The near real-time deforestation detection system: case study of the DETER system for the Cerrado Biome

References

• Almeida AMR, Specht CD. 2019. Tropical biodiversity: why should we care? 1st ed. de Almeida Ana Maria Rocha, Specht Chelsea D., editors. Lausann: Frontiers Media SA. doi:10.3389/978-2-88945-878-3.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida CA, Maurano LEP, Valeriano DM, Câmara G, Vinhas L, Motta M, Gomes AR, Monteiro AMV, Souza AAA, Messias CG, et al 2022. Metodologia utilizada nos sistemas PRODES e DETER - 2a Edição (Atualizada). São José dos Campos - SP http://mtc-m21d.sid.inpe.br/col/sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21d/2022/08.25.11.46/doc/thisInformationItemHomePage.html
   Google Scholar
• Assis LF, Ferreira KR, Vinhas L, Maurano L, Almeida C, Carvalho A, Rodrigues J, Maciel A, Camargo C. 2019. Terrabrasilis: a spatial data analytics infrastructure for large-scale thematic mapping. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. 8(11):513. doi:10.3390/ijgi8110513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuchle R, Grecchi RC, Shimabukuro YE, Seliger R, Eva HD, Sano E, Achard F. 2015. Land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote sensing sampling approach. Appl Geogr. 58:116–127. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRASIL. 2015. Mapeamento do Uso e Cobertura do Cerrado: Projeto TerraClass Cerrado 2013. [accessed 2022 Jul 19]:[69p.]. http://www.dpi.inpe.br/tccerrado/.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara G, Vinhas L, Ferreira KR, de Queiroz GR, de Souza RCM, Monteiro AMV, de Carvalho MT, Casanova MA, de Freitas UM. 2008. Terralib: an open source GIS library for large-scale environmental and socio-economic applications. In: Hall GB, editor. Open source approaches to spatial data handling. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 247–270. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74831-1_12.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves MED, Soares AR, Sanches ID, Fronza JG. 2021. CBERS data cubes for land use and land cover mapping in the Brazilian Cerrado agricultural belt. Int J Remote Sens. 42(21):8398–8432. doi:10.1080/01431161.2021.1978584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araújo MLS, Sano EE, Bolfe ÉL, Santos JRN, dos Santos JS, Silva FB. 2019. Spatiotemporal dynamics of soybean crop in the Matopiba region, Brazil (1990–2015). Land Use Policy. 80(July 2018):57–67. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.040.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz CG, Souza AADA, Santos DC, Dias MC, da Luz NC, de Moraes DRV, Maia JSA, Gomes AR, Narvaes IDS, Valeriano DM, et al. 2015. DETER-B: the new Amazon near real-time deforestation detection system. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 8(7):3619–3628. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves TAP, Nisgoski S, Oliveira JS, Marcati CR, Ballarin AW, Muñiz GIB. 2016. A contribution to the identification of charcoal origin in Brazil II - Macroscopic characterization of Cerrado species. An Acad Bras Cienc. 88(2):1045–1054. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201620150322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grecchi R, Beuchle R, Vogt P, Shimabukuro YE, Gomes AR. 2017. The potential of landscape metrics for assessing the impacts of selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Anais, editor. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto INPE. Santos: INPE; p. 1684–1691. ISBN: 978-85-17-00088-1.
   Google Scholar
• IBGE. 2023. Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola. Área e Produção de Cereais, Leguminosas e Oleaginosas - Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. [accessed 2023 Mar 1]:[1p.]. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9201-levantamento-sistematico-da-producao-agricola.html?=&t=resultados.
   Google Scholar
• INC. AS. 2019. Avenza Maps®. https://www.avenza.com/avenza-maps/.
   Google Scholar
• INMET. 2018. Banco de Dados Meteorológicos para Ensino e Pesquisa. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. [accessed 2019 Dec 4]. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep.
   Google Scholar
• INPE. 2019. Programa de Monitoramento da Amazônia de demais Biomas – Bioma Cerrado. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS COORDENAÇÃO GERAL DE OBSERVAÇÃO DA TERRA. [accessed 2019 Dec 4]. http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/downloads/.
   Google Scholar
• INPE. 2021. The Cerrado deforestation monitoring project/PRODES. [accessed 2022 Jul 19]. http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/.
   Google Scholar
• INPE. 2022. Divisão de Geração de Imagens. [accessed 2022 Jul 6]. http://www2.dgi.inpe.br/catalogo/explore.
   Google Scholar
• Latrubesse EM, Arima E, Ferreira ME, Nogueira SH, Wittmann F, Dias MS, Dagosta FCP, Bayer M. 2019. Fostering water resource governance and conservation in the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Conserv Sci. Pract. 1:1–8. doi:10.1111/csp2.77.
   Google Scholar
• MMA. 2007. Cerrado e Pantanal: Áreas Prioritárias para Conservação da Biodiversidade. 1st ed. MMA, editor. Brasília - DF: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Parente L, Nogueira S, Baumann L, Almeida C, Maurano L, Affonso AG, Ferreira L. 2021. Quality assessment of the PRODES Cerrado deforestation data. Remote Sens Appl. 21:100444. doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100444.
   Google Scholar
• Ratter JA, Ribeiro F, Bridgewater S. 1997. The Brazilian Cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity. Ann Bot. 80(September 1997):223–230. doi:10.1006/anbo.1997.0469.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JF, Walter BMT. 2008. As principais fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In: Sano S, de Almeida SP, editor. Cerrado: Ecologia e flora. 1st ed. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados/Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; p. 152–212.
   Google Scholar
• Sano EE. 2019. Land use expansion in the Brazilian Cerrado. In: Hosono A, Hamaguchi N, Bojanic A, editor. Innovation with spatial impact: sustainable development of the Brazilian Cerrado. Singapore: Springer Singapore; p. 137–162. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6182-1_5.
   Google Scholar
• Sano EE, Rosa R, Scaramuzza CADM, Adami M, Bolfe EL, Coutinho AC, Esquerdo JCDM, Maurano LEP, Narvaes IDS, Oliveira FJ, Silva EB. 2019. Land use dynamics in the Brazilian Cerrado in the period from 2002 to 2013. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 54. doi:10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza AA, Galvão LS, Korting TS, Almeida CA. 2021. On a data-driven approach for detecting disturbance in the Brazilian savannas using time series of vegetation indices. Remote Sens (Basel). 13(24). doi:10.3390/rs13244959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale Ad, Felfili JM. 2005. Dry biomass distribution in a cerrado sensu stricto site in Brazil central. Revista Árvore. 29(5):661–669. doi:10.1590/S0100-67622005000500001.
   Google Scholar
• Valeriano DM, Mello EMK, Moreira JC, Shimabukuro YE, Duarte V. 2012. Monitoring tropical forest from space: the PRODES digital project. In: Shortis M, Wagner W, Hyyppä J, editor. Photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Melbourne, Australia: ISPRS; p. 1–3. http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/xxxv/congress/comm7/papers/53.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2018. A case study of the Brazil forest investment program: an innovative approach to forest investments. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbres B, Rodríguez-Veiga P, Shimbo JZ, da Conceição Bispo P, Balzter H, Bustamante M, Roitman I, Haidar R, Miranda S, Gomes L, et al. 2021. Mapping the stock and spatial distribution of aboveground woody biomass in the native vegetation of the Brazilian Cerrado biome. For Ecol Manage. 499:119615. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar