Interaction turns in knowledge production: actors, problems and methodologies

References

• Alonso, M. R., M. Cuschnir, M. Nápoli, J. E. Noriega, V. Lamas, W. Authier, and J. Naidorf. 2021. “La movilización del conocimiento en ciencias sociales en la voz de investigadores. Política, gestión y evaluación de la investigación y la vinculación en América Latina y el Caribe.” In Facultad de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (FCS-UNC), Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, Foro Latinoamericano de Evaluación Científica (FOLEC-CLACSO), edited by L. Córdoba, L. Rovelli, and P. Vommaro, 537–572.
   Google Scholar
• Bunders, J. F. G., J. E. W. Broerse, F. Keil, C. Pohl, R. W. Scholz, and M. B. M. Zweekhorst. 2010. “How Can Transdisciplinary Research Contribute to Knowledge Democracy?” In Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics, and Media, edited by R. J. in’t Veld, 125–152. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fals Borda, O. 1979. El problema de cómo investigar la realidad para transformarla. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., J. Igelsböck, A. Schikowitz, and T. Völker. 2016. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.” Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (4): 732–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (7): 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Cott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goñi Mazzitelli, M., C. Zeballos Lereté, and M. Bianco Bozzo. 2021. “Construyendo agendas situadas de conocimiento: experiencias desde la Universidad de la República en Uruguay. Dossier Libre acceso al conocimiento y publicaciones científicas en el campo educativo coordinado por Judith Naidorf y Gustavo Fischman.” Revista del IICE (50): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.34096/iice.n50.11267.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1992. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity?” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff, and E. Potter. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., and H. van Lente. 2008. “Re-Thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 37 (4): 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp, eds. (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., C. Pohl, and G. Bammer. 2010. “Solving Problems through Transdisciplinary Research.” In Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, and R. C. S. Pacheco. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., C. Pohl, and J. G. Hering. 2017. “Exploring Transdisciplinary Integration within a Large Research Program: Empirical Lessons from Four Thematic Synthesis Processes.” Research Policy.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., J. Thompson Klein, and C. Pohl. 2019. “Linking Transdisciplinary Research Projects with Science and Practice at Large: Introducing Insights from Knowledge Utilization.” Environmental Science & Policy 102: 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “In a Constitutional Moment: Science and Social Order at the Millennium.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, Yearbook of the Sociology of the Sciences, edited by B. Joerges, and H. Nowotny, 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., and B. J. Morehouse. 2005. “The Co-Production of Science and Policy in Integrated Climate Assessments.” Global Environmental Change 15 (1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidorf, J. 2014. “Knowledge Utility: From Social Relevance to Knowledge Mobilization.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 22 (70).
   Google Scholar
• Naidorf, J., and D. Perrota. 2015. “La ciencia social politizada y móvil de una nueva agenda latinoamericana orientada a prioridades.” Revista de la Educación Superior XLIV (174): abril-junio, 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2001. Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutz, J., C. Tomassini, C. Zeballos, M. Goñi, and M. Rodales. 2019. “Ten Years of Research and Innovation for Social Inclusion in the Uruguayan Public University: Policy Lessons Learned.” In Atlas of Social Innovation. Ecosystem and Infraestructures for Social Innovation, edited by J. Howaldr, C. Kaletka, and A. Z. Schroder. Dortmund: TU Dortmund University.
   Google Scholar
• Tengö, M., E. S. Brondizio, T. Elmqvist, P. Malmer, and M. Spierenburg. 2014. “Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach.” Ambio 43 (5): 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson Klein, J. 2012. “Research Integration: A Comparative Knowledge Base.” In Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Research, edited by A. F. Repko, W. H. Newell, and R. Szostak, 283–298. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., and G. Hirsch Hadorn. 2008. “Methodological Challenges of Transdisciplinary Research.” Natures Sciences Sociétés 16 (2): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., J. Thompson Klein, S. Hoffmann, C, Mitchell, and D. Fam. 2021. “Conceptualising Transdisciplinary Integration as a Multidimensional Interactive Process.” Environmental Science & Policy 118: 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeer, B. 2009. “Making the Invisible Visible. Analysing the Development of Strategies and Changes in Knowledge Production to Deal with Persistent Problems in Sustainable Development.” (Tesis doctorado). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vessuri, H. 2004. “La hibridización del conocimiento. La tecnociencia y los conocimientos locales a la búsqueda del desarrollo sustentable convergencia.” Revista de Ciencias Sociales 11 (35): 171–191. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México Toluca, México.
   Google Scholar
• Vessuri, H., G. Bocco, and A. Burgos. 2012. “Vinculación ciencia y sociedad: La participación del investigador.” In Apropiación social del conocimiento y aprendizaje: una mirada crítica desde diferentes ámbitos, edited by A. Martínez Martínez, R. de Gortari, H. Vessuri, and A. Vega. México: Plaza y Valdés Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Vienni Baptista, B. 2016. “Los estudios sobre interdisciplina: construcción de un ámbito en el campo cts.” Revista redes. Revista de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia 40), issn: 0328–3186.
   Google Scholar