Animal models in xenotransplantation

Bibliography

• SACHS DH: CCETS BASIC SCIENCE LECTURE: Transplan- tation tolerance. Ann. Thorac. Surg. (1993) 56 (6) :1221–1227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •A thorough review of transplantation tolerance, including xenograft tolerance.
   Google Scholar
• PARKER W, SAADI S, UN SS et al: Transplantation of discordant xenografts: a challenge revisited. Immunol. Today (1996) 17 (8):373–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •An excellent review of the progress in understanding the immunology of xenotransplantation and in developing strategies for potential clinical application.
   Google Scholar
• NOWAK R: Xenotransplantation set to resume. Science(1994) 266(18):1148–1151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GALILI U, MACHER BA, BUEHLER J, SHOHET SB: Human natural an ti-a-galacto syl IgG. II. The specific recogni-tion of alpha (1–3)-linked galactose residues. J. Exp. Med. (1985) 162 (2):573–582.
   Google Scholar
• ••A crucial paper recognising that a human natural antibodyrecognises a-Gal, elucidating a mechanism of hyperacute rejection following discordant xenografting in humans.
   Google Scholar
• PLATT JL, FISCHEL RJ, MATAS AJ et al.: Immunopa- thology of hyperacute xenograft rejection in a swine-to-primate model. Transplantation (1991) 52 (2) 214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••A detailed description of the immunopathological changesof hyperacute rejection in the pig-to-primate model.
   Google Scholar
• GOOD AH, COOPER DK, MALCOLM AJ et al.: Identifica-tion of carbohydrate structures that bind human antiporcine antibodies: implications for discordant xenografting in humans. Transplant. Proc. (1992) 24 (2):559–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITE DJ, YANNOUTSOS N: Production of pigstransgenic for human DAF to overcome complement-mediated hyperacute xenograft rejection in man. Res. Immunol. (1996) 147 (2):88–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •A thorough review of the role of the hDAF transgene in preventing hyperacute rejection in a pig-to-human transplantation.
   Google Scholar
• MCCURRY KR, KOOYMAN DL, ALVARADO CG et al.: Human complement regulatory proteins protect swine-to-primate cardiac xenografts from humoral injury. Nature Med. (1995) 1(5):423–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •A key article demonstrating that human complement regula-tory proteins, such as CD59, can prevent hyperacute rejection in a pig-to-primate model.
   Google Scholar
• BACH FH, WINKLER H, FERRAN C, HANCOCK WW, ROBSON SC: Delayed xenograft rejection. Immunol. Today (1996) 17 (8):379–384.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •A review of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of delayed xenograft rejection.
   Google Scholar
• PLATT JL, UN SS, MCGREGOR CG: Acute vascular rejection. Xenotransplantation (1998) 5 (3) :169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •A detailed review of the mechanisms involved in acute vascular rejection.
   Google Scholar
• SATO K, TAKIGAMI K, MIYATAKE T et al: Suppression ofdelayed xenograft rejection by specific depletion of elicited antibodies of the IgM isotype. Transplantation (1999) 68(6):844–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WATERWORTH PD, DUNNING J, TOLAN M et al.: Life-supporting pig-to-baboon heart xenotransplanta-tion. J. Heart Lung Transplant. (1998) 17(12):1201–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••This paper demonstrates that a transgenic hDAF pig heart isable to support the life of a primate when transplanted orthotopically.
   Google Scholar
• YAMADA K, SACHS DH, DERSIMONIAN H: Human anti-porcine xenogeneic T cell response. Evidence for allelic specificity of mixed leukocyte reaction and for both direct and indirect pathways of recognition. J. Immunol (1995) 155(10:5249–5256.
   Google Scholar
• DORLING A, RIESBECK K, LECHLER RL et al.: The T-cell response to xenografts: molecular interactions and graft-specific immunosuppression. Xenotransplanta-tion (1996) 4(4):68–77.
   Google Scholar
• ••A thorough review of the role of T-cells in xenograftrejection.
   Google Scholar
• SCHERINGA M, BUCHNER B, DE BRUIN RW et al: Chronic rejection of concordant aortic xenografts in the hamster-to-rat model. Transpl Immunol (1996) 4(3):192–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GALILI U, MINANOV OP, MICHLER RE et al.: High-affinity anti-Gal immunoglobulin G in chronic rejection of xenografts. Xenotransplantation (1997) 4(4)127–131.
   Google Scholar
• FISCHEL RJ, PLATT JL, MATAS AJ et al.: Prolonged survival of a discordant cardiac xenograft in a rhesus monkey. Transplant. Proc. (1999) 23:589.
   Google Scholar
• WENKLER H, FERRAN C, BACH FJ: Accommodation of xenografts: a concept revisited. Xenotransplantation (1995) 2:53.
   Google Scholar
• CALNE RY: Organ transplantation between widely disparate species. Transplant. Proc. (1970) 2(4):550–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••The first review article of organ transplantation betweenwidely disparate species.
   Google Scholar
• ROTHCHILD L: A Classification of Living Animals (Edition 2). Longmans Green, London, UK (1965):46–47.
   Google Scholar
• CHONG AS, SHEN J, XIAO F et al.: Delayed xenograft rejection in the concordant hamster heart into Lewis rat model. Transplantation (1996) 62 (1):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIYAGAWA S, HIROSE H, SHIRAKURA R et al.: The mechanism of discordant xenograft rejection. Transplantation (1988) 46 (6):825–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRAUER RB, BALDWIN WM, DAHA MR et al.: Use of C6-deficient rats to evaluate the mechanism of hyperacute rejection of discordant cardiac xenografts. Immunol. (1993) 151 (12):7240–7248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATSUMIYA G, SHIRAKURA R, MIYAGAWA S et al.: Analysis of rejection mechanism in the rat to mouse cardiac xenotransplantation. Role and characteristics of anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Transplantation (1994) 57 (11) :1653–1660.
   Google Scholar
• ••This paper clearly demonstrates the role of xenoreactiveantibodies in a rat-to-mouse model.
   Google Scholar
• GORCZYNSKI RM, FU XM, CHUNG S, SULLIVAN B, CHENZ: Manipulation of xenogeneic skin and/or renal graft survival in the rat-mouse concordant combination by portal vein pretransplant transfusion. Transpl Immunol (1995) 3(4):321–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZHANG Z, ZHONG R, JIANG J et al.: Prevention of heartallograft and kidney xenograft rejection by monoclonal antibody to CD45 RB. Transplant. Proc. (1997) 29 (1-2) :1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEVENTHAL JR, MATAS AJ, SUN LH et al.: The immunopa- thology of cardiac xenograft rejection in the guinea pig-to-rat model. Transplantation (1993) 56 (0 :1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •A detailed description of the pathological changes of hyperacute rejection in a guinea-pig-to-rat model.
   Google Scholar
• YEDIDAG EN, FRYER JP, LEVI E, BUCKINGHAM FC et al: Early histopathology of small intestinal discordant xenografts. Transplantation (1996) 62 (10) :1385–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOARES M, LU X, HAVAUX X et al.: In vivo IgM depletion by anti-mu monoclonal antibody therapy. The role of IgM in hyperacute vascular rejection of discordant xenografts. Transplantation (1994) 57 (7) :1003–1009.
   Google Scholar
• GAMBIEZ L, SALAME E, CHEREAU C et al.: The role ofnatural IgM in the hyperacute rejection of discordant heart xenografts. Transplantation (1992) 54(4) :577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRUITT SK, BALDWIN WM 3D, BARTH RN, SANFILIPPO F:The effect of xenoreactive antibody and B cell depletion on hyperacute rejection of guinea pig-to-rat cardiac xenografts. Transplantation (1993) 56(6):1318–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DELRIVIERE LD, HAVAUX X, GIBBS P, GIANELLO PR:Basic anatomical and physiological differences between species should be considered when choosing combinations for use in models of hepatic xenotrans-plantation: an investigation of the guinea pig-to-rat combination. Transplantation (1998) 66 (1) :112–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KERR SR, DALMASSO AP, APASOVA EV, CHEN SS, KIRSCH-FINK M, MATES AJ: Mouse-to-rabbit xenotransplanta-tion: a new small animal model of hyperacute rejection mediated by the classical complement pathway. Transplantation (1999) 67(3) :360–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Description of a novel mouse-to-rabbit model, in whichhyperacute rejection is mediated by the classical comple-ment pathway.
   Google Scholar
• ALIKHAN N, JIANG J, ZHONG R et al.: Analysis ofrejection in a novel guinea pig-to-mouse discordant transplant model. j C/in. Invest. (2000) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• ZHONG R, ZHANG Z, KIYOCHI H, WANG H: Novel mouse models for xenotransplantation research. In: Organ Transplantation in Rats and Mice. Timmormann W, Gassel H, Ulrichs K, Zhong R, Thiede A (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Germany (1999) :605–614.
   Google Scholar
• KIYOCHI H, KELLERSMANN R, BLOMER A et al.: Rat-to-mouse small bowel xenotransplantation: a novel model for studying acute vascular and hyperacute xenograft rejection and xenogenic cell migration. Xenotransplantation (1999) 6(1) :28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIN Y, SOARES MP, SATO K et al.: long-term survival of hamster hearts in presensitized rats. The 5th Congress of the International Xenotransplantation Association. Nagoya, Japan (1999). (Abstract 201B).
   Google Scholar
• TEARLE RG, TANGE MJ, ZANNETTINO ZL et al.: The a-1, 3 -galacto syltransferase knockout mouse. Implications for xenotransplantation. Transplantation (1996) 61(0:13–19.
   Google Scholar
• ••This paper demonstrates the possibility to preventinghyperacute rejection by depleting a-Gal.
   Google Scholar
• THALL AD, MALY P, LOWE JB: Oocyte Gal a 1,3Gal epitopes implicated in sperm adhesion to the zona pellucidaglycoprotein ZP3 are not required for fertili-zation in the mouse. J. Biol. Chem. (1995) 270 (37):21437–21440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Description of techniques involved in generating a-Gal knockout mice.
   Google Scholar
• PEARSE MJ, WITORT E, MOTTRAM P et al.: Anti-Gal antibody-mediated allograft rejection in a1,3-galactosyltransferase gene knockout mice: a model of delayed xenograft rejection. Transplantation (1998) 66(6):748–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHONG A, BLINDER L, YIN DP et al.: Anti-Gal antibody production in a1,3galactosyl-transferase gene knockout (GT-K0 mice after xeno (LEW rat)-and allo (C3H)-transplantation. The 5th Congress of the Interna-tional Xenotransplantation Association. Nagoya, Japan (1999). (Abstract 34).
   Google Scholar
• MCKENZIE IF, LI YQ, PATTON K, THALL AD, SANDRIN MS: A murine model of antibody-mediated hyperacute rejection by galactose-a(1,3)galactose antibodies in Gal o/o mice. Transplantation (1998) 66(6):754–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LATEMPLE DC, GALILI U: Adult and neonatal anti-Gal response in knock-out mice for a1,3galactosyltransfe-rase. Xenotransplantation (1998) 5 (3) :191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TANEMURA M, GALILI U: Differential expression of the a-Gal epitopes on pig and mouse organs. The 5th Congress of the International Xenotransplantation Associa-tion. Nagoya, Japan (1999). (Abstract 33).
   Google Scholar
• HASAN R, VAN DEN BOGAERDE JB, WALLWORK J, WHITE DJ: Evidence that long-term survival of concordant xenografts is achieved by inhibition of antispecies antibody production. Transplantation (1992) 54 (3):408–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIELSEN B, STEINBRUCHEL DA, LILLEVANG ST, KEMP E:Evidence for a primarily humoral rejection mechanism in concordant xenogeneic heart transplantation. A sequential immunohistological study in a hamster-to-rat model. APMIS (1993) 101 (8) :587–594.
   Google Scholar
• THOMAS FT, MARCHMAN W, CAROBBI A eta].: Inimun o-biology of the xenograft response: xenograft rejection in immunodeficient animals. Transplant. Proc. (1991) 23(1 Part 0:208–209.
   Google Scholar
• LIM SM, LI SQ, WEE A et al.: Both concordant and discor-dant heart xenografts are rejected by athymic(nude) rats with the same tempo as in T cell competent animals. Transplant. Proc. (1991) 23(1 Part 0:581–582.
   Google Scholar
• LIN Y, VANDEPUTTE M, WAER M: Natural killer cell- andmacrophage-mediated rejection of concordant xenografts in the absence of T and B cell responses. J Immunol. (1997) 158(12):5658–5667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •This paper clearly demonstrates the role of the innate immune system in xenograft rejection.
   Google Scholar
• MURASE N, STARZL TE, DEMETRIS AJ et al: Hamster-to-rat heart and liver xenotransplantation with FK506 plus antiproliferative drugs. Transplantation (1993) 55 (4):701–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIYAZAWA H, MURASE N, DEMETRIS AJ et al.: Hamster to rat kidney xenotransplantation. Effects of FK 506, cyclophosphamide, organ perfusion and complement inhibition. Transplantation (1995) 59 (8) :1183–1188.
   Google Scholar
• SALOMON S, STEINBRUCHEL DA, NIELSEN B, LILLEVANG S, KEMP E: Effect of leflunomide, cyclosporine and splenectomy in two different organ systems of concor-dant xenotransplantation in rats. Transplant. Proc. (1996) 28(2):698–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KEMP E: Experimental concordant xenografting in small Animals in Organ transplantation in rats and mice. In: Organ Transplantation in Rats and Mice. Timmor-mann W, Gassel H, Ulrichs K, Zhong R, Thiede A (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Germany (1999):561–573.
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSSON C, ANDERSSON A, BERSZTEL A et al.: Successful retransplantation of mouse-to-rat cardiac xenografts under immunosuppressive monotherapy with cyclosporine. Transplantation (1997) 63 (5):652–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TORGERSEN KM, SALCEDO M, VAAGE JT et al.: Major histocompatibility complex class I-independent killing of xenogeneic targets by rat allospecific natural killer cells. Transplantation (1997) 63 (1) :119–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REHMAN A, TU Y, ARIMA T, LINSLEY PS, FLYE MW: Long-term survival of rat to mouse cardiac xenografts with prolonged blockade of CD28-B7 interaction combined with peritransplant T-cell depletion. Surgery (1996) 120(2):205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OHTA Y, GOTOH M, OHZATO H et al.: Direct antigen presentation through binding of donor intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to recipient lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 molecules in xenograft rejection. Transplantation (1998) 65 (8):1094–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WANG H, DEVRIES ME, DENG S et al.: The axis of interleukin 12 and gamma interferon regulates acute vascular xenogeneic rejection. Nature Med. (2000) 6 (5)549–555.
   Google Scholar
• •This paper demonstrates how cytokines regulate acute vascular xenogenic rejection.
   Google Scholar
• MURRAY AG, PETZELBAUER P, HUGHES CC et al: Human T-cell-mediated destruction of allogeneic dermal microvessels in a severe combined immunodeficient mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. ScL USA (1994) 91(19):9146–9150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SULTAN P, MURRAY AG, MCNIFF JM et al.: Pig but not human interferon-7 initiates human cell-mediated rejection of pig tissue in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. ScL USA (1997) 94(16):8767–8772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••This paper demonstrates that the biological effect of IFN-y isspecies specific.
   Google Scholar
• MURRAY AG, SCHECHNER JS, EPPERSON DE et al.:Dermal microvascular injury in the human peripheral blood lymphocyte reconstituted-severe combined immunodeficient (HuPBL-SCID) mouse/skin allogr aft model is T cell mediated and inhibited by a combina-tion of cyclosporine and rap amycin. Am. J. Pathol (1998) i53(2):627–638.
   Google Scholar
• ZHONG R, TUCKER J, GRANT D et al: Long-term survivaland functional tolerance of baboon to monkey kidney and liver transplantation: a preliminary report. Transplant. Proc. (1996) 8(2):762.
   Google Scholar
• •Development of an immunosuppressive protocol, which allows long-term survival of concordant xenografts in primates.
   Google Scholar
• DANKO I, GEBHARD C, SCHOLZ S, GOKEL J, HAMMER C:Transplant aspiration cytology for monitoring of kidney xenograft (wolf-dog) under cyclosporine A treatment. Eur. Surg. Res. (1983) i5(5):276–283.
   Google Scholar
• KANAI N, MORITA N, MUNKHBAT B et al.: Delayed hyperacute xenograft rejection in porcine to canine fetal liver transplantation. Transpl. Immunol. (1999) 7 (2):95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZAIDI A, SCHMOECKEL M, BHATTI F et al.:Life-suppor ting pig-to-primate renal xenotransplanta-tion using genetically modified donors. Transplanta-tion (1998) 65(12):1584–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROMANO E, NEETHLING FA, NILSSON K et al.: Intrave-nous synthetic alphaGal saccharides delay hyperacute rejection following pig-to-baboon heart transplanta-tion. Xenotransplantation (1999) 6(0:36–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MAKOWKA L, MILLER C, CHAPCHAP P et al.: Prolonga-tion of pig-to-dog xenograft survival by modification of the inflammatory mediator response. Ann. Surg. (1987) 206 (0482–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KING FA, YARBROUGH CJ, ANDERSON DC, GORDON TP,GOULD KG: Primates. Science (1988) 240(48501475–1482.
   Google Scholar
• MYBURGH JA, SMIT JA, STARK JH: Experimental concor-dant kidney xenotransplantation in primates. In: Xenotransplantation (Edition 4. Cooper DK, Kemp E, Platt JL, White DJ (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Germany (1997):316–322.
   Google Scholar
• MYBURGH JA, SMIT JA, STARK JH: Transplantation tolerance following total lymphoid irradiation in baboon-to-vervet monkey kidney xenotransplanta-tion. Transplant. Proc. (1994) 26(3):1080–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHMOECKEL M, BHATTI FN, ZAIDI A et al.: Orthotopic heart transplantation in a tr an sgenic pig-to-primate model. Transplantation (1998) 65(12):1570–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •This paper clearly demonstrates that a kidney from a phylogenetically distant species, such as the pig, is capable of maintaining normal functions in primates.
   Google Scholar
• LAMBRIGTS D, SACHS D, COOPER D: Discordant organxenotransplantation in primates - world experience and current status. Transplantation (1998) 66(5):547–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITE DG: hDAG transgenic pig organs: are theyconcordant for human transplantation? Xenotrans-plantation (1996) 4(5):50.
   Google Scholar
• XU H, GUNDRY SR, HANCOCK WW et al: Prolonged discordant xenograft survival and delayed xenograft rejection in a pig-to-baboon orthotopic cardiac xenograft model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. (1998) 115 (6):1342–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YEATMAN M, DAGGETT CW, PARKER W et al.: Complement-mediated pulmonary xenograft injury: studies in swine-to-primate orthotopic single lung transplant models. Transplantation (1998) 65(8):1084–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LUO Y, WEN J, CUMMINGS RD et al.: Pig xenogeneic antigen modification with green coffee bean alpha-galactosidase. Xenotransplantation (1999) 6 (0238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HAMMER D: In: Xenogene. Hardy M (Ed.), International Congress Series, USA (1989).
   Google Scholar
• STONE KR, WALGENBACH AW, ABRAMS JT et al.: Porcine and bovine cartilage transplants in cynomolgus monkey: I. A model for chronic xenograft rejection. Transplantation (1997) 63 (5):640–645.
   Google Scholar
• GALILI U, LATEMPLE DC, WALGENBACH AW, STONE KR: Porcine and bovine cartilage transplants in cynomolg-us monkey: II. Changes in anti-Gal response during chronic rejection. Transplantation (1997) 63 (5):646–651.
   Google Scholar
• STONE KR, AYALA G, GOLDSTEIN J et al.: Porcinecartilage transplants in the cynomolg-us monkey III. Transplantation of alpha-galactosidase-treated porcine cartilage. Transplantation (1998) 65 (12):1577–1583.
   Google Scholar
• KROSHUS TJ, DALMASSO AP, LEVENTHAL JR et al.: Antibody removal by column immunoabsorption prevents tissue injury in an ex vivo model of pig-to-human xenograft hyperacute rejection. J Surg. Res. (1995) 59(1):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABOUNA GM, GANGULY PK, HAMDY HM et al.: Extracor-poreal liver perfusion system for successful hepatic support pendingliver regeneration or liver transplan-tation: a pre-clinical controlled trial. Transplantation (1999) 67 (12) :1576–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAUMVVEBER DM, BERGMANN R, GOKEL M, HAMMER C: Hyperacute rejection in an ex vivo model of renal xenografting. Role of the mediator response and its pharmacologic manipulation by the specific platelet-activating factor antagonist WEB 2086BS. Transplanta-tion (1994) 57(3):358–363.
   Google Scholar
• SCHMOECKEL M, NOLLERT G, SHAHMOHAMMADI M et Transgenic human decay accelerating factor makes normal pigs function as a concordant species. J Heart Lung Transplant (1997) 16(7):758–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOX IJ, LANGNAS AN, FRISTOE LW et al.: Successful application of extracorporeal liver perfusion: a technology whose time has come. Am. J. Gastroenterol. (1993) 88(10:1876–1881.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• COLLINS BH, CHARI RS, MAGEE JC et al: Mechanisms ofinjury in porcine livers perfused with blood of patients with fulminant hepatic failure. Transplanta-tion (1994) 58(10:1162–1171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AZIMZADEH A, WOLF P, DALMASSO AP et al.: Assess-ment of hyperacute rejection in a rat-to-primate cardiac xenograft model. Transplantation (1996) 61 (9):1305–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHARREAU B, MENORET S, TESSON L et al.: Protectionagainst hyperacute xenograft rejection of transgenic rat hearts expressing human decay accelerating factor (DAF) transplanted into primates. Mol. Med. (1999) 5 (9):617–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GALILI U, SHOHET SB, KOBRIN E, STULTS CL, MACHERBA: Man, apes and Old World monkeys differ from other mammals in the expression of a-galactosyl epitopes on nucleated cells. J. Biol. Chem. (1988) 263(33):17755–17762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITE D: Transgenic strategies. 27th World Congress ofthe Transplantation Society. Montreal, Canada (1998). (Abstract 482).
   Google Scholar
• COZZI E, YANOUTSOS N, LANGFORD GA eta].: Effect of transgenic expression of human decay accelerating factor on the inhibition of hyperacute rejection of pig organs. In: Xenotransplantation(Edition 2). Cooper DKC, Kemp E (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Germany (1997):665.
   Google Scholar
• OSTLIE DJ, COZZI E, VIAL CM et al: Improved renal function and fewer rejection episodes using SDZ RAD in life-supporting hDAF pig to primate renal xenotransplanation. 18th AST Annual Meeting. Chicago, USA (1999). (Abstract 445).
   Google Scholar
• VIAL CM, OSTLIE DJ, COZZI E et al.: Mycophenolic acid-sodium (ERD)80) permits prolonged function in hDAF pig to primate renal xenotransplantation. 25th ASTS Annual Meeting. Chicago, USA (1999). (Abstract 280).
   Google Scholar
• DIAMOND LE, MARTIN MJ ADAMS D et al.: Transgenic pig hearts and kidneys expressing human CD59, CD55, or CD46 are protected from hyperacute rejection upon transplantation into baboons. The 4th Congress of the International Xenotransplantation Associa-tion. Nantes, France (1997). (Abstract 185).
   Google Scholar
• LIN SS, WEIDNER BC, BYRNE GW et al.: The role of antibodies in acute vascular rejection of pig-to-baboon cardiac transplants. J. C/in. Invest. (1998) 101 (8):1745–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••This article clearly demonstrates the essential role of xenore-active antibodies in acute vascular rejection in a pig-to-baboon cardiac transplant model.
   Google Scholar
• VIAL CM, BHATTI GNK, OSTLIE DJ et al.: Prolonged survival of orthotopic cardiac xenografts in a hDAF transgenic pig-to-baboon model. 18th AST Annual Meeting. Chicago, USA (1999). (Abstract 444).
   Google Scholar
• WANG H, ROLLINS S, GARCIA B et al.: Complement inactivation with an anti-05 monoclonal antibody prevents hyperacute rejection in a presensitized rat to mouse heart transplant model. Transplantation (1999) 68(10:1643–1651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HENEINE W, TIBELL A, SWITZER WM et al.: No evidenceof infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of porcine islet-cell xenografts. Lancet (1998) 352(9129):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GROTH CG, KORSGREN O, TIBELL A et al: Transplanta-tion of porcine fetal pancreas to diabetic patients [see comments]. Lancet (1994) 344 (8934):1402–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABOUNA GM, GANGULY PK, HAMDY HM et al.: Extracor-poreal liver perfusion system for successful hepatic support pendingliver regeneration or liver transplan-tation: a pre-clinical controlled trial. Transplantation (1999) 67 (12) :1576–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEACON T, SCHUMACHER J, DINSMORE J et al.: Histological evidence of fetal pig neural cell survival after transplantation into a patient with Parkinson's disease. Nature Med. (1997) 3 (3):350–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOLENAAR GJ, HOGENESCH RI, SPRENGERS ME, STAAL MJ: Ontogenesis of embryonic porcine ventral mesencephalon in the perspective of its potential use as a xenograft in Parkinson's disease. J. Comp. Neurol. (1997) 382(0:19–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RAYAT GR, RAJOTTE RV, ELLIOTT JF, KORBUTT GS: Expression of Gal a(1,3)gal on neonatal porcine islet 13-cells and susceptibility to human antibody/comple-ment lysis. Diabetes (1998) 47(9):1406–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIRENDA V, LE MAUFF B, BOEFFARD F et al: Intact pancreatic islet function despite humoral x enorecog-nition in the pig-to-monkey combination. Transplanta-tion (1998) 66(11):1485–1495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIRENDA V, LE MAUFF B, CASSARD A et al.: Intact pig pancreatic islet function in the presence of human xenoreactive natural antibody binding and comple-ment activation. Transplantation (1997) 63(10):1452–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KORSGREN O, JANSSON L, EIZIRIK D, ANDERSSON A: Functional and morphological differentiation of fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters after transplantation into nude mice. Diabetologia (1991) 34 (6):379–386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SANDBERG JO, MARGULIS B, JANSSON L, KARLSTEN R, KORSGREN O: Transplantation of fetal porcine pancreas to diabetic or normoglycemic nude mice, Evidence of a rapid engraftment process demonstrated by blood flow and heat shock protein 70 measurements. Transplantation (1995) 59 (12):1665–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KORSGREN O, JANSSON L: Discordant cellular xenografts revascularized in intermediate athymic hosts fail to induce a hyperacute rejection when transplanted to immunocompetent rats. Transplanta-tion (1994) 57(9):1408–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAUSTMAN D, COE C: Prevention of xenograft rejection by masking donor HLA class I antigens. Science (1991) 252 (5013):1700–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LENSCHOW DJ, ZENG Y, THISTLETHWAITE JR et al.: Long-term survival of xenogeneic pancreatic islet grafts induced by CTLA4Ig. Science (1992) 257(5071) :789–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEBER CJ, SAFLEY S, HAGLER M, KAPP J: Evaluation of graft-host response for various tissue sources and animal models. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. (1999) 875:233–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARADIS K, LANGFORD G, LONG Z et al.: Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. Science (1999) 285(5430:1236–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MANDEL TE, KOVARIK, KOULMANDA M, GOERGIOU HM: Cellular rejection of fetal pancreas grafts: Differences between allo- and xenograft rejection. Xenotransplan-tation (1997) 4 (4) :2–10.
   Google Scholar
• SANDLER S, ANDERSSON A, EIZIRIK DL et al: Assessment of insulin secretion in vitro from microencapsulated fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters and rat, mouse and human pancreatic islets. Transplantation (1997) 63 (12):1712–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUN Y, MAX, ZHOU D, VACEK I, SUN AM: Normalization of diabetes in spontaneously diabetic cynomolog-us monkeys by xenografts of microencap sulated porcine islets without immunosuppression. j C/in. Invest. (1996) 98(6):1417–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LANGER S, LAU D, ECKHARDT T, JAHR H et al.: Viability and recovery of frozen-thawed human islets and in vivo quality control by xenotransplantation. j Mol Med. (1999) 77(0:172–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KORBUTT GS, ELLIOTT JF, AO Z, SMITH DK et al.: large scale isolation, growth and function of porcine neonatal islet cells./ Clin. Invest. (1996) 97 (9) :2119–2129.
   Google Scholar
• SUN Y, ZHOU D, VACEK I, SUN AM: Isolation of porcine pancreatic islets for xenotransplantation studies: Effects of low collagenase digestion temperatures. Xenotransplantation (1997) 4 (4) :2–10.
   Google Scholar
• THOMAS FT, RICORDI C, CONTRERAS JL et al.: Reversal of naturally occurring diabetes in primates by unmodi-fied islet xenografts without chronic immunosuppres-sion. Transplantation (1999) 67 (6):846–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WENNBERG L, KARLSSON-PARRA A, SUNDBERG B et al.: Efficacy of immunosuppressive drugs in islet xenotransplantation: leflunomide in combination with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil prevents islet xenograft rejection in the pig-to-rat model. Transplantation (1997) 63 (9) :1234–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KARLSSON-PARRA A, RIDDERSTAD A, WALLGREN AC et Xenograft rejection of porcine islet-like cell clusters in normal and natural killer cell-depleted mice. Transplantation (1996) 61 (9) :1313–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARCHETTI P. SCHARP DW. FINKE EH et al.: Prolonged survival of discordant porcine islet xenografts. Transplantation (1996) 61 (7) :1100–1102.
   Google Scholar
• LANZA RP, KUHTREIBER WM, ECKER D, STARUK JE, CHICK WL: Xenotransplantation of porcine and bovine islets without immunosuppression using uncoated alginate microspheres. Transplantation (1995) 59 (10) :1377–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUN YL, MA X, ZHOU D, VACEK I, SUN AM: Porcine pancreatic islets: isolation, microencapsulation and xenotransplantation. Artif. Organs (1993) 17 (8) :727–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRUISE GM, HEGRE OD, LAMBERTI FV et al.: In vitro and in vivo performance of porcine islets encapsulated in interfacially photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate membranes. Cell Transplant. (1999) 8 (3) 293–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BENDA B, KARLSSON-PARRA A, RIDDERSTAD A, KORSGREN O: Xenograft rejection of porcine islet-like cell clusters in immunoglobulin- or Fc-receptor gamma-deficient mice. Transplantation (1996) 62(9):1207–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHIROKI R, NAZIRUDDIN B, SHISHIDO S et al.: Human peripheral blood leukocyte-reconstituted severe combined immunodeficient mouse: analysis of the human immune response against porcine islet transplantation. Transplantation (1997) 63 (6):818–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS CF, SIMEONOVIC CJ, FUNG MC, WILSON JD, HAPEL AJ: Intragraft expression of cytokine transcripts during pig proislet x enograft rejection and tolerance in mice. .1 Immunol. (1995) 154(5):2470–2482.
   Google Scholar
• SANDBERG JO, KORSGREN O: Islet alio- and x en o tr an s-plantation in normal, intercellular adhesion molecule-l-deficient and P selectin-deficient mice. Transplantation (1997) 64 (4):584–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLER B, O'NEIL AJ, WICKER L: Both the 1yt-2+ and L3T4+ T cell subsets are required for the transfer of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. j immunoi. (1988) 140:52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SODERLUND J, WENNBERG L, CASTANOS-VELEZ E et al.: Fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters transplanted to cynomolgus monkeys: an immunohistochemical study. Transplantation (1999) 67(6):784–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUN Y, MAX, ZHOU D, VACEK I, SUN AM: Normalization of diabetes in spontaneously diabetic cynomolog-us monkeys by xenografts of microencap sulated porcine islets without immunosuppression. J. Clin. Invest. (1996) 98(6):1417–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar