References

• Agarwal, S. K., C. Chapron, L. C. Giudice L, and C. et al. 2019. “Clinical Diagnosis of Endometriosis: A Call to Action.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 4: 354–364.
   Google Scholar
• Ballweg, M. L. 1997. “Blaming the Victim: The Psychologizing of Endometriosis.” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 24 (2): 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70312-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, K. 2002. “Self-Help Literature and the Making of an Illness Identity: The Case of Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS).” Social Problems 49 (3): 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.3.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R. 1996. “Citizen Science: A Lab Tradition.” Living Bird 15 (4): 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M., and F. Neresini. 2008. “Science and Public Participation.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by E. J. Hackett, and Society for Social Studies of Science, 449–472. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, R. 2021. Round Table: “El diagnóstico en endometriosis con base en las 6Ds.” Endometriosis México, Facebook Live, December 12. Accessed December 12, 2021. https://fb.watch/bOsCw1350I/.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, R. 2022. Inaugural Talk: “Endometriosis en México. Panorama actual.” Summit Endometriosis y Neuropelviología. Hospital de la Mujer de Morelia, February 18–20, Morelia, Michoacán, México.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1999. “The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400106
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. B., and B. V. Lewenstein. 2016. “Two Meanings of Citizen Science.” In The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, edited by D. Cavalier, 51–62. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and J. Yu. 2018. “Deconstructing Datafication's Brave New World.” New Media & Society 20 (12): 4473–4449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818775968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culley, L., C. Law, N. Hudson, et al. 2013. “The Social and Psychological Impact of Endometriosis on Women's Lives: A Critical Narrative Review.” Human Reproduction Update 19 (6): 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitzel, M. V., J. L. Cappadonna, C. Santos-Lang, R. E. Duerr, A. Virapongse, S. E. West, C. Kyba, et al. 2017. “Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96
   Google Scholar
• Endometriosis México. 2013. “¿Cómo se vive la enfermedad?” In Endometriosis: Un Enfoque Médico-Quirúrgico Global, edited by J. G. Garza Leal, and H. H. Bustos López, 1–9. Mexico City: Editorial Médica Panamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Endometriosis México. 2015. Endometriosis. Nuestras voces. Monterrey: Fundación Mexicana para el Apoyo a Mujeres con Endometriosis A.C.
   Google Scholar
• Endometriosis México. 2021. Round Table: “El diagnóstico en endometriosis con base en las 6Ds.” Facebook Live, December 12. Accessed December 12, 2021. https://fb.watch/bOsCw1350I/.
   Google Scholar
• Endometriosis México. 2022. “Marzo, mes de la endometriosis.” Video Produced for the Endometriosis Outreach And Awareness Campaign. Facebook Live, March 14. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://fb.watch/kVbgQCsmHe/ .
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. G. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. G. 2008. “Patient Groups and Health Movements.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 499–539. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, A., L. Del Savio, B. Prainsack, et al. 2018. “Conceptual and Ethical Considerations for Citizen Science in Biomedicine.” In Personal Health Science, edited by N. Heyen, S. Dickels, and A. Bruninghause, 195–217. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frickel, S., S. Gibbon, J. Howard, J. Kempner, G. Ottinger, and D. J. Hess. 2009. “Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (4): 444–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Santos, S. P. 2020. “Cross-Border Reproductive Healthcare.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3 (1): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1849475
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J. 2016. Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Perinatología (INPER). 2022a. “14 de marzo: Día Mundial de la Endometriosis.” Facebook post, March 14. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/133416716691261/posts/5462273837138829/?d = n.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Perinatología (INPER). 2022b. “¿Qué es la endometriosis?” Facebook post, March 14. Accessed March 14, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/inper.mx/photos/a.257240107642254/5462697150429831/.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, N. 2020. “Public Participation and Democratization: Effects on the Production and Consumption of Science and Technology.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 3 (1): 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2015. “Citizen Science and Scientific Citizenship: Same Words, Different Meanings?” In Science Communication Today, edited by B. Shiele, J. L. Marec, and P. Baranger, 29–38. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. P., and L. Hummelshoj. 2013. “Consensus on the Current Management of Endometriosis.” Human Reproduction 28 (6): 1552–1568. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. H., and A. Kinchy. 2016. “Citizen Science: Probing the Virtues and Contexts of Participatory Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 331–361. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchinskaya, O. 2019. “Citizen Science and the Politics of Environmental Data.” Science, Technology & Human Values 44 (5): 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919858669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacorti, C. M. 2020. “Endometriosis México: El grito de una mujer ante una sociedad callada, 2019.” Bachelor's thesis in Economy, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, R. 2012. “Neoliberalism and the Production of Environmental Knowledge.” Environment and Society 3 (1): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2012.030103
   Google Scholar
• Levina, M. 2010. “Googling Your Genes: Personal Genomics and the Discourse of Citizen Bioscience in the Network age.” Journal of Science Communication 9 (1), http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/09/01/01/Jcom0901(2010)A06/.
   Google Scholar
• Menocal, A. 2021. Round table: “El diagnóstico en endometriosis con base en las 6Ds.” Endometriosis México, Facebook Live, December 12. Accessed December 12, 2021. https://fb.watch/bOsCw1350I/.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2017. “Against Citizen Science.” Aeon 20. https://aeon.co/essays/is-grassroots-citizen-science-a-front-for-big-business.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, M. 2022. “El dolor es real: Endometriosis, una enfermedad ‘invisible’ que afecta a millones de mujeres mexicanas.” Infobae, March 24. Accessed March 24, 2022. https://www.infobae.com/america/mexico/2022/03/24/el-dolor-es-real-endometriosis-una-enfermedad-invisible-que-afecta-a-millones-de-mujeres-mexicanas/.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, M., and J. Gérvas. 1999. “Encarnizamiento diagnóstico y terapéutico con las mujeres.” Revista Semergen 25 (3): 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Piña-Romero, J. 2017. “Ciencia ciudadana como emprendimiento de la ciencia abierta: El riesgo del espectáculo de la producción y el acceso al dato. Hacia otra ciencia ciudadana.” LIINC em Revista 13 (1): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v13i1.3765
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N. 1995. Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What we Know and Don't Know About Cancer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N., and L. Schiebinger, eds. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, L. 2021. “Padecimiento del útero afecta la calidad de vida de la mujer.” Gaceta UNAM, March 16. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.gaceta.unam.mx/padecimiento-del-utero-afecta-la-calidad-de-vida-de-la-mujer/.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, B. 2003. The Greatest Experiment Ever Performed on Women: Exploding the Estrogen Myth. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, D. 2015. Coño Potens (manual sobre su poder, su próstata y sus fluidos). País Vasco: Txalaperta.
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. 2004. “Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance.” Hypatia 19 (1): 194–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01275.x
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. 2006. “The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women's Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance.” Hypatia 21 (3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01110.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuana, N., and S. Sullivan. 2006. “Introduction: ‘Feminist Epistemologies of Ignorance’.” Hypatia 21 (3): 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01110.x
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, N., and S. Sullivan. 2007. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vignolo, J., M. Vacarezza, C. Álvarez, and A. Sosa. 2011. “Niveles de atención, de prevención y atención primaria de la salud.” Archivos de Medicina Interna 33 (1): 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, E. 2007. “'No One Agrees Except for Those of Us Who Have it': Endometriosis Patients as an Epistemological Community.” Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (7): 957–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01024.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Endometriosis Society and World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WES and WERF). 2022. Facts about Endometriosis. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://endometriosis.org/resources/articles/facts-about-endometriosis/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2021a. “Endometriosis.” Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2021b. “Priority Diseases and Reasons for Inclusion. Rare Diseases.” Accessed February 1, 2021. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/Ch6_19Rare.pdf.
   Google Scholar