Marriage and the reproductive regime of a digitally connected Roma diaspora

References

• Agarwala, R., A. A. Schaffer, and J. F. Tomlin. 2001. “Towards a Complete North American Anabaptist Genealogy II: Analysis of Inbreeding.” Human Biology 73 (4): 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1353/hub.2001.0045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghel, R. G. 2019. “When the Poor Migrate and Return: Class and Status Repositioning Among Roma Transnational Returnees.” In Transnational Return and Social Change. Hierarchies, Identities, and Ideas, edited by R. G. Anghel, M. Fauser, and P. P. Boccagni, 25–42. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beluschi-Fabeni, G. 2013. “Roma Korturare entre Transilvania y Andalucía: Procesos migratorios y reproducción cultural.” PhD. Dissertation, Granada: Universidad de Granada.
   Google Scholar
• Beluschi-Fabeni, G. 2018. “Ritual Spaces and Burial Places. International Migration and Transnational Change Among the Korturare Roma.” Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics 4 (3): 136–157. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v4i3.378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkner, L. K. 1972. “The Stem Family and the Developmental Cycle of the Peasant Household: An Eighteenth-Century Austrian Example.” The American Historical Review 77 (2): 398–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/1868698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berta, P. 2019. Materializing Difference: Consumer Culture, Politics, and Ethnicity Among Romanian Roma. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bideau, A., and M. Poulain. 1984. “De la généalogie à la démographie historique : généalogie ascendante et analyse démographique.” Annales de démographie historique 1984 (1): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.3406/adh.1984.1597.
   Google Scholar
• Bošnjak, B., and T. Acton 2013. “Virginity and Early Marriage Customs in Relation to Children's Rights Among Chergashe Roma from Serbia and Bosnia.” The International Journal of Human Rights 17 (5–6): 646–667.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1976. “Marriage Strategies as Strategies of Social Reproduction.” In Family and Society. Selections from the Annales. Economies, Societiés, Civilisations, edited by R. Foster and O. Ranum, 117–144. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budilová, L. J. 2020. “Endogamy Between Ethnicity and Religion. Marriage and Boundary Construction in Voyvodovo (Bulgaria), 1900–1950.” The History of the Family 25 (1): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2019.1641132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahn, C. 2009. “Romani Law in the Timiş County Giambaş Community.” Romani Studies 19 (2): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2009.5.
   Google Scholar
• Chirițoiu, A., and C. Tesăr. 2020. “Introduction: Roma Marriage-Making, Between the Constraints of “Tradition” and the “Choices” of Liberalization.” Martor. 25: 9–14. https://doi.org/10.57225/martor.2020.25.01.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. L. 1980. The Meaning of Marriage Payments. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupâquier, J. 1993. “Généalogie et démographie historique.” Annales de démographie historique 1993 (1): 391–395. https://doi.org/10.3406/adh.1993.1851.
   Google Scholar
• Engebrigtsen, A. 2007. Exploring Gypsiness. Power, Exchange and Interdependence in a Transylvanian Village. Oxford: Bergham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fosztó, L. 2009. Ritual Revitalisation After Socialism: Community, Personhood, and Conversion Among Roma in a Transylvanian Village. Münster: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gamella, J. F. 2018. “Marriage, Gender and Transnational Migrations in the Fertility Transitions of Romanian Roma Women.” Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics 4 (2): 57–85. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v4i2.389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamella, J. F. 2020. “Consanguineous Marriages Among Andalusian Gitanos/Calé: A Genealogical Analysis (1925–2006).” Journal of Biosocial Science 52 (6): 809–831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamella, J. F., and A. Álvarez-Roldán. 2023. “Breaking Secular Endogamy. The Growth of Intermarriage Among the Gitanos/Calé of Spain (1900–2006).” The History of the Family 28 (3): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2159852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamella, J. F., G. Beluschi-Fabeni, E. Gómez Oehler, and V. Muntean. 2017. “Founder Effects and Transnational Mutations: The Familial Structure of a Romani Diaspora.” In Open Borders, Unlocked Cultures: Romanian Roma Migrants in Western Europe, edited by Y. Matras and D. V. Leggio, 83–106. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamella, J. F., and E. Martín. 2017. “The Decline of Infant and Child Mortality Among Spanish Gitanos or Calé (1871–2005) a Micro-Demographic Study in Andalusia.” Demographic Research 36:945–988. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamella, J. F., V. M. Muntean, and F. J. Ogáyar-Marín. 2023. Kris in the Digital Era. Transnational Conflict Resolution in a Roma Diaspora. Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gropper, R. C. 1975. Gypsies in the City: Culture Patterns and Survival. Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hrdy, S. B. 2009. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, B. R., W. F. Danaher, and W. L. Breedlove. 2011. “New Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Marriage Transactions.” Cross-Cultural Research 45 (4): 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111402466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette, R., and H. Charbonneau. 1984. “Généalogies descendantes et analyse démographique.” Annales de démographie historique 1984 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.3406/adh.1984.1596.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, H. P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. 2002. “The Emergence of Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s.” Population and Development Review 28 (4): 641–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebano, A., and L. Jamieson. 2020. “Childbearing in Italy and Spain: Postponement Narratives.” Population and Development Review 46 (1): 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeson, P. T. 2013. “Gypsy Law.” Public Choice 155 (3–4): 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0048-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggio, D. V. 2020. “Romani on the Internet.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Romani Language and Linguistics, edited by I. Matras and A. Tenser, 515–537. Cham: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martín, J., P. Brañas-Garza, A. M. Espín, J. F. Gamella, and B. Herrmann 2019. “The Appropriate Response of Spanish Gitanos: Short-Run Orientation Beyond Current Socio-Economic Status.” Evolution and Human Behavior 40 (1): 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, E., and G. J. F. 2005. “Marriage Practices and Ethnic Differentiation: The Case of Spanish Gypsies (1870–2000).” The History of the Family 10 (1): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2004.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Marushiakova, E., and V. Popov. 1997. Gypsies (Roma) in Bulgaria. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mateescu, B. 2020. “Marriage and Family Life of Romanians and Roma: Aspects Reflected in the First Two Modern Romanian Censuses.” Martor The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review 25:37–58. https://doi.org/10.57225/martor.2020.25.03.
   Google Scholar
• Ogáyar, F. J., V. Muntean, J. F. Gamella, and A. M. Espín. 2023. “The Network Expression of a Roma Diaspora.” Social Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Okley, J. 1983. The Traveller-Gypsies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olivera, M. 2011. La tradition de l’intégration. Une ethnologie des Roms Gabori dans les années 2000. Paris: Éditions Pétra.
   Google Scholar
• Oprea, A. 2004. “Re-Envisioning Social Justice from the Ground Up: Including the Experiences of Romani Women.” Essex Human Rights Review 1 (1): 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Piasere, L. 1985. Màre Roma. Categories humaines et structure sociale. Une contribution a l’ethnologie tsigane. Paris: Études et Documents Balkaniques er Méditterranéens.
   Google Scholar
• Piasere, L. 2015. Mariages romanès. Une esquisse comparative. Florence: Seid Editori.
   Google Scholar
• Post, W., F. Van Poppel, E. Van Imhoff, and E. Kruse. 1997. “Reconstructing the Extended Kin-Network in the Netherlands with Genealogical Data: Methods Problems and Results.” Population Studies 51 (3): 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000150046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. F. 1991. Beyond the Family. The Social Organization of Human Reproduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotaru, J., and D. Gaunt. 2023. The Wallachian Gold-Washers. Unlocking the Golden Past of the Rudari Woodworkers. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, O. 1998. “Two Kinds of Stem-Family System? Traditional Japan and Europe Compared.” Continuity and Change 13 (1): 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416098003087.
   Google Scholar
• Salat, L., and S. Mișcoiu. 2021. “Roma Autonomous Lawmaking – the Romanian Case.” In Non-Territorial Autonomy and Decentralization: Ethno-Cultural Diversity Governance, edited by T. H. Malloy and L. Salat, 167–194. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salo, M., and S. Salo. 1977. The Kalderas in Eastern Canada. Ottawa: National Museum.
   Google Scholar
• San Román, T. 1976. Vecinos gitanos. Madrid: Akal.
   Google Scholar
• Schlegel, A., and R. Eloul. 1988. “Marriage Transactions: Labor, Property, Status.” American Anthropologist 90 (2): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1988.90.2.02a00030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorescu-Marinković, A., T. Kahl, and B. Sikimić, edited by 2021. Boyash Studies: Researching “Our People”. Berlin: Frank and Timme GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, P. 1986. Household, Village and Village Confederation in Southeastern Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. 1997. The Time of the Gypsies. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, A. 1975. Gypsies: The Hidden Americans. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, A. 2016. Roma: Modern American Gypsies. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szikszai, K., J. A. Kacso, and S. Enache. 2012. “Report: Survey on Forced Marriages in Romania.” Noua Revistă de Drepturile Omului (The New Journal of Human Rights) 2:67–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tesăr, C. 2012. “Becoming Rom (Male), Becoming Romni (Female) among Romanian Cortorari Roma: On Body and Gender.” Romani Studies 22 (2): 113–140. https://doi.org/10.3828/rs.2012.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesăr, C. 2015. “Houses Under Construction: Conspicuous Consumption and the Values of the Youth Among Romanian Cortorari Gypsies.” In Romani Livelihoods and Notion of Worth in the 21st Century, edited by M. Brazzabeni, M. I. Cunha, and M. Fotta, 181–200. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tesăr, C., and A. Chiritoiu, eds. 2020. “Marriage-Making among Roma in Central and Eastern Europe: Practices, Imaginaries, Economies.” In The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Journal. Bucharest: Martor.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happyness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. W. 1926. “Gypsy Marriage in England, I.” Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society 6 (1): 9–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tillion, G. 1966. Le harem et les cousins. Paris: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, J. 2003. “When Her Feet Touch the Ground: Conflict Between the Roma Familistic Custom of Arranged Juvenile Marriage and Enforcement of International Human Rights Treaties.” Journal of Transnational Law and Polity 13:475. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jtrnlwp13&div=19&id=&page=.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61 (4): 674–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyrauch, W. O., edited by 2001a. Gypsy Law: Romani Legal Traditions and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyrauch, W. O. 2001b. “Romaniya: An Introduction to Gypsy Law.” In Gypsy Law: Romani Legal Traditions and Culture, edited by W. O. Weyrauch, 1–10. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 1984. Marriage tsigane. Une cérémonie de fiancailles chez les Rom de Paris. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 1994. “Jeux, tours et manèges: une étnologie des tsiganes.” Études Tsiganes 2:169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, E. A. 1966. “Family Reconstitution.” In An Introduction to English Historical Demography. From the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Century, edited by E. A. Wrigley, 96–159. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z. 2001. “Chinese Genealogies as a Source for Demographic Research: A Further Assessment of Their Reliability and Biases.” Population Studies 55 (2): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720127690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar