Approaching Irreversibility in Global Nuclear Politics

References

• Abraham, I. 2006. “The Ambivalence of Nuclear Histories.” Osiris 21 (1): 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/507135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, I. 2011. Irreversibility in Nuclear Disarmament: Political, Societal, Legal and Military-Technical Aspects. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Asia, N. 2022. “‘North Korea Makes Nuclear Weapons Policy ‘Irreversible’.” Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/N-Korea-at-crossroads/North-Korea-makes-nuclear-weapons-policy-irreversible?fbclid=IwAR0B3yCzF1KHwiUsphBvFNdmMmdhSgBUNoU67JepF5FUMz0wrx3uF4_oG6U
   Google Scholar
• Betts, R. K. 1977. “Paranoids, Pygmies, Pariahs & Nonproliferation.” Foreign Policy 26 (26): 157–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/1147904.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, S. 2014. Nuclear Desire: Power and the Postcolonial Nuclear Order. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, D., H. Elbahtimy, and A. Persbo. 2011. Irreversibility in Nuclear Disarmament: Practical Steps Against Nuclear Rearmament. VERTIC. https://www.vertic.org/media/assets/Presentations/Irreversibility_Launch_Presentation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CRS. 2003–2011. Nuclear Arms Control: The Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL31448.html.
   Google Scholar
• den Dekker C., G. den Dekker, and T. Coppen. 2012. “Termination and Suspension Of, and Withdrawal From, WMD Arms Control Agreements in Light of the General Law of Treaties.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 17 (1): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krs004.
   Google Scholar
• Elbahtimy, H. 2022. “Approaching Irreversibility in Global Nuclear Politics.” Consortium Working Paper 1.
   Google Scholar
• Elbahtimy, H., and R. Peel. 2023. “Nuclear Weapons Production Complexes in a Disarmed World.” Journal for Peace & Nuclear Disarmament 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2292348.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, W. 1977. “Why States Go—And Don’t Go—Nuclear.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 430 (1): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627743000104.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, D. 2023. “Irreversibility in Nuclear Arms Control and Disarmament Law?” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 28 (3): 423–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krad013.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, N. W. 1997. “The Politics of Verification: Why ‘How much?’ is Not Enough.” Contemporary Security Policy 18 (2): 138–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523269708404165.
   Google Scholar
• Goodby, J., R. Lajoie, and A. Diakov. 1998. “Dismantlement and Irreversibility.” Meeting Summary: The Future of Russian-US Strategic Arms Reductions: START III and Beyond. https://www.armscontrol.ru/transforming/day2.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gower, J., and C. Parthemore. 2021. A Practical Strategy for Nuclear Risk Reduction and Disarmament: Fulfilling the Code of Nuclear Responsibility. Briefer No.17. The Nolan Centre and Council on Strategic Risks. https://councilonstrategicrisks.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/A-Practical-Strategy-for-Nuclear-Risk-Reduction-and-Disarmament_Fulfilling-the-Code-of-Nuclear-Responsibility_Briefer-17_2021_4_19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnoczi, T. 2023. “Legal Reflections on the Irreversibility of Nuclear Disarmament.” Journal of Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.
   Google Scholar
• Hymans, J. E. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on Fissile Materials. 2023. “‘Countries: France’. International Panel on Fissile Materials.” https://fissilematerials.org/countries/france.html.
   Google Scholar
• IPNDV Working Group 1. 2018. Food-For-Thought Paper: Achieving Irreversibility in Nuclear Disarmament. IPNDV. https://www.ipndv.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/IPNDV-WG1-FFT-Irreversibility-Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I. 2004. “A Comparative Analysis of President Clinton and Bush’s Handling of the North Korean Nuclear Weapons Program: Power and Strategy.” Pacific Focus 19 (1): 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1976-5118.2004.tb00303.x.
   Google Scholar
• Krass, A. S. 2020. Verification: How Much is Enough?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. 2019. “‘New START Treaty Data Shows Treaty Keeping Lid on Strategic Nukes by Hans Kristensen’.” Federation of American Scientists. https://fas.org/blogs/security/2019/10/new-start-2019-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Muti, A., G. Christopher, and N. Stott. 2023. “The Role of Verification in Supporting Irreversible Nuclear Disarmament.” Journal for Peace & Nuclear Disarmament 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2291892.
   Google Scholar
• Pelopidas, B. 2011. “The Oracles of Proliferation: How Experts Maintain a Biased Historical Reading That Limits Policy Innovation.” The Nonproliferation Review 18 (1): 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2011.549185.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2013. “Valuing and devaluing nuclear weapons.” Contemporary Security Policy 34 (1): 146–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2013.771040.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2014. “Waiting for Kant: devaluing and delegitimizing nuclear weapons.” International Affairs 90 (3): 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, N. 2023. “Irreversibility and Nuclear Disarmament: Unmaking Nuclear Weapon Complexes.” Journal for Peace & Nuclear Disarmament 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2023.2282737.
   Google Scholar
• Rublee, M. R. 2009. Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, S. D. 1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb.” International Security 21 (3): 54–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.21.3.54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., L. Register, and H. Chen. 2022. “North Korea Declares Itself a Nuclear Weapons State, in ‘Irreversible’ Move.” CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/09/asia/north-korea-kim-nuclear-weapons-state-law-intl-hnk/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Smetana, M., and C. Wunderlich. 2021. “Forum: Nonuse of Nuclear Weapons in World Politics: Toward the Third Generation of “Nuclear Taboo” Research.” International Studies Review 23 (3): 1072–1099. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solingen, E. 2009. Nuclear Logics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. 2005. “Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo.” International Security 29 (4): 5–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2005.29.4.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welna, D. 2018. “‘Complete, Verifiable, Irreversible’ a Tough Goal for North Korea Summit’.” NPR. https://www.npr.org/2018/06/06/617619192/complete-verifiable-irreversible-a-tough-goal-for-north-korea-summit.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H., J. Link, and J. Rodgers. 2023. Irreversibility in Nuclear Disarmament. CSIS. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep47438.1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wit, J. S., D. B. Poneman, and R. L. Gallucci. 2005. Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar