Comparing Design Features of Campus Buildings with Adaptation/Demolition Outcomes

References

• Baker, H. 2020. “The Adaptation and Demolition of Existing Buildings on Masterplan Sites.” Thesis, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.50098.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H. and A. Moncaster. 2018. “Adaptation and Demolition in a Masterplan Context.” In Building Urban Resilience through Change of Use, edited by S. J. Wilkinson and H. Remøy. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H., A. Moncaster, and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2017. “Decision-Making for the Demolition or Adaptation of Buildings.” In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.16.00026.
   Google Scholar
• Bitter, C., B. E. Ross, S. Parker, and M. Milkovitz. 2021. “Cost Comparison of Typical and Adaptable Precast Parking Structures in the U.S.” Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference of Circular Systems for the Built Environment, Eindhoven/virtual, Netherlands, December.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, R. and P. M. Teuffel. 2019. “Demolition versus Transformation, ‘Mortality of Building Structures’ Depending on Their Technical Building Properties.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 225: 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012016.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. 1994. How Buildings Learn: What Happens after They’re Built. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Brigante, J., B. E. Ross, and M. Bladow. 2023. “Costs of Implementing Design for Adaptability Strategies in Wood-Framed Multifamily Housing.” Journal of Architectural Engineering 29:1: 05022013. https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon Leadership Forum. n.d. “Building with Biomass: Using Buildings to Sequester Carbon at Gigaton-Scale.” Accessed October 1, 2022. https://www.leverforchange.org/challenges/explore-challenges/2030-climate-challenge/building-biomass-using-buildings-sequester-carbon-gigaton-scale/.
   Google Scholar
• Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2013. “AdaptSTAR Model: A Climate-Friendly Strategy to Promote Built Environment Sustainability.” Habitat International 37: 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design Build Network. 2019. “Upcycled Buildings: Sustainability on a Grand Scale.” https://www.designbuild-network.com/analysis/upcycled-buildings/.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, F. 1990. “Measuring Building Performance.” Facilities 8:5: 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002112.
   Google Scholar
• enVerid. n.d. “How to Achieve Sustainable Indoor Air Quality: A Roadmap to Simultaneously Improving Indoor Air Quality & Meeting Building Decarbonization and Climate Resiliency Goals.” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://enverid.com/resources/learning/how-to-achieve-sustainable-indoor-air-quality-a-roadmap-to-simultaneously-improving-indoor-air-quality-meeting-building-decarbonization-and-climate-resiliency-goals/.
   Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer, M., P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink. 2017. “The Circular Economy—A New Sustainability Paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habraken, N. J. 1961. De Dragers en de Mensen, het einde van de massawoningbouw. NV, Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema. https://www.habraken.com/html/supports.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Heidrich, O., J. Kamara, S. Maltese, F. R. Cecconi, and M. C. Dejaco. 2017. “A Critical Review of the Developments in Building Adaptability.” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 35:4: 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-03-2017-0018.
   Google Scholar
• Landman, M. 2016. “Technical Building Properties with the Probability of Elongating the Functional Service Life.” Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C., E. H. K. Yung, and E. H. W. Chan. 2013. “The Application of ARP Modelling to Adaptive Reuse Projects in Hong Kong.” Habitat International 40: 233–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lever for Change. n.d. “2030 Climate Challenge.” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://2030climatechallenge.org/.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D. E., B. E. Ross, and D. Albright. 2020. “Quantifying Adaptability of College Campus Buildings.” In Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2020, virtual. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8783-2_6.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D. E., B. E. Ross, M. Z. Naser, R. Blok, and P. Teuffel. 2021. “Quantitative Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical Parameters and Building Demolition or Adaptation Outcomes.” Architecture, Structures and Construction, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-021-00014-9.
   Google Scholar
• Mouilek, S. 2009. “Design for Adaptability and Deconstruction (DfAD).” Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. n.d. “National Register of Historic Places (U.S. National Park Service).” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. 2004. “Survey on Actual Service Lives for North American Buildings.” In Proceedings of the Woodframe Housing Durability and Disaster Issues Conference, 1–9. Las Vegas.
   Google Scholar
• Pomponi, F. and A. Moncaster. 2017. “Circular Economy for the Built Environment: A Research Framework.” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 710–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RMI. n.d. “Scale Zero: Healthy, Zero-Emission Affordable Housing for All.” Accessed October 1, 2022. https://www.leverforchange.org/challenges/explore-challenges/2030-climate-challenge/scale-zero-healthy-zero-emission-affordable-housing-all/.
   Google Scholar
• Rockow, Z. R. 2020. “Qualitative & Quantitative Analyses of Existing Buildings’ Adaptability.” PhD diss., Clemson University.
   Google Scholar
• Rockow, Z. R., B. E. Ross, and A. K. Becker. 2021. “Comparison of Building Adaptation Projects and Design for Adaptability Strategies.” Journal of Architectural Engineering 27:3: 04021022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, B. E. 2017. “The Learning Buildings Framework for Quantifying Building Adaptability.” In AEI 2017. Oklahoma City, OK. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480502.089.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt III, R. and S. Austin. 2016. Adaptable Architecture: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. and J. Till. 2005. “Flexible Housing: Opportunities and Limits.” Arq: Architectural Research Quarterly 9:2: 157–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135505000199.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, H., B. Davison, P. Hodgson, C. Kitching, and D. D. Tingley. 2023. “What Should an Adaptable Building Look Like?” Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances: 200158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200158.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2014. “The Preliminary Assessment of Adaptation Potential in Existing Office Buildings.” International Journal of Strategic Property Management 18:1: 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. J., H. Remøy, and C. Langston. 2014. Sustainable Building Adaptation: Innovations in Decision-Making. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Zaiontz, C. n.d. “Real Statistics Resource Pack.” Real Statistics Using Excel (website). Accessed July 1, 2020. http://www.real-statistics.com/free-download/real-statistics-resource-pack/.
   Google Scholar