Survival stories as access to society. People with history of a crime as experts by experience

References

• Adams, R. (2008). Empowerment, participation, and social work (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2009). Authoritative consumers or experts by experience? User groups in health and social care. In R. Simmons, M. Powell, & I. Greener (Eds.), The consumer in public services: Choice, values and difference (pp. 219–234). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., & Cotterell, P. (2012). Critical perspectives on user involvement. In M. Barnes., & P. Cotterell., (Eds.). Critical Perspectives on User Involvement.(pp. xv-xxvi). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2001). Service users, social policy and the future of welfare. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 494–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100404
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy and Society: A Journal of the Social Policy Association, 1(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402000222
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2013). From “other” to involved: User involvement in research: An emerging paradigm. Nordic Social Work Research: Understanding the Other, 3(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2013.835138
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2020). PPI or user involvement: Taking stock from a service user perspective in the twenty first century. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00211-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2001). Service users’ knowledges and the social construction of social work. Journal of Social Work, 1(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100304
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., Salo, M., & Varner, E. (2008). Kokemuksen muodonmuutos: Kohti palveluiden käyttäjien omaa tutkimustoimintaa. Mielenterveyden keskusliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Beckwith, M., Haslam, C., Alexander Haslam, S., Jetten, J., Mawson, E., & Lubman, D. I. (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory,24(2), 111–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2017). I wanted to feel the way they did: Mimesis as a situational dynamic of Peer Mentoring by Ex-Offenders. Deviant Behavior, 38(9), 1027–1041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1237829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2019). Politicisation or professionalisation? Exploring divergent aims within UK voluntary sector Peer Mentoring. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 58(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12305
   Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2003). Social Constructionism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M. (2009). Critical commentary: Happy shopper? The problem with service user and carer participation. The British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley, H., Roddam, G., & Wiston, J. (2009). Working with service users and carers. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates (3rd). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500235603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D., N., Pelletier, E., & Szkola, J. (2018). Education in prison and the Self-Stigma: Empowerment continuum. Crime and Delinquency, 64(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. (2019). Empowerment evaluation: A stakeholder involvement approach. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 30(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, N. (2020). Considering a participatory approach to social work – Service user research. Qualitative Social Work: QSW: Research and Practice, 19(5–6), 1078–1094. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019894636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. (2017). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouché, C., & Chubb, L. (2017). Action researchers encountering ethical review: A literature synthesis on challenges and strategies. Educational Action Research,25(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1128956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. In Pedagogy of indignation. Paradigm Publ. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315632902
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M., J. (2014). On the inside looking in: Methodological insights and challenges in conducting qualitative insider research. The Qualitative Report, 19(29), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschovits-Gerz, T., Sihvo, S., Karjalainen, J., & Nurmela, A.,(2019). Kokemusasiantuntijuus Suomessa: Selvitys kokemusasiantuntijakoulutuksen ja -toiminnan käytännöistä. Työpaperi nro 17/2019 Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos.
   Google Scholar
• Hänninen, V. (2004). A model of narrative circulation. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.14.1.04han
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, P. K. (2020). Strengthening the empowerment approach in social work practice: An EPS model. Journal of Social Work, 20(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320911348
   Google Scholar
• Killington, M., Fyfe, D., Patching, A., Habib, P., McNamara, A., Kay, R., Kochiyil, V., & Crotty, M. (2019). Rehabilitation environments: Service users’ perspective. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 22(3), 396–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivipelto, M., & Kotiranta, T. (2011). Valtaistumisen vaikuttavuuden arviointi. Miten voisimme edistää sitä sosiaalityössä? Janus, 19(2), 122–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lakeman, R., Walsh, J., & McGowan, P. (2007). Service users authority, power and protest: A call for renewed activism. Mental Health Practice, 11(4), 12–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp2007.12.11.4.12.c6332
   Google Scholar
• Leppo, A., Perälä, R., (2009). User involvement in Finland: The hybrid of control and emancipation. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260910966771
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2020). Assessing the impact of co-production on pathways to outcomes in public services: The case of policing and criminal justice. International Public Management Journal,23(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1668895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, H., Broderick, G., & Hegarty, R. (2020) Service users reaching out to help professionals: Shaping professional education on substance use and poverty issues. In H. McLaughlin, P. Beresford, H. Casey, C. Cameron, & J. Duffy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of service user involvement in human services research and education 1st Routledge.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433306
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2010). The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: From programmes to lives. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 65–89). William Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maunula, M. (2016). Tarina väitöskirjan takana: Tutkimusta elämänkulussa, arjessa ja vähän tulevaisuudessakin. In E. Johnson & L. Kivioja, Centria. Tutkimuksia, 2 Eds. Avauksia tutkimusmatkalle: Kokemuksia narratiivisesta ja kehittävästä tutkimusotteesta (pp. 69–78). Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 242–262). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). Service-User research in health and social care. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K. (2014). Empowering the people: ‘empowerment’ and the British journal of social work, 1971–99. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/204986014X13987657343659
   Google Scholar
• Meriluoto, T. (2018). Making Experts by experience Governmental Ethnography of Participatory Initiatives in Finnish Social Welfare Organisations. University of Jyväskylä. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. JYU Dissertations 38.
   Google Scholar
• Meriluoto, T. (2019). “The will to not be empowered (according to your rules)”: Resistance in finnish participatory social policy. Critical Social Policy,39(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318764322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miley, K. K., O’Melia, M., & DuBois, B. (2009). Generalist social work practice: An empowering approach (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. S., Lapan, S. D., & Quartaroli, M. T. (2012). Case study research. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Riemer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (p. 243–270). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Muurinen, H. (2019). Service-user participation in developing social services: Applying the experiment-driven approach. European Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 961–973. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1461071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Clarke, J., Remaking the public in public services. (2009). Publics, politics and power remaking the public in public services. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, S. (2020a). Using desistance narratives as a pedagogical resource in criminology teaching. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(4), 471–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2020.1802496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, S. (2020b). “Giving back and getting on with my life”: Peer mentoring, desistance and recovery of ex-offenders. Probation Journal, 67(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550519900249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorani, T. (2013). Service user involvement, authority and the ‘expert-by-experience’ in mental health. Journal of Political Power, 6(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2013.774979
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2013). Modern social work theory. Palgrave: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rabeharisoa, V., Moreira, T., & Akrich, M. (2014). Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties, 9(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00896357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen, P.,(2015). Toivoton tapaus. Autoetnografia sairastumisesta ja kuntoutumisesta. Kuntoutussäätiö.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. M., & Black, B. L. (1985). Advocacy and empowerment: Mental health care in the community. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D., Argentzell, E. (2018). Service users experience of Peer support in Swedish Mental Health Care: A “Tipping Point” in the Care-Giving culture? J. Psychosoc, 2018(5), 53–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0109-1
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J., & Beresford, P. (2015). Between exclusion and colonisation: Seeking a place for mad people’s knowledge in academia. Disability & Society, 30(1), 153–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.957925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen, J.,(1999). Voimaantumisteorian perusteiden hahmotelma. Oulu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. (2009). So what is survivor research? In A. Sweeney, P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, & D. Rose, Herefordshire Eds. This is survivor research (pp. 22–37). PCCS BOOKS Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• TENK (2012). Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland 2012.
   Google Scholar
• TENK (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Toikko, T. (2012). Asiakkaasta kokemusasiantuntijaksi. Suuntaaja 3/2012.
   Google Scholar
• Toikko, T. (2016). Becoming an expert by experience: An analysis of service users’ learning process. Social Work in Mental Health,14(3), 292–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2015.1038411
   Google Scholar
• Winston, C. E. (2012). Biography and life story research. In S. Lapan, M. Quartaroli, & F. Riemer; Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (Eds.) Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 107–136).
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. (2000). Empowerment theory. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman, & Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Kluwer Academic/Plen.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, R., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00930023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar