The Women’s Complaint: sociolegal mobilization against authoritarian backsliding following the 2020 abortion law in Poland

References

• Ajani, G. 1995. “By Chance and Prestige: Legal Transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 43 (1): 93–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/840578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albiston, C. R., L. B. Edelman, and J. Milligan. 2014. “The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (1): 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030826.
   Google Scholar
• Bodnar, A. 2018. “Protection of Human Rights After the Constitutional Crisis in Poland.” Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart Neue Folge 66 (1): 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1628/joer-2018-0026.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bucholc, M. 2022. “Abortion Law and Human Rights in Poland: The Closing of the Jurisprudential Horizon.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 14 (1): 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00167-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugaric, B., and A. Kuhelj. 2018. “Varieties of Populism in Europe: Is the Rule of Law in Danger?“ Hague J Rule Law 10 (1): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0075-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujalski, R. 2021. “Polscy Prawnicy Przed ETPC: 1994-2020 [Polish Lawyers Before the ECtHr: 1994–2020].” In. Warsaw: Lex Prawo Europejskie on 18 August 2022 Accessed from: https://gasiorowska.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Raport-Polscy-prawnicy-przed-ETPC-1994-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBOS. 2020. “Legality of Abortion and the Protests After the Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal.” In Polish Public Opinion Solid and Professional 11/2020. Warsaw: CBOS - Public Opinion Research Center. 1–4. on 16 August 2 Accessed from: https://www.cbos.pl/PL/publikacje/public_opinion/2020/11_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, L. J. 2019. “Legal Mobilization and Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15 (1): 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-043026.
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, R. A. 2011. “Civil Society and the European Court of Human Rights.” In The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, edited by J. Christoffersen and M. R. Madsen, 77–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, R. A. 2016. “The European Court of Human Rights, Amicus Curiae, and Violence Against Women.” Law & Society Review 50 (4): 890–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzięgielewska, A. 2022. “A Mimicry of International Law Compliance: How the Abusive Interpretation of International Norms Serves Poland’s Illiberal Regime.” Chicago Journal of International Law 23 (1): 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• ECtHR Registrar of the Court. 2021. “Notification of 12 Applications Concerning Abortion Rights in Poland.” In ECtHR Brief, Vol. 217. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• ECtHR Registrar of the Court. 2023. “Group of Abortion Rights Cases Against Poland Declared Inadmissible.” In ECtHR Brief, Vol. 173. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1971. Politics as Symbolic Action. Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago: Markham Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Federacja na rzecz Kobiet i Planowania Rodziny. 2021. “W Ciągu Zaledwie Tygodnia Ponad 8 Tysięcy Osób Pobrało Nasz Wzór Skargi Do #ETPCz” [In Less Than a Week More Than 8 Thousand People Have Downloaded Our Template of the Complaint to #ECtHR]. Facebook, on 18 August 2021. Accessed from https://www.facebook.com/federapl/photos/pb.100064724734643.-2207520000./4301222879907054/?type=3.
   Google Scholar
• Felstiner, W., R. Abel, and A. Sarat. 1980. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming.” Law and Society Review 15 (3/4): 631–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galligan, D. J., M. Kurkchiyan, D. J. Galligan, and M. Kurkchiyan. 2003. Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259366.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., and W. Sadurski. 2021. “The Judgment That Wasn’t (But Which Nearly Brought Poland to a Standstill): ‘Judgment’ of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 22 October 2020, K1/20.” European Constitutional Law Review 17 (1): 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, A., and E. Korolczuk. 2022. Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133520.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. P. 2006. Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225804.003.0007.
   Google Scholar
• He, X., and Y. Feng. 2016. “Mismatched Discourses in the Petition Offices of Chinese Courts.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (1): 212–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. 2013. “Contesting the Dominant Paradigm: Feminist Critiques of Liberal Legalism.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory, edited by M. Davies and V. E. Munro, 13–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. A. 2019. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapelańska-Pręgowska, J. 2021. “The Scales of the European Court of Human Rights: Abortion Restriction in Poland, the European Consensus, and the State’s Margin of Appreciation.” Health and Human Rights 23 (2): 213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsoni, S. 2023 ‘Dangerous’ Abortion Cases and the Dangers of Misportraying ECtHr’s Inadmissibility Decisions. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law [Online]. 26 June 2023. Accessed from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/dangerous-abortion-cases-and-the-dangers-of-misportraying-ecthrs-inadmissibility-decisions/on.
   Google Scholar
• Kocemba, K., and M. Stambulski. 2022. ““Czym jest strategiczna litygacja?” [What is strategic litigation?].” Student Journal of Law, Administration and Economics 41:13–29. https://doi.org/10.19195/1733-5779.41.2.
   Google Scholar
• Koralewska, I., and K. Zielińska. 2022. “‘Defending the unborn’, ‘Protecting women’ and ‘Preserving Culture and nation’: Anti-Abortion Discourse in the Polish Right-Wing Press.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 24 (5): 673–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.1878559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciańska, A., A. Kosiorowska, and N. Pomian. 2021. “„Kobieta powinna decydować w swoim sumieniu” – o katolickimi zaangażowaniu w protesty przeciwko zakazowi aborcji w Polsce.” LUD 105:12–43. https://doi.org/10.12775/lud105.2021.01.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I., and S. Holmes. 2019. The Light That Failed: A Reckoning. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Król, A., and P. Pustułka. 2018. “Women on Strike: Mobilizing Against Reproductive Injustice in Poland.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 20 (3): 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1460214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krygier, M. 2019. “The Challenge of Institutionalisation: Post-Communist “Transitions’, Populism, and the Rule of Law.” European Constitutional Law Review 15 (3): 544–573. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurkchiyan, M. 2009. “Russian Legal Culture: An Analysis of Adaptive Response to an Institutional Transplant.” Law & Social Inquiry 34 (2): 337–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01149.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurkchiyan, M. 2013. “Justice Through Bureaucracy: The Ukrainian Model.” Social & Legal Studies 22 (4): 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663913482931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani, S. M. 2014. “From Problems of Living to Problems of Law: The Legal Translation and Documentation of Immigrant Abuse and Helpfulness.” Law & Social Inquiry 39 (3): 643–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, P., and K. L. Scheppele. 2017. “Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19:3–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. 2006. How Russia Really Works: Informal Practices in the 1990s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, K. 1997. “Feminist Epistemology as Local Epistemology.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00018.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, K., and S. R. Anleu. 2007. “`getting Through the List’: Judgecraft and Legitimacy in the Lower Courts.” Social & Legal Studies 16 (3): 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907079763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. 2019. “Creating Authoritarian Clientelism: Poland After 2015.“ Hague J Rule Law 11 (1): 111132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0082-5–.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastracci, M. 2020. “Judiciary Saga in Poland: An Affair Torn Between European Standards and ECtHr Criteria.” Polish Review of International and European Law 9 (2): 39–79. https://doi.org/10.21697/priel.2020.9.2.02.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, L., and B. Yngvesson. 1980-81. “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes.” Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 775–821. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, L., and B. Yngvesson. 2015. “Disputes, Social Construction and Transformation of.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. D. Wright, 560–566. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86024-9.
   Google Scholar
• Mechlinska, A. 2021. “When is a Tribunal Not a Tribunal? Poland Loses Again as the ECtHr Declares the Disciplinary Chamber Not to Be a Tribunal Established by Law in Reczkowicz V Poland.” In Strasbourg Observers, edited by E. Brems and S. Smet. 20 September 2022. Accessed from: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/10/26/when-is-a-tribunal-not-a-tribunal-poland-loses-again-as-the-european-court-of-human-rights-declares-the-disciplinary-chamber-not-to-be-a-tribunal-established-by-law-in-reczkowicz-v-poland/on.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even. Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. 2009. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mrowicki, M. 2022. “Strategic Nature of the Judicial Resistance in Poland During the Rule of Law Crisis” In SLSA Annual Conference 4-6 April 2022. York.
   Google Scholar
• Nawojski, R., and B. Kowalska. 2022. “’Kiedy państwo mnie nie chroni … ’: oddolne mobilizacje na rzecz praw reprodukcyjnych a doświadczanie obywatelstwa.” Studia Socjologiczne 1 (244): [When the State does not protect me. Bottom up mobilization for reproductive rights and citizenship]. https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2022.140597.
   Google Scholar
• Nyyssönen, H., and J. Metsälä. 2020. “Highlights of national history? Constitutional memory and the preambles of post-communist constitutions.“ European Politics and Society 21 (3): 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1645425.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, A., and O. Hammerslev. 2021. “Naming, Blaming, Claiming: An Interview with Bill Felstiner, Rick Abel, and Austin Sarat.” Journal of Law and Society 48 (3): 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, A., and O. Hammerslev. 2022. “The Dynamic and Iterative Pre-Dispute Phase: The Transformation from a Justiciable Problem into a Legal Dispute.” Journal of Law and Society 50 (1): 120–138. Advanced access. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, M. 2010. Framing Equal Opportunity: Law and the Politics of School Finance Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, L., P. Wachowiec, and D. Mazur. 2021. “Poland’s Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five-Year Assessment of Eu’s (In)action.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 13 (1): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00151-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Płatek, M. S. 2018. “Czy Kobieta to człowiek? Rzecz Nie Tylko O Aborcji. [Is a Woman a Human Being? A Note Not Only About Abortion].” Nowa Orgia Myśli. 17 August 2022. Accessed from: http://nowaorgiamysli.pl/index.php/2018/03/22/czy-kobieta-to-czlowiek/on.
   Google Scholar
• Ploszka, A. 2022. “It Never Rains but It Pours. The Polish Constitutional Tribunal Declares the European Convention on Human Rights Unconstitutional.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 15 (1): 51–74. Advanced access. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00174-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, B. 1995. “The Ethics of Hybrid Subjects: Feminist Constructivism According to Donna Haraway.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (3): 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadurski, W. 2018. “How Democracy Dies (In Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103491.
   Google Scholar
• Sadurski, W. 2019. “Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11 (1): 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadurski, W. 2020. “Populism and Human Rights in Poland.” In Human Rights in a Time of Populism: Challenges and Responses, edited by G. L. Neuman, 60–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sajó, A. 2021. Ruling by Cheating: Governance in Illiberal Democracy, Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108952996.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, A., and L. von Danwitz. 2018. “Selecting Judges in Poland and Germany: Challenges to the Rule of Law in Europe and Propositions for a New Approach to Judicial Legitimacy.” German Law Journal 19 (4): 769–816. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022872.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. D. S. 1977. “The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada.” Law & Society Review 12 (1): 5–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 85 (2): 545–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şerban, M. 2018. “Stemming the Tide of Illiberalism? Legal Mobilization and Adversarial Legalism in Central and Eastern Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51 (3): 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skąpska, G. 2002. “Law and society in a natural laboratory: the case of Poland in the broader context of East-Central Europe.“ In Three social science disciplines in Central and Eastern Europe: handbook on economics, political science and sociology (1989-2001), edited by M. Kaase, V. Sparschuh and A. Wenninger, 588–603. Berlin: Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, L. M. 2014. “Russian NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights: A Spectrum of Approaches to Litigation.” Human Rights Quarterly 36 (4): 844. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2014.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, L. M., V. Sperling, and M. Sayoglu. 2019. Courting Gender Justice: Russia, Turkey, and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. K. 2020. “On the Social Construction of Legal Grievances: Evidence from Colombia and South Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (8): 1326–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019897685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tykwińska-Rutkowska, D. 2021. “The Right to Abortion in Poland in the Light of the Constitutional Tribunal’s Judgment of 22 October 2020.” Studia Iuridica Toruniensia 29:419–440. https://doi.org/10.12775/SIT.2021.040.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L. 2018. “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (3): 380–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R. 2015. Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe. Oxford: Macmillan – St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyrzykowski, M. 2019. “Experiencing the Unimaginable: The Collapse of the Rule of Law in Poland.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11 (2–3): 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00124-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar