491
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Funding of research agendas about the global south in Latin America and the Caribbean: lexicometric and content analysis in Latin American scientific production

Financiamento de agendas de pesquisa sobre o sul global na América Latina e Caribe: análise lexicométrica e de conteúdo na produção científica latinoamericana

Financiación de agendas de investigación sobre el sur global en América Latina y el Caribe: análisis lexicométrico y de contenido en producción científica latinoamericana

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2218260 | Received 01 Jun 2022, Accepted 22 May 2023, Published online: 04 Dec 2023

References

  • Abdenur, A. E., and J. M. E. M. Da Fonseca. 2013. “The North’s Growing Role in South–South Cooperation: Keeping the Foothold.” Third World Quarterly 34 (8): 1475–1491. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.831579
  • Ai, M., and M. Masood. 2021. “De-Westernization in Journalism Research: A Content and Network Analysis of the BRICS Journals.” Scientometrics 126: 9477–9498. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04194-5.
  • Albuquerque, A., and T. de Oliveira. 2021. “Thinking the Recolonial in Communication Studies: Reflections from Latin America Afonso de Albuquerque/Pensando o Recolonial nos estudos da Comunicacao: Reflexoes a partir da America Latina.” Comunicacao, Midia E Consumo 18 (51): 82–103.
  • Albuquerque, A., T. M. de Oliveira, M. A. dos Santos Junior, and S. O. F. de Albuquerque. 2020. Structural Limits to the De-Westernization of the Communication Field: The Editorial Board in Clarivate's JCR system. Communication, Culture & Critique 13 (2): 185-203. doi:10.18568/cmc.v18i51.2521.
  • Albuquerque, A., and D. Lycarião. 2018. “Winds of Change? BRICS as a Perspective in International Media Research.” International Journal Of Communication 12: 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8549.
  • Anievas, A., and K. Matin. 2016. Historical Sociology and World History. Uneven and Combined Development Over the Longue Durée. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Araújo, R. F. D., and A. L. Appel. 2021. "Open Science Research Projects Funding: An Analysis of Dimensions Data. Encontros Bibli: Revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação. O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica 24 (2): 19-1.
  • Barata, G. 2019. Por métricas alternativas mais relevantes para a América Latina. Transinformação, 31.
  • Bardin, L. 2016. Análise de conteúdo [Content Analysis]. Translated by L. Reto. São Paulo Edições, 70.
  • Beigel, M. F. 2013. “Centros y periferias en la circulación internacional del conocimiento.” Fundación Foro Nueva Sociedad; Nueva Sociedad 245 (5-2013): 110–123. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/1232.
  • Beigel, F. 2016. “El nuevo carácter de la dependencia intelectual.” Cuestiones De sociología (14): e004. http://www.cuestionessociologia.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/CSn14a04.
  • Beigel, F. 2019. “Indicadores de circulación: Una perspectiva multi-escalar Para medir la producción científico-tecnológica latinoamericana.” Ciencia, Tecnología y Política 2 (3): 028–028. doi:10.24215/26183188e028.
  • Beigel, F., A. L. Packer, O. Gallardo, and M. Salatino. 2023. “OLIVA: The Scientific Output in Journals Edited in Latin America. Disciplinary Diversity, Institutional Collaboration, and Multilingualism in SciELO and Redalyc (1995-2018).” Dados 67: e20210174. doi:10.1590/dados.2024.67.1.307x.
  • Bernardino-Costa, J., and R. Grosfoguel. 2016. “Decolonialidade e perspectiva negra.” Sociedade e Estado 31 (1): 15–24. doi:10.1590/S0102-69922016000100002.
  • Bhambra, G. K. 2007. Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
  • Bornmann, L., L. Leydesdorff, C. Walch-Solimena, and C. Ettl. 2011. “Mapping Excellence in the Geography of Science: An Approach Based on Scopus Data.” Journal of Informetrics 5 (4): 537–546.
  • Boshoff, N. 2009. “Neo-Colonialism and Research Collaboration in Central Africa.” Scientometrics 81, 413–434.
  • Bresser-Pereira, L. C., and D. Theuer. 2012. “Um estado novo-desenvolvimentista na América Latina?” Economia e sociedade 21: 811–829. doi:10.1590/S0104-06182012000400005
  • Brown, J. M. 2006. Global South Asians: Introducing the Modern Diaspora (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burron, N. A. 2014. “Counter-Hegemony in Latin America? Undestanding Emerging Multipolarity Through a Gramscian Lens.” Revue québécoise de droit international / Quebec Journal of International Law / Revista quebequense de derecho internacional, 33–68. doi:10.7202/1068072ar.
  • Camargo, B. V., and A. M. Justo. 2013. “IRAMUTEQ: Um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais.” Temas em psicologia 21 (2): 513–518. doi:10.9788/TP2013.2-16
  • Chabowski, B. R., S. Samiee, and G. T. M. Hult. 2013. “A Bibliometric Analysis of the Global Branding Literature and a Research Agenda.” Journal of International Business Studies 44 (6): 622–634. doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.20
  • Chase-Dunn, C., and T. Hall. 2016. “The Historical Evolution of World-Systems.” In Strukturelle Evolution und das Weltsystem, edited by G. Preyer. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09907-7_14
  • Chaturvedi, S., T. Fues, and E. Sidiropoulos. 2012. “Development Cooperation: Contours, Evolution and Scope.” Development Cooperation and Emerging Powers, 13–36. doi:10.5040/9781350219564.ch-001.
  • Chavarro, D., I. Ràfols, and P. Tang. 2018. “To What Extent is Inclusion in the Web of Science an Indicator of Journal ‘Quality’?” Research Evaluation 27 (2): 106–118. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy001.
  • Colpean, M., and R. Dingo. 2018. “Beyond Drive-by Race Scholarship: The Importance of Engaging Geopolitical Contexts.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15 (4): 306–311. doi:10.1080/14791420.2018.1533988.
  • Dados, N., and R. Connell. 2012. “The Global South.” Contexts 11 (1): 12–13. doi:10.1177/1536504212436479
  • De Oliveira, T. M., F. P. J. Marques, A. Veloso Leão, A. de Albuquerque, J. L. A. Prado, R. Grohmann, A. Clinio, D. Cogo, and L. S. Guazina. 2021. “Towards an Inclusive Agenda of Open Science for Communication Research: A Latin American Approach.” Journal of Communication 71 (5): 785–802.
  • Demeter, M. 2021. “Development Studies in the World System of Global Knowledge Production: A Critical Empirical Analysis.” Progress in Development Studies, 14649934211060155. doi:10.1177/14649934211060155.
  • Demir, I. 2017. “The Global South as Foreignization: The Case of the Kurdish Diaspora in Europe.” Global South 11 (2): 54–70. doi:10.2979/globalsouth.11.2.04
  • Donelli, F., and A. Gonzalez-Levaggi. 2016. “Becoming Global Actor: The Turkish Agenda for the Global South.” Rising Powers Quarterly 1 (2): 93–115.
  • Dutta, M., S. Ramasubramanian, M. Barrett, C. Elers, D. Sarwatay, P. Raghunath, D. Zapata, et al. 2021. “Decolonizing Open Science: Southern Interventions.” Journal of communication 71 (5): 803–826.
  • Fernández, V. R., L. Moretti, and E. Ormaechea. 2022. “Divergent Convergence: Complementing Theoretical Approaches for Understanding the Rise of the Global South and the Challenges for the Rest.” Journal of World-Systems Research 28 (1): 98–126.
  • Escobar, A. 2003. “Mundos y conocimientos de outro modo: El programa de investigación de modernidad/colonialidade latinoamericano.” Tabula Rasa 1: 51–86. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id = 39600104. doi:10.25058/20112742.188
  • Ganter, S. A., and F. Ortega. 2019. “The Invisibility of Latin American Scholarship in European Media and Communication Studies: Challenges and Opportunities of de-Westernization and Academic Cosmopolitanism.” International Journal of Communication 13: 68–91. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8449.
  • García-Gutiérrez, A. 2014. “La Organización del conocimiento en el nuevo orden transcultural: Del totalitarismo a la desclasificación (la razón como creencia y la oc como burocracia).” Brazilian Journal of Information Science 8 (1-2): 1–34. doi:10.5016/10.5016/1981-16.
  • Goyanes, M. 2019. “Diversidad geográfica y de género en los comités editoriales de las revistas en comunicación.” Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 25 (1): 251. doi:10.5209/ESMP.63727
  • Grant, J. 2015. “Live Aid/8: Perpetuating the Superiority Myth.” Critical Arts 29 (3): 310–326. doi:10.1080/02560046.2015.1059547
  • Grosfoguel, R. 2008. “Para descolonizar os estudos de economia política e os estudos pós-coloniais: Transmodernidade, pensamento de fronteira e colonialidade global.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 80: 115–147. doi:10.4000/rccs.697.
  • Grosfoguel, R. 2012. “Decolonizing Werstern Uni-versalisms: Decolonial Pluri-versalism from Aimé Césaire to the Zapatistas.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World. Merced 1 (3): 88–104. doi:10.5070/t413012884.
  • Guha, R., and G. C. Spivak, eds. 1982. Subaltern Studies (Vol. 11). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Hayes, D. (1975). “Solar Power in the Middle East.” Science 188 (4195): 1261-1261.
  • Huang, M. H., and M. J. Huang. 2018. “An Analysis of Global Research Funding from Subject Field and Funding Agencies Perspectives in the G9 Countries.” Scientometrics 115 (2): 833–847.
  • Hytten, E., and M. Marchioni. (1970). Industrializzazione senza sviluppo. Gela: Une storia meridionale.
  • Ibarra, D. 2011. “O neoliberalismo na América Latina.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 31: 238–248. doi:10.1590/S0101-31572011000200004
  • Jacsó, P. 2005. “Google Scholar: The Pros and the Cons.” Online Information Review 29 (2): 208–214. doi:10.1108/14684520510598066
  • Larivière, V., S. Haustein, and P. Mongeon. 2015. “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.” PLOS ONE 10 (6): e0127502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
  • Lima, M. C., and C. M. Maranhao. 2009. “O sistema de educação superior mundial: Entre a internacionalização ativa e passiva.” Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior 14 (3): 583–610. doi:10.1590/S1414-40772009000300004.
  • López, A. J. 2007. “Introduction: The (Post) Global South.” The Global South, 1–11. doi:10.2979/gso.2007.1.1.1.
  • Mahler, A. G. 2017. “Global South.” In Oxford Bibliographies in Literary and Critical Theory, edited by Eugene O’Brien. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Mandják, T., Z. Szalkai, E. Neumann-Bódi, M. Magyar, and J. Simon. 2015. “Emerging Relationships: How are They Born?” Industrial Marketing Management 49: 32–41. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.031.
  • Marchand, É, and W. E. Strawderman. 2013. “On Bayesian Credible Sets, Restricted Parameter Spaces and Frequentist Coverage.” Electronic Journal of Statistics 7 (0): 1419–1431. doi:10.1214/13-ejs806.
  • Martín-Martín, A., E. Orduna-Malea, M. Thelwall, and E. Delgado López-Cózar. 2018. “Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A Systematic Comparison of Citations in 252 Subject Categories.” Journal of Informetrics 12 (4): 1160–1177. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.
  • Matthews, J., and K. Onyemaobi. 2020. “Precarious Professionalism: Journalism and the Fragility of Professional Practice in the Global South.” Journalism Studies 21 (13): 1836–1851. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2020.1797524.
  • Mawdsley, E., E. Fourie, and W. Nauta, eds. 2019. Researching South-South Development Cooperation: The Politics of Knowledge Production. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mazzetti, A. C., J. C. Wedig, M. A. Perondi, and M. Rubin-Oliveira. 2021. “América Latina em Perspectiva: Oo pensamento cepalino e decolonial.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais 23: e202111, 1-22. doi:10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202111.
  • Mejia, C., and Y. Kajikawa. 2018. “Using Acknowledgement Data to Characterize Funding Organizations by the Types of Research Sponsored: The Case of Robotics Research.” Scientometrics 114 (3): 883–904. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2617-2
  • Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mignolo, W. D. 2008. “Desobediência epistêmica: A opção descolonial e o significado de identidade em política.” Cadernos de Letras da UFF – Dossiê: Literatura, Língua e Identidade 34: 287–324. https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33191.
  • Mignolo, W. D. 2017. “Colonialidade: O lado mais escuro da modernidade.” Revista brasileira de ciências sociais 32. doi:10.17666/329402/2017
  • Modi, R., ed. 2011. South-South Cooperation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mongeon, P., and A. Paul-Hus. 2016. “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis.” Scientometrics 106 (1): 213–228. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
  • Mori, A. 2020. Latin America and the new Global Order: Dangers and Opportunities in a Multipolar World. Milano: Ledizioni. http://digital.casalini.it/9788855261883.
  • Mukherjee, R. 2020. “Of Experts and Tokens: Mapping a Critical Race Archaeology of Communication.” Communication, Culture and Critique, doi:10.1093/ccc/tcaa009.
  • Netto, C. D. O., and J. E. Tello-Gamarra. 2020. “Sharing Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trends and Research Agenda.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 15 (2): 41–55. doi:10.4067/S0718-27242020000200041
  • Neves, F. M., and J. V. C. Lima. 2012. “As mudanças climáticas e a transformação das agendas de pesquisa | Climate Change and the Transformation of Research Agendas.” Liinc Em Revista 8 (1). doi:10.18617/liinc.v8i1.475.
  • Oliveira, T. 2019. “As políticas científicas na era do conhecimento: uma análise de conjuntura sobre o ecossistema científico global.” Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação 24 (1): 191–215. doi:10.1590/1981-5344/3520. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/112221.
  • Oliveira, T., G. Barata, and A. Uribe-Tirado. 2021. “Ten Years of Altmetrics: A Review of Latin America Contributions.” Journal of Scientometric Research 10 (1): 102–114. doi:10.5530/jscires.10.1s.26
  • Olmeda-Gómez, C., A. Perianes-Rodríguez, and M. A. Ovalle-Perandones. 2008. Estructura de las redes de colaboración científica entre las universidades españolas.
  • Overmyer, M., and E. Sepúlveda III. 2018. Global Latin (o) Americanos. Transoceanic Diasporas and Regional Migrations.
  • Panda, J. P. 2016. India-China Relations: Politics of Resources, Identity and Authority in a Multipolar World Order. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Panizza, F. 2009. Contemporary Latin America: Development and Democracy Beyond the Washington Consensus. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Paul-Hus, A., N. Desrochers, and R. Costas. 2016. “Characterization, Description, and Considerations for the Use of Funding Acknowledgement Data in Web of Science.” Scientometrics 108: 167–182.
  • Peter, S. G., and M. S. Estrada. 2014. Asymmetries of Knowledge in Latin America. CroLAr.
  • Pettman, R. (1974). “Problems in Australian Foreign Policy, January to June 1974.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 20 (3): 299–311.
  • Piefer, N. 2014, September. Triangular Cooperation–Bridging South-South and North-South Cooperation. In Workshop on South-South Development Cooperation, University of Heidelberg.
  • Prashad, V. 2014. The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South. London: Verso.
  • Prebisch, R. 2016. The Economic Development of Latin America. ECLAC Thinking, Selected Texts (1948–1998). Santiago: ECLAC, p. 45-84.
  • Purugganan, J., A. Jafri, and P. Solon. 2014. BRICS: A Global Trade Power in a Multi-Polar World. Shifting Power Critical Perspectives on Emerging Economies Tni Working Papers.
  • Quijano, A. 2005. Colonialidade do poder, eurocentrismo e América Latina1. A Colonialidade do Saber: etnocentrismo e ciências sociais–Perspectivas Latinoamericanas. Buenos Aires: Clacso.
  • Reynolds, C. W. 1992. “Dívida da América Latina, Papel dos EUA na Transmissão das Ligações Norte-Sul e Comércio Mundial.” In Interdependência Econômica Internacional, Padrões de Balanças Comerciais e Coordenação de Políticas Econômicas. Questões Centrais na Teoria e Política Econômica Contemporânea, edited by M. Baldassarri, L. Paganetto, and E. S. Phelps. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-22256-8_9
  • Rizzoli, V., L. S. Norton, and M. Sarrica. 2021. “Mapping the Meanings of Decarbonisation: A Systematic Review of Studies in the Social Sciences Using lexicometric Analysis.” Cleaner Environmental Systems 3: 100065.
  • Salem, H., E. Roth, and J. Fornango. 1983. “A Comparison of Automated Data Collection and Manual Data Collection for Toxicology Studies.” Archives of Toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement 6: 361–364. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69083-9_68.
  • Sampaio, R. C., and D. Lycarião. 2021. Análise de conteúdo categorial: Manual de aplicação. Brasília: Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (Enap). http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/6542.
  • Santos, B. de S. 2007. “Para além do pensamento abissal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes.” Novos Estudos - CEBRAP 79: 71–94. doi:10.1590/S0101-33002007000300004.
  • Seymore, S. B. 2015. “Patent Asymmetries.” UCDL Rev 49: 963. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2574977.
  • Smits, P. A., and J. L. Denis. 2014. “How Research Funding Agencies Support Science Integration Into Policy and Practice: An International Overview.” Implementation Science 9 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-28
  • Sousa Santos, B. 2015. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Spatti, A. C., P. R. Cintra, A. Bin, and R. F. D. Araújo. 2021. “Alternative Metrics to Evaluate Latin American Scientific Production: A SciELO Network Study.” Informação & Informação. 24 (2): 624–596. doi:10.5433/1981-8920.2021v26n2p596.
  • Strange, S. 1987. “The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony.” International Organization 41 (4): 551–574. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027600
  • Subrahmanyam, S. 1997. “Connected Histories: Notes Towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia.” Modern Asian Studies 31 (3): 735–762. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00017133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/312798.
  • Suzina, A. C. 2021. “English as lingua franca. Or the Sterilisation of Scientific Work.” Media, Culture & Society 43 (1): 171–179. doi:10.1177/0163443720957906
  • Taise Hoffmann, Y., E. Bisset Alvarez, and Y. Martí-Lahera. 2020. “Análise textual com IRaMuTeQ de pesquisas recentes em História da educação matemática no Brasil: Um exemplo de Humanidades Digitais.” Investigación bibliotecológica 34 (84): 103–133. doi:10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2020.84.58097
  • Thelwall, M. 2018. “Dimensions: A Competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science?” Journal of Informetrics 12 (2): 430–435.
  • Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2010. “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping.” Scientometrics 84 (2): 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
  • Vessuri, H., J. C. Guédon, and A. M. Cetto. 2014. “Excellence or Quality? Impact of the Current Competition Regime on Science and Scientific Publishing in Latin America and its Implications for Development.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 647–665. doi:10.1177/0011392113512839
  • Vélez-Cuartas, G., D. Lucio-Arias, and L. Leydesdorff. 2016. “Regional and Global Science: Publications from Latin America and the Caribbean in the SciELO Citation Index and the Web of Science.” El profesional de la información (EPI) 25 (1): 35–46. Estructura de las redes de colaboración científica entre las universidades españolas. doi:10.3145/epi.2016.ene.05
  • Vieira, M. A., and C. Alden. 2011. “India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership.” Global Governance 17: 507. doi:10.1163/19426720-01704007
  • Visentini, P. F. 2015. “Editor's Note: Third World or Global South?” Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations 4 (8): 7–8. doi:10.22456/2238-6912.63029.
  • Waisbord, S., and C. Mellado. 2014. “De-Westernizing Communication Studies: A Reassessment.” Communication Theory 24 (4): 361–372. doi:10.1111/comt.12044
  • Wallerstein, I. M. 2015. Análisis de sistemas-mundo: Una introducción. Siglo xxi.
  • Walsh, C. 2010. “Raza, mestizaje y poder: Horizontes coloniales pasados y presentes.” Crítica y Emancipación 3: 95–124. doi:10.2307/j.ctvnp0jp6.17.