Alloys innovation through machine learning: a statistical literature review

References

• Tanaka I, Rajan K, Wolverton C. Data-centric science for materials innovation. MRS Bull. 2018;43(9):659–31. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2018.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Marques MRG, Botti S, et al. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. Npj Comput Mater. 2019;5. doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson GB. Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science. 1997;277(5330):1237–1242. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsmore KM, Puglisi CE, Grammer AC, et al. An introduction to machine learning and analysis of its use in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(12):710–730. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00708-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiler, W. Alloy physics: a comprehensive reference. Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand D, Jain A, Glensk A, et al. Machine learning for metallurgy I. A neural-network potential for al-cu. Phys Rev Mater. 2020;4(10):1–21. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.103601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakse N, Sandberg J, Granz LF, et al. Machine learning interatomic potentials for aluminium: application to solidification phenomena. J Phys Condens Matter. 2023;35(3):035402. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac9d7d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol ÖH, İnce M, Bıçaklı EE. Prediction of mechanical properties of the 2024 aluminum alloy by using machine learning methods. Arab J Sci Eng. 2023;48:2841–2850. doi: 10.1007/s13369-022-07009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar AK, Surya MS, Venkataramaiah P. Performance evaluation of machine learning based-classifiers in friction stir welding of Aa6061-T6 alloy. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2023;17(1):469–472. doi: 10.1007/s12008-022-00904-2
   Google Scholar
• Yao D, Pu S, Li M, et al. Parameter identification method of the semi-coupled fracture model for 6061 aluminium alloy sheet based on machine learning assistance. Int J Solids Struct. 2022;254–255:111823. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wu H, Paul MJ, et al. Machine-learning assisted laser powder bed fusion process optimization for AlSi10Mg: new microstructure description indices and fracture mechanisms. Acta Mater. 2020;201:316–328. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanase Y, Miyauchi H, Matsumoto H, et al. Densification behavior and microstructures of the Al-10%Si-0.35Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting: from experimental observation to machine learning. Mater Trans. 2022;63:176–184. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.MT-M2021215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun MS, Biglou J, Lenard JG, et al. Using neural networks to predict parameters in the hot working of aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Technol. 1999;86(1–3):245–251. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00318-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Du Y, Zheng ZS, et al. Manipulation of mechanical properties of 7xxx aluminum alloy via a hybrid approach of machine learning and key experiments. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;19:2483–2496. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.015
   Google Scholar
• Aydin F. The investigation of the effect of particle size on wear performance of AA7075/Al2O3 composites using statistical analysis and different machine learning methods. Adv Powder Technol. 2021;32:445–463. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2020.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decke J, Engelhardt A, Rauch L, et al. Predicting flow stress behavior of an AA7075 alloy using machine learning methods. Crystals. 2022;12(9):1–19. doi: 10.3390/cryst12091281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghdadi N, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Khalesian AR, et al. Artificial neural network modeling to predict the hot deformation behavior of an A356 aluminum alloy. Mater Des. 2013;49:386–391. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang H, Wu P, Lou Y, et al. Machine learning-based modeling of the coupling effect of strain rate and temperature on strain hardening for 5182-O aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2022;302:117501. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soofi Y J, Rahman MA, Gu Y, et al. A feasibility study of machine learning-assisted alloy design using wrought aluminum alloys as an example. Comput Mater Sci. 2022;215:111783. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takara Y, Ozawa T, Yamaguchi M. Analysis of the elemental effects on the surface potential of aluminum alloy using machine learning. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2022;61:SL1008. doi: 10.35848/1347-4065/ac5a2a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian Z, Li M, Lu W. Fatigue life prediction of aluminum alloy via knowledge-based machine learning. Int J Fatigue. 2022;157:106716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun PJ, Yamane T, Izumi S, et al. Development of a machine learning-based damage identification method using multi-point simultaneous acceleration measurement results. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(10):20. doi: 10.3390/s20102780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Zhang R, Zhang C, et al. Fast prediction of the quasi phase equilibrium in phase field model for multicomponent alloys based on machine learning method. Calphad. 2019;66:101644. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0364591619300860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Y, Zhao S, Song C, et al. Identification of aluminum alloy by laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with machine algorithm. Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2021;63(6):1629–1634. doi: 10.1002/mop.32810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yousefzadi Nobakht A, Blanks JD, et al. Machine learning for thermal transport analysis of aluminum alloys with precipitate morphology. Adv Theory Simul. 2019;2(4). doi: 10.1002/adts.201800196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinov S, Sha W, McKeown J. Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties in titanium alloys using artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci. 2001;21(3):375–394. doi: 10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00160-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinov S, Sha W. Application of artificial neural networks for modelling correlations in titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;365(1–2):202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu C, Li C, Wu D, et al. A titanium alloys design method based on high-throughput experiments and machine learning. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;11:2336–2353. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.055
   Google Scholar
• Bautista-Monsalve F, García-Sevilla F, Miguel V, et al. A novel machine-learning-based procedure to determine the surface finish quality of titanium alloy parts obtained by heat assisted single point incremental forming. Metals (Basel). 2021;11(8):11. doi: 10.3390/met11081287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan Z, Hu W, Meng Q. Data-driven fatigue life prediction in additive manufactured titanium alloy: a damage mechanics based machine learning framework. Eng Fract Mech. 2021;252:107850. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang Z, Qian G, et al. Machine learning based very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Fatigue. 2022;158:106764. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Zeng WD, Zhao YQ, et al. Development of constitutive relationship model of Ti600 alloy using artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci. 2010;48:686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy NS, Panigrahi BB, Ho CM, et al. Artificial neural network modeling on the relative importance of alloying elements and heat treatment temperature to the stability of α and β phase in titanium alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2015;107:175–183. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak S, Kim J, Ding H, et al. Machine learning prediction of the mechanical properties of γ-TiAl alloys produced using random forest regression model. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;18:520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.108
   Google Scholar
• Outeiro J, Cheng W, Chinesta F, et al. Modelling and optimization of machining of ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy using machine learning and design of experiments methods. J Manuf Mater Process. 2022;6(3):6. doi: 10.3390/jmmp6030058
   Google Scholar
• Wu CT, Lin PH, Huang SY, et al. Revisiting alloy design of low-modulus biomedical β-Ti alloys using an artificial neural network. Materialia. 2022;21:101313. doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101313
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang L, Zhang H, et al. Accelerated development of high-strength magnesium alloys by machine learning. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2021;52:943–954. doi: 10.1007/s11661-020-06132-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Wang L, Zhu G, et al. Predicting tensile properties of AZ31 magnesium alloys by machine learning. JOM. 2020;72:3935–3942. doi: 10.1007/s11837-020-04343-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra-Hernández W, Hajinazar S, Avendaño-Franco G, et al. Structural search for stable Mg-ca alloys accelerated with a neural network interatomic model. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:27545–27557. doi: 10.1039/C8CP05314F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui Y, Li Q, Zhu K, et al. A combined machine learning and EBSD approach for the prediction of {10-12} twin nucleation in an Mg-RE alloy. Mater Today Commun. 2021;27:102282. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Wang J, Wang C, et al. Prediction of electronic work function of the second phase in binary magnesium alloy based on machine learning method. J Mater Res. 2022;37(21):3792–3802. doi: 10.1557/s43578-022-00752-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang S, Xiao X, Xia L, et al. Relationship between the widths of supercooled liquid regions and bond parameters of Mg-based bulk metallic glasses. J Non Cryst Solids. 2003;321(1–2):120–125. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(03)00155-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Gao Q, Yuan Y, et al. Coupling physics in machine learning to investigate the solution behavior of binary Mg alloys. J Magnes Alloy. 2022;10:2817–2832. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213956721001584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao L, Ramanujan RV, Zhu J. Machine learning discovery of a new cobalt free multi-principal-element alloy with excellent mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A. 2022;845:143198. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li B, Xuan FZ. A dimensionally augmented and physics-informed machine learning for quality prediction of additively manufactured high-entropy alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2022;307:117637. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovinelli A, Sangid MD, Proudhon H, et al. Using machine learning and a data-driven approach to identify the small fatigue crack driving force in polycrystalline materials. Npj Comput Mater. 2018;4:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41524-018-0094-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zeng S, Wang X, et al. Machine learning for hierarchical prediction of elastic properties in Fe-cr-al system. Comput Mater Sci. 2019;166:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YM, Yang S, Evans JRG. Revisiting Hume-Rothery’s rules with artificial neural networks. Acta Mater. 2008;56(5):1094–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seko A, Maekawa T, Tsuda K, et al. Machine learning with systematic density-functional theory calculations: application to melting temperatures of single- and binary-component solids. Phys Rev B. 2014;89(5):054303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.054303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitz DM, Blaisten-Barojas E. Simulating the NaK eutectic alloy with Monte Carlo and machine learning. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36574-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oh SV, Hwang W, Kim K, et al. Using feature‐assisted machine learning algorithms to boost polarity in lead‐free multicomponent niobate alloys for high‐performance ferroelectrics. Adv Sci. 2022;9. doi: 10.1002/advs.202104569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintakindi S, Alsamhan A, Abidi MH, et al. Annealing of monel 400 alloy using principal component analysis, hyper-parameter optimization, machine learning techniques, and multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Int J Comput Intell Syst. 2022;15(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s44196-022-00070-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Guo Z, Gellman AJ, et al. Simulating segregation in a ternary Cu-pd-au alloy with density functional theory, machine learning, and monte carlo simulations. J Phys Chem C. 2022;126:1800–1808. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeur JR, Mourad HM, Luscher DJ, et al. Numerical implementation of a crystal plasticity model with dislocation transport for high strain rate applications. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2016;24(4):045013. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/24/4/045013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nieuwenburg EPL, Liu Y-H, Huber SD. Learning phase transitions by confusion. Nat Phys. 2017;13:435–439. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys4037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang H, Ren G, et al. A knowledge transfer framework for general alloy materials properties prediction. Materials. 2022;15(21):7442. doi: 10.3390/ma15217442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Y, Frazier WE, Choi KS, et al. Prediction of grain structure after thermomechanical processing of U-10Mo alloy using sensitivity analysis and machine learning surrogate model. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14731-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautz E, Ma W, Jana S, et al. An image-driven machine learning approach to kinetic modeling of a discontinuous precipitation reaction. Mater Charact. 2020;166:110379. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski B, Ikeda Y, Srinivasan P, et al. Ab initio vibrational free energies including anharmonicity for multicomponent alloys. Npj Comput Mater. 2019;5. 10.1038/s41524-019-0218-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YJ, Jui CY, Lee WJ, et al. Prediction of the composition and hardness of high-entropy alloys by machine learning. JOM. 2019;71:3433–3442. doi: 10.1007/s11837-019-03704-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim G, Diao H, Lee C, et al. First-principles and machine learning predictions of elasticity in severely lattice-distorted high-entropy alloys with experimental validation. Acta Mater. 2019;181:124–138. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Wang Z, Hu X, et al. Uncovering the eutectics design by machine learning in the Al–Co–Cr–Fe–Ni high entropy system. Acta Mater. 2020;182:278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.10.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menou E, Toda-Caraballo I, Rivera-Díaz-Del-Castillo PEJ, et al. Evolutionary design of strong and stable high entropy alloys using multi-objective optimisation based on physical models, statistics and thermodynamics. Mater Des. 2018;143:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menou E, Tancret F, Toda-Caraballo I, et al. Computational design of light and strong high entropy alloys (HEA): obtainment of an extremely high specific solid solution hardening. Scr Mater. 2018;156:120–123. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang X, Antonov S, Li W, et al. Alloying effects and effective alloy design of high-Cr CoNi-based superalloys via a high-throughput experiments and machine learning framework. Acta Mater. 2022;243:118525. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafary-Zadeh M, Khoo KH, Laskowski R, et al. Applying a machine learning interatomic potential to unravel the effects of local lattice distortion on the elastic properties of multi-principal element alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2019;803:1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickman JM, Chan HM, Harmer MP, et al. Materials informatics for the screening of multi-principal elements and high-entropy alloys. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10533-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozerdem MS, Kolukisa S. Artificial neural network approach to predict the mechanical properties of Cu-Sn-Pb-Zn-Ni cast alloys. Mater Des. 2009;30:764–769. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Qian K, Huang J, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation and machine learning of mechanical response in non-equiatomic FeCrNiCoMn high-entropy alloy. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;13:2043–2054. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.021
   Google Scholar
• Kostiuchenko T, Körmann F, Neugebauer J, et al. Impact of lattice relaxations on phase transitions in a high-entropy alloy studied by machine-learning potentials. Npj Comput Mater. 2019;5:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0195-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao Z, Tung P-Y, Xie R, et al. Machine learning–enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science. 2022;378:78–85. doi: 10.1126/science.abo4940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machaka R. Machine learning-based prediction of phases in high-entropy alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2021;188:110244. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wen C, Wang C, et al. Phase prediction in high entropy alloys with a rational selection of materials descriptors and machine learning models. Acta Mater. 2020;185:528–539. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor TAA, Pedersen JK, Winther SH, et al. High-entropy alloys as a discovery platform for electrocatalysis. Joule. 2019;3(3):834–845. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghouchan Nezhad Noor Nia R, Jalali M, Mail M, et al. Machine Learning Approach to Community Detection in a high-entropy alloy interaction network. ACS Omega. 2022;7:12978–12992. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan X, Zhang Z, Yu W, et al. Machine-learning-assisted discovery of highly efficient high-entropy alloy catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Patterns. 2022;3:100553. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clausen CM, Nielsen MLS, Pedersen JK, et al. Ab Initio to activity: machine learning-assisted optimization of high-entropy alloy catalytic activity. High Entropy Alloy Mater. 2022;1:0–3.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Kompella L, Sanagavarapu LM, et al. Ensemble-based machine learning models for phase prediction in high entropy alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2022;210:111025. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen C, Wang C, Zhang Y, et al. Modeling solid solution strengthening in high entropy alloys using machine learning. Acta Mater. 2021;212:116917. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Srinivasan P, Körmann F, et al. Thermodynamics up to the melting point in a TaVCrW high entropy alloy: systematic ab initio study aided by machine learni. Phys Rev B. 2022;105:214302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna YV, Jaiswal UK, RM R. Machine learning approach to predict new multiphase high entropy alloys. Scr Mater. 2021;197:113804. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Guo W. Machine-learning model for predicting phase formations of high-entropy alloys. Phys Rev Mater. 2019;3:95005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.095005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Martin P, Zhuang HL. Machine-learning phase prediction of high-entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 2019;169:225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Xie B, Fang Q, et al. Machine learning approach to design high entropy alloys with heterogeneous grain structures. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2021;52(2):439–448. doi: 10.1007/s11661-020-06099-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen C, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property. Acta Mater. 2019;170:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Ren C, Jia Y, et al. A machine learning-based alloy design system to facilitate the rational design of high entropy alloys with enhanced hardness. Acta Mater. 2022;222:117431. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XG, Chen C, Zheng H, et al. Complex strengthening mechanisms in the NbMoTaW multi-principal element alloy. Npj Comput Mater. 2020;6:1–32. doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-0339-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapeev A. Accurate representation of formation energies of crystalline alloys with many components. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;139:26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshkov EA, Novoselov II, Shapeev AV, et al. Sublattice formation in CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy. Intermetallics. 2019;112:106542. doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Chen H, Tao X, et al. Machine learning reveals the importance of the formation enthalpy and atom-size difference in forming phases of high entropy alloys. Mater Des. 2020;193:108835. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu X, Bi S, et al. Robust data-driven approach for predicting the configurational energy of high entropy alloys. Mater Des. 2020;185:108247. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nong Z-S, Zhu J-C, Cao Y, et al. Stability and structure prediction of cubic phase in as cast high entropy alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2014;30(3):363–369. doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Odeh A, Galvan E, Kirk T, et al. Efficient exploration of the high entropy alloy composition-phase space. Acta Mater. 2018;152:41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Lu D, Wang K. Accelerated discovery of single-phase refractory high entropy alloys assisted by machine learning. Comput Mater Sci. 2021;199:110723. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo T, Wu L, Li T. Machine learning accelerated, high throughput, multi‐objective optimization of multiprincipal element alloys. Small. 2021;17(42). doi: 10.1002/smll.202102972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy D, Mandal SC, Pathak B. Machine learning assisted exploration of high entropy alloy-based catalysts for selective CO2 reduction to methanol. J Phys Chem Lett. 2022;13(25):5991–6002. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann K, Maryanovsky D, Mellor WM, et al. Discovery of high-entropy ceramics via machine learning. Npj Comput Mater. 2020;6:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-0317-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancret F, Toda-Caraballo I, Menou E, et al. Designing high entropy alloys employing thermodynamics and Gaussian process statistical analysis. Mater Des. 2017;115:486–497. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi J, Cheung AM, Poon SJ. High entropy alloys mined from binary phase diagrams. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50015-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domínguez LA, Goodall R, Todd I, et al. Prediction and validation of four component high entropy alloys using principal component analysis. Adv Eng Mater. 2015;210:259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Deng L, Wang C, Luo J, et al. Preparation and property optimization of FeCrAl-based ODS alloy by machine learning combined with wedge-shaped hot-rolling. Mater Charact. 2022;188:111894. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.111894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin D, Yamamoto Y, Brady MP, et al. Modern data analytics approach to predict creep of high-temperature alloys. Acta Mater. 2019;168:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng X, Cheng Z, Wang S, et al. A data-driven machine learning approach to predict the hardenability curve of boron steels and assist alloy design. J Mater Sci. 2022;57:10755–10768. doi: 10.1007/s10853-022-07132-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng G, Sun Y, Zhang Q, et al. A collaborative design platform for new alloy material development. Adv Eng Informatics. 2022;51:101488. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Yang J, Yang Y, et al. Data-mining and atmospheric corrosion resistance evaluation of Sn- and Sb-additional low alloy steel based on big data technology. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2022;29(4):825–835. doi: 10.1007/s12613-022-2457-9
   Google Scholar
• Rakhshkhorshid M, Teimouri Sendesi SA. Bayesian regularization neural networks for prediction of austenite formation temperatures (Ac1 and Ac3). J Iron Steel Res Int. 2014;21(2):246–251. doi: 10.1016/S1006-706X(14)60038-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan Z, Li H. Machine learning based fatigue life prediction with effects of additive manufacturing process parameters for printed SS 316L. Int J Fatigue. 2021;142:105941. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanush AA, Chitra P, Kasinath J, et al. Atmospheric corrosion rate prediction of low-alloy steel using machine learning models. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2022;1248(1):012050. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1248/1/012050
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wei X, Ren D, et al. High-throughput map design of creep life in low-alloy steels by integrating machine learning with a genetic algorithm. Mater Des. 2022;213:110326. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Goh B, Nelaturu P, et al. Integrated high-throughput and machine learning methods to accelerate discovery of molten salt corrosion-resistant alloys. Adv Sci. 2022;9(20):1–13. doi: 10.1002/advs.202200370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavard L, Bhadeshia HKDH, MacKay DJC, et al. Bayesian neural network model for austenite formation in steels. Mater Sci Technol. 1996;12(6):453–463. doi: 10.1179/mst.1996.12.6.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfouf M, Jamei M, Linkens DA. Optimal design of alloy steels using multiobjective genetic algorithms. Mater Manuf Process. 2005;20(3):553–567. doi: 10.1081/AMP-200053580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones CAL, Bhadeshia HKDH, MacKay DJC. Gaussian process modelling of austenite formation in steel. Mater Sci Technol. 1999;15(3):287–294. doi: 10.1179/026708399101505851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdevila C, Caballero FG, de AC. Determination of ms temperature in steels: a bayesian neural network model. ISIJ Int. 2002;42:894–902. http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/isijinternational1989/42/8/42_8_894/_article
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdevila C, Caballero FG, de Andrés C G. Analysis of effect of alloying elements on martensite start temperature of steels. Mater Sci Technol. 2003;19:581–586. doi: 10.1179/026708303225001902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behler J, Parrinello M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98(14):146401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Murugananth M, HKDH B. δ TRIP steel. Mater Sci Technol. 2007;23:819–827. doi: 10.1179/174328407X179746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun F, Yoshida T, Robson JD, et al. Theoretical design of ferritic creep resistant steels using neural network, kinetic, and thermodynamic models. Mater Sci Technol. 1999;15(5):547–554. doi: 10.1179/026708399101506085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Sivaprasad PV, Venugopal S, et al. Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the deformation behavior of stainless steel type AISI 304L during hot torsion. Appl Soft Comput. 2009;9(1):237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji G, Li F, Li Q, et al. A comparative study on Arrhenius-type constitutive model and artificial neural network model to predict high-temperature deformation behaviour in Aermet100 steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528:4774–4782. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbassi F, Belhadj T, Mistou S, et al. Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using artificial neural networks in sheet metal forming. Mater Des. 2013;45:605–615. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk-Kolodziejczyk D, Regulski K, Gumienny G. Comparative analysis of the properties of the nodular cast iron with carbides and the austempered ductile iron with use of the machine learning and the support vector machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;87(1–4):1077–1093. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-8510-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary N, Abu-Odeh A, Karaman I, et al. A data-driven machine learning approach to predicting stacking faulting energy in austenitic steels. J Mater Sci. 2017;52(18):11048–11076. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1252-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia G, Khairallah S, Matthews M, et al. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;94(9–12):3591–3603. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCost BL, Lei B, Francis T, et al. High throughput quantitative metallography for complex microstructures using deep learning: a case study in ultrahigh carbon steel. Microsc Microanal. 2019;25(1):21–29. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618015635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Zhou H, Dong H. Using deep neural network with small dataset to predict material defects. Mater Des. 2019;162:300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng L, Zhang J. Process design of laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel using a Gaussian process-based machine learning model. JOM. 2020;72:420–428. doi: 10.1007/s11837-019-03792-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F, Song K, Gao L, et al. DCLF: a divide-and-conquer learning framework for the predictions of steel hardness using multiple alloy datasets. Mater Today Commun. 2022;30:103195. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon J, Seo N, Jung J-G, et al. Prediction and mechanism explain of austenite-grain growth during reheating of alloy steel using XAI. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;21:1408–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.119
   Google Scholar
• Tapia G, Elwany AH, Sang H. Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Sha W. Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties of maraging steels using artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci. 2004;29(1):12–28. doi: 10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00092-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao KP, YKDV P. Neural network approach to flow stress evaluation in hot deformation. J Mater Process Technol. 1995;53:552–566. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/092401369401744L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gocheva-Ilieva S, Dobrev G study of the tensile strength of alloy steels using polynomial regression. 2022. p. 050005. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2828445.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson NH, Priddy MW, McDowell DL, et al. Data-driven reduced-order models for rank-ordering the high cycle fatigue performance of polycrystalline microstructures. Mater Des. 2018;154:170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahnama A, Clark S, Sridhar S. Machine learning for predicting occurrence of interphase precipitation in HSLA steels. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;154:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma W, Kautz EJ, Baskaran A, et al. Image-driven discriminative and generative machine learning algorithms for establishing microstructure–processing relationships. J Appl Phys. 2020;128:128. doi: 10.1063/5.0013720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling J, Hutchinson M, Antono E, et al. High-dimensional materials and process optimization using data-driven experimental design with well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2017;6(3):207–217. doi: 10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Long Z, Lei S, et al. Machine learning driven rationally design of amorphous alloy with improved elastic models. Mater Des. 2022;220:110881. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Shi SQ, Zhang TY. A machine-learning approach to predicting and understanding the properties of amorphous metallic alloys. Mater Des. 2020;187:108378. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Wan Y, Wang Z, et al. Machine learning and Python assisted design and verification of Fe–based amorphous/nanocrystalline alloy. Mater Des. 2022;219:110726. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artrith N, Kolpak AM. Grand canonical molecular dynamics simulations of Cu-Au nanoalloys in thermal equilibrium using reactive ANN potentials. Comput Mater Sci. 2015;110:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller T. Ab initio determination of structure-property relationships in alloy nanoparticles. Phys Rev B. 2012;86(14):144201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.144201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, Niu L, Mueller T. Computationally generated maps of surface structures and catalytic activities for alloy phase diagrams. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(44):22044–22051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910724116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran K, Ulissi ZW. Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction and H2 evolution. Nat Catal. 2018;1(9):696–703. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S, Zhen H, Wen B, et al. Exploring the physical origin of the electrocatalytic performance of an amorphous alloy catalyst via machine learning accelerated DFT study. Nanoscale. 2022;14(7):2660–2667. doi: 10.1039/D1NR07661B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keong KG, Sha W, Malinov S. Artificial neural network modelling of crystallization temperatures of the Ni–P based amorphous alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;365(1–2):212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankanamge UMHU, Reiner J, Ma X, et al. Machine learning guided alloy design of high-temperature NiTiHf shape memory alloys. J Mater Sci. 2022;57:19447–19465. doi: 10.1007/s10853-022-07793-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomou A, Zhao G, Boluki S, et al. Multi-objective Bayesian materials discovery: application on the discovery of precipitation strengthened NiTi shape memory alloys through micromechanical modeling. Mater Des. 2018;160:810–827. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Kappes BB, Amin-Ahmadi B, et al. Physics-informed machine learning for composition – process – property design: shape memory alloy demonstration. Appl Mater Today. 2021;22:100898. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue D, Xue D, Yuan R, et al. An informatics approach to transformation temperatures of NiTi-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 2017;125:532–541. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen N, Altay O. Machine learning enhanced dynamic response modelling of superelastic shape memory alloy wires. Materials. 2022;15(1):15. doi: 10.3390/ma15010304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trehern W, Ortiz-Ayala R, Atli KC, et al. Data-driven shape memory alloy discovery using artificial intelligence materials selection (AIMS) framework. Acta Mater. 2022;228:117751. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai A, Wang H, Li X, et al. Progress of component design methods for bulk metallic glass. Mater Des. 2007;28(10):2694–2697. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai AH, Xiong X, Liu Y, et al. Artificial neural network modeling of reduced glass transition temperature of glass forming alloys. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92(11):12–15. doi: 10.1063/1.2899633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui CA, Xiong X, Liu Y, et al. Artificial neural network modeling for undercooled liquid region of glass forming alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2010;48:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai AH, Liu Y, An WK, et al. Prediction of critical cooling rate for glass forming alloys by artificial neural network. Mater Des. 2013;52:671–676. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YX, Xing GC, Sha ZD, et al. A two-step fused machine learning approach for the prediction of glass-forming ability of metallic glasses. J Alloys Compd. 2021;875:160040. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi MK, Chattopadhyay PP, Ganguly S. Multivariate analysis and classification of bulk metallic glasses using principal component analysis. Comput Mater Sci. 2015;107:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun YT, Bai HY, Li MZ, et al. Machine learning approach for prediction and understanding of glass-forming ability. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8(14):3434–3439. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Zhang TY, Shi SQ. Machine learning prediction of elastic properties and glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses. MRS Commun. 2019;9(2):576–585. doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward L, O’Keeffe SC, Stevick J, et al. A machine learning approach for engineering bulk metallic glass alloys. Acta Mater. 2018;159:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren F, Ward L, Williams T, et al. Accelerated discovery of metallic glasses through iteration of machine learning and high-throughput experiments. Sci Adv. 2018;4(4):4. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li K, Wen B, et al. Machine learning accelerated DFT research on platinum-modified amorphous alloy surface catalysts. Chinese Chem Lett. 2023;34(5):107833. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosal S, Dey S, Chattopadhyay PP, et al. Designing optimized ternary catalytic alloy electrode for efficiency improvement of semiconductor gas sensors using a machine learning approach. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng. 2021;4:126–139. doi: 10.31181/dmame210402126g
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J-Y, Xia C, Wang H-F, et al. Recent advances in electrocatalytic oxygen reduction for on-site hydrogen peroxide synthesis in acidic media. J Energy Chem. 2022;67:432–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artrith N, Kolpak AM. Understanding the composition and activity of electrocatalytic nanoalloys in aqueous solvents: a combination of DFT and accurate neural network potentials. Nano Lett. 2014;14(5):2670–2676. doi: 10.1021/nl5005674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinnouchi R, Asahi R. Predicting catalytic activity of nanoparticles by a DFT-Aided machine-learning algorithm. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8(17):4279–4283. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Ma X, Xin H. Feature engineering of machine-learning chemisorption models for catalyst design. Catal Today. 2017;280:232–238. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang S, Chin WS, et al. High-throughput screening of bimetallic catalysts enabled by machine learning. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5(46):24131–24138. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01812F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen M, Levchenko SV, Scheffler M, et al. Beyond scaling relations for the description of catalytic materials. ACS Catal. 2019;9:2752–2759. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back S, Yoon J, Tian N, et al. Convolutional neural network of atomic surface structures to predict binding energies for high-throughput screening of catalysts. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10(15):4401–4408. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong M, Tran K, Min Y, et al. Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature. 2020;581(7807):178–183. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2242-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Noh SH, Hwang J, et al. First-principles database driven computational neural network approach to the discovery of active ternary nanocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20(38):24539–24544. doi: 10.1039/C8CP03801E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah AK, Agilan M, Dineshraj S, et al. Machine learning-enabled prediction of density and defects in additively manufactured inconel 718 alloy. Mater Today Commun. 2022;30:103193. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks TD, Gaultois MW, Oliynyk A, et al. Data mining our way to the next generation of thermoelectrics. Scr Mater. 2016;111:10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Li Z, Achenie LEK, et al. Machine-learning-augmented chemisorption model for CO 2 electroreduction catalyst screening. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6(18):3528–3533. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung V, Ganesh P, Sumpter BG. Physically informed machine learning prediction of electronic density of states. Chem Mater. 2022;34(11):4848–4855. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger MOJ, Morooka EV, Federici Canova F, et al. Machine learning hydrogen adsorption on nanoclusters through structural descriptors. Npj Comput Mater. 2018;4:37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-018-0096-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao X, Wang L, Xu Y, et al. Computational high-throughput screening of alloy nanoclusters for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Npj Comput Mater. 2021;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00514-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavkovic R, Jugovic Z, Dragicevic S, et al. An application of learning machine methods in prediction of wear rate of wear resistant casting parts. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;64(3):850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2012.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong X, Dong C, Xu J, et al. Machine learning assistance for electrochemical curve simulation of corrosion and its application. Mater Corros. 2020;71(3):474–484. doi: 10.1002/maco.201911224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Fu H, Zhu S, et al. Machine learning assisted composition effective design for precipitation strengthened copper alloys. Acta Mater. 2021;215:117118. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajinazar S, Sandoval ED, Cullo AJ, et al. Multitribe evolutionary search for stable Cu-Pd-Ag nanoparticles using neural network models. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:8729–8742. doi: 10.1039/C9CP00837C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangal A, Holm EA. Applied machine learning to predict stress hotspots I: face centered cubic materials. Int J Plast. 2018;111:122–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusne AG, Gao T, Mehta A, et al. On-the-fly machine-learning for high-throughput experiments: search for rare-earth-free permanent magnets. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):6367. doi: 10.1038/srep06367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson J, Sanvito S. Predicting the curie temperature of ferromagnets using machine learning. Phys Rev Mater. 2019;3(10):104405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.104405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrain F, Carrete J, Van Roekeghem A, et al. Materials screening for the discovery of new half-heuslers: machine learning versus ab initio methods. J Phys Chem B. 2018;122(2):625–632. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b05296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrete J, Li W, Mingo N, et al. Finding unprecedentedly low-thermal-conductivity half-heusler semiconductors via high-throughput materials modeling. Phys Rev X. 2014;4(1):011019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrete J, Mingo N, Wang S, et al. Nanograined half-heusler semiconductors as advanced thermoelectrics: an Ab Initio high-throughput statistical study. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24(47):7427–7432. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201401201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong M, Chen W, Notestine R, et al. A statistical learning framework for materials science: application to elastic moduli of k-nary inorganic polycrystalline compounds. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):34256. doi: 10.1038/srep34256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrain F, van Roekeghem A, Curtarolo S, et al. Vibrational properties of metastable polymorph structures by machine learning. J Chem Inf Model. 2018;58(12):2460–2466. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artrith N, Urban A, Ceder G, Constructing first-principles phase diagrams of amorphous LixSi using machine-learning-assisted sampling with an evolutionary algorithm. J Chem Phys. 2018;148. doi: 10.1063/1.5017661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Shang Z, Lu W, et al. A Property‐Driven stepwise design strategy for multiple low‐melting alloys via machine learning. Adv Eng Mater. 2021;23(12). doi: 10.1002/adem.202100612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward L, Agrawal A, Choudhary A, et al. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. Npj Comput Mater. 2016;2(1):16028. doi: 10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha R, Chakraborti N, Diercks DR, et al. Combined machine learning and CALPHAD approach for discovering processing-structure relationships in soft magnetic alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancret F. Computational thermodynamics, Gaussian processes and genetic algorithms: combined tools to design new alloys. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2013;21(4):21. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menou E, Ramstein G, Bertrand E, et al. Multi-objective constrained design of nickel-base superalloys using data mining- and thermodynamics-driven genetic algorithms. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2016;24(5):055001. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conduit BD, Jones NG, Stone HJ, et al. Design of a nickel-base superalloy using a neural network. Mater Des. 2017;131:358–365. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Yin HQ, Zhang C, et al. An materials informatics approach to Ni-based single crystal superalloys lattice misfit prediction. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;143:295–300. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran M, Lee SC, Shim J-H. Machine learning assisted first-principles calculation of multicomponent solid solutions: estimation of interface energy in Ni-based superalloys. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2018;26(2):025010. doi: 10.1088/1361-651X/aa9f37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schooling J, Brown M, Reed PA. An example of the use of neural computing techniques in materials science—the modelling of fatigue thresholds in Ni-base superalloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;260(1–2):222–239. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00957-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PL, Conduit G. Machine learning predictions of superalloy microstructure. Comput Mater Sci. 2022;201:201. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wei G, Wang G, et al. Creating win-wins from strength–ductility trade-off in multi-principal element alloys by machine learning. Mater Today Commun. 2022;32:104010. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam N, Huang W, Zhuang HL. Machine learning for phase selection in multi-principal element alloys. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;150:230–235. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue D, Balachandran PV, Hogden J, et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasudevan RK, Choudhary K, Mehta A, et al. Materials science in the artificial intelligence age: high-throughput library generation, machine learning, and a pathway from correlations to the underpinning physics. MRS Commun. 2019;9(3):821–838. doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. Two-way design of alloys for advanced ultra supercritical plants based on machine learning. Comput Mater Sci. 2018;155:331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanadhapalli B, BR VK, Nagaraju KC. Experimental study and machine learning model to predict formability of magnesium alloy sheet. F1000Res. 2022;11:1118. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.124085.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Géron A. Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and Tensorflow. 2nd ed. O’Reilly Media. Advanced theory and simulations; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchio KS, Dippo OF, Kaufmann KR, et al. High-throughput rapid experimental alloy development (HT-READ). Acta Mater. 2021;221:117352. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghannasiri R, Xue D, Balachandran PV, et al. Optimal experimental design for materials discovery. Comput Mater Sci. 2017;129:311–322. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.11.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopakumar AM, Balachandran PV, Xue D, et al. Multi-objective optimization for materials discovery via adaptive design. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21936-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Zhong J, Liu G, et al. A machine learning accelerated distributed task management system (malac-distmas) and its application in high-throughput CALPHAD computation aiming at efficient alloy design. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.apmate.2021.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi K, Tanaka Y. Material synthesis and design from first principle calculations and machine learning. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;112:364–367. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyao T, Suzuki K, Kikuchi S, et al. Toward effective utilization of methane: machine learning prediction of adsorption energies on metal alloys. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122(15):8315–8326. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Zelaia P, Roshan Joseph V, Kalidindi SR, et al. Estimating mechanical properties from spherical indentation using Bayesian approaches. Mater Des. 2018;147:92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thankachan T, Prakash KS, David Pleass C, et al. Artificial neural network to predict the degraded mechanical properties of metallic materials due to the presence of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(47):28612–28621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangal A, Holm EA. A comparative study of feature selection methods for stress hotspot classification in materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2018;7(3):87–95. doi: 10.1007/s40192-018-0109-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustillo A, Reis R, Machado AR, et al. Improving the accuracy of machine-learning models with data from machine test repetitions. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33(1):203–221. doi: 10.1007/s10845-020-01661-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Jin C, Zhang C, et al. Machine learning assisted modelling and design of solid solution hardened high entropy alloys. Mater Des. 2021;211:110177. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang DJ, Li H. A machine learning guided investigation of quality repeatability in metal laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2021;203:109606. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godaliyadda GMD, Ye DH, Uchic MD, et al. A supervised learning approach for dynamic sampling. Electron Imaging. 2016;28:1–8. https://library.imaging.org/ei/articles/28/19/art00020
   Google Scholar