788
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Cluster: Interaction Turns in Knowledge Production

Knowing from conflict: interculturality as a space of interaction for the production of knowledges

ORCID Icon
Article: 2207866 | Received 23 Jun 2022, Accepted 25 Apr 2023, Published online: 13 Jul 2023

References

  • Arocena, Rodrigo, and Judith Sutz. 2009. “Sistemas de innovación e inclusión social.” Pensamiento Iberoamericano 5 (2): 99–120.
  • Beck, U. 1998. La Sociedad del Riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
  • Biset, Emilio. 2021. “¿Qué es una ontología política?” Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político 15: 323–346. https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.5613.
  • Blaser, Mario. 2018. “¿Es otra cosmopolítica posible?” Anthropologica 36 (41): 115–144. https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201802.005.
  • Boghossian, Paul. 2009. El miedo al conocimiento. Contra el relativismo y el constructivismo. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.
  • Boswell, Christina. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unicamp/docDetail.action?docID=10333229.
  • Briggs, John. 2013. “Indigenous Knowledge: A False Dawn for Development Theory and Practice?” Progress in Development Studies 13 (3): 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993413486549.
  • Callon, Michel. 1999. “The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Science Technology & Society 4 (1): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400106.
  • Carroll, William. 2015. “Modes of Cognitive Praxis in Transnational Alternative Policy Groups.” Globalizations 12 (5): 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.1001231.
  • Casas-Cortés, Maria Isabel, Michael Osterweil, and Dana Powell. 2008. “Blurring Boundaries: Recognizing Knowledge-Practices in the Study of Social Movements.” Anthropological Quarterly 81 (1): 17–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2008.0006.
  • Choudry, A. 2014. “Activist Research and Organizing: Blurring the Boundaries, Challenging the Binaries.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 33 (4): 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2013.867907.
  • Collins, Harry, Robert Evans, and Mike Gorman. 2007. “Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (4): 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.003.
  • Conde, Marta. 2014. “Activism Mobilising Science.” Ecological Economics 105: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.012.
  • Corburn, Jason. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA, London, UK: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20179
  • Cruz-Rodríguez, Edwin. 2013. “Multiculturalismo e interculturalismo: Una lectura comparada.” Cuadernos Interculturales 11 (20): 45–76. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55228138003
  • Cunha, Maria Carneiro. 2007. “Relações e dissensões entre saberes tradicionais e saberes científicos.” Revista USP, São Paulo, n75, 76–84, September/November.
  • De la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond ‘Politics’.” Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x.
  • Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Flórez, Juliana. 2007. “Tácticas de des-sujeción: Disenso, subjetividad y deseo en los movimientos sociales. Relaciones de género en la red ‘Proceso de Comunidades Negras’ del Pacífico colombiano.” Athenea Digital 12: 397–402. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v0n12.439.
  • Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Genus, Audley, and Anne-Marie Coles. 2005. “On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4): 433–443. Routledge, Londres. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357251.
  • Goñi-Mazzitelli, Maria, Camila Zeballos-Lereté, and Mariela Bianco-Bozzo. 2022. “Construyendo agendas situadas de conocimiento: experiencias desde la Universidad de la República en Uruguay.” Revista Del IICE 50 (50): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.34096/iice.n50.11267.
  • Harding, Sandra. 2016. “Latin America Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge: Aliances and Tensions.” Science, Technology & Human Values 1 (# 25): 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656465.
  • Hill, Rosemary, Çigdem Adem, Wilfred Alangui, Zsolt Molnár, Yildiz Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Peter Bridgewater, and Dayuan Xue. 2020. “Working with Indigenous, Local and Scientific Knowledge in Assessments of Nature and Nature’s Linkages with People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 43: 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2019.12.006.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. “States of Knowledge: The co-Production of Science and Social Order.” In Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, edited by S. Jasanoff, (Vol. 36) 2–12. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845
  • Kreimer, Pablo. 2015. “Co-producing Social Problems and Scientific Knowledge: Chagas Disease and the Dynamics of Research Fields in Latin America.” In Sociology of Science Yearbook, edited by Martina Merz and Philippe Sormani, 173–190. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Kullenberg, Christopher. 2015. “Citizen Science as Resistance: Crossing the Boundary Between Reference and Representation.” Journal of Resistance Studies 1 (1): 50–76.
  • Latour, Bruno. 1994. Jamais Fomos Modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Coleção TRANS, Editora 34.
  • Latour, Bruno. 2008. “Reensamblando los social: Una introducción a la teoría del actor-red.” In Ediciones Manantial, edited by Manantial, 392. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Oxford University press.
  • Ludwig, David, and Charbel El-Hani. 2020. “Philosophy of Ethnobiology: Understanding Knowledge Integration and its Limitations.” Journal of Ethnobiology 40 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.1.3.
  • Meurer, Michaela. 2021. “Rethinking Political Ontology. Notes on a Practice-Relat­ed Approach and a Brazilian Conservation Area.” Berliner Blätter 84: 77–91. http://www2.hu-berlin.de/ifeeojs/index.php/blaetter/article/view/1119
  • Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. 2014. Ecofeminismo. Barcelona, Spain: Icaria Antrazyt.
  • Mol, Annemarie. 2007. “Política ontológica. Algumas ideias e várias perguntas.” In Objectos impuros: experiências em estudos sociais da ciência, edited by J. Nunes and R. Roque, 63–75. Porto, Portugal: Afrontamento.
  • Molina-Andrade, Adela. 2017. “Algunas aproximaciones a una perspectiva intercultural: Entre discursos generales de la educación y específicos centrados en la naturaleza de lo que se quiere enseñar.” TED: Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis 2 (42): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.6971.
  • Monteiro, Fabrício. 2022. “Some Elements of the Regime of Management of Irrelevance in Science.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 5: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2035951.
  • Moreno-Cely, Adriana, Darío Cuajera-Nahui, Cesar Gabriel Escobar-Vasquez, Tom Vanwing, and Nelson Tapia-Ponce. 2021. “Breaking Monologues in Collaborative Research: Bridging Knowledge Systems Through a Listening-Based Dialogue of Wisdom Approach.” Sustainability Science 16 (3): 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-021-00937-8/FIGURES/2.
  • Nogueira, Leticia, Maiken Bjørkan, and Brigt Dale. 2021. “Conducting Research in a Post-Normal Paradigm: Practical Guidance for Applying Co-Production of Knowledge.” Frontiers in Environmental Science 9 (699397): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.699397.
  • Noguera, Ana Patricia, Leonardo Ramírez, and Sergio Manuel Echeverri. 2020. “Métodoestesis.” Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental 11 (3): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.3897.
  • Noorani, Tehseen, and Julian Brigstocke. 2018. “More-Than-Human Participatory Research.” In Connected Communities Foundation Series, edited by K. Facer and K. Dunleavy, 1–40. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
  • Parra-Romero, Adela. 2016. “¿Por qué pensar un giro decolonial en el análisis de los conflictos socioambientales en América Latina?” Ecología Política 51: 15–20.
  • Parra-Romero, Adela. 2020. “Producción de conocimiento en conflictos socioambientales.” Revista de Ciências Sociais 51 (2): 37–83. https://doi.org/10.36517/rcs.51.2.d02; https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8110848
  • Polanyi, Michael. 1983. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Reyes-Galindo, Luis, and Thiago Duarte. 2017. “Introduction: Intercultural Communication and Science and Technology Studies.” In Intercultural Communication and Science and Technology Studies, edited by L. Reyes-Galindo and T. Ribeiro Duarte, 1–21. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Robinson, Catherin, and Tabatha Wallington. 2012. “Boundary Work: Engaging Knowledge Systems in Co-management of Feral Animals on Indigenous Lands.” Ecology and Society 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04836-170216.
  • Robles-Piñeros, Jairo, David Ludwig, Geilsa Costa Santos Baptista, and Adela Molina-Andrade. 2020. “Intercultural Science Education as a Trading Zone Between Traditional and Academic Knowledge.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 84: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHPSC.2020.101337.
  • Rodriguez Medina, L. 2014. Centers and Peripheries in Knowledge Production. New York, NY, and London, UK: Routledge.
  • Rowe, Gene, and Lynn Frewer. 2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 25 (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2009. Una epistemología del sur: la reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social, edited by José Guadalupe Garandilla Salgado. México City, Mexico: Siglo XXI, CLACSO.
  • Santos, Boaventura de Souza. 2010. Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Montevideo, Uruguay: Trilce.
  • Taylor, Ch. 1993. El multiculturalismo y la "política del reconocimiento." México City, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Tengö, Maria, Rosemary Hill, Pernilla Malmer, Christopher Raymond, Marja Spierenburg, Finn Danielsen, and Carl Folke. 2017. “Weaving Knowledge Systems in IPBES, CBD and Beyond – Lessons Learned for Sustainability.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2016.12.005.
  • Toomey, Anne. 2016. “What Happens at the Gap Between Knowledge and Practice? Spaces of Encounter and Misencounter Between Environmental Scientists and Local People.” Ecology and Society 21 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08409-210228.
  • Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2005. Friction. An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tym, Christian. 2023. “Antropología ontológica e interculturalidad de la salud en el pueblo shuar de Zamora-Chinchipe.” Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 75: 163–180. https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.75.2023.5445.
  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation.” Tipití 2: 3–22. http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol2/iss1/1
  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2010. Metafísicas caníbales. Líneas de Antropología Posestructural. Madrid, Spain: Katz Editores.
  • Walsh, Catherine. 2008. “Interculturalidad, plurinacionalidad y decolonialidad: las insurgencias político-epistémicas de refundar el Estado.” In Tabula Rasa, N°9, edited by Pedro and João Editores, 131–152. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca.
  • Walsh, Catherine. 2010. ¿Interculturalidad y (de)colonialidad? Gritos, grietas y siembras desde Abya Yala. https://redivep.com/sitio/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CATHERIN-WALSH.pdf
  • Walsh, Catherine. 2012. “Interculturalidad y (de)colonialidad: Perspectivas críticasy políticas. Visão Global.” Joaçaba 15 (1–2): 61–74.