References

• Aceros, J. C., and M. Domènech. 2021. “Private Issues in Public Spaces: Regimes of Engagement at a Citizen Conference.” Minerva 59 (2): 195–215. doi:10.1007/s11024-020-09423-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta, M., J. M. Azagra-Caro, and D. Coronado. 2016. “Access to Universities’ Public Knowledge: Who is More Regionalist?” Regional Studies 50 (3): 446–459. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.923094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. K. 2001. “University-to-industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions.” International Journal of Management Reviews 3 (4): 285–302. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albornoz, M. B., and I. Pérez Ones. 2020. “Researching Public Policy in the Making: The Ecuadorian Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3 (1): 107–124. doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1795494
   Google Scholar
• Argote, L., and P. Ingram. 2000. “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1): 150–169. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., R. Putman, R. D. Putnam, and D. M. Smith. 1985. Vol. 13 of Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
   Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M., A. Fernández-Mesa, and N. Robinson-García. 2020. “‘Getting Out of the Closet’: Scientific Authorship of Literary Fiction and Knowledge Transfer.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 45 (1): 56–85. doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9672-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M., L. González-Salmerón, and P. Marques. 2021. “Fiction Lagging Behind or Non-Fiction Defending the Indefensible? University–Industry (et al.) Interaction in Science Fiction.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 46 (6): 1889–1916. doi:10.1007/s10961-020-09834-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J. M., and O. Llopis. 2018. “Who Do You Care About? Scientists’ Personality Traits and Perceived Impact on Beneficiaries.” R&D Management 48 (5): 566–579. doi:10.1111/radm.12308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, E. C., A. R. Sengik, and J. Tello-Gamarra. 2021. “Fifty Years of University-Industry Collaboration: A Global Bibliometrics Overview.” Science and Public Policy 48 (2): 177–199. doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodorkós, B., and G. Pataki. 2009. “Local Communities Empowered to Plan?” Action Research 7 (3): 313–334. doi:10.1177/1476750309336720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L. 2013. “What is Societal Impact of Research and How Can it be Assessed? A Literature Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (2): 217–233. doi:10.1002/asi.22803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., H. Rimes, and J. Youtie. 2015. “The Evolving State-of-the-Art in Technology Transfer Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model.” Research Policy 44 (1): 34–49. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H. 2015. “Introduction: How to Situate and Define Action Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Action Research, edited by H. Bradbury, 1–9. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, T., and D. Coghlan. 2007. “In Defense of Being ‘Native’: The Case for Insider Academic Research.” Organizational Research Methods 10 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1177/1094428106289253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buenstorf, G., and M. Geissler. 2013. “Not Invented Here: Technology Licensing, Knowledge Transfer and Innovation Based on Public Research.” In The Two Sides of Innovation, edited by G. Buenstorf, U. Cantner, H. Hanusch, M. Hutter, H. W. Lorenz, and F. Rahmeyer, 77–107. Cham.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., and D. F. Campbell. 2009. “‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3–4): 201–234. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., O. Llopis, F. Rentocchini, and A. Yegros. 2019. “The Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Distinct Modes of University-Industry Interaction.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103799. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., I. Ramos-Vielba, R. Woolley, and N. Amara. 2018. “How do Researchers Generate Scientific and Societal Impacts? Toward an Analytical and Operational Framework.” Science and Public Policy 45 (6): 752–763. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. “Issue Papers for the High Level Group on Maximising the Impact of EU Research and Innovation Programmes.” http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/hlg_issue_papers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evered, R., and M. R. Louis. 1981. “Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: ‘Inquiry from the Inside’ and ‘Inquiry from the Outside’.” The Academy of Management Review 6 (3): 385–395. doi:10.2307/257374.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, I. M. B., and B. Verspagen. 2017. “The Motivations, Institutions and Organization of University-Industry Collaborations in the Netherlands.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27 (3): 379–412. doi:10.1007/s00191-017-0495-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. 2018. “RRI: How to ‘Mainstream’ the ‘Upstream’ Engagement.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (03): C06. doi:10.22323/2.17030306.
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., and G. Laudel. 2015. “A Bibliometric Reconstruction of Research Trails for Qualitative Investigations of Scientific Innovations.” Historical Social Research 40 (3): 299–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goñi Mazzitelli, M., C. Zeballos, and M. Bianco Bozzo. 2021. “Construyendo agendas situadas de conocimiento: Experiencias desde la Universidad de la República en Uruguay.” Revista del IICE 50: 75–90. doi:10.34096/iice.n50.11267
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, S., and M. D. Santoro. 2004. “Distinguishing Between Knowledge Transfer and Technology Transfer Activities: The Role of key Organizational Factors.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 (1): 57–69. doi:10.1109/TEM.2003.822461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayter, C. S., E. Rasmussen, and J. H. Rooksby. 2020. “Beyond Formal University Technology Transfer: Innovative Pathways for Knowledge Exchange.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 45 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9677-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, J., and P. Reason. 2008. “The Practice of Co-Operative Inquiry: Research ‘with’ Rather Than ‘on’ People.” In Handbook of Action Research. 2nd ed., edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 144–154. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hmieleski, K. M., and E. E. Powell. 2018. “The Psychological Foundations of University Science Commercialization: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research.” Academy of Management Perspectives 32 (1): 43–77. doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, N. 2020. “Public Participation and Democratization: Effects on the Production and Consumption of Science and Technology.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3 (1): 227–253. doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2005. Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. F., R. J. McQueen, and L. S. John. 1997. “Can Action Research be Made More Rigorous in a Positivist Sense? The Contribution of an Iterative Approach.” Journal of Systems and Information Technology 1 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1108/13287269780000732.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2020. “Hybrids, Identity and Knowledge Boundaries: Creative Artists Between Academic and Practitioner Communities.” Human Relations 73 (6): 837–863. doi:10.1177/0018726719846259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., S. A. Lynham, and E. G. Guba. 2011. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 4: 97–128.
   Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., D. S. Siegel, and B. Bozeman. 2007. “An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Informal University Technology Transfer.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16 (4): 641–655. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2012. Action Research for Teachers: A practical Guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noriega, C. A. 2020. “Not Inconceivable: Knowledge-Production, the Arts, and the pre-History of a Puerto Rican Artist, 1934–1882.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3 (1): 63–91. doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1763687
   Google Scholar
• Nsanzumuhire, S. U., and W. Groot. 2020. “Context Perspective on University-Industry Collaboration Processes: A Systematic Review of Literature.” Journal of Cleaner Production 258: 120861. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Z. 2014. The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project. 2nd ed.. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orazbayeva, B., T. Davey, C. Plewa, and V. Galán-Muros. 2020. “Engagement of Academics in Education-Driven University-Business Cooperation: A Motivation-Based Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (8): 1723–1736. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1582013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., R. Salandra, V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, and A. Hughes. 2021. “Academic Engagement: A Review of the Literature 2011–2019.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104114. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, H., and M. Fernández-Esquinas. 2018. “What do Stakeholders Think About Knowledge Transfer Offices? The Perspective of Firms and Research Groups in a Regional Innovation System.” Industry and Innovation 25 (1): 25–52. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1270820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöö, K., and T. Hellström. 2019. “University–Industry Collaboration: A Literature Review and Synthesis.” Industry and Higher Education 33 (4): 275–285. doi:10.1177/0950422219829697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skute, I., K. Zalewska-Kurek, I. Hatak, and P. de Weerd-Nederhof. 2019. “Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on University–Industry Collaborations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44 (3): 916–947. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9637-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaapen, J., and L. Van Drooge. 2011. “Introducing ‘productive Interactions’ in Social Impact Assessment.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 211–218. doi:10.3152/095820211X12941371876742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin, A. K., and H. Kotaman. 2013. “The Epistemological Perspectives on Action Research.” Journal of Educational and Social Research 3 (1): 81–91. doi:10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p81.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. 2001. “Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (5): 996–1004. doi:10.2307/3069443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vick, T. E., and M. Robertson. 2018. “A Systematic Literature Review of UK University-Industry Collaboration for Knowledge Transfer: A Future Research Agenda.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 579–590. doi:10.1093/scipol/scx086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehn, U., and C. Montalvo. 2018. “Knowledge Transfer Dynamics and Innovation: Behaviour, Interactions and Aggregated Outcomes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 171: S56–S68. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.198
   Google Scholar