sample of adults with social anxiety disorder. Cognit Ther Res. 2017;41(4):576–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman JS, Silverman JA, Eardley DA. Do maladaptive attitudes cause depression? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(1):28–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam D, Wright K, Smith N. Dysfunctional assumptions in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2004;79(1):193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J, Pope M. Cognitive styles in individuals with bipolar disorders. Psychol Med. 2003;33(06):1081–1088.
   Google Scholar
• Scott J, Stanton B, Garland A, et al. Cognitive vulnerability in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychol Med. 2000;30(2):467–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alatiq Y, Crane C, Williams JMG, et al. Dysfunctional beliefs in bipolar disorder: hypomanic vs. depressive attitudes. J Affect Disord. 2010;122(3):294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perich T, Manicavasagar V, Mitchell PB, et al. Mindfulness, response styles and dysfunctional attitudes in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1):126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters KC, Neale JM. Mania and low self-esteem. J Abnorm Psychol. 1985;94(3):282–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lex C, Meyer TD, Marquart B, et al. No strong evidence for abnormal levels of dysfunctional attitudes, automatic thoughts, and emotional information processing biases in remitted bipolar I affective disorder. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2008;81(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mackali Z, Tosun A, Tosun OC, et al. Validity and reliability study of ‘Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory’ short form. Turkish J Psychiatry. 2014;25(2):124–132.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell W, Jones SH. The Brief HAPPI: a questionnaire to assess cognitions that distinguish between individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and non-clinical controls. J Affect Disord. 2006;93:29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler D, Freeman D, Smith B, et al. The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples. Psychol Med. 2006;36:749–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsekili N, Ak M. Early maladaptive schemas related to unipolar and bipolar depression: similarities and differences. J Cogn-Behav Psychother Res. 2012;1(3):145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Young JE, Brown G. Young Schema Questionnaire. New York (DC): Cognitive Therapy Center of New York; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Cakmak S. Metacognitions about rumination in depression-related mood disorders [dissertation]. Tokat: Gaziosmanpasa University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson SL, McKenzie G, McMurrich S. Ruminative responses to negative and positive affect among students diagnosed with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Cognit Ther Res. 2008;32(5):702–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman GC, Joorman J, Johnson SL. Responses to positive affect: a self-report measure of rumination and dampening. Cognit Ther Res. 2008;32(4):507–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksel B. Seeking complementary model for relationship between attachment, positive and negative emotion regulation and intolerance to uncertainty in explaining anxiety symptoms [dissertation]. Ankara: Hacettepe University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson ME, Boersma K, Engh J, et al. A psychometric evoluation of the Swedish version of the responses to positive affect questionnaire. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014;68(8):588–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133:429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadag F, Oral ET, Yalcın FA, et al. The reliability and validity of the Young Mania Rating Scale in Turkey. Turkish J Psychiatry. 2001;13:107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Angst J, Adolfsson R, Benazzi F, et al. The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients. J Affect Disord. 2005;88(2):217–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahip S, Aydemir O, Akkaya C, et al. Turkish reliability and validity study of the hypomania question list-32- revised version. Turkish J Psychiatry. 2017;28(2):117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Berk M, Malhi GS, Cahill C, et al. The Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS): its development, validation and utility. Bipolar Disorder. 2007;9(6):571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Ozdel K, Kocbiyik S, et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Bipolar Depression Rating Scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(6):1448–1454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery SA, Åsberg MA. New depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer SK, Demir B, Tugal O, et al. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: inter-rater reliability and validity study. Turkish J Psychiatry. 2001;12(3):185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32:50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazıcı MK, Demir B, Tanriverdi N, et al. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Inter-rater reliability and validity study. Turkish J Psychiatry. 1998;9:114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Brown G, Steer RA, et al. Differentiating anxiety and depression: a test of the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis. J Abnorm Psychol. 1987;96(3):179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Yuncu OA, Kocbiyik S. Assessing negative automatic thoughts: psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the cognition checklist. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2015;9(4):e3444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Yesilyaprak N, Akpinar Aslan E. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the cognition checklist for mania. J Cogn-Behav Psychother Res. 2018;7(Supplement 1):25.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira IR, Seixas C, Osorio FL, et al. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest) in a sample of undergraduate students. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2015;12(7–8):20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Weissman AN, Beck AT. Development and the validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: a preliminary investigation. Paper presented at: The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 1978; Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Savasır I, Sahin NH. Evaluation in cognitive-behavioral therapies: frequently used scales. Ankara (DC): Turkish Psychological Association Publications; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Ozdel K. Psychometric properties of the revised and abbreviated form of the Turkish version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale. Psychol Rep. 2016;118(1):180–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell W. The Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory (HAPPI): a pilot study to select cognitions that are elevated in individuals with bipolar disorder compared to non-clinical controls. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2006;34(4):467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Yesilyaprak N, Akpinar Aslan E. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Brief Core Schemas Scale in patients with mood disorders. J Cogn-Behav Psychother Res. 2018;7(Supplement 1):25.
   Google Scholar
• Treynor W, Gonzalez R, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis. Cognit Ther Res. 2003;27:247–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdur-Baker O, Bugay A. The Turkish version of the Ruminative Response Scale: an examination of its reliability and validity. Int J Educ Psychol Community. 2012;10:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Scott J, Haque S, et al. Cognitive style in bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187(5):431–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell W, Colom F, Scott J. The nature and treatment of depression in bipolar disorder: a review and implications for future psychological investigation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(8):1076–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir Y, Mor N. If I only knew why: The relationship between brooding, beliefs about rumination, and perceptions of treatments. Behav Ther. 2014;45(4):553–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batmaz S, Kaymak SU, Kocbiyik S. Metacognitions and emotional schemas: a new cognitive perspective for the distinction between unipolar and bipolar depression. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(7):1546–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar