What “Shrinkage” of the MnSOST-R? A Response to Wollert (2002b)

References

• American Psychiatric Association . 2000 . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Volume IV-Text Revision , Washington, DC : American Psychiatric Association .
   Google Scholar
• Barbaree , H. E. , Seto , M. C. , Langton , C. and Peacock , E. 2001 . Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders . Criminal Justice & Behavior , 28 : 490 – 521 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartosh , D. L. , Garby , T. , Lewis , D. and Gray , S. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , in press
   Google Scholar
• Bradley , M. and Epperson , D. L. 2001 . Inter-rater reliability study of the MnSOST-R Unpublished research
   Google Scholar
• Darlington , R. B. 1975 . Radicals and squares: Statistical methods for the behavioral sciences , Ithaca, NY : Logan Hill Press .
   Google Scholar
• Doren , D. M. 1998 . Recidivism base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the “sexual predator” commitment laws . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 16 : 97 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doren , D. M. 2002 . Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. L. Updated research on the MnSOST-R: A year of research and use in perspective . Presentation given at the Sex Offender Re-Offense Risk Prediction Symposium, Sinclair Seminars . Madison, WI. March .
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. L. , Kaul , J. D. , Huot , S. J. , Hesselton , D. , Alexander , W. and Gilman , M. Cross-validation of the Minnesota sex offender screening tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) . Paper presented at the 19th annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers . San Diego, CA. November .
   Google Scholar
• Epperson , D. L. , Kaul , J. D. , Huot , S. J. , Hesselton , D. , Alexander , W. and Goldman , R. 1999 . Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised (MnSOST-R): Development, performance, and recommended risk level cut scores Available at: http://129.186.143.73/faculty/epperson/mnsost_download.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fanning , T. , Zimmel , T. , Jaskulske , D. and Curran , S. 1999 . An assessment of recidivism in juvenile/young adult sex offenders Unpublished research
   Google Scholar
• Hanson , R. K. and Bussière , M. T. 1998 . Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 66 : 348 – 362 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson , R. K. , Steffy , R. A. and Gauthier , R. 1993 . Long-term recidivism of child molesters . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 61 : 646 – 652 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson , R. K. and Thornton , D. 2000 . Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales . Law and Human Behavior , 24 : 119 – 136 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton , C. M. 2003 . Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy , Dissertation from the Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto .
   Google Scholar
• Langton , C. M. , Barbaree , H. E. and Seto , M. C. Evaluating the predictive validity of seven risk assessment instruments for sex offenders: Comparing actuarial and structured clinical approaches . Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers . Montreal, Quebec. October .
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd , M. D. and Grove , W. M. 2002 . The uselessness of the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) in commitment decisions , Manuscript submitted for publication .
   Google Scholar
• Prentky , R. A. , Lee , A. F. S. , Knight , R. A. and Cerce , D. 1997 . Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis . Law and Human Behavior , 21 : 635 – 659 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush , R. 2000 . The assessment of sex offenders in Ireland and the Irish sex offender risk tool Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , C. F. , Doren , D. M. and Thornton , D. 2002 . Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29 : 569 – 589 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , S. Assessment, treatment, and follow-up of female sex offenders . Presentation at the 17th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers . Vancouver, British Columbia. October .
   Google Scholar
• Wollert , R. W. 2002b . The importance of cross-validation in actuarial test construction: Shrinkage in the risk estimates for the Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised . Journal of Threat Assessment , 2 ( 1 ) : 87 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• Wollert , R. W. 2002a . Additional flaws in the Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised: A response to Doren and Dow 2002 . Journal of Threat Assessment , 2 ( 4 ) : 65 – 78 .
   Google Scholar