Physical function assessment scales used in rehabilitation for upper limb lymphedema: a scoping review

References

• Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(6):1009–1020. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton LH, Narkthong N, Hulett JM. Psychosocial issues associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a literature review. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2020;12(4):216–224. doi:10.1007/s12609-020-00376-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan S, Taeymans J, Luginbuehl H, et al. Therapy modalities to reduce lymphoedema in female breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;159(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3919-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasinski BB, McKillip Thrift K, et al. A systematic review of the evidence for complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of lymphedema from 2004 to 2011. PM R. 2012;4(8):580–601. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.05.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. Prisma extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Park EY, Lee H. The effect of myofascial release in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59(1):85–93. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07698-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajero Otero V, García Delgado E, Martín Cortijo C, et al. Intensive complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression versus kinesio taping for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper limb: a randomised cross-over clinical trial. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31(5):e13625. doi:10.1111/ecc.13625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajero Otero V, García Delgado E, Martín Cortijo C, et al. Kinesio taping versus compression garments for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized, cross-over, controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(12):1887–1897. doi:10.1177/0269215519874107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezgin Ozcan D, Dalyan M, Unsal Delialioglu S, et al. Complex decongestive therapy enhances upper limb functions in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018;16(5):446–452. doi:10.1089/lrb.2017.0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoot B, Wong J, Cooper B, et al. Upper extremity impairments in women with or without lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):167–178. doi:10.1007/s11764-010-0118-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didem K, Ufuk YS, Serdar S, et al. The comparison of two different physiotherapy methods in treatment of lymphedema after breast surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;93(1):49–54. doi:10.1007/s10549-005-3781-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tastaban E, Soyder A, Aydin E, et al. Role of intermittent pneumatic compression in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(2):220–228. doi:10.1177/0269215519888792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantawy SA, Abdelbasset WK, Nambi G, et al. Comparative study between the effects of kinesio taping and pressure garment on secondary upper extremity lymphedema and quality of life following mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1534735419847276. doi:10.1177/1534735419847276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hwang JH, Chu I, et al. Analysis of factors related to arm weakness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(8):2297–2304. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2584-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran E, Özçakar L, Özgül S, et al. Upper limb sensory evaluations and ultrasonographic skin measurements in breast cancer-related lymphedema receiving complex decongestive physiotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(11):6545–6553. doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06235-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korucu TS, Ucurum SG, Tastaban E, et al. Comparison of shoulder-arm complex pain, function, and scapular dyskinesia in women with and without unilateral lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(3):e285–e293. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2020.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampinen R, Lee JQ, Leano J, et al. Treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema using negative pressure massage: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(8):1465–1472.e2. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buragadda S, Alhusaini AA, Melam GR, et al. Effect of complete decongestive therapy and a home program for patients with post mastectomy lymphedema. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(9):2743–2748. doi:10.1589/jpts.27.2743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayes IS, Whelan TJ, Julian JA, et al. Randomized trial of decongestive lymphatic therapy for the treatment of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3758–3763. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.45.7192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Deveaux A, White H, et al. Compression garments versus compression bandaging in decongestive lymphatic therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(5):1031–1036. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1178-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen EI, Arman S, Zure M, et al. Manual lymphatic drainage may not have an additional effect on the intensive phase of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Lymphat Res Biol. 2021;19(2):141–150. doi:10.1089/lrb.2020.0049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009; [cited 1 Nov 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Valdes K, MacDermid J, Algar L, et al. Hand therapist use of patient report outcome (PRO) in practice: a survey study. J Hand Ther. 2014;27(4):299–308. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2014.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(5):623–632. doi:10.1002/art.24396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30–39. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.4893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson Möller U, Beck I, Rydén L, et al. A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer treatment - a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):472. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5648-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groef A, Van Kampen M, Dieltjens E, et al. Effectiveness of postoperative physical therapy for upper-limb impairments after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(6):1140–1153. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–423. doi:10.1093/ageing/afq034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamoto K, Morizaki Y, Fukuda A, et al. Hand grip strength differences in geriatric subjects with and without hand diseases. Prog Rehabil Med. 2023;8:20230030. Published 2023 Sep 21. doi:10.2490/prm.20230030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis [published correction appears in Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601]. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12(1):155–161. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80189-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(3):252–264. doi:10.1016/J.JHSB.2004.12.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang J, Ji JR, Liang C, et al. Effects of physical therapy-based rehabilitation on recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Palliat Med. 2022;11(2):521–531. doi:10.21037/apm-21-3710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, Tyson SF. Clinical reality of measuring upper-limb ability in neurologic conditions: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(2):221–228. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research Arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404–411. doi:10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar