776
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Thematic Cluster: Interaction Turns in Knowledge Production

Understanding mechanisms of knowledge co-production in peace research projects supported by international cooperation

Entendendo mecanismos de coprodução do conhecimento em projectos de investigação da paz apoiados pela cooperação internacional

Entendiendo mecanismos de coproducción de conocimiento en proyectos de investigación sobre paz apoyados por la cooperación internacional

ORCID Icon &
Article: 2236507 | Received 17 Jul 2022, Accepted 07 Jul 2023, Published online: 17 Oct 2023

References

  • Alessa, L., K. Andrew, J. Gamble, M. Fidel, G. Beaujean, and J. Gosz. 2016. “The Role of Indigenous Science and Local Knowledge in Integrated Observed Systems: Moving Toward Adaptive Capacity Indices and Early Warning Systems.” Sustainability Science 11 (1): 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0295-7
  • Autesserre, S. 2017. “International Peacebuilding and Local Success: Assumptions and Effectiveness.” International Studies Review 19 (1): 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw054.
  • Balanzó, A., C. M. Nupia, and J. P. Centeno. 2020. “Conocimiento científico, conocimientos heterogéneos y construcción de paz: Hacia una agenda de investigación sobre políticas y gobernanza del conocimiento en transiciones hacia la paz.” Opera 27, Article 27.
  • Barnett, M. N., and M. Finnemore. 1999. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization, 53: 699–732.
  • Bergmann, J. 2018. “Turning an Idea Into Reality: Creating the European Institute of Peace.” Cooperation and Conflict 53 (3): 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836717729722.
  • Bliesemann de Guevara, B., E. Furnari, and R. Julian. 2020. “Researching with ‘Local’ Associates: Power, Trust and Data in an Interpretive Project on Communities’ Conflict Knowledge in Myanmar.” Civil Wars 22 (4): 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2020.1755161.
  • Bliesemann de Guevara, B., and R. Kostic. 2017. “Intervention Theatre: Performance, Authenticity and Expert Knowledge in Politicians' Travel to Post-/Conflict Spaces.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2016.1260208
  • Campbell, S., D. Chandler, and M. Sabaratnam. 2011. “Introduction: The Politics of Liberal Peace.” In A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding, 1–9. Zed Books. https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Campbell-Susanna/dp/1780320027?asin=1780320027&revisionId=&format=4&depth=1.
  • Castro-Gómez, S. 2010. La hybris del punto cero. 2nd ed. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  • Corcione-Nieto, M. A., A. E. Fernández-Osorio, and L. J. Cabrera-Cabrera. 2021. “Academia, conflicto armado y paz en Colombia: Un acercamiento desde la geopolítica del conocimiento.” DADOS 64 (4): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2021.64.4.247.
  • Danielsen, F., P. M. Jensen, N. D. Burgess, I. Coronado, S. Holt, M. K. Poulsen, R. M. Rueda, et al. 2014. “Testing Focus Groups as a Tool for Connecting Indigenous and Local Knowledge on Abundance of Natural Resources with Science-Based Land Management Systems.” Conservation Letters 7 (4): 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12100.
  • Danielsson, A. 2020. “Reconceptualising the Politics of Knowledge Authority in Post/Conflict Interventions: From a Peacebuilding Field to Transnational Fields of Interventionary Objects.” European Journal of International Security 5 (1): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.22.
  • de Sousa Santos, B. 2009. Una Epistemología del Sur. México DF: Clacso – Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
  • Dussel, E. D. 2012. “Transmodernity and Interculturality: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Liberation.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1 (3). https://doi.org/10.5070/T413012881
  • Escobar, A. 2014. La Invención del desarrollo. 2nd ed. Popayán: Universidad del Cauca.
  • Facio Lince, L. 2019. Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (CTeI) y la construcción de paz en Colombia: Laboratorio de Innovación Para la Paz. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  • Failing, L., R. Gregory, and M. Harstone. 2007. “Integrating Science and Local Knowledge in Environmental Risk Management: A Decision-Focused Approach.” Ecological Economics 64 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.010.
  • Fals Borda, O. 2008. “The Application of the Social Sciences’ Contemporary Issues to Work on Participatory Action Research.” Human Organization 67 (4): 359–361. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.4.h02175x647m44k86
  • FIP. 2020. Informe de gestion 2020, 42. Fundación Ideas Para la Paz (FIP). https://cutt.ly/aJVMaAd.
  • Fricker, M. 2013. “Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?” Synthese, 190 (7): Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0227-3
  • García Duque, J., and J. P. Casadiego. 2021. “International Cooperation in Peacebuilding: Stakeholder Interaction in Colombia.” Third World Quarterly 42 (10): 2372–2392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1951200.
  • Goetze, C., and B. Bliesemann de Guevara. 2014. “Cosmopolitanism and the Culture of Peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 40 (4): 771–802. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051300051X.
  • Harding, S. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Jabri, V. 2016. “Post-colonialism: A Post-Colonial Perspective on Peacebuilding.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace (First), edited by O. P. Richmond, S. Pogodda, and J. Ramovic. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jones, C. E., K. Kielland, L. D. Hinzman, and W. S. Schneider. 2015. “Integrating Local Knowledge and Science: Economic Consequences of Driftwood Harvest in a Changing Climate.” Ecology and Society 20 (1), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07235-200125.
  • Joshi, M., S. Y. Lee, and R. Mac Ginty. 2014. “Just how Liberal is the Liberal Peace?” International Peacekeeping 21 (3): 364–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2014.932065
  • Joshi, M., and J. M. Quinn. 2017. “Implementing the Peace: The Aggregate Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Peace Duration after Intrastate Armed Conflict.” British Journal of Political Science, 47 (4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000381
  • Julian, R., B. Bliesemann de Guevara, and R. Redhead. 2019. “From Expert to Experiential Knowledge: Exploring the Inclusion of Local Experiences in Understanding Violence in Conflict.” Peacebuilding 7 (2): 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2019.1594572.
  • Leon, J. X., J. Hardcastle, R. James, S. Albert, J. Kereseka, and C. D. Woodroffe. 2015. “Supporting Local and Traditional Knowledge with Science for Adaptation to Climate Change: Lessons Learned from Participatory Three-Dimensional Modeling in BoeBoe, Solomon Islands.” Coastal Management 43 (4): 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2015.1046808.
  • Leyva Solano, X. 2018. “¿Academia versus activimo? Repensarnos desde y para la práctica Teórica -Política.” En Práticas otras de conocimiento (s). Entre crisis, entre guerras, 199–222. Clacso.
  • Leyva Solano, X., J. Alonso, A. Hernández, A. Escobar, and A. Köhler. 2018. Prácticas otras de conocimiento (s) entre crisis, entre guerras: Vol. Tomo I. Retos – La Casa del Mago – CLACSO.
  • Mac Ginty, R., and O. P. Richmond. 2013. “The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace.” Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750.
  • Maldonado-Torres, N. 2008. Against War: Views from the Underside of Modernity. Duke University Press.
  • McLean, R. K. D., and K. Sen. 2019. “Making a Difference in the Real World? A Meta-Analysis of the Quality of Use-Oriented Research Using the Research Quality Plus Approach.” Research Evaluation 28 (2): 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy026.
  • Mignolo, W. D. 2009. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and De-Colonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7–8): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275.
  • Miklian, J., and K. Hoelscher. 2018. “A New Research Approach for Peace Innovation.” Innovation and Development 8 (2): 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1349580
  • Millar, G. 2014a. “Disaggregating Hybridity: Why Hybrid Institutions Do Not Produce Predictable Experiences of Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51(4):501–514. Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313519465.
  • Millar, G. 2018. “Decentring the Intervention Experts: Ethnographic Peace Research and Policy Engagement.” Cooperation and Conflict 53 (2): 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836718768631.
  • Montgomery, M. E. 2003. “Working for Peace While Preparing for War: The Creation of the United States Institute of Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 40 (4): 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433030404007
  • Ordonez-Matamoros, G., J. Centeno, E. Arond, A. Jaime, and K. Arias. 2018. La paz y los retos de la política de ciencia, tecnología e innovación en Colombia. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/la-paz-y-los-retos-de-la-pol%C3%ADtica-de-ciencia-tecnolog%C3%ADa-e-innovac
  • Paffenholz, T. 2005. “Peace and Conflict Sensitivity in International Cooperation: An Introductory Overview.” Internationale Politik Und Gesellschaft, 4 (2005): Article 2005.
  • Parra-Romero, A. 2020. “Producción de conocimiento en conflictos socioambientales.” Revista de Ciências Sociais 51 (2): 37–83. https://doi.org/10.36517/rcs.51.2.d02.
  • Pohl, C., S. Rist, A. Zimmermann, P. Fry, G. S. Gurung, F. Schneider, C. I. Speranza, et al. 2010. “Researchers’ Roles in Knowledge Co-Production: Experience from Sustainability Research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal.” Science and Public Policy 37 (4): 267–281. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496628.
  • Puyo Tamayo, G. A. (Ed.). 2018. Cooperación y construcción de paz territorial en Colombia. Análisis desde cuatro estudios de caso. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
  • Quijano, A. 2000. “Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America.” International Sociology 15 (2): 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
  • Quijano, A. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2-3): 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.
  • Rau, H., G. Goggins, and F. Fahy. 2018. “From Invisibility to Impact: Recognising the Scientific and Societal Relevance of Interdisciplinary Sustainability Research.” Research Policy 47 (1): 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.005.
  • Raymond, C. M., I. Fazey, M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely. 2010. “Integrating Local and Scientific Knowledge for Environmental Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 91 (8): 1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023.
  • Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Robles Lomeli, J. D., and J. Rappaport. 2018. “Imagining Latin American Social Science from the Global South: Orlando Fals Borda and Participatory Action Research.” Latin American Research Review 53 (3): 597–612. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.164.
  • Rosengren, D. 2018. “Science, Knowledge and Belief. On Local Understandings of Weather and Climate Change in Amazonia.” Journal of Antrhopology 83 (4): 607–623.
  • Schwachula, A. 2021. “Transnational Science Cooperation for Sustainable Development.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Development Cooperation for Achieving the 2030 Agenda, edited by S. Chaturvedi, H. Janus, S. Klingebiel, L. Xiaoyun, A. de Mello e Souza, E. Sidiropoulos, and D. Wehrmann, 59–88. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schneidewind, U., M. Singer-Brodowski, and K. Augenstein. 2016. “Transformative Science for Sustainability Transitions.” In Handbook on Sustainability Transitions and Sustainable Peace, 123–136.
  • Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 27–313. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Spoelstra, S. F. 2013. “Sustainability Research: Organizational Challenge for Intermediary Research Institutes.” NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 66: 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.06.002
  • Stone, D. 2008. “Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and Their Networks.” Policy Studies Journal, 36 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00251.x
  • Thornton, T. F., and A. M. Scheer. 2012. “Collaborative Engagement of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Science in Marine Environments: A Review.” Ecology and Society 17 (3), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04714-170308.
  • United Nations Security Council. 2017. Final Agreement for Ending the Conflict and Building a Stable and Lasting Peace.
  • van der Haar, G., A. Heijmans, and D. Hilhorst. 2013a. “Interactive Research and the Construction of Knowledge in Conflict-Affected Settings.” Disasters 37 (s1):S20–S35. Article s1. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12010.
  • Vargas, A. 2015. “Alianza de universidades por la paz.” UN Periódico 189: 4.
  • Walsh, C. 2018. “The Decolonial for. Resurgences, Shifts, and Movements.” In On Decoloniality. Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, 15–32. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Wolff, J. 2015. “Beyond the Liberal Peace: Latin American Inspirations for Post-Liberal Peacebuilding.” Peacebuilding 3 (3): 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2015.1040606
  • Yang, L. 2015. “Local Knowledge, Science, and Institutional Change: The Case of Desertification Control in Northern China.” Environmental Management 55 (3): 616–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0418-4
  • Yang, L. 2018. “Collaborative Knowledge-Driven Governance: Types and Mechanisms of Collaboration Between Science, Social Science, and Local Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 45 (1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx047
  • Zürcher, C. 2018. “A Theory of Democratisation Through Peace-Building.” Conflict, Security & Development 18 (4): 1478–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2018.1483559