A policy design perspective on electricity rates

References

• Auffhammer, M., P. Baylis, and C. H. Hausman. 2017. “Climate Change is Projected to Have Severe Impacts on the Frequency and Intensity of Peak Electricity Demand across the United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (8): 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613193114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. M., and F. A. Felder. 2019. “Residential Energy Supply Market: Unmet Promises and Needed Reforms.” The Electricity Journal 32 (3): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2019.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Berg, W., and A. Drehobl. 2018. “State-Level Strategies for Tackling the Energy Burden: A Review of Policies Extending State-and Ratepayer-Funded Energy Efficiency to Low-Income Households.” 2018 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Making Efficiency Easy and Enticing.
   Google Scholar
• Bonbright, J. C. 1961. Principles of Public Utility Rates. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonbright, J. C., A. L. Danielsen, and D. R. Kamerschen. 1988. Principles of Public Utility Rates. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. A., A. Soni, M. V. Lapsa, K. Southworth, and M. Cox. 2020. “High Energy Burden and Low-Income Energy Affordability: Conclusions from a Literature Review.” Progress in Energy 2 (4): 042003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/abb954
   Google Scholar
• Calver, P., and N. Simcock. 2021. “Demand Response and Energy Justice: A Critical Overview of Ethical Risks and Opportunities within Digital, Decentralised, and Decarbonised Futures.” Energy Policy 151: 112198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S. 2009. “Distributed Generation: An Empirical Analysis of Primary Motivators.” Energy Policy 37 (5): 1648–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., M. Graff, D. M. Konisky, and T. Memmott. 2022. “Behavioral and Financial Coping Strategies among Energy-Insecure Households.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119 (36): e2205356119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205356119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., and D. M. Konisky. 2020. “The Justice and Equity Implications of the Clean Energy Transition.” Nature Energy 5 (8): 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, M., L. Dunning, and J. Heibel. 2019. “State Policies for Utility Investment in Energy Efficiency.” In Report for the National Conference of State Legislatures. Washington, DC: NCSL (National Conference of State Legislatures). www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/Documents/ energy/Utility_Incentives_4_2019_33375.pdf?ver=2019-04-04-154310-703.
   Google Scholar
• Convery, F. J., K. Mohlin, and E. Spiller. 2017. “Policy Brief—Designing Electric Utility Rates: insights on Achieving Efficiency, Equity, and Environmental Goals.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11 (1): 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, C., N. Harrison, C. Kewei Xu, and S. Zhou. 2021. “Collaboration Mitigates Barriers of Utility Ownership on Policy Adoption: Evidence from the United States.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 64 (1): 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1755241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darghouth, N. R., R. H. Wiser, G. Barbose, and A. D. Mills. 2016. “Net Metering and Market Feedback Loops: Exploring the Impact of Retail Rate Design on Distributed PV Deployment.” Applied Energy 162: 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faruqui, A. 2022. “Ten Lessons in Rate Design: A Meditation.” The Electricity Journal 35 (10): 107223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2022.107223
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui, A., W. Davis, J. Duh, and C. Warner. 2016. Curating the Future of Rate Design for Residential Customers. Electricity Daily. San Francisco: The Brattle Group. https://www.brattle.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/7137_curating_the_future_of_rate_design_for_residential_customers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui, A., and S. Sergici. 2010. “Household Response to Dynamic Pricing of Electricity: A Survey of 15 Experiments.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 38 (2): 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. S. 2011. “The Importance of Marginal Cost Electricity Pricing to the Success of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Programs.” Energy Policy 39 (11): 7347–7360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, M., S. Carley, D. M. Konisky, and T. Memmott. 2021. “Which Households Are Energy Insecure? An Empirical Analysis of Race, Housing Conditions, and Energy Burdens in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science 79: 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, D. 2016. “Understanding ‘Energy Insecurity’ and Why It Matters to Health.” Social Science & Medicine 167: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, K. 2022. “Coordinating Markets for Reliability: Resource Adequacy as a Public Good.” The Electricity Journal 35 (3): 107097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2022.107097
   Google Scholar
• Joskow, P. L., and C. D. Wolfram. 2012. “Dynamic Pricing of Electricity.” American Economic Review 102 (3): 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J. 2006. “Green Markets and Private Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Political Economy 114 (4): 816–834. https://doi.org/10.1086/506337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousky, C., K. Greig, B. Lingle, and K. Kunreuther. 2018. “Wildfire Cost in California: The Role of Electric Utilities.” Changes 114: 4582–4590.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, A., and S. Hoff. 2019. “Investor-Owned Utilities Served 72% of U.S. electricity Customers in 2017.” Today in Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=40913
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. P., and H. Yin. 2010. “Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation.” The Energy Journal 31 (3): 133–158. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No3-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratori, M., B. A. Schuelke-Leech, and G. Rizzoni. 2014. “Role of Residential Demand Response in Modern Electricity Markets.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33: 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanquist, T. F., H. Orr, B. Shui, and A. C. Bittner. 2012. “Lifestyle Factors in US Residential Electricity Consumption.” Energy Policy 42: 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satchwell, A., A. Mills, and G. Barbose. 2015. “Regulatory and Ratemaking Approaches to Mitigate Financial Impacts of Net-Metered PV on Utilities and Ratepayers.” Energy Policy 85: 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L., and H. M. Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, S. E., and A. L. Sexton. 2014. “Conspicuous Conservation: The Prius Halo and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Bona Fides.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67 (3): 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin, E. D., and I. M. Azevedo. 2020. “Characterizing the Association between Low-Income Electric Subsidies and the Intra-Day Timing of Electricity Consumption.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (9): 094089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S. 2020. Understanding and Analyzing Public Policy Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. M., C. Koski, and S. Siddiki. 2021. “Regulating Net Metering in the United States: A Landscape Overview of States’ Net Metering Policies and Outcomes.” The Electricity Journal 34 (2): 106901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2020.106901
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, E. 1970. “Alternative Rate or Return Concepts and Their Implications for Utility Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1 (1): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003023
   Google Scholar
• White, L. V., and N. D. Sintov. 2019. “Health and Financial Impacts of Demand-Side Response Measures Differ across Sociodemographic Groups.” Nature Energy 5 (1): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0507-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 2020. “Distributed Energy Systems as Common Goods: Socio-Political Acceptance of Renewables in Intelligent Microgrids.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 127: 109841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 2012. “The Research Agenda on Social Acceptance of Distributed Generation in Smart Grids: Renewable as Common Pool Resources.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (1): 822–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X., Y. Ozturk, Z. Hu, and Y. Song. 2018. “A Review on Price-Driven Residential Demand Response.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 96: 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, H., and N. Powers. 2010. “Do State Renewable Portfolio Standards Promote in-State Renewable Generation?” Energy Policy 38 (2): 1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar