868
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Evaluations

Bevacizumab for the treatment of cervical cancer

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 407-419 | Received 24 Jul 2015, Accepted 19 Jan 2016, Published online: 11 Feb 2016

References

  • Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of considerable interest (••) to readers.
  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29.
  • Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Plummer M, et al. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:3262–3327.
  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.
  • Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2004. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2007.
  • Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5802–5812.

• Systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized trials that approved concurrent chemoradiation as standard treatment of LACC.

  • DiSaia P, Creasman W. Clinical gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2012.
  • Wright JD, Viviano D, Powell MA, et al. Bevacizumab combination therapy in heavily pretreated, recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(2):489–493.

•• First study that involves the use of bevacizumab in patients with cervical cancer.

  • Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Bellati F, Ruscito I, et al. Monoclonal antibodies therapies for ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:739–764.

• A very complete overview of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

  • Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition-a critical review. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2007;7:223–245.
  • Lopez-Ocejo O, Viloria-Petit A, Bequet-Romero M, et al. Oncogenes and tumor angiogenesis: the HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein activates the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene promoter in a p53 independent manner. Oncogene. 2000;19(40):4611–4620.
  • Toussaint-Smith E, Donner DB, Roman A. Expression of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins in primary foreskin keratinocytes is sufficient to alter the expression of angiogenic factors. Oncogene. 2004;23(17):2988–2995.
  • Guidi AJ, Abu-Jawdeh G, Berse B, et al. Vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) expression and angiogenesis in cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(16):1237–1245.
  • Kaku T, Hirakawa T, Kamura T, et al. Angiogenesis in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 1998;83(7):1384–1390.
  • Lenczewski A, Terlikowski S, Famulski W, et al. Angiogenesis as a prognostic factor in invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2001;39(2):165–166.
  • Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ 3rd, et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):734–743.

•• Pivotal phase III trial that demonstrated an improvement in OS by adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer, with subsequent FDA approval for these patients.

  • Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):107–108.
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCC Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer Version 2.2015. [ cited 2015 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf
  • Stehman FB, Bundy BN, DiSaia PJ, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer. 1991;67:2776–2785.
  • Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1137–1143.
  • Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1154–1161.
  • Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RGW, et al. Cisplatin, 5-Fluorouracil plus radiation therapy are superior to radiation therapy as adjunctive therapy in high risk, early stage carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: Report of a Phase III inter group study. Presented at Soc Gynecol Oncol 30th Annual Meeting; 1999 February 5–9; San Fransisco, CA.
  • Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:144–153.
  • Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(5):1339–1348.
  • NCI Issues Clinical Announcement on Cervical Cancer: Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Improves Survival. [ cited 2015 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/feb99/nci-22.htm
  • Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3113–3119.
  • Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4649–4655.

•• Important study showing that combination of cisplatin–paclitaxel is superior to other cisplatin doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma.

• One of the first studies on the role of angiogenesis in cervical cancer.

  • Bachtiary B, Schindl M, Potter R, et al. Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha indicates diminished response to radiotherapy and unfavorable prognosis in patients receiving radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(6):2234–2240.
  • Cheng WF, Chen CA, Lee CN, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and prognosis of cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:721–726.
  • Loncaster JA, Cooper RA, Logue JP, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression is a prognostic factor for radiotherapy outcome in advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Cancer. 2000;83(5):620–625.
  • Lee IJ, Park KR, Lee KK, et al. Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in Stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54(3):768–779.

• Significant study that evaluates the prognostic value of VEGF in cervical cancer.

  • Silva-Filho AL, Traiman P, Triginelli SA, et al. Association between CD31 expression and histopathologic features in stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(2):757–762.
  • Randall LM, Monk BJ, Darcy KM, et al. Markers of angiogenesis in high-risk, early-stage cervical cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):583–589.
  • Monk BJ, Sill MW, Burger RA, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(7):1069–1074.

•• Prominent phase II trial of bevacizumab in combination with other drugs in persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

  • Zighelboim I, Wright JD, Gao F, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of topotecan, cisplatin and bevacizumab for recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(1):64–68.

•• Multicenter phase II trial of combination bevacizumab and other drugs in patients with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

  • Penson RT, Huang HQ, Wenzel LB, et al. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: patient-reported outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial (NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240). Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(3):301–311.
  • Phippen NT, Leath CA, Havrilesky LJ, et al. Bevacizumab in recurrent, persistent, or advanced stage carcinoma of the cervix: Is it cost-effective? Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:43–47.
  • Minion LE, Bai J, Monk BJ, et al. A Markov model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of antiangiogenesis therapy using bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(3):490–496.
  • Moore DH, Tian C, Monk BJ, et al. Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):44–49.
  • Tewari KS, Sill MW, Monk BJ, et al. Prospective Validation of Pooled Prognostic Factors in Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy with/without Bevacizumab: NRG Oncology/GOG Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(24):5480–5487.
  • Schefter TE, Winter K, Kwon JS, et al. A phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with definitive radiotherapy and cisplatin chemotherapy in untreated patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma: preliminary results of RTOG 0417. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(4):1179–1184.

•• The only phase II trial evaluating safety of the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation in LACC (1st part).

  • Schefter T, Winter K, Kwon JS, et al. RTOG 0417: efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with definitive radiation therapy and cisplatin chemotherapyin untreated patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(1):101–105.

•• The only phase II trial evaluating efficacy of the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation in LACC (2nd part).

  • Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M, et al. Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(5):872–880.
  • FDA Approval for Bevacizumab. [ cited 2015 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-bevacizumab
  • Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–2342.
  • Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX4 for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(12):1539–1544.
  • Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-Carboplatin alone or with Bevacizumab for NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2542–2550.
  • Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2184–2191.
  • Field KM, Jordan JT, Wen PY, et al. Bevacizumab and glioblastoma: scientific review, newly reported updates, and ongoing controversies. Cancer. 2015;121(7):997–1007.
  • Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9605):2103–2111.
  • Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B, et al. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: the AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(13):1302–1308.
  • Hong JH, Tsai CS, Lai CH, et al. Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(1):249–257.
  • Copur MS, Obermiller A. An algorithm for the management of hypertension in the setting of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibition. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011;10(3):151–156.

• Algorithm for the management of bevacizumab-induced hypertension.

  • Lambrechts D, Moisse M, Delmar P, et al. Genetic markers of bevacizumab-induced hypertension. Angiogenesis. 2014;17(3):685–694.
  • Tahover E, Uziely B, Salah A, et al. Hypertension as a predictive biomarker in bevacizumab treatment for colorectal cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2013;30(1):327.
  • Scartozzi M, Galizia E, Chiorrini S, et al. Arterial hypertension correlates with clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line bevacizumab. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(2):227–230.
  • Ranpura V, Pulipati B, Chu D, et al. Increased risk of high-grade hypertension with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23(5):460–468.

• Meta-analysis on bevacizumab-induced hypertension.

  • Krill LS, Adelson JW, Randall LM, et al. Clinical commentary: medical ethics and the ramifications of equipoise in clinical research. Is a confirmatory trial using a nonbevacizumab containing arm feasible in patients with recurrent cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(3):447–449.
  • Mandrekar SJ, Sargent DJ. Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4027–4034.
  • Backen A, Renehan AG, Clamp AR, et al. The combination of circulating Ang1 and Tie2 levels predicts progression-free survival advantage in bevacizumab-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(17):4549–4558.
  • Hansen TF, Nielsen BS, Sørensen FB, et al. Epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 predicts response to first-line chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(9):2238–2245.
  • Hansen TF, Carlsen AL, Heegaard NH, et al. Changes in circulating microRNA-126 during treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab predicts treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(4):624–629.
  • Weickhardt AJ, Williams DS, Lee CK, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor D expression is a potential biomarker of bevacizumab benefit in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(1):37–45.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.