References

• An Ecomodernism Manifiesto. 2015. Breacktrough Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 205–224. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ariztia, T., F. Fonseca, and O. Bernasconi. 2019. “Heating Ecologies: Resituating Stocking and Maintenance in Domestic Heating.” Energy Research & Social Science, 47: 128–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariztía, T. 2022. “¿No hay futuro? Apuntes para una sociología de las alternativas.” Economia y Politica 8 (2): 34.
   Google Scholar
• Avanessian, A., F. Berardi, R. Brassier, M. Fisher, N. Land, R. Negarestani, A. Negri, et al. 2017. Aceleracionismo: Estrategias para una transición hacia el postcapitalismo. Buenos Aires: Caja Negra.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y. A. 2012. “What is Frugal, What is Innovation? Towards a Theory of Frugal Innovation.” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2005910.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., and J. Law. 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, H. J. 2019. After Geoengineering: Climate Tragedy, Repair, and Restoration. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• De Laet, M., and A. Mol. 2000. “The Zimbabwe Bush Pump Mechanics of a Fluid Technology.” Social Studies of Science 30 (2): 225–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverría, B. 2013. La modernidad de lo barroco. 2nd ed., 3. reimpr. Mexico D.F: Ed. Era.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gago, V. 2015. La razón neoliberal: Economías barrocas y pragmática popular (Primera edición). Traficantes de Sueños.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. 2021. Como evitar un desastre climatico: Las soluciones que ya tenemos y los avances que a??n necesitamos. https://www.overdrive.com/search?q=EB2CA078-5E7D-4963-B7BC-CA9D9E4E289A
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. 2018. Planetary Improvement: Cleantech Entrepreneurship and the Contradictions of Green Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. 2018. “Grassroots Innovation: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.” Technology in Society 55: 63–69. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, Y., and Tadeo Lima. 2020. Fragmentar el futuro: Ensayos sobre tecnodiversidad. Caja Negra.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. (Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Isenhour, C. 2016. “Unearthing Human Progress? Ecomodernism and Contrasting Definitions of Technological Progress in the Anthropocene.” Economic Anthropology 3 (2): 315–328. doi:10.1002/sea2.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2016. The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future/Sheila Jasanoff. First ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2021. “Limits, Ecomodernism and Degrowth.” Political Geography 87: 102367. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, A. 2001. “Appropriating Technology: The Whole Earth Catalog and Counterculture Environmental Politics.” Environmental History 6 (3): 374–394. doi:10.2307/3985660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Alier, J. 2009. El ecologismo de los pobres: Conflictos ambientales y lenguajes de valoración. 3rd ed. ampl. Barcelona: Icaria.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. First US edition. New York, NY: Public Affairs, an imprint of Perseus Books a subsidiary of Hachette Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1998. Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M. 2017. Frugalidade e Inovação Popular: Novos Caminhos para a Sustentabilidade e a Inclusão Social no Equador. 12, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and S. Sarkar. 2016. “Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions: Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs.” Sustainability 8(1): 51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and M. Fressoli. 2020. “Innovation Without Growth: Frameworks for Understanding Technological Change in a Post-Growth Era.” Organization 28: 380–404. doi:10.1177/1350508420973631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik, J., and B. Bhowmick. 2019. “Revisiting Appropriate Technology with Changing Socio-technical Landscape in Emerging Countries.” Technology in Society 57: 8–19. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E. F. 2011. Small is Beautiful: A study of Economics as if People Mattered. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, D. Abrol, E. Arond, and A. Ely. 2017. Grassroots Innovation Movements. http://site.ebrary.com/id/11251855.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, and H. Thomas. 2014. “Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 63: 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I., and A. Goffey. 2015. In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tironi, M., and I. Rodríguez-Giralt. 2017. “Healing, Knowing, Enduring: Care and Politics in Damaged Worlds.” The Sociological Review 65 (2_suppl): 89–109. doi:10.1177/0081176917712874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2011. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2012. “On Nonscalability: The Living World is Not Amenable to Precision-Nested Scales.” Common Knowledge 18 (3): 505–524. doi:10.1215/0961754X-1630424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üzelgün, M. A., and J. R. Pereira. 2020. “Beyond the Co-Production of Technology and Society: The Discursive Treatment of Technology with Regard to Near-term and Long-Term Environmental Goals.” Technology in Society 61: 107–108. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2018. “The Matrix of Convivial Technology – Assessing Technologies for Degrowth.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1778–1786. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109 (1): 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar