Can Individual code reviews improve solo programming on an introductory course?

References

• Armitage A. and Bryant R. and Dunnill R. and Flanagan K. and Hayes D. and Hudson A. and Kent J. and Lawes S. and Renwick M. (2007) Teaching and the Management of Learning In Teaching and Training in Post-Compulsory Education Open University Press, Berkshire, England, pp 88-142.
   Google Scholar
• Aybuke A. and Petersson H. and Wohlin C. (2002) State-of-the-Art: Software Inspections after 25 Years, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 12,(3) pp 113-154.
   Google Scholar
• Bagel A. and Nachiappan N. (2008) Presented at 2nd ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineeirng and Measurement, Kaiserslautern, Germany, pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S. A. (2000) Scheme and Java in the First Year, Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 15,(5) pp 157-165.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm B. W. (1979) Software Engineering; R & Dtrends and Defense Needs In Reserach Directions in Software Techology(Ed, Wenger P.) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 22:1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner J. S. (1985) Vygotsky: A Historical and Conceptual Perspective In Culture, Communiation and Cognition, Vygotskian Perspectives. (Ed, Wertsch J. V.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21-34.
   Google Scholar
• Brykczynski B. (1999) A Servey of Software Inspection Checklists, ACM SIG SOFT Software Engineering Notes, 24,(1) pp 82-89.
   Google Scholar
• Chapparro E. A. and Yuksel A. and Romero P. and Bryant S. (2005) Presented at 17th Annual Workshop Psycology of Programming Interest Group, Brighton, Sussex, UK, pp 5-18.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle J. K. (2005) Improving Performance and Retention in Cs1, Journal of Computer Science in Colleges, 21,(1) pp 11-18.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards S. H. (2003a) Improving Student Performance by Evaluting How Well Students Test Their Own Programs, Journal on educational resources in computing, 3,(3) pp Article 1.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards S. H. (2003b) Presented at 18th International Conference on Object Orientated Programming Systems, Languages and Appilcations, Anaheim, CA, USA, pp 148-155.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan M. E. (1976) Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development, IBM Systems Journal, 15,(3) pp 182-211.
   Google Scholar
• Fallows S. and Chandramohan B. (2001) Multiple Approaches to Assessment: Reflections on the Use of Tutor, Peer and Self Assessment, Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J), 9,(1) pp 26-37.
   Google Scholar
• Gambell T. J. (1991) University Education Students’ Self-Perceptions of Writing, Canadian Journal of Education, 16,(4) pp 420-433.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins J. K. (2009) Engaging Computer Science Studetns through Cooperative Education, ACM SIGCSE, 41,(4) pp 90-94.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey W. S. (1997) Finding Defects In Introduction to the Personal Software Process Addison Wesley Longman Inc, New York, USA, pp 157-174.
   Google Scholar
• Hundhausen C. and Agrawal A. and Fairbrother D. and Trevisan M. (2009) Intergrating Pedagogical Code Reviews into a Cs 1 Course: An Emperical Study, ACM SIGCSE, 41,(2) pp 291-295.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson N. and Schaefer S. K. (2008) Pair Programming in Cs1: Overcomming Objections to Its Adoption, ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education, 40,(2) pp 93-96.
   Google Scholar
• Ma L. and Ferguson J. and Roper M. and Wilson J. and Wood M. (2005) Presented at 6th Annual Conference of the ICS HEA, York, UK, pp.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell C. and Werner L. and Bullcock H. E. and Fernland J. (2002) Presented at ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Educaton Technical Symposium, Cincinnati, Kentucky, pp 38-42.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell C. and Werner L. and Bullcock H. E. and Fernland J. (2006) Pair Programming Improves Student Retention, Confidence and Program Quality, Communications of the ACM, 39,(8) pp 90-95.
   Google Scholar
• Muller M. M. (2005) Two Controlled Experiments Concerning the Comparison of Pair Programming and Peer Review, Journal of Systems and Software, 78,(2) pp 166-179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panselinas G. (2009) ‘Scaffolding’ Though Talk in Groupwork Learning, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4 pp 86-103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty G. (2004a) Group Work and the Art of Student Talk In Teaching Today Nelson Thrones, Cheltnam, UK, pp 218-233.
   Google Scholar
• Petty G. (2004b) Learning from Experience In Teaching Today Nelson Thrones, Cheltnam, UK, pp 319-329.
   Google Scholar
• Phongpaibul M. and Boehm B. (2006) Presented at ACM-IEEE International Symposium of Empirical Software Engineering, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, pp 85-94.
   Google Scholar
• Race P. (2005) Beyond Learning Styles? In Making Learning Happen Sage Publications, London, pp 42-64.
   Google Scholar
• Reece I. and Walker S. (2007) Assessment of Learning and Achievement In Teaching, Training and Learning: A Practical Guide Business Education Publishers Ltd., Tyne and Wear, UK, pp 321-384.
   Google Scholar
• Sheard J. and Simon S. and Hamilton M. and Lonnberg J. (2009) Presented at 5th International workshop on Computing education research, Berkeley, CA, USA, pp 93-104.
   Google Scholar
• Simon B. and Hanks B. (2008) First-Year Students’ Impressions of Pair Programming in Cs1, Journal on educational resources in computing, 7,(4) pp 5:1-5:28.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville I. (2007a) Software Process In Software Engineering Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England, pp 65-91.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville I. (2007b) Verification and Validation In Software Engineering Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England, pp 516-136.
   Google Scholar
• Trytten D. A. (2005) A Design for Team Peer Code Review, ACM SIGCSE, 37,(1) pp 455-459.
   Google Scholar
• Turner S. A. and Quintana-Castillo R. and Perez-Quinones M. A. and Edwards S. H. (2008) Presented at 39th Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education, Portland, OR, USA, pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y. and Li Y. and Collins M. and Liu P. (2008) Process Improvement of Peer Code Reivew and Behaviour Analysis of Its Participants, ACM SIGCSE, 40,(1) pp 107-111.
   Google Scholar
• Williams L. (2007) Lessons Learned from Seven Years of Pair Programming at North Carolina State University, ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Bulletin, 39,(4) pp 79-83.
   Google Scholar
• Williams L. and Upchurch R. L. (2001) In Support of Student Pair-Programming, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33,(1) pp 327-331.
   Google Scholar
• Williams L. A. and Kessler R. R. (2000) All I Needed to Know About Pair Programming I Learned at Kindergarten, Communications of the ACM, 43,(4) pp 108-114.
   Google Scholar