A conceptual model of intergroup contact, social capital, and youth civic engagement for diverse democracy

References

• Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253.
   Google Scholar
• Akiva, T., Carey, R. L., Cross, A. B., Delale-O’Connor, L., & Brown, M. R. (2017). Reasons youth engage in activism programs: Social justice or sanctuary? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53(September), 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Al Ramiah, A., & Hewstone, M. (2013). Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: Evidence, limitations, and potential. American Psychologist, 68(7), 527–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison–Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J., & Hughes, M. (2014). Adolescence and emerging adulthood (pp. 102–111). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., … Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629–1643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. E., & Zhou, S. (2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 442–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizjak, I. (2012). Improving public participation in spatial planning with web 2.0 tools. Urbani Izziv, 23(1), 112–124.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. JG Richardson. New York, Greenwood, 241(258), 19.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. (2004). Microeconomics: Behavior. Institutions, and Evolution, 164.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 29–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A. (2008). Conceptualizing resiliency: An interactional perspective for community and youth development. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A., Barnett, R. V., & McGrath, B. (2009). The intersection of youth and community development in Ireland and Florida: Building stronger communities through youth civic engagement. Community Development, 40(4), 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bridger, J. C., & Alter, T. R. (2006). Place, community development, and social capital. Community Development, 37(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. J., Greene, S., & McKenna, M. K. (2016). A critical geographic approach to youth civic engagement: Reframing educational opportunity zones and the use of public spaces. Urban Education, 51(2), 143–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (2009). Youth civic engagement for dialogue and diversity at the metropolitan level youth civic engagement for dialogue and diversity at the metropolitan level. The Foundation Review, 1(2), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 340–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B., & Aldana, A. (2013). Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1894–1899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogburn, C. D., Chavous, T. M., & Griffin, T. M. (2011). School-based racial and gender discrimination among African American adolescents: Exploring gender variation in frequency and implications for adjustment. Race and Social Problems, 3(1), 25–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Socilogy, 94, S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. R., & Guidry, S. (2018). What effect does inequality have on residents’ sense of safety? Exploring the mediating processes of social capital and civic engagement. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 1009–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. S., Killen, M., & Ruck, M. (2008). It is who you know that counts: Intergroup contact and judgments about race-based exclusion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 51–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M. (2010). Strengthening the “social” in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustainable Development, 18(6), 362–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bernardo, G. A., Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., McKeown Jones, S., Cocco, V. M., Saguy, T., & Dixon, J. (2019). Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430219889134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Voight, A. M., & McWhirter, E. H. (2016). Critical consciousness: A developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 216–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18(10), 867–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., & Fallon, L. A. (1989). The concept of sustainability: Origins, extensions, and usefulness for policy. Society and Natural Resources, 2(1), 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(6), 411–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2010). “Let them eat harmony”: Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current DIrections in Psychological Science, 19(2), 76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle, A., & Faul, A. C. (2013). Civic engagement scale: A validation study. SAGE Open, 3(3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, R. (2008). Social capital and implications for positive youth development. Monograph, 1998, 1–18. November 10, 2019. http://4h.ucanr.edu/files/1224.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Enos, R. R. (2017). The space between us: Social geography and politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness (Vol. 1). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gaby, S. (2017). The civic engagement gap(s): Youth participation and inequality from 1976 to 2009. Youth and Society, 49(7), 923–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S., Burke, K. J., & McKenna, M. K. (2018). A review of research connecting digital storytelling, photovoice, and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 844–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurin, P., Sorensen, N., Lopez, G. E., Nagda, B., & Ratnesh, A. (2015). Intergroup dialogue: Race still matters. In: R. Bangs & L. E. Davis (Eds.), Race and social problems-restructuring inequality (pp. 39–60). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0863-9
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, E., Cohen, A. K., & Andes, S. (2021). Youth civic action across the United States: Projects, priorities, and approaches. Youth and Society, 53(4), 654–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B., & Dowds, L. (2006). Social contact, cultural marginality or economic self-interest? Attitudes towards immigrants in Northern Ireland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 455–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberle, A. E., Rapa, L. J., Farago, F., & Austin, S. F. (2020). Supplemental material for critical consciousness in children and adolescents: A systematic review, critical assessment, and recommendations for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 146(6), 525–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71(2), 417–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., Hewstone, M., & Swart, H. (2013). Advances in intergroup contact:Epilogue and future directions. Psychology press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Wilkenfeld, B. (2008). The stability of political attitudes and behaviors across adolescence and early adulthood: A comparison of survey data on adolescents and young adults in eight countries. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(2), 155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, E. C., Skoog, A. B., & Jagers, R. J. (2015). “It’ll never be the white kids, it’ll always be us”: Black high school students’ evolving critical analysis of racial discrimination and inequity in schools. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30(1), 83–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlings, I., & Padt, F. (2013). Leadership for sustainable regional development in rural areas: Bridging personal and institutional aspects. Sustainable Development, 21(6), 413–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S., Engberg, M. E., Ponjuan, L., & Landreman, L. (2002). Students’ precollege preparation for participation in a diverse democracy. Research in Higher Education, 43(2), 163–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N. (2021). Social capital as civic engagement. Anti-Capital: Human, Social and Cultural, 4(1), 115–150.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivijärvi, A. (2015). Fragility of leisure ties between ethnic minority and majority youth – An empirical case from. Leisure Studies, 34(2), 150–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasny, M. E., Kalbacker, L., Stedman, R. C., & Russ, A. (2015). Measuring social capital among youth: Applications in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, A., Austic, E. A., Gutiérrez, L. M., & Dirksen, K. E. (2015). The comparative impacts of social justice educational methods on political participation, civic engagement, and multicultural activism. Equity and Excellence in Education, 48(3), 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J. (2019). Youth engagement, positive interethnic contact, and ‘associational bridges’: A quasi-experimental investigation of a UK national youth engagement scheme. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(7), 1264–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, J. (2020). Cohesion through participation? Youth engagement, interethnic attitudes, and pathways of positive and negative intergroup contact among adolescents: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(13), 2700–2722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Pastore, M., & Santinello, M. (2013). Neighborhood social connectedness and adolescent civic engagement: An integrative model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, M. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions. In Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth. 10.1002/9780470767603.ch13
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2005). A network theory of social capital. In: The handbook on social capital (pp. 1–25). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Cohen, A. K. (2016). Diverging paths: Understanding racial differences in civic engagement among white, African American, and Latina/o adolescents using structural equation modeling. American Journal of Community Psychology, 57(1–2), 102–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2019). Extending the benefits of intergroup contact beyond attitudes: When does intergroup contact predict greater collective action support? Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Makarova, E., & Herzog, W. (2014). Sport as a means of immigrant youth integration: An empirical study of sports, intercultural relations, and immigrant youth integration in Switzerland. Sportswissenschaft, 44(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(7), 717–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInerney, P. (2009). Toward a critical pedagogy of engagement for alienated youth: Insights from Freire and school-based research. Critical Studies in Education, 50(1), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mckeown, S., & Taylor, L. K. (2017). Intergroup contact and peacebuilding: Promoting youth civic engagement in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 415–434.
   Google Scholar
• Mckinney, K. D. (2006). “I really felt white”: Turning points in whiteness through interracial contact. Social Identities, 12(2), 167–185.
   Google Scholar
• Merrilees, C. E., Taylor, L. K., Baird, R., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2018). Neighborhood effects of intergroup contact on change in youth intergroup bias. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(1), 77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. W. (2016). Learning to live together: Connecting the classroom to the community for racial justice in housing. In The crisis of race in higher education: A day of discovery and dialogue (Vol. 19, pp. 109–125). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2017). Civic participation reimagined: Youth interrogation and innovation in the multimodal public sphere. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 136–158.
   Google Scholar
• Nagda, B. R. A., & Gurin, P. (2007). Intergroup dialogue: A critical- dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality, and social justice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 111(111), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(May), 65–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkington, H., Pollock, G., & Franc, R. (2017). Understanding youth participation across Europe: From survey to ethnography. In Understanding Youth Participation Across Europe: From Survey to Ethnography. 10.1057/978-1-137-59007-7
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., … Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive ontact for ollective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruck, M. D., Park, H., Killen, M., & Crystal, D. S. (2011). Intergroup contact and evaluations of race-based exclusion in urban minority children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(6), 633–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, K., Al Ramiah, A., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup ontact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeland, K., Dübendorfer, S., & Hansmann, R. (2009). Making friends in Zurich’s urban forests and parks: The role of public green space for social inclusion of youths from different cultures. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, R. Q., Ezeofor, I., Smith, L. C., Welch, J. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2016). The development and validation of the contemporary critical consciousness measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 210–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, W., & Kim, J. (2011). The exploration of the relationship between participation in organized activity and cross-group friendships. International Journal on Personal Relationships, 5(2), 222–236.
   Google Scholar
• Syversten, A. K., Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., Osgood, D. W., & Briddell, L. (2011). Story of changing participation and educational differences. Journal of Adolescence, 21(3), 586–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. (2018). Civic engagement in the Middle East and North Africa. Arab Barometer. www.arabbarometer.org
   Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1145–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoy-Smith, K. M., Kane, R., & Pedersen, A. (2013). The willingness of a society to act on behalf of Indigenous Australians and refugees: The role of contact, intergroup anxiety, prejudice, and support for legislative change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(SUPPL.2), 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C., & Leong, C. H. (2006). Intercultural relations in plural societies: Theory, research and ap- plication. In D. L. Sam & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 484–503). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. J., Williams, N. C., & Jagers, R. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1/2), 185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zúñiga, X., Lopez, G., & Ford, K. A. (2016). Intergroup dialogue: Engaging difference, social identities and social justice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar