The corticomuscular coupling underlying movement and its application for rehabilitation: a review

References

• De Groote F, Falisse A. Perspective on musculoskeletal modelling and predictive simulations of human movement to assess the neuromechanics of gait. Proceedings of the royal society. Proc Biol Sci. 2021;288(1946):20202432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katan M, Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):208–211.
   Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29–e322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon RE. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(8):811–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Wu K, Meng Q, et al. Research progress on intelligent assessment system for upper limb function of stroke patients. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2022;39(3):620–626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirton A, Chen R, Friefeld S, et al. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(6):507–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraifej J, Clark W, France B, et al. Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VAdS J, MdS S, NMdS R, et al. Combining proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and virtual reality for improving sensorimotor function in stroke survivors: a randomized clinical trial. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2019;11:1179573519863826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He C, Xiong C-H, Chen Z-J, et al. Preliminary assessment of a postural synergy-based exoskeleton for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:1795–1805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Wang X, Chen B, et al. Development of a minimal-intervention-based admittance control strategy for upper extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2017;48(6):1005–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao G, Pan L, Fang H, et al. Academic review and perspectives on robotic exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(11):2294–2304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto Y, Imura T, Suzukawa T, et al. Combination of exoskeletal upper limb robot and occupational therapy improve activities of daily living function in acute stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(7):2018–2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijk BCM, Van Beek PJ, Daffertshofer A, et al. Differential modulations of ipsilateral and contralateral beta (de)synchronization during unimanual force production. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;36(1):2088–2097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waszak F, Wascher E, Keller P, et al. Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Exp Brain Res. 2005;162(3):346–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirigu A, Daprati ES, Giraux P, et al. Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(1):80–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourab K, Schmit BD. Changes in movement-related β-band EEG signals in human spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(12):2017–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtold L, Ghio M, Lange J, et al. Event-related desynchronization of mu and beta oscillations during the processing of novel tool names. Brain Lang. 2018;177:44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai O, Mari Z, Vorbach S, et al. Asymmetric spatiotemporal patterns of event-related desynchronization preceding voluntary sequential finger movements: a high-resolution EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(5):1213–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burle B, van den Wildenberg WPM, Spieser L, et al. Preventing (impulsive) errors: electrophysiological evidence for online inhibitory control over incorrect responses. Psychophysiology. 2016;53(7):1008–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang R, Yao D, et al. Differences in intersubject early readiness potentials between voluntary and instructed actions. Front Psychol. 2020;11:529821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Ren H, Zhang R, et al. Time-estimation process could cause the disappearence of readiness potential. Cogn Neurodyn. 2022;16(5):1003–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwick RM, Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, et al. Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:31–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz LJ, Eickhoff SB, Pool EM, et al. Differential modulation of motor network connectivity during movements of the upper and lower limbs. Neuroimage. 2015;119:44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert GHM, Carson RG. Neural mechanisms mediating cross education: with additional considerations for the ageing brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;132:260–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer R, Fels M, Vukelic M, et al. Bridging the gap between motor imagery and motor execution with a brain-robot interface. Neuroimage. 2015;108:319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khademi F, Naros G, Nicksirat A, et al. Rewiring cortico-muscular control in the healthy and poststroke human brain with proprioceptive β-Band neurofeedback. J Neurosci. 2022;42(36):6861–6877.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monteiro TSK, Adab HZ. Age-related differences in network flexibility and segregation at rest and during motor performance. Neuroimage. 2019;194:93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Scheinost D, Zuo N, et al. A neuroimaging signature of cognitive aging from whole‐brain functional connectivity. Adv Sci. 2022;9(24):2201621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Wu Z, Sun J, et al. Reorganization of motor execution networks during Sub-Acute phase after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23(4):713–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Luo J, Guo Y, et al. Changes in EEG brain connectivity caused by short-term bci neurofeedback-rehabilitation training: a case study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spring JN, Tomescu MI, Barral J. A single-bout of endurance exercise modulates EEG microstates temporal features. Brain Topogr. 2017;30(4):461–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Yao D, Valdés-Sosa PA, et al. Efficient resting-state EEG network facilitates motor imagery performance. J Neural Eng. 2015;12(6):066024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To XV, Nasrallah FA. A roadmap of brain recovery in a mouse model of concussion: insights from neuroimaging. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9(1):1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottone C, Porcaro C, Cancelli A, et al. Neuronal electrical ongoing activity as a signature of cortical areas. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222(5):2115–2126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis P, Keller PE, Nozaradan S, et al. Dynamic modulation of cortico-muscular coupling during real and imagined sensorimotor synchronisation. Neuroimage. 2021;238:118209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi NF, Van Vugt FT, Valle-Mena RR, et al. Error-related persistence of motor activity in resting-state networks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018;30(12):1883–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina D, Jiang N, Rehbaum H, et al. The extraction of neural information from the surface EMG for the control of upper-limb prostheses: emerging avenues and challenges. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(4):797–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca CJ, Adam A, Wotiz R, et al. Decomposition of surface EMG signals. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96(3):1646–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C. A review of control methods for electric power wheelchairs based on electromyography signals with special emphasis on pattern recognition. IETE Tech Rev. 2011;28(4):316–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenore F, Ramos A, Fahmy A, et al. editors. Towards the control of individual fingers of a prosthetic hand using surface EMG signals. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society; 2007 Aug 22–26; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Khushaba RN, Kodagoda S, editors. Electromyogram (EMG) feature reduction using mutual components analysis for multifunction prosthetic fingers control. International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision; 2012 Dec 05–07; Guangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin U, Sahin F. editors. Pattern recognition with surface EMG signal based wavelet transformation. IEEE International Conference on Systems; 2012 Oct 14–17; Seoul, Korea (South).
   Google Scholar
• Andreas S, Markus Due J, Lars Louis A, et al. EMG evaluation of hip adduction exercises for soccer players: implications for exercise selection in prevention and treatment of groin injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(14):1108–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danna-Dos SA, Poston B, Jesunathadas M, et al. Influence of fatigue on hand muscle coordination and EMG-EMG coherence during three-digit grasping. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(6):3576–3587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conchola EC, Thompson BJ, Smith DB. Effects of neuromuscular fatigue on the electromechanical delay of the leg extensors and flexors in young and old men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;52(5):844–851.
   Google Scholar
• Lalitharatne TDT, Hayashi Y. Towards hybrid EEG-EMG-based control approaches to be used in bio-robotics applications: current status, challenges and future directions. Paladyn, J Behav Robot. 2013;4(2):147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Castelein B, Cools A, Bostyn E, et al. Analysis of scapular muscle EMG activity in patients with idiopathic neck pain: a systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(2):371–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein N. The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey MT. Coordination. Am Psychol. 1990;45:938–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takei T, Confais J, Tomatsu S, et al. Neural basis for hand muscle synergies in the primate spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(32):8643–8648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine AJ, Hinckley CA, Hilde KL, et al. Identification of a cellular node for motor control pathways. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(4):586–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Burke D. The circuitry of the human spinal cord: its role in motor control and movement disorders. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Jair L, Loaiza NA. Evolución Y tendencias EN EL desarrollo DE prótesis DE mano. DYNA. 2011;78(169):191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Song X, Van De Ven SS, Liu L, et al. Activities of daily living-based rehabilitation system for arm and hand motor function retraining after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:621–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy AC, Muldoon SF, Baker D, et al. Structure, function, and control of the musculoskeletal network. PLOS Biol. 2018;16(1):e2002811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross JT, Salenius S, Hari R, et al. Corticomuscular synchronization during isometric muscle contraction in humans as revealed by magnetoencephalography. J Physiol. 2000;527(3):623–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown P. Cortical drives to human muscle: the piper and related rhythms. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;60(1):97–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen TH, Willerslev-Olsen M, Conway BA, et al. The motor cortex drives the muscles during walking in human subjects. J Physiol. 2012;590(10):2443–2452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilner JM, Baker SN, Salenius S, et al. Human cortical muscle coherence is directly related to specific motor parameters. J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):8838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Qi H, Gu Y, et al. editors. Towards single trial decoding of cortical-muscular activities. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics; 2017 July 03–07; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Teija S, Forss N, Salenius S, et al. Oscillatory cortical drive to isometrically contracting muscle in Unverricht-Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (ULD). Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113(12):1973–1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzica F, Canafoglia L, Franceschetti S, et al. Movement-activated myoclonus in genetically defined progressive myoclonic epilepsies: EEG–EMG relationship estimated using autoregressive models. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(6):1041–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Masani K, Zabjek K, et al. Dynamic increase in corticomuscular coherence during bilateral, cyclical ankle movements. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Siemionow V, Yao W, et al. Single-Trial EEG-EMG coherence analysis reveals muscle Fatigue-Related progressive alterations in corticomuscular coupling. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng. 2010;18(2):97–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ. Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(12):2844–2854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka T, Ross B, Trainor LJ. Beta-band oscillations represent auditory beat and its metrical hierarchy in perception and imagery. J Neurosci. 2015;35(45):15187–15198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourguignon M, Piitulainen H, Smeds E, et al. MEG insight into the spectral dynamics underlying steady isometric muscle contraction. J Neurosci. 2017;37(43):10421–10437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piitulainen H, Bourguignon M, Smeds E, et al. Phasic stabilization of motor output after auditory and visual distractors. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(12):5168–5182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1273–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran RJ, Stephan KE, Seidenbecher T, et al. Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses. Neuroimage. 2009;44(3):796–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston KJ, Moran R, Seth AK. Analysing connectivity with granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(2):172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li FL, Chen B, Li H, et al. The time-varying networks in P300: a task-evoked EEG study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(7):725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citri A, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):18–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7(2):76–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernaskie J, Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21(14):5272–5280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly JJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(11):1032–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(3):910–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller G, Mllerputz GR, Scherer R, et al. Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface systems. Computer. 2008;41(10):58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, et al. Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(7):674–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushiba J, Morishita A, Maeda T, editors. A task-oriented brain-computer interface rehabilitation system for patients with stroke hemiplegia. International Conference on Wireless Communications; 2014 May 11–14; Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Donati ARC, Shokur S, Morya E, et al. Long-Term training with a brain-machine interface-Based gait protocol induces partial neurological recovery in paraplegic patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon AM, Gillespie RB, Ferris DP. Symmetry-based resistance as a novel means of lower limb rehabilitation. J Biomech. 2007;40(6):1286–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono T, Tomita Y, Inose M, et al. Multimodal sensory feedback associated with motor attempts alters BOLD responses to paralyzed hand movement in chronic stroke patients. Brain Topography. 2015;28(2):340–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiguchi K, Rahman MH, Sasaki M, et al. Development of a 3DOF mobile exoskeleton robot for human upper-limb motion assist. Rob Auton Syst. 2008;56(8):678–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzi T, Rossi SMM, De Vitiello N, et al. Intention-based EMG control for powered exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(8):2180–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yang C, Ye X, et al. Implementing a calibration-free SSVEP-based BCI system with 160 targets. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(4):046094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevallier S, Kalunga EK, Barthélemy Q, et al. Review of riemannian distances and divergences, applied to SSVEP-based BCI. Neuroinformatics. 2021;19(1):93–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang X, Yang Z, Cordes D. A technical review of canonical correlation analysis for neuroscience applications. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(13):3807–3833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barios JA, Ezquerro S, Bertomeu-Motos A, et al. Synchronization of slow cortical rhythms during motor imagery-based brain–machine interface control. Int J Neural Syst. 2019;29(05):1850045.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mushtaq M, Marshall L, Bazhenov M, et al. Differential thalamocortical interactions in slow and fast spindle generation: a computational model. PLOS One. 2022;17(12):e0277772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López ME, Pusil S, Pereda E, et al. Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching. Neuroimage. 2019;186:70–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar