A Comparison of Generational Differences in Faculty Perceptions of Online versus Face-to-Face Professional Development – A Community College Case Study

References

• Achen, K., & Rutledge, D. (2022). The transition from emergency remote teaching to quality online course design; Instructor perspectives of surprise, awakening, closing loops, and changing engagement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2046207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of University Professors. (2018, October 11). Data snapshot: Contingent faculty in US higher ed. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/news/data-snapshot-contingent-faculty-us-higher-ed#.XmRSm­GhKi70
   Google Scholar
• Beach, R. (2012). Can online learning communities foster professional development? Language Arts, 89(4), 256–262.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2013). Higher education in America. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. S. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to ­effective online instruction in a college of education. Online Learning, 23(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourque, S. F. (2016). The impact of faculty development on community college faculty (Publication No. 80) [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England]. All Theses and Dissertations.
   Google Scholar
• Castleberry, A. N., Haines, S. L., Stein, S. M., Van Amburg, J. A., & Persky, A. M. (2018). 5-minute university: A description and discussion of 5-minute faculty teaching training videos. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(2), 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, K. L., & Wright, S. (2017). Embedding engaged learning in high enrollment lecture-based classes. Higher Education, 74(4), 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0070-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. W. (2014). Faculty development curriculum: What informs it? Journal of Faculty Development, 28(3), 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, T. (2017). Marching off the map: Inspire student to navigate a brand new world. Poet Gardner Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, D. L., & Kinslow, S. L. (2016). Faculty talk about teaching at the community college (pp. 1–20). Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/987199935291.013.47
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, L. (2009). Can community colleges save the U.S. economy? Time Magazine, 174(4), 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Haras, C., Taylor, S. C., Sorcinelli, M. D., & von Hoene, L. (Eds.). (2017). Institutional commitment to teaching and excellence: Assessing the impacts and outcomes of faculty development. [White paper]. Retrieved from American Council on Education, https://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/Institutional-Commitment-to-Teaching-Excellence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, M. C. (2017). Professional development as a catalyst for change in the community college science classroom: How active learning pedagogy impacts teaching practices as well as faculty and student perceptions of learning (Publication No. 10607893). [Doctoral dissertation, Wingate University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007). Millennials go to college (2nd ed.) LifeCourse Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. C. (2003). Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Quality of professional learning index: Measure of outcomes of professional development.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2003). Evaluating the quality and impact of professional development programs. Paper presented at 2003 Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER): Building Teacher Quality: What Does the Research Tell Us, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Juszkiewicz, J. (2020, July). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data, Issue 6. American Association of Community Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. [Monograph] Gulf Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1979). Speaking from experience: The professional organization as learning community. Training and Development Journal, 33, 36–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kroll, E. K. (2016). The commercialization of the community college. In J. L. Devitis, & P.A Sasso. (Eds.), Higher education and society (pp. 199–212). Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, A. F., Johnson, A. M., Yoder, B., Guerra, R. C., & Pimmel, R. (2016). Evaluating virtual communities of practice for faculty development. The Journal of Faculty Development, 30(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, E. (2021). Designing effective online courses: Exploring the rlationships amonsgst online teaching self-efficacy, professional development, online teaching experience, and reported implementation of effective higher education online course design practices. The Interactive Journal of Global Leadership and Learning, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55354/2692-3394.1026
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S., & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning, 21(4), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). 2008 spotlight community college. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/analysis/2008-index.asp
   Google Scholar
• Outcalt, C. L. (2000). ERIC review: Community college teaching – Toward collegiality and community. Community College Review, 28(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155210002800204
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015. The whys and hows of generations research. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2015/09/03/the-whys-and-hows-of-generations-research/
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C. (2008). Do generational differences matter in instructional design? The University of Georgia. https://paeaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/imported-files/10c-Gen-Diff-Matter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rizzuto, M. (2017). Design recommendations for self-paced online faculty development courses. TechTrends, 61(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0130-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. E. (2011). An examination of faculty development practices at the American community college (Publication No. 3461577). [Doctoral dissertation, Morgan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2019). Generation Z learns: A guide for engaging Generation Z students in meaningful learning. Independently Published.
   Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli, M. D., Berg, J. J., Bond, H., & Watson, C. E. (2017). Why now is the time for evidence-based faculty development. In C. Haras, S. C. Taylor, M. D. Sorcinelli, & L. von Hoene (Eds.). Institutional commitment to teaching and excellence: Assessing the impacts and outcomes of faculty development. [White paper]. Retrieved from American Council on Education. https://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/Institutional-Commitment-to-Teaching-Excellence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z @ work: How the next generation is transforming the workplace. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing the generational chasm: The parenting and teaching of Generations Y and Z. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs92201818216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. Harper Publications.
   Google Scholar
• The 21st Century Commission on the Future of Community Colleges. (2012). Reclaiming the American dream: Community colleges and the nation’s future. American Association of Community Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T. S. (2009). Online vs. face-to-face: Educator opinions on professional development delivery methods (Publication No. 3409126). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, A. L. (2019). Facilitating sustainable professional development programs: A phenomenological study of the use of online professional development (Publication No. 13865370). [Doctoral dissertation, Manhattanville College]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmer, T. (2015). Generations do differ: Best practices in leading Traditionalists, Boomers, and Generations X, Y, and Z. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 82, 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wynants, S., & Dennis, J. (2018). Professional development in an online context: Opportunities and challenges from the voices of college faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.2
   Google Scholar