593
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Shaping scientific work in universities in Chile: exploring the role of research management instruments

Moldando o trabalho científico nas universidades do Chile: explorando o papel dos instrumentos de gestão da investigação

Dando forma al trabajo científico en las universidades de Chile: explorando el papel de los instrumentos de gestión de la investigación

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2236503 | Received 02 Aug 2022, Accepted 07 Jul 2023, Published online: 30 Nov 2023

References

  • Abramo, G., and C. A. D’Angelo. 2015. “Evaluating University Research: Same Performance Indicator, Different Rankings.” Journal of Informetrics 9 (3): 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.002.
  • Androgué, C., A. García de Fanelli, M. Pita Carranza, and D. Salto. 2019. “Las Universidades Frente al Aseguramiento de la Calidad y las Políticas de Financiamiento de la Investigación: Estudios de Caso en el Sector Privado Argentino.” Revista de la Educación Superior 48 (190): 45–70. https://doi.org/10.36857/resu.2019.190.711.
  • Araneda-Guirriman, C., J. Gairín-Sallán, and L. Pedraja-Rejas. 2018. “La Autonomía en la Educación Superior: Reflexiones Desde los Actores en el Contexto del Financiamiento por Desempeño en Chile.” Formación Universitaria 11 (4): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000400065.
  • Atkinson, P. A., and A. Coffey 1997. “Analysing Documentary Realities.” In Qualitative research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman, 45–62. London: Sage.
  • Barron, G. R. S. 2021. “Rankings as Surveillance Assemblage.” In Global University Rankings and the Politics of Knowledge, edited by M. Stack, 172–194. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Beigel, F. 2014. “Publishing from the Periphery: Structural Heterogeneity and Segmented Circuits. The Evaluation of Scientific Publications for Tenure in Argentina’s CONICET.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533977.
  • Beigel, F., O. Gallardo, and F. Bekerman. 2018. “Institutional Expansion and Scientific Development in the Periphery: The Structural Heterogeneity of Argentina’s Academic Field.” Minerva 56 (3): 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9340-2.
  • Bhopal, K. 2016. The Experiences of Black and Minority Ethnic Academics: A Comparative Study of the Unequal Academy. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Bowker, G., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Broitman, C., and P. Rivero. 2022. “La movilidad científica y los significados en torno a la utilidad en la producción y circulación de conocimientos: Un análisis a partir del programa Becas Chile.” Universum (Talca) 37 (2): 457–478. http://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-23762022000200457.
  • Bruner, J., F. Ganga-Contreras, and E. Rodríguez-Ponce. 2018. “Gobernanza del Capitalismo Académico: Aproximaciones Desde Chile.” Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, Esp 1: 11–28. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29062781001.
  • Burrows, R. 2012. “Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy.” The Sociological Review 60 (2): 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02077.x.
  • Busch, L. 2013. Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2013.00378.x
  • Castillo, A., and J. Watson. 2017. “Academic Entrepreneurial Behavior: Birds of More Than One Feather.” Technovation 64-65: 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.07.001.
  • Chiappa, R. 2021. “Finding Academics Jobs in Stratified Countries: The Effects of Social Class of Origin in the Development of Academic Networks for Chilean PhD.” In The Global Scholar: Implications for Postgraduate Studies and Supervision, edited by En Rule, 189–213. Western Cape: African Sun Media.
  • Clarke, C., and D. Knights. 2015. “Careering Through Academia: Securing Identities or Engaging Ethical Subjectivities?” Human Relations 68 (12): 1865–1888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715570978.
  • Cruz-Castro, L., and L. Sanz-Menéndez. 2018. “Autonomy and Authority in Public Research Organisations: Structure and Funding Factors.” Minerva 56 (2): 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9349-1.
  • Fardella, C., A. Corvalán-Navia, and R. Zavala. 2019. “El Académico Cuantificado. La Gestión Performativa a Través de los Instrumentos de Medición en la Ciencia.” Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad 9 (2): 62–78. https://doi.org/10.26864/pcs.v9.n2.15.
  • Fardella-Cisternas, C., J.-F. Espinosa-Cristia, and J.-M. Garrido-Wainer 2023. “Administradores de la producción científica y gobernanza académica: Análisis de un conflicto identitario.” Revista Iberoamericana De Educación Superior. 14 (41): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2023.41.157.
  • Feld, A., and P. Kreimer. 2019. “¿Cosmopolitismo o Subordinación? La Participación de Científicos Latinoamericanos en Programas Europeos: Motivaciones y Dinámicas Analizadas Desde el Punto de Vista de los Líderes Europeos.” História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 26 (3): 779–799. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702019000300004.
  • García de Fanelli, A. 2019. “El Financiamiento de la Educación Superior en América Latina: Tendencias e Instrumentos de Financiamiento.” Propuesta Educativa 28 (2): 111–126. https://souciencia.unifesp.br/images/docs/pesquisas/Financiamiento_Educativo_AL_Revista_PE_FLACSO_AC_1.pdf.
  • Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
  • Good, B., N. Vermeulen, B. Tiefenthaler, and E. Arnold. 2015. “Counting Quality? The Czech Performance-Based Research Funding System.” Research Evaluation 24 (2): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu035.
  • Góngora, E. 2021. “Financiamiento por Concurso Para Investigación Científica en México. Lógicas de Competencia y Experiencias de Científicos.” Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa 26 (88): 149–172. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmie/v26n88/1405-6666-rmie-26-88-149.pdf.
  • Guthrie, S., I. Ghiga, and S. Wooding. 2017. “What Do We Know About Grant Peer Review in the Health Sciences?” F1000Research 6: 1335. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.1.
  • Hicks, D. 2012. “Performance-based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41 (2): 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.
  • Jiménez, J. 2019. “El Sistema Nacional de Investigadores en México Como Mecanismo Meritocrático de un Estado Evaluador.” Reflexión Política 21 (41): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.2850.
  • Koch, T., R. Vanderstraeten, and R. Ayala. 2021. “Making Science International: Chilean Journals and Communities in the World of Science.” Social Studies of Science 51 (1): 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720949709.
  • Kreimer, P. 2011. “La Evaluación de la Actividad Científica: Desde la Indagación Sociológica a la Burocratización. Dilemas Actuales.” Propuesta Educativa 36: 59–77. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=403041707007.
  • Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lim, M. A. 2021. “Governing Higher Education: The PURE Data System and the Management of the Bibliometric Self.” Higher Education Policy 34: 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-00130-0.
  • Liu, J., Z. Yin, W. Lyu, and S. Lin. 2019. “Does Money Accelerate Faculty Mobility? Survey Findings from 11 Research Universities in China.” Sustainability 11: 6925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246925.
  • Lounsbury, M.. 2001. “A World of Standards by Nils Brunsson, Bengt Jacobsson, and Associates.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (3): 839–841. https://doi.org/10.1086/343153.
  • Mathies, C., J. Kivistö, and M. Birnbaum. 2020. “Following the Money? Performance-Based Funding and the Changing Publication Patterns of Finnish Academics.” Higher Education 79: 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00394-4.
  • Maxwell, J. A. 2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • McAlpine, L., and C. Amundsen. 2015. “Early Career Researcher Challenges: Substantive and Methods-Based Insights.” Studies in Continuing Education 37 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2014.967344.
  • Ministerio de Educación. 2023. “Fondo Basal por Desempeño.” https://dfi.mineduc.cl/instrumentos-de-financiamiento/asignacion-directa/fondo-basal-por-desempeno/.
  • Mondaca, C., J. Lopatinsky, A. Montecinos, and J. Rojas-Mora. 2019. “Medición del Nivel de Desarrollo de las Universidades Chilenas: Un Análisis con Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales.” Calidad en la Educación Educación 50: 284–318. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n50.562.
  • Patton, M. 2014. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pérez, M., and A. Montoya. 2018. “La Insostenibilidad de la Universidad Pública Neoliberal: Hacia una Etnografía de la Precariedad en la Academia.” Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares 73: 9–24. https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.2018.01.001.01.
  • Prior, L. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020222.
  • Reinhart, M., and C. Schendzielorz. 2021. “Peer Review Procedures as Practice, Decision, and Governance – Preliminaries to Theories of Peer Review.” SocArXiv, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ybp25.
  • Reymert, I., J. Jungblut, and S. B. Borlaug. 2021. “Are Evaluative Cultures National or Global? A Cross-National Study on Evaluative Cultures in Academic Recruitment Processes in Europe.” Higher Education 82 (5): 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00659-3.
  • Rovelli, L. 2017. “Expansión Reciente de la Política de Priorización en la Investigación Científica de las Universidades Públicas de Argentina.” Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior 22 (3): 103–121. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2991/299151245006.pdf.
  • Sisto, V. 2017. “Gobernados por Números: El Financiamiento Como Forma de Gobierno de la Universidad en Chile.” Psicoperspectivas. Individuo y Sociedad 16 (3): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol16-Issue3-fulltext-1086.
  • Spence, C. 2019. “‘Judgement’ Versus ‘Metrics’ in Higher Education Management.” Higher Education 77 (5): 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0300-z.
  • Spinello, A. O., E. Reale, and A. Zinilli. 2021. “Outlining the Orientation Toward Socially Relevant Issues in Competitive R&D Funding Instruments.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 6: 712839. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.712839.
  • Viales-Hurtado, R. 2021. “The Problem of Scientific Policies in Central America (1980–2020): The Tension Between Innovation and Social Cohesion in a Global Context.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1876314.
  • Vohlídalová, M. 2021. “Early-Career Women Academics: Between Neoliberalism and Gender Conservatism.” Sociological Research Online 26 (1): 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780420914468.
  • Wetherell, M. 2007. “‘A Step too Far: Discursive Psychology, Linguistic Ethnography and Questions of Identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (15): 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00345.x.
  • Zacharewicz, T., B. Lepori, E. Reale, and K. Jonkers. 2019. “Performance-based Research Funding in EU Member States – a Comparative Assessment.” Science and Public Policy 46 (1): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy041.