Advancing policy design through creative engagement with lived experience: the Tomorrow Party

References

• Adams, Tony E., Stacy Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis, eds. 2022. Handbook of Autoethnography. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Yoko, Penny Hagen, and Desna Whaanga-Schollum. 2019. “Problematizing Replicable Design to Practice Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-Designing with Indigenous People.” Design and Culture 11 (1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Paul, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland, and Lyn Lofland, eds. 2007. Handbook of Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, Christian, and Robert D. Austin. 2022. “Design in the Public Sector: Toward a Human Centred Model of Public Governance.” Public Management Review 24 (11): 1727–1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1919186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, Emma. 2018. “The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 77 (4): 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow, Davis B., and John S. Dryzek. 1987. Policy Analysis by Design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Tim. 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organisation and Inspires Innovation. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Denshire, Sally. 2014. “On Auto-Ethnography.” Current Sociology 62 (6): 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. 2019. Mental Health Lived Experience Engagement Framework. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Caroline, Karen Gardner, and Karen Wells. 2021. “The Importance of Incorporating Lived Experience in Efforts to Reduce Australian Reincarceration Rates.” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 10 (2): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.1942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, Catherine, and Liz Richardson. 2016. Designing Public Policy for Co-Production: Theory, Practice and Change. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Carolyn, and Michael G. Flaherty, eds. 1992. Investigating Subjectivity: Research on Lived Experience. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. 2019. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael. 2011. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael. 2014. “From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Policy Design: Design Thinking beyond Markets and Collaborative Governance.” Policy Sciences 47 (3): 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. 2018. “IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation.” https://iap2.org.au/resources/spectrum/
   Google Scholar
• Isom, Jessica, and Lilanthi Balasuriya. 2021. “Nothing about us without us in Policy Creation and Implementation.” Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.) 72 (2): 121–121. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.72202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy, and Jocelyn Bailey. 2017. “Prototyping and the New Spirit of Policy-Making.” CoDesign 13 (3): 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer, Hannah, Ann Light, and Lisa Grocott. 2021. “Understanding Feminist Anticipation through ‘Back-Talk’: 3 Narratives of Willful, Deviant, and Care-Full Co-Design Practices.” Futures 136: 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtka, Jeanne, Andrew King, and Kevin Bennett. 2013. Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling through.” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, Steven, and B. Guy Peters. 1991. “The Logic of Public Policy Design: Linking Policy Actors and Plausible Instruments.” Knowledge and Policy 4 (1–2): 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692751
   Google Scholar
• McGann, Michael, Emma Blomkamp, and Jenny M. Lewis. 2018. “The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael, and Joannah Luetjens. 2016. “Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael, Deirdre O’Neill, and Ruby O’Connor. 2021. “Royal Commissions and Policy Influence.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 80 (1): 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, Michael. 2019. Public Policy: Investing for a Better World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muiderman, Karlijn, Aarti Gupta, Joost Vervoort, and Frank Biermann. 2020. “Four Approaches to Anticipatory Climate Governance: Different Conceptions of the Future and Implications for the Present.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11 (6): e673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, Daniel, Karin Ingold, Christopher M. Weible, Elizabeth A. Koebele, Kristin L. Olofsson, Keiichi Satoh, and Hank Jenkins-Smith. 2023. “The Advocacy Coaltion Framework: Progress and Emerging Areas.” Chap. 4 in Theories of the Policy Process. 5th ed., edited by Christopher M. Weible, 130–159. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penin, Lara. 2018. An Introduction to Service Design: designing the Invisible. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah, Vaike Fors, Debora Lanzeni, Melisa Duque, Shanti Sumartojo, and Yolande Strengers. 2022. Design Ethnography: Research, Responsibilities, and Futures. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah, Yoko Akama, and Shanti Sumartojo. 2018. Uncertainty and Possibility: New Approaches to Future Making in Design Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, Zoe, Stephen P. Osborne, Tony Kinder, and Jean Mutton. 2014. “Operationalizing co-Production in Public Services Delivery: The Contribution of Service Blueprinting.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.848923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbotham, Sheila, and Swatsi Mitter, eds. 1994. Dignity and Daily Bread: New Forms of Economic Organising among Poor Women in the Third World and the First. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2–3): 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1992. “Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation.” Knowledge-Based Systems 5 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simey, T. S. 1961. “The Contribution of Sidney and Beatrice Webb to Sociology.” The British Journal of Sociology 12 (2): 106–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/586926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Leanne Betasamosake. 2017. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance. Kindle ed. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelton-Wilson, Syreeta, Madison Sandoval-Lunn, Xiaodong Zhang, Francesca Stern, and Jessica Kendall. 2021. “Methods and Emerging Strategies to Engage People with Lived Experience—Improving Federal Research.” Policy and Practice 19 (December): 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, Erin, and Katherine E. McDonald. 2014. “Nothing About Us without Us: Does Action Research in Developmental Disabilities Research Measure Up?” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 11 (2): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, Shanti, Tim Edensor, and Sarah Pink. 2019. “Atmospheres in Urban Light.” Ambiances 5 (5): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4000/ambiances.2586
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, Arwin, Jenny M. Lewis, B. Guy Peters, and William Voorberg. 2020. “Improving Public Policy and Administration: Exploring the Potential of Design.” Policy & Politics 48 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher M., ed. 2023. Theories of the Policy Process. 5th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2023. WHO Framework for Meaningful Engagement of People Living with Noncommunicable Diseases, and Mental Health and Neurological Conditions. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yunkaporta, Tyson. 2019. Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar