School and home-based responding in an online youth crime survey: A natural experiment related to school lockdown in spring 2020

References

• Aquilino, W. S., Wright, D. L., & Supple, A. J. (2000). Response effects due to bystander presence in CASI and paper-and-pencil surveys of drug use and alcohol use. Substance Use and Misuse, 35(6–8), 845–867+1101–1105. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826080009148424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2004). Measuring crime victimisation: The impact of different collection methodologies. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/research/measuring-crime-victimisation-impact-different-collection-methodologies (Accessed 14 March, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Bjarnason, T. (1995). Administration mode bias in school survey on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use. Addiction, 90(4), 555–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02190.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brener, N. D., Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Grunbaum, J. A., Gross, L. A., Kyle, T. M., & Ross, J. G. (2006). The association of survey setting and mode with self-reported health risk behaviors among high school students. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(3), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brener, N. D., Bohm, M. K., Jones, C. M., Puvanesarajah, S., Robin, L., Suarez, N., Deng, X., Harding, R. L., & Moyse, D. (2022). Use of tobacco products, alcohol, and other substances among high school students during the covid-19 pandemic - adolescent behaviors and experiences survey, United States, January-June 2021. MMWR Supplements, 71(3), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su7103a2
   Google Scholar
• Cops, D., De Boeck, A., & Pleysier, S. (2016). School vs. mail surveys: Disentangling selection and measurement effects in self-reported juvenile delinquency. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815608883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellonen, N., Minkkinen, J., Kaakinen, M., Suonpää, K., Miller, B. L., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Does parental control moderate the effect of low self-control on adolescent offline and online delinquency? Justice Quarterly, 38(5), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1738526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enzmann, D., Kivivuori, J., Haen Marshall, I., Steketee, M., Hough, M., & Killias, M. (2018). A Global Perspective on Young People as Offenders and Victims. First Results from the ISRD3 Study. Springer Briefs in Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, H. S., Farrington, D. P., Maia, Â., & Krohn, M. D. (2019). Measurement bias in self-reports of offending: A systematic review of experiments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09379-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfreson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivivuori, J. (2011). Discovery of hidden crime: Self-report surveys in criminal policy context. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivivuori, J., Salmi, V., & Walser, S. (2013). Supervision mode effects in computerized delinquency surveys at school: Finnish replication of a Swiss experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9162-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolttola, I. (2021). Rikollisuustilanne 2020: Rikollisuuskehitys tilastojen ja tutkimusten valossa. Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, Katsauksia. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/337259/Katsauksia_49_Rikollisuustilanne_2020_2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, I. H. (2010). “Pourquoi pas?” Versus “Absolutely not!” Cross-national differences in access to schools and pupils for survey research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-010-9125-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naplava, T., & Oberwittler, D. (2002). Methodeneffekte bei der Messung selbstberichteter Delinquenz von männlichen Jugendlichen. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 85(6), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2002-00062
   Google Scholar
• Saukkonen, S., Laajasalo, T., Jokela, M., Kivivuori, J., Salmi, V., & Aronen, E. T. (2016). Weapon carrying and psychopathic-like features in a population-based sample of Finnish adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 25(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0724-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walser, S., & Killias, M. (2012). Who should supervise students during self-report interviews? A controlled experiment on response behaviour in online questionnaires. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-011-9129-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (2012). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 12(2), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar