Coexistence and creativity: screen media education in the age of artificial intelligence content generators

References

• Appleton, L., G. G. Montero, and A. Jones. 2017. “Creative Approaches to Information Literacy for Creative Arts Students.” Communications in Information Literacy 11 (1): 7. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.39.
   Google Scholar
• Bas-Sarmiento, P., M. Fernández-Gutiérrez, M. Baena-Baños, A. Correro-Bermejo, P. S. Soler-Martins, and S. de la Torre-Moyano. 2020. “Empathy Training in Health Sciences: A Systematic Review.” Nurse Education in Practice 44: 102739. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastick, T. 2003. Intuition: Evaluating the Construct and Its Impact on Creative Thinking. Kingston, Jamaica: Stoneman & Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, S.M., and M. Broderick. 2021. Virtual Realities: Case Studies in Immersion and Phenomenology. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, S.M., and B. Sung. 2020. “Data-driven Creativity for Screen Production Students: Developing and Testing Learning Materials Involving Audience Biometrics.” Digital Creativity 31 (2): 98–113. doi:10.1080/14626268.2020.1767654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. [1935] 1969. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, 217–252. New York: Shocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. 2009. “Academy and the Real World: Developing Realistic Notions of Career in the Performing Arts.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8 (3): 309–327. doi:10.1177/1474022209339953.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, J. D., and R. Grusin. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. 2012. Poetics of Cinema. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R. 2019. “Creative Industries and Higher Education: What Curriculum, What Evidence, What Impact?” In A Research Agenda for Creative Industries, edited by S. Cunningham, and T. Flew, 112–130. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R., and S. Cunningham. 2016. “Creative Labour and Graduate Outcomes: Implications for Higher Education and Cultural Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 22 (1): 10–26. doi:10.1080/10286632.2015.1101086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplin, L.-P. 2020. Writing Compelling Dialogue for Film and TV. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caratozzolo, P., V. Lara-Prieto, S. Hosseini, and J. Membrillo-Hernández. 2022. “The use of Video Essays and Podcasts to Enhance Creativity and Critical Thinking in Engineering.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 16 (3): 1231–1251. doi:10.1007/s12008-022-00952-8.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, C. 2023. “Australian Universities to Return to “Pen and Paper” Exams After Students Caught Using AI to Write Essays.” The Guardian, January 10. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/10/universities-to-return-to-pen-and-paper-exams-after-students-caught-using-ai-to-write-essays.
   Google Scholar
• Cattoni, J., C. Ryan, C. Batty, M. McAllister, and J. Nash. 2022. “Collaborative Story Development Across the Creative Arts and Nursing: Reflections on a Practice-Based Filmmaking Research Project.” Journal of Media Practice 23 (4): 329–346. doi:10.1080/25741136.2022.2122682.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. 2022. “When AI Can Make Art – What Does it Mean for Creativity?” The Guardian, November 12. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/12/when-ai-can-make-art-what-does-it-mean-for-creativity-dall-e-midjourney.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, T. 2007. “Articulating Aesthetic Understanding Through Art Making.” International Journal of Education & The Arts 8 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2012. “Degree Programmes Need to be Business-Ready.” Financial Times, September 16. https://www.ft.com/content/3cbb7938-ed3a-11e1-83d1-00144feab49a.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. “Play and Intrinsic Rewards.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 15 (3): 41–63. doi:10.1177/002216787501500306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, R., and R. Johnstone. 2017. “Becoming an Artist: Exploring the Motivations of Undergraduate Students at a Regional Australian University.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (6): 1015–1032. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1075196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, K. 2022. “AI Image Generators Will Help Artists, Not Replace Them.” BBC Science Focus Magazine, September 29. https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/ai-image-generators-will-help-artists-not-replace-them/.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, W. 2006. “From “Doing” to “Knowing What You Are Doing”: Kolb’s Learning Theory in Teaching Documentary Practice.” Journal of Media Practice 7 (2): 151–158. doi:10.1386/jmpr.7.2.151_3.
   Google Scholar
• Di Leo, J. R. 2013. Corporate Humanities in Higher Education: Moving Beyond the Neoliberal Academy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, K., M. McHugh, M. Berry, C. Batty, and J. Verdon. 2022. “Approaches to Gender Diversity Behind the Camera in Australian Student Screen Productions.” Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media 24: 118–131. doi:10.33178/alpha.24.07.
   Google Scholar
• Dowds, B. N. 1998. “Helping Students Make Connections Across Disciplines.” Creativity Research Journal 11 (1): 55–60. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1101_7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, D. 2009. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, & Human Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A. D. 2004. “Art Education as Imaginative Cognition.” In Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education, edited by E. W. Eisner, and M. D. Day, 751–773. Mahway, USA: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., and L. Shanock. 2003. “Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity: A Case Study of Conceptual and Methodological Isolation.” Creativity Research Journal 15 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, L. 2022. “Crafting Higher Education in the UK: Tensions Between Policy and Practice.” In Craft Shaping Society, edited by L. Joubert, 183–194. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• The Future Of. 2022. The Future Of: Visual Effects [YouTube]. Youtube, October 17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = rESQIKt01tQ.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. 2022. Meta’s New Make-a-Video Signals the Next Generative AI Evolution, September 29. https://venturebeat.com/ai/metas-new-make-a-video-signals-the-next-generative-ai-evolution/.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. 1995. The Story of Art. 16th ed. London: Phaidon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, C., D. Acuña, K. Toyama, L. Parker, and M. Finlayson. 2023. “AI and the Future of Work: 5 Experts on What ChatGPT, DALL-E and Other AI Tools Mean for Artists and Knowledge Workers.” The Conversation, January 11. http://theconversation.com/ai-and-the-future-of-work-5-experts-on-what-chatgpt-dall-e-and-other-ai-tools-mean-for-artists-and-knowledge-workers-196783.
   Google Scholar
• Greylock. 2022. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman | AI for the Next Era. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = WHoWGNQRXb0.
   Google Scholar
• Hanney, R. 2013. “Towards a Situated Media Practice: Reflections on the Implementation of Project- led Problem-Based Learning.” Journal of Media Practice 14 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1386/jmpr.14.1.43_1.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. 2022. “Waste Creatively: The Intersection of Creativity and Consumerism.” In Homo Creativus: Creativity in the Twenty First Century, edited by T. Lubart, M. Botella, S. Bourgeois-Bougrine, X. Caroff, J. Guegan, C. Mouchiroud, J. Nelson, and F. Zenasni, 219–234. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., and T. M. Amabile. 1998. “Reality, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity.” American Psychologist 53 (6): 674–675. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.6.674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, J., W. Chan, C. Saharia, J. Whang, R. Gao, A. Gritsenko, D. P. Kingma, et al. 2022. Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Models. https://imagen.research.google/video/paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J. 2018. “Insights Into Teaching Creativity in Editing.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 12 (2-3): 179–191. doi:10.1080/17503175.2018.1469456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoorn, J. 2014. Creative Confluence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K. 2023. “Alarmed by A.I. Chatbots, Universities Start Revamping How They Teach.” The New York Times, January 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technology/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-universities.html.
   Google Scholar
• Illingworth, S. 2023. “ChatGPT: Students Could Use AI to Cheat, but it’s a Chance to Rethink Assessment Altogether.” The Conversation, January 19. http://theconversation.com/chatgpt-students-could-use-ai-to-cheat-but-its-a-chance-to-rethink-assessment-altogether-198019.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P., and J. Y. Lee. 2020. “The Labour Market Outcomes of Australian Creative Arts Degree Holders.” Australian Journal of Labour Economics 23 (1): 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Liddy, S. 2022. ““Where Are We Now?” Assessing the Gender Equality and Diversity Journey in Irish Screen Industries (2016–21).” Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media 24: 12–31. doi:10.33178/alpha.24.01.
   Google Scholar
• Lindauer, M. S. 1998. “Interdisciplinarity, the Psychology of Art, and Creativity: An Introduction.” Creativity Research Journal 11 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1101_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loloum, T. 2020. “Containing the Future Shock.” Social Anthropology 28 (2): 306–307. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, I. W. 2006. “Mindset and Skillset; the Persistence of Division in Media Education.” Journal of Media Practice 7 (2): 135–142. doi:10.1386/jmpr.7.2.135_3.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, L. 2021. “Electric Sheep? Humans, Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Writing.” Changing English 28 (4): 442–455. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2021.1941768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosen, D. 2022. Can Artificial Intelligence Replace Humans in Artistic Jobs? - Crayon. Crayon. https://www.crayon.com/resources/insights/artificial-intelligence-replace-humans-artistic-jobs/.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, E., R. Bridgstock, and P. McDonald. 2018. “ The Unique Value of Creative Arts Higher Education for Preparing Graduates for Work.” In Research and Development in Higher Education: [Re] Valuing Higher Education, edited by Dale Wache Don Houston, 162–171. Adelaide: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, P. 2021. ““Deepfakes” and the End of the Photographic Age.” Aporia XXI: 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Petric, V. 1976. “The Projector and the Camera: Integrating Courses in Cinema Studies and Filmmaking.” Journal of the University Film Association 28 (2): 3–7. doi:10.1080/1358165770030402.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, S. 1996. “True Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images, and Film Theory.” Film Quarterly 49 (3): 27–37. doi:10.2307/1213468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, S. 2011. Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: The Seduction of Reality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, S., and J. Tai. 2021. “What’s Outside the Learning box? Resisting Traditional Forms of Learning and Assessment with the Video Essay: A Dialogue Between Screen Media & Education.” Media Practice and Education 22 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1080/25741136.2020.1832765.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., M. McAllister, R. Vanderburg, and C. Batty. 2023. “A Creative Intervention Focusing on Transformative Learning in the Professional Development of Clinical Teachers.” Science Talks 100131. doi:10.1016/j.sctalk.2023.100131.
   Google Scholar
• Salkowitz, R. 2022. “AI Is Coming For Commercial Art Jobs. Can It Be Stopped?” Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robsalkowitz/2022/09/16/ai-is-coming-for-commercial-art-jobs-can-it-be-stopped/?sh = 4223045254b0.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. 2021. “The Iterative and Improvisational Nature of the Creative Process.” Journal of Creativity 31: 100002. doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100002.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. 2022. “The Dialogue of Creativity: Teaching the Creative Process by Animating Student Work as a Collaborating Creative Agent.” Cognition and Instruction 40 (4): 459–487. doi:10.1080/07370008.2021.1958219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shine, K., and T. Cullen. 2019. “Student Responses to a new Project Model Capstone Unit in Journalism.” Australian Journalism Review 41 (2): 241–255. doi:10.1386/ajr_00009_1.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. 2022. “Your Creativity Won’t Save Your Job From AI.” The Atlantic, December 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/12/why-the-rise-of-ai-is-the-most-important-story-of-the-year/672308/.
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A. 1971. Future Shock. London: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasulo, F. P. 1997. “Theory to Practice: Integrating Cinema Theory and Film Production.” Cinema Journal 36 (3): 113–117. doi:10.2307/1225680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanova University. 2017. Should Creatives Fear Losing Their Jobs to AI? Villanova University. https://www.villanovau.com/resources/bi/artificial-intelligence-job-security/.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, B. 2013. “A Reflective Perspective on the Challenges Facing Research-led Teaching in the Performing and Creative Arts.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 12 (2-3): 222–233. doi:10.1177/1474022212473944.
   Google Scholar
• Wright-Brough, F., P. Hart, S. Maher, and S. Cake. 2023. “Co-creative Practice Reconciling Theory and Practice in Tertiary Student Documentary Production.” Journal of Media Practice 24 (1): 52–69. doi:10.1080/25741136.2022.2157936.
   Google Scholar
• Zeki, S. 1999. Inner Vision: An Exploration of art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar