379
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Cluster: Interaction Turns in Knowledge Production

One alternative health device! A methodological proposal to analyze research projects’ orientation towards national health problems

Um dispositivo de saúde alternativo! Uma proposta metodológica para analisar a orientação de projetos de pesquisa para problemas de saúde nacionais

¡Un dispositivo de salud alternativo! Una propuesta metodológica para analizar la orientación de los proyectos de investigación hacia los problemas nacionales de salud

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2196236 | Received 23 Jun 2022, Accepted 24 Mar 2023, Published online: 20 Sep 2023

References

  • Ahumada Barona J., & Miranda Miranda F. 2003. Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad: Algunas reflexiones. Documento preparado para la Organización de Estados Americanos–OEA. Bogotá. Previously available at: http://portal.oas.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=212MRnmEifM%3D&amp%3Btabid=586
  • Arocena, R. 2014. “La investigación universitaria en la democratización del conocimiento.” Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia Tecnología y Sociedad 9 (27): 85–102. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-00132014000300006&lng=es&nrm=iso
  • Arocena, R., and J. Sutz. 2001. “Changing Knowledge Production and Latin American Universities.” Research Policy 30 (8): 1221–1234. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00143-8.
  • Arocena, R., and J. Sutz. 2010. “Weak Knowledge Demand in the South: Learning Divides and Innovation Policies.” Science and Public Policy 37 (8): 571–582. doi:10.3152/030234210X12767691861137.
  • Balaram, P. 2008. “Science, Invention and Pasteur’s Quadrant.” Current Science, 961–962.
  • Bianco, M., N. Gras, and J. Sutz. 2016. “Academic Evaluation: Universal Instrument? Tool for Development?” Minerva 54 (4): 399–421. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9306-9.
  • Bozeman, B., and D. Sarewitz. 2011. “Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation.” Minerva 49 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11024-011-9161-7.
  • Cozzens, S., and J. Sutz. 2014. “Innovation in Informal Settings: Reflections and Proposals for a Research Agenda.” Innovation and Development 4 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2013.876803.
  • Delgado, A. 2010. “¿Democratizar la Ciencia? Diálogo, Reflexividad y Apertura.” Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia Tecnología y Sociedad 5 (15): 9–25. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-00132010000200002&lng=es&nrm=iso
  • FOLEC-CLACSO. 2020. “Evaluando la evaluación de la producción científica. Serie Para Una Transformación de la Evaluación de la Ciencia en América Latina y el Caribe del Foro Latinoamericano sobre Evaluación Científica.” https://www.clacso.org/%0Auna-nueva-evaluacion-academica-para-una-ciencia-con-relevancia-social/.
  • Gibbons, M. 2000. “Mode 2 Society and the Emergence of Context-Sensitive Science.” Science and Public Policy 27 (3): 159–163. doi:10.3152/147154300781782011.
  • Graham, I., J. Logan, M. B. Harrison, S. E. Straus, J. Tetroe, W. Caswell, and N. Robinson. 2006. “Lost in Knowledge Map: Time for a Map?” The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1002/chp.47.
  • Graham, I., and J. Tetroe. 2007. “How to Translate Health Research Knowledge into Effective Healthcare Action.” Healthcare Quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) 10 (3): 20–22. doi:10.12927/hcq..18919.
  • Gras, N. 2022. Formas de evaluación de propuestas de investigación orientadas a problemas del desarrollo. Prácticas y perspectivas desde organizaciones nacionales de ciencia y tecnología e instituciones de educación superior de América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. Available at: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5bc3dc41-bdba-4bee-81f3-68a82d3c6674/content
  • Hicks, D., P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S. de Rijcke, and I. Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature 520 (7548): 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429a.
  • Hoppe de Sousa, W., Zamudio Igami, M. P., and de Souza Bido, D. 2009. “R&D Management and the Stokes Diagram: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 4 (4): 95–109.
  • Natera, J. M., Rojas Rajs, S., & Suárez, M. (2016). “Tecnología e Innovación para el desarrollo inclusivo en el sector salud.” In Sociedad, desarrollo y políticas públicas, edited by J. M. Corona, 1st ed., 301–329. Mexico: Editorial UAM.
  • Natera, J. M., S. Rojas-Rajs, G. Dutrénit, and A. O. Vera-Cruz. 2019. “National Health Problems and Useful Knowledge: Lessons from Public Funding of Diabetes Research in Mexico.” Innovation and Development 9 (2), doi:10.1080/2157930X.2019.1567906.
  • Natera, J., S. Rojas-Rajs, G. Dutrénit, and A. O. Vera-Cruz. 2020. “Knowledge Dialogues for Better Health: Complementarities between Health Innovation Studies and Health Disciplines.” Prometheus 36 (1): 30–50. doi:10.13169/prometheus.36.1.0030
  • Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. “‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge.” Minerva 41: 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250.
  • OECD. 2015. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en.
  • Philip, S. 2017. “Diseases of Poverty and the 10/90 Gap.” In Fighting the Diseases of Poverty, edited by S. Philip, 126–140. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Piovani, J. I. 2014. “Reflexiones metodológicas sobre la evaluación académica.” I Jornada de Debate: Investigación y Evaluación en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (La Plata, 2014), 43–69. Available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/51721/Documento_completo.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Rafols, I., L. Leydesdorff, A. O. Hare, P. Nightingale, and A. Stirling. 2012. “How Journal Rankings Can Suppress Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management.” Research Policy 41(7): 1262–1282. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015.
  • Rafols, I., and A. Yegros. 2017. “Is Research Responding to Health Needs?” SSRN 3106713.
  • Rocha, P. R., and H. M. S. L. David. 2015. “Determination or Determinants? A Debate Based on the Theory on the Social Production of Health.” Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP 49: 129–135. doi:10.1590/S0080-623420150000100017.
  • Rojas Rajs, S., and J. M. Natera. 2019. “Knowledge Mobilization: Contributions for Social Studies in Health.” Revista Ciencias de La Salud 17 (3): 111–131. doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.8369.
  • Rojas-Rajs, S., and E. J. Soto. 2013. “Comunicación para la salud y estilos de vida saludables.” Interface – Comunicação, Saúde, Educação 17 (46): 587–599. doi:10.1590/S1414-32832013000300008.
  • Rycroft-Malone, J., C. R. Burton, T. Bucknall, I. D. Graham, A. M. Hutchinson, and D. Stacey. 2016. “Collaboration and Co-Production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges.” Kerman University of Medical Sciences 5 (4): 221–223. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.08.
  • Simmons, P. E., Brunkhorst, H., Lunetta, V., Penick, J., Peterson, J., Pietrucha, B., and Staver, J. (2005). “Developing a Research Agenda in Science Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14 (2): 239–252.
  • Stokes, D. E. 1997. “Pasteur’s Quadrant.” Political Science 92 (3): 180. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
  • Tijssen, R. J. W. 2010. “Discarding the ‘Basic Science/Applied Science’ Dichotomy: A Knowledge Utilization Triangle Classification System of Research Journals.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (9): 1842–1852.
  • Tsao, J. Y., Boyack, K. W., Coltrin, M. E., Turnley, J. G., and Gauster, W. B. 2008. “Galileo’s Stream: A Framework for Understanding Knowledge Production.” Research Policy 37 (2): 330–352.
  • WHO, OMS, Neelam, S., W. Savedoff, A. Sengupta, A. Marie, R. López, et al. 2013. The World Health Report 2013: Research for Universal Health Coverage. Luxembourg: World Health Organization Press. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240690837
  • Yazdizadeh, B., R. Majdzadeh, and H. Salmasian. 2010. “Systematic Review of Methods for Evaluating Healthcare Research Economic Impact.” Health Research Policy and Systems 8: 1–8. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-8-6.
  • Yegros–Yegros, A., Van de Klippe, W., Abad–Garcia, M. F., & Rafols, I. 2020. “Exploring Why Global Health Needs are Unmet by Research Efforts: The Potential Influences of Geography, Industry and Publication Incentives.” Health Research Policy and Systems 18: 1–14.