References

• Almeida Filho, N. 2020. “Previsões terraplanistas sobre a Covid-19 no Brasil têm validade?” Abrasco, April 27. Accessed May 9, 2023. https://abrasco.org.br/previsoes-terraplanistas-sobre-a-covid-19-no-brasil-tem-validade-artigo-de-naomar-de-almeida-filho/
   Google Scholar
• AMB. 2020. “Hidroxicloroquina: AMB defende autonomia do medico.” AMB Press Release, July 19. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://coronavirus.amb.org.br/hidroxicloroquina-amb-defende-autonomia-do-medico/
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, R. 2020. “Laços em recuperação.” Revista Pesquisa FAPESP 292: 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., and J. Huysmans. 2019. “Assembling Credibility: Knowledge, Method and Critique in Times of ‘Post-Truth’.” Security Dialogue 50 (1): 40–58. doi:10.1177/0967010618788996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bolsonaro, E. 2020. “Estudo clínico realizado em Manaus pra desqualificar … ” Twitter: BolsonaroSP, April 17. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://twitter.com/bolsonarosp/status/1251132537373630469
   Google Scholar
• Bolsonaro, J. 2020a. “Discurso do Presidente da República, Jair Bolsonaro, durante o Encontro Brasil Vencendo a Covid-19.” Palácio do Planalto, August 24. Accessed November 13, 2023. https://www.biblioteca.presidencia.gov.br/presidencia/ex-presidentes/bolsonaro/discursos/discurso-do-presidente-da-republica-jair-bolsonaro-durante-o-encontro-brasil-vencendo-a-covid-19-palacio-do-planalto
   Google Scholar
• Bolsonaro, J. 2020b. “No Reino Unido, o Departamento de Saúde estima … ” Twitter: JairBolsonaro, August 9. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://twitter.com/jairbolsonaro/status/1292522930279260160
   Google Scholar
• Borba, M., F. Val, and V. Sampaio, et al. 2020. “Effect of High vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection. A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Network Open 3: 4. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulware, D., M. Pullen, A. Bangdiwala, K. Pastick, S. Lofgren, E. Okafor, and C. Skipper. 2020. “A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19.” NEJM 383 (6): 517–525. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2016638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil Ministry of Health. 2020. “Nota Informativa N° 5/2020-DAF/SCTIE/MS. Departamento de Assistência Farmacêutica e Insumos Estratégicos.” Brazil Ministry of Health, March 27. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://saude.rs.gov.br/upload/arquivos/202004/14141043-ms-nota-informativa-5-cloroquina.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burdick, A. 2021. “The Pandemic and the Limits of Science.” The New York Times, March 16. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/health/coronavirus-pandemic-lessons.html
   Google Scholar
• Caponi, S. 2020. “Covid-19 no Brasil: entre o negacionismo e a razão neoliberal.” Estudos Avançados 34 (99): 209–223. doi:10.1590/s0103-4014.2020.3499.013
   Google Scholar
• Carvalheiro, J. 2020. “Os coletivos da Covid-19.” Estudos Avançados 34 (99): 7–23. doi:10.1590/s0103-4014.2020.3499.002
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, D., and R. Colletta. 2020. “Sem apresentar provas, Bolsonaro diz desconfiar do número de vítimas do coronavírus em SP.” Folha de São Paulo, March 27. Accessed March 13, 2023. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2020/03/sem-apresentar-provas-bolsonaro-diz-desconfiar-do-numeros-de-vitimas-do-coronavirus-em-sp.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. 2011. “Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 14 (2): 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2010.0222
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. 2013. “Controversy over Manufactured Scientific Controversy: A Rejoinder to Fuller.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 16 (4): 761–766. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.4.0761
   Google Scholar
• CFM. 2020. “Processo-Consulta CFM N° 8/2020–Parecer CFM n° 4/2020.” CFM Press Release, April 16. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://sistemas.cfm.org.br/normas/visualizar/pareceres/BR/2020/4
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. 2021. “Negacionistas são os outros? Verdade, engano e interesse na era da pós-verdade.” Principia 25 (2): 305–334. doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e79698
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, T. 2020. “Ignoring Scientific Advice During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Bolsonaro’s Actions and Discourse.” Tapuya 3 (1): 288–291. doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1767492
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, D., and P. Benetti. 2022. “Pela Ciência, contra os cientistas? Negacionismo e as disputas em torno das políticas de saúde durante a pandemia.” Sociologias 24 (60): 98–138. doi:10.1590/18070337-120336
   Google Scholar
• Empoli, G. 2019. Os engenheiros do caos. São Paulo: Vestígio.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. 2019. The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, E., N. Nattrass, L. Lazaro, and F. Bastos. 2021. “Political Discourse, Denialism and Leadership Failure in Brazil’s Response to COVID-19.” Global Public Health 18 (8-9): 1251–1266. doi:10.1080/17441692.2021.1945123
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2019. “Prison Talk.” In The Microphysics of Power. 10th ed., 213–233. Translated by Roberto Machado. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. 2013. “Manufactured Scientific Consensus: A Reply to Ceccarelli.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 16 (4): 753–760. doi:10.1353/rap.2013.0048
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. 2018. Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• G1. 2020. “Em debate, Osmar Terra nega eficácia do isolamento e Mandetta defende estratégia.” G1, May 9. Accessed March 12, 2023. https://g1.globo.com/bemestar/coronavirus/noticia/2020/05/09/seculo-21-comecou-com-o-coronavirus-diz-ex-ministro-mandetta.ghtml
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, B. 2020. “STS, Post-Truth, and the Rediscovery of Bullshit.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6: 370–390. doi:10.17351/ests2020.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., A. Woodford, and T. Platts-Mills. 2020. “Characteristics of COVID-19 Clinical Trials Registered with Clinical Trials. gov: Cross-Sectional Analysis.” BMJ Open 10. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Lasco, G. 2020. “Medical Populism and the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Global Public Health 15 (10): 1417–1429. doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1807581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, F. 2020. “‘Fake science’ ou fantasia do real.” Folha de São Paulo, March 15. Accessed September 8, 2023. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/flavia-lima-ombudsman/2020/03/fake-science-ou-fantasia-do-real.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2020. “We Have Never Been Anti-Science: Reflections on Science Wars and Post-Truth.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6: 49–57. doi:10.17351/ests2020.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, G. 2020. “Bolsonaro diz que vai discutir com Teich protocolo do uso da cloroquina contra Covid-19.” O Globo, May 13. Accessed April 11, 2023. https://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/bolsonaro-diz-que-vai-discutir-com-teich-protocolo-do-uso-da-cloroquina-contra-covid-19-1-24424494
   Google Scholar
• Mazui, G. 2020. “Bolsonaro volta a falar em ‘histeria’ e diz que ações de governadores sobre isolamento prejudicam a economia.” G1, March 17. Accessed April 11, 2023. https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2020/03/17/bolsonaro-volta-a-falar-em-histeria-e-diz-que-acoes-de-governadores-sobre-isolamento-prejudicam-a-economia.ghtml
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. 2012. “Strategic Unknowns: Towards a Sociology of Ignorance.” Economy and Society 41 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mede, N., and M. Schäfer. 2020. “Science-Related Populism: Conceptualizing Populist Demands Toward Science.” Public Understanding of Science 29 (5): 473–491. doi:10.1177/0963662520924259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, M., S. Desai, F. Ruschitzka, and A. Patel. 2020. “Retracted: Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine with or without a Macrolide for Treatment of COVID-19: A Multinational Registry Analysis.” The Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Million, M., J. Lagier, P. Gautret, P. Colson, P. Fournier, S. Amrane, and M. Hocquart. 2020. “Early Treatment of COVID-19 Patients with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: A Retrospective Analysis of 1061 Cases in Marseille, France.” Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 35: 101738: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitjà, O., M. Monné, M. Ubals, C. Tebé, J. Peñafiel, A. Tobias, and E. Ballana. 2020. “Hydroxychloroquine for Early Treatment of Adults with Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.” Clinical Infectious Diseases 73 (11): e4073–e4081. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. 2006. The Republican War on Science. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, R. 2020. “Urgente: A revista científica The Lancet RETIRA DE … ” Twitter: rmotta2, June 4. Accessed March 14, 2023. https://twitter.com/rmotta2/status/1268635602536271872
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2017. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by R. Kaltwasser et al., 27–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., S. Evangelista, M. Alves, and R. Quinan. 2021. “‘Those on the Right Take Chloroquine’: The Illiberal Instrumentalisation of Scientific Debates during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil.” Javnost 28 (2): 165–184. doi:10.1080/13183222.2021.1921521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., R. Quinan, and J. Toth. 2020. “Antivacina, fosfoetanolamina e Mineral Miracle Solution (MMS): mapeamento de fake sciences ligadas à saúde no Facebook.” RECIIS 14 (1): 90–111. doi:10.29397/reciis.v14i1.1988
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., and E. Conway. 2011. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionary. 2016. “World of the Year 2016.” Accessed February 8, 2023. https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2016/
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pasternak, N., and C. Orsi. 2020. “Novos estudos demolem base biológica do uso de HCQ na COVID-19.” Questão de Ciência, July 22. Accessed July 17, 2023. https://www.revistaquestaodeciencia.com.br/artigo/2020/07/22/novos-estudos-demolem-base-biologica-do-uso-de-hcq-na-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• Pasternak, N., and C. Orsi. 2021. Contra a Realidade: A negação da ciência, suas causas e consequências. Campinas: Papirus 7 Mares.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, C., and M. Matthews. 2016. “The Russian ‘Firehose of Falsehood’ Propaganda Model: Why it Might Work and Options to Counter It.” Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html
   Google Scholar
• Perl, A., M. Howlett, and M. Ramesh. 2018. “Policy-Making and Truthiness: Can Existing Policy Models Cope with Politicized Evidence and Willful Ignorance in a ‘Post-Fact’ World?” Policy Sciences 51 (4): 581–600. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9334-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, A. 2020. “Efeitos colaterais: As controvérsias relacionadas com a circulação da cloroquina no Brasil.” Dilemas 67. https://www.reflexpandemia.org/texto-67
   Google Scholar
• Riera, R., and R. Pacheco. 2020. “Hidroxicloroquina e Cloroquina para Infecção por Covid-19.” Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital Sírio-Libanês, March 20. Accessed March 17, 2023. https://oxfordbrazilebm.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/RS_rapida_hidroxi_cloroquina_COVID19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roque, T. 2021. “A Queda Dos Experts.” Revista Piauí 176. Accessed November 11, 2023. https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/queda-dos-experts/
   Google Scholar
• Rosendaal, F. 2020. “Review of: ‘Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin as a Treatment of COVID-19: Results of an Open-Label Non-Randomized Clinical Trial’, by Gautret et al. 2010.” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 56 (1): 106063. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruediger, M. 2021. (Pseudo) ciência e esfera pública: reivindicações científicas sobre Covid-19 no Twitter. Rio de Janeiro: FGV DAPP.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2006. “Liberating Science from Politics.” American Scientist 94 (2): 104–106. doi:10.1511/2006.58.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SBI. 2020. “Informe n. 16 da Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia Sobre: Atualização Sobre a Hidroxicloroquina no Tratamento Precoce da Covid-19.” SBI Press Release, July 17. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://infectologia.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/atualizacao-sobre-a-hidroxicloroquina-no-tratamento-precoce-da-covid-19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SBPT. 2020. “Posicionamento da SBPT acerca da profilaxia e tratamento da COVID-19. SBPT Press release, June 29. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://sbpt.org.br/portal/sbpt-profilaxia-tratamento-covid-19/
   Google Scholar
• Schuch, M. 2020. “Bolsonaro volta a criticar OMS e diz que entidade ‘não acerta nada’.” Valor Econômico, June 18. Accessed July 21, 2023. https://valor.globo.com/politica/noticia/2020/06/18/bolsonaro-volta-a-criticar-oms-e-diz-que-entidade-nao-acerta-nada.ghtml
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 2019. “Is There a Crises of Truth?” Los Angeles Review of Books, December 2. Accessed March 12, 2023. https://www.lareviewofbooks.org/article/is-there-a-crisis-of-truth/
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J., and D. Ventura. 2020. “Between Science and Populism: The Brazilian Response to COVID-19 from the Perspective of the Legal Determinants of Global Health.” Brazilian Journal of International Law 17 (2): 67–84. doi:10.5102/rdi.v17i2.6687
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., A. Singh, R. Singh, and A. Misrta. 2020. “Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 14 (4): 589–596. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. 2017. “Casting a Wider Net: A Reply to Collins, Evans and Weinel.” Social Studies of Science 47 (4): 587–592. doi:10.1177/0306312717721410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipper, C., K. Pastick, N. Engen, A. Bangdiwala, M. Abassi, S. Logfren, and D. Williams. 2020. “Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults with Early COVID-19. A Randomized Trial.” Annals of Internal Medicine 173 (8): 623–632. doi:10.7326/m20-4207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Lancet. 2020. “Editorial – COVID-19 in Brazil: ‘So What?’” The Lancet 395 (10235): 1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31095-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen, L. 2012. “I-Pistemology: Changing Truth Claims in Popular and Political Culture.” European Journal of Communication 27 (1): 56–67. doi:10.1177/0267323112438808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, L. 2020. “‘It’s a Nightmare.’ How Brazilian Scientists Became Ensnared in Chloroquine Politics.” Science, June 22, 2020. Accessed June 21, 2023. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/it-s-nightmare-how-brazilian-scientists-became-ensnared-chloroquine-politics
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2020. “Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV).” WHO Situation Report, January 31. Accessed November 8, 2023. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200131-sitrep-11-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=de7c0f7_4
   Google Scholar
• Ylä-Anttila, T. 2018. “Populist Knowledge: ‘Post-Truth’ Repertoires of Contesting Epistemic Authorities.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5 (4): 356–388. doi:10.1080/23254823.2017.1414620
   Google Scholar