Confinement and restrictive measures against young people in the Nordic countries – a comparative analysis of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

References

• Andersson, P., Enell, S., Nolbeck, K., Pettersson, T., Rennerskog, J., & Vogel, M. A. (2021). Barnkonventionen gäller även unga som begår brott. Tidskrift för Kriminalvård, 14 mars. www.tfkriminalvard.org
   Google Scholar
• Ankestyrelsen (2020). Årsrapport. [Annual report.] Köpenhamn: Ankestyrelsen
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V. (2013). Nordic exceptionalism revisited: Explaining the paradox of a Janus-faced penal regime. Theoretical Criminology, 17(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612468935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, T. T. (2012). Learning to become a ‘gangster’? Journal of Youth Studies, 15(6), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.671930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryderup, I. (2010). Ungdomskriminalitet, socialpolitik och socialpædagogik. Biografiske interview med unge om straf og behandling [Youth crime, social policy and social pedagogy. Biographical interviews with youth on punishment and treatment]. Århus: Klim.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Right Defenders. (2020). Sweden’s compliance with the convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CAT) joint NGO-submission for the UN committee against torture review of Sweden during its 70th session. Stockholm: Civil Right Defenders. 2020-September-23.
   Google Scholar
• Danske Regioner. (2020). Statistik for de sikrede institutioner 2019 [Statistics for secure institutions].
   Google Scholar
• Enell, S., Gruber, S., & Vogel, M. A. Eds., (2018). Kontrollerade unga. Tvångspraktiker på institution. [Controlled Youths. Practices of coercion in residential care.] Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Enell, S., & Wilińska, M. (2021). Negotiating, opposing, and transposing dangerousness: A relational perspective on young people’s experiences of secure care. YOUNG, 29(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308820914825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freymon, N., & Cameron, G. (2006). Understanding International Comparisions of Child Protection, family service, and community caring systems of child and family welfare. In N. Freymon & G. Cameron (Eds.), Towards positive systems of child and family welfare. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., & Zobbe, K. (2006). Fokus på anvendelsen af de sikrede afdelinger [Focus on the use of secure units]. Teori og Metodecenteret, Hillerød: Professionshøjskolen UCC.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. (2014). Methodological pluralism in international comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.892656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrikari, T. (2008). Exploring risk governance in the Nordic context. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 20(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2008.12056185
   Google Scholar
• Helavirta, S., Halttunen, S., & Laakso, R. (eds). (2021). Sijaishuollon rajoitustoimenpiteet ammatillisina käytäntöinä ja kokemuksina [Restrictive measures in out-of-home care as professional practices and experiences]. Rovaniemi: Lapin ammattikorkeakoulu.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A. (2017). Confined to care: Girls’ gendered vulnerabilities in secure institutions. Gender & Society, 31(5), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217726968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A. K. E. (2021). Unges veje til og fra sikret anbringelse: En beskrivelse af tre forløbstyper [Young people’s paths to and from placement in secure care: A description of three types of courses]. Social Kritik: Tidsskrift for social analyse & debat, 164 , 78–85 https://socialkritik.dk/164-opslag/.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A., & Prieur, A. (2019). ‘So, why am I here?’ Ambiguous practices of protection, treatment and punishment in Danish secure institutions for youth. British Journal of Criminology, 59(5), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestbæk, A.-D. (1998). En komparativ beskrivelse af de nordiske landes lovgivning. [Compulsory care in the Nordic countries. A comparative description of legislation] 98:15 København: Socialforskningsinstituttet.
   Google Scholar
• Hoikkala, S. (2020). Historiallinen tapaustutkimus lastensuojelulaitoksen rajoittamis- ja kurinpitokäytännöistä 1950-2000 [A historical case study of the restrictive and disciplinary practices of one residential institution in 1950–2000]. Helsinki: Heikki Waris-instituutti.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtanen, R., & Pösö, T. (2018). Restriktiva åtgärder i den finska barnavården. In S. Enell, S. Gruber, & M. A. Vogel (Eds.), Kontrollerade unga. Tvångspraktiker på institution [Controlled youths. Practices of coercion in residential care] (pp. 213–234). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet (2020). Høring – forslag til endringer i konfliktrådsloven, straffeloven, straffeprosessloven mv. – strafferettslige reaksjoner og tvangsmidler for ungdom. [Hearing – Proposals to changes of criminal sanctions and coercive measures to young people]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing–forslag-til-endringer-i-konfliktradsloven-straffeloven-straffeprosessloven-mv.–strafferettslige-reaksjoner-og-tvangsmidler-for-ungdom/id2737600/
   Google Scholar
• Kalliomaa-Puha, T., Pösö, T., & Toivonen, V. (2021). Error correction of restrictive measures: Appeals made by young people in care. Young, 29(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308820914810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriminalvården. (2018). Redovisning av regeringens uppdrag till Kriminalvården att, tillsammans med Åklagarmyndigheten och Statens institutionsstyrelse, lämna förslag på åtgärder i syfte att förbättra situationen för barn som frihetsberövas. [Report of the government’s assignment to the Swedish Prison and probation service, public prosecutor and the National Board of Institutional Care, to provide suggestions of improvements for children deprived of their liberty]. Stockholm: Kriminalvården.
   Google Scholar
• Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2011). Nordic Youth Justice. Crime and Justice, 40(1), 199–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/661113
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M. I., & Keisala, H. (2007). Nuorisorangaistus I. Nuorisoprosessi ja tuomitseminen (The New Juvenile Punishment). Report 2030. Helsinki: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos.
   Google Scholar
• Muurinen, T. (2021). Alaikäiset ja nuoret vangit [Underage and young prisoners]. Handout 5. Helsinki: Rikosseuraamuslaitos.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Human Rights Institution (2021). The UN Human Rights Monitoring Bodies 2017–2020: Compilation of Recommendations to Norway. https://www.nhri.no/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/UN_Recommendation_2020_web_oppslag.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. (2019). The United Nations global study on children deprived of liberty, Geneva, November 2019. http://omnibook.com/view/e0623280-5656-42f8-9edf-5872f8f08562
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, T. (2010). Recidivism among youth sentenced to prison and youth custody [Återfall i brott bland ungdomar dömda till fängelse respektive sluten ungdomsvård]. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, T. (2017). Young offenders and open custody. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, T. (2018). När hjälpen gör ont värre – Om (oönskade?) effekter av att undvika häkte för unga lagöverträdare [When the help makes it worse – (unwanted?) consequences of avoiding remand prisons for young offenders]. In P. Leviner & T. Lundström (Eds.), Tvångsvård av unga. Rättigheter, utmaningar och gränszoner [Compulsory care of young people. Rights, challenges and grey areas]. 278–295. Stockholm: Wolters Kluver .
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., Skivenes, M., & Hestbæk, A.-D. (2014). Child protection systems within the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian welfare states-time for a child centric approach? European Journal of Social Work, 17(4), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2013.829802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2008). SCANDINAVIAN EXCEPTIONALISM IN AN ERA OF PENAL EXCESS: Part II: Does Scandinavian exceptionalism have a future? British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2008a). SCANDINAVIAN EXCEPTIONALISM IN AN ERA OF PENAL EXCESS: Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettighetsforskrift [Ministry of children and families]. (2011). https://lovdata.no/static/lovtidend/ltavd1/2018/sf-20180627-1081.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rise, (2020). Rikosseuraamuslaitoksen tilastoja 2020 [The statistics of the criminal sanctions agency]. Helsinki: Rikosseuraamuslaitos. https://www.rikosseuraamus.fi/material/collections/20210630143720/7RRy9CvLt/RISE_Tilastollinen_vuosikirja_2020_FI_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sköld, J., & Swain, S. (eds.). (2015). Apologies and the legacy of abuse of children in ‘care’. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. S. (2011). A critical look at Scandinavian exceptionalism. Welfare state theories, penal populism and prison conditions in Denmark and Scandinavia. In T. Ugelvik & J. Dullum (Eds.), Penal exceptionalism? Nordic prison policy and practice. Oxford: Routledge 38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Stang Dahl, T. (1978). Barnevern og Samfunnsvern: Om Stat, Vitenskap og Profesjoner under Barnevernets Oppkomst i Norge. [Child welfare and social defence]. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Statens institutionsstyrelse. (2017). SiS i korthet 2016. En samling statistiska uppgifter om SiS. [Statistics 2016, SiS]. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Statens institutionsstyrelse. (2021). SiS i korthet 2020. En samling statistiska uppgifter om SiS. [Statistics 2020, SiS]. Stockholm: Statens institutionsstyrelse.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk Sentralbyrå (2020). Barn med tiltak i løpet av året og per 31. desember, etter region, tiltakskategori, statistikkvariabel og år. [ Measures for children at december 31 according to region, category of measure, variable and year]. https://data.ssb.no/api/v0/no/table/12238/
   Google Scholar
• Storgaard, A. (2005). Juvenile justice in Scandinavia. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 5(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850410028703
   Google Scholar
• Taxhjelm, F. R., Gaardsted, M. F., & Dabelsten, H. B. (2020). Sociale anbringelser på sikrede institutioner i et menneskeretligt perspektiv. København: Institut for Menneskerettigheder.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). United nations committee on the rights of the child (CRC/C/SWE/CO/5 6 mar 2015), Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• van Dorp, M., Nijhof, K. S., Mulder, E. A., & Popma, A. (2021). Defining seclusion: A qualitative multiphase study based on the perspectives of youth and professionals in secure residential youth care in the Netherlands. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth 38 4 , 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2021.1879710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Duschinsky, R., Fox, N. A., Goldman, P. S., Gunnar, M. R., Johnson, D. E., Nelson, C. A., Reijman, S., Skinner, G. C. M., Zeanah, C. H., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2020). Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: A systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(8), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30399-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, M. A. (2012). Särskilda ungdomshem och vårdkedjor: Om ungdomar, kön, klass och etnicitet [Secure units and chains of care: youth, gender, class and ethnicity]. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, M., Rausmaa, S., & Kortelainen, J. (2020). Erityisen huolenpidon nuorten palvelupolut [The service paths of young people in special care]. Report 3. Helsinki: ITLA.
   Google Scholar