123
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

‘On n’est pas dans Black Mirror’: ambivalent optimism in Osmosis

ORCID Icon

Filmography

References

  • Applebaum, N. 2010. Representations of Technology in Science Fiction for Young People. New York: Routledge.
  • Asimov, I. 1963. “Runaway.” In I, Robot, 40–58. New York: Doubleday.
  • Baker, B. 2014. Science Fiction: A Reader’s Guide to Essential Criticism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Balzac, H. de. 2011. Le Père Goriot: Histoire Parisienne, edited by A. Olivier. Paris: Champion.
  • Bataille, G. 1970. “La valeur d’usage de D.A.F. de Sade (I) (Lettre ouverte à mes camarades actuels).” In Of Œuvres complètes. Vol. 2. edited by Denis Hollier, 54–69. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Battin, J. M. 2021. “Technology and Place in Science Fiction: Exploring the Post-Pessimism of Black Mirror.” In Reading Black Mirror: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition, edited by G. A. Duarte and J. M. Battin, 119–147. Bielefeld: Transcript.
  • Bhaumik, A. 2018. From AI to Robotics: Mobile, Social, and Sentient Robots. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Blanc-Hoang, H.-S. 2018. “City of Lights No More: Dystopian Paris in French Science Fiction.” In Cityscapes of the Future: Urban Spaces in Science Fiction, edited by Y. Maurer and M. Koren-Kuik, 102–119. Leiden: Brill.
  • Boswell, P. A. 2014. Pregnancy in Literature and Film. Jefferson: McFarland.
  • Brand, C. 2018. “‘Feeding like a Parasite’: Extraction and Science Fiction in Capitalist Dystopia.” In Economic Science Fictions, edited by W. Davies, 95–124. London: Goldsmiths Press.
  • Bréan, S. 2012. La Science-fiction en France. Théorie et histoire d’une littérature. Paris: Presses de l’université de Paris-Sorbonne.
  • Davies, W. 2018. “Introduction to Economic Science Fictions.” In Economic Science Fictions, edited by W. Davies, 1–28. London: Goldsmiths Press.
  • DeJean, J. 2014. How Paris Became Paris: The Invention of the Modern City. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Delogu, D. 2015. Allegorical Bodies: Power and Gender in Late Medieval France. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Dinello, D. 2005. Technophobia! Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Di Summa, L. T. 2022. “Technology in Pastel Colors: An Alternative Take on Black Mirror.” In Philosophical Reflections on Black Mirror, edited by D. Shaw, K. Marshall, and J. Rocha, 49–66. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Faber, L. W. 2020. The Computer’s Voice: From ‘Star Trek’ to Siri. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Fauer, J. 2020. “Interview with J.-F. Hensgens: ‘RED MONSTRO 8K VV—Cooke S7/i—Hensgens AFC SBC’.” Film and Digital Times, March 3. https://www.fdtimes.com/2020/03/22/hensgens/
  • Gatje, R. F. 2010. Great Public Squares: An Architect’s Selection. New York: Norton.
  • Gibson, W. 1984. Neuromancer. New York: Ace.
  • Giraldo-Luque, S., R. C. Bugs, and S. Tejedor. 2021. “Nosedive and the ‘Like’ Dystopia: A Reflection on Black Mirror.” In Reading Black Mirror: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition, edited by G. A. Duarte and J. M. Battin, 165–182. Bielefeld: Transcript.
  • Gordin, M. D., H. Tilley, and G. Prakash. 2010. “Introduction: Utopia and Dystopia beyond Space and Time.” In Utopia/Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility, edited by M. D. Gordin, H. Tilley, and G. Prakash, 8–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hilal, N., A. Ismail, M. K. Souhaimi, and Daniel Johnson, eds. 2021. Osmosis Engineering. San Diego: Elsevier.
  • Husain, A. 2017. The Sentient Machine: The Coming of Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Scribner.
  • Houllebecq, M. 2015. Soumission. Paris: Flammarion.
  • Kerjean, H. 2019. “‘On n’est pas dans Black Mirror’: On a visité le tournage d’Osmosis, la nouvelle série française de Netflix.” Allociné, March 6. https://www.allocine.fr/article/fichearticle_gen_carticle=18679574.html
  • Lay, C. 2021. “Black Mirror as Philosophy: A Dark Reflection of Human Nature.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy, edited by D. K. Johnson, 1–20. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Levigne, C. 2013. Cyberpunk Women, Feminism and Science Fiction: A Critical Study. Jefferson: McFarland.
  • Mbembe, A. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Translated by Libby Meintjes. Public Culture 15: 11–40. doi:10.1215/08992363-15-1-11.
  • McKenna, T. 2019. “Behind the Black Mirror: The Limits of Orwellian Dystopia.” Critique 47: 365–376. doi:10.1080/03017605.2019.1601887.
  • Michaud, T. 2017. Innovation, between Science and Science Fiction. London: ISTE.
  • Morgan, R. K. 2002. Altered Carbon. London: Gollanz.
  • Nickelsburg, M. 2016. “Why Is AI Female? How Our Ideas about Sex and Service Influence the Personalities We Give Machines.” Geekwire, April 4. https://www.geekwire.com/2016/why-is-ai-female-how-our-ideas-about-sex-and-service-influence-the-personalities-we-give-machines/
  • Niebur, L. 2013. “Babylon 5: Science Fiction, Melodrama, and Musical Style.” In Music in Science Fiction Television: Tuned to the Future, edited by K. J. Donnelly and P. Hayward, 151–162. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Pilon, C. 2019. “Robotisation et aliénation: De l’objectivation de l’homme à la valorisation de la machine.” In La Société robotisée. Enjeux éthiques et politiques, edited by M.-H. Parizeau and S. Kash, 167–185. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
  • Piquat, A. 2019. “Comment la France veut forcer Netflix et Amazon à financer la création française.” Le Monde, September 4. https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2019/09/04/comment-la-france-veut-forcer-netflix-et-amazon-a-financer-la-creation-francaise_5506232_3234.html
  • Price, R. G. 2020. “Love in Black Mirror: Who Do We Really Love?” In Black Mirror and Philosophy: Dark Reflections, edited by D. K. Johnson, 301–310. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Rocha, L. 2018. “That Geek Look: Beauty and the Female Geek Body.” In Age of the Geek: Depictions of Nerds and Geeks in Popular Media, edited by K. E. Lane, 193–211. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schröpfer, T. 2016. Dense + Green: Innovative Building Types for Sustainable Urban Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  • Schröpfer, T. 2020. Dense + Green Cities: Architecture as Urban Ecosystem. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  • Scott, P., and A. Ziethen. 2019. “La science-fiction en langue française: Du merveilleux scientifique à l’afrofuturisme.” Œuvres & Critiques 44 (2): 5–14. doi:10.2357/OeC-2019-0011.
  • Sebald, W. G. 2001. Austerlitz. Munich: Hanser.
  • Sorolla-Romero, T., J. A. Palao-Errando, and J. Marzal-Felici. 2021. “Unreliable Narrators for Troubled Times: The Menacing ‘Digitalisation of Subjectivity’ in Black Mirror.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video 38: 147–169. doi:10.1080/10509208.2020.1764322.
  • Stacey, J. 2010. The Cinematic Life of the Gene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Steinmueller, W. Edward. 2017. “Science Fiction and Innovation: A Response.” Research Policy 46: 550–553. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.009.
  • Tallibert, C., and B. Cailler. 2021. “Video on Demand Platforms, Editorial Strategies, and Logics of Production: The Case of Netflix France.” In A European Television Fiction Renaissance: Premium Production Models and Transnational Circulation, edited by L. Barra and M. Scaglioni, 103–117. London: Routledge.
  • Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, A. de. 1886. L’Ève future. Paris: de Brunhoff.
  • Vincent-Arnaud, N. 2009. “Contrepoints chromatiques. Couleur et énonciation musicale dans Gattaca d’Andrew Niccol (1997).” In Cinéma et couleur, edited by R. C. de Beauregard, 358–369. Paris: Houdiard.
  • Withers, J. 2020. Futuristic Cars and Space Bicycles: Contesting the Road in American Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  • Wosk, J. 2015. My Fair Ladies: Female Robots, Androids, and Other Artificial Eves. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Yeung, L. K. C., and K.-N. Pei. 2022. “Black Mirror as Philosophizing about Immortality, Technology, and Human Nature.” In Philosophical Reflections on Black Mirror, edited by D. Shaw, K. Marshall, and J. Rocha, 31–48. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Zhou, Y., and M. H. Fischer. 2019. “Intimate Relationships with Humanoid Robots: Exploring Human Sexuality in the Twenty-First Century.” In AI Love You: Developments in Human–Robot Intimate Relationships, edited by Y. Zhou and M. H. Fischer, 177–184. Cham: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.