Direct and Indirect Roles of Men in Determining Women Decision to Use Laser Procedures for Skin Care

References

• Bonell S, Barlow FK, Griffiths S. The cosmetic surgery paradox: toward a contemporary understanding of cosmetic surgery popularisation and attitudes. Body Image. 2021;38:230–240. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy A. Beauty and physics — physics projects based on modern aesthetic and medical treatments. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1929(1):012027. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012027
   Google Scholar
• Ceci L. YouTube: most subscribed beauty content creators 2022. Hamburg: Statista Inc.; 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/627448/most-popular-youtube-beautychannels-ranked-by-subscribers. Accessed October 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel M. Top beauty, wellness & lifestyle influencers on social media for 2022. Montvale, NJ: Happi; 2022. Available from: https://www.happi.com/contents/view_online-exclusives/2022-08-26/top-beautywellness-lifestyle-influencers-on-social-media-for-2021. Accessed October 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Maymone MBC, Laughter M, Dover J, Vashi NA. The malleability of beauty: perceptual adaptation. Clin Dermatol. 2019;37(5):592–596. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Jia Y, He C. Promoting new concepts of skincare via skinomics and systems biology—from traditional skincare and efficacy‐based skincare to precision skincare. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(6):968–976. doi:10.1111/jocd.12663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alster TS, Li MK. Dermatologic laser side effects and complications: prevention and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(5):711–723. doi:10.1007/s40257-020-00530-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torbeck RL, Schilling L, Khorasani H, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Saedi N. Evolution of the picosecond laser: a review of literature. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(2):183–194. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop P, Dylewski Ł, Woźna JT, Tryjanowski P. Cues of woman’s fertility predict prices for sex with prostitutes. Curr Psychol. 2020;39(3):919–926. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9807-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw HK, Leyva RP, Nicolas SCA, Hill SE. Costly female appearance-enhancement provides cues of short-term mating effort: the case of cosmetic surgery. Personal Individ Differ. 2019;138:48–55. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batres C, Russell R, Simpson JA, Campbell L, Hansen AM, Cronk L. Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;122:148–154. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Alleva JM, Broers NJ, Mulkens S. Attitudes towards cosmetic surgery among women in China and the Netherlands. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267451. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milothridis P. The elective nature of cosmetic medicine. In: Cosmetic Patient Selection and Psychosocial Background. Springer International Publishing; 2020:1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44725-0_1
   Google Scholar
• Davis AC. Resolving the tension between feminism and evolutionary psychology: an epistemological critique. Evol Behav Sci. 2021;15(4):368–388. doi:10.1037/ebs0000193
   Google Scholar
• Walter KV, Conroy-Beam D, Buss DM, et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a large-scale replication. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(4):408–423. doi:10.1177/0956797620904154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur LC, Brooks RC, Blake KR. Female self-sexualization covaries with mate value but not mate availability. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol. 2020;6(3):277–291. doi:10.1007/s40750-020-00133-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake KR, Brooks RC. Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(50):25029–25033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909806116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takács K. Discounting of evolutionary explanations in sociology textbooks and curricula. Front Sociol. 2018;3:24. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2018.00024
   Google Scholar
• Davis AC, Arnocky S. An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(1):3–37. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill R, Orgad S. The shifting terrain of sex and power: from the ‘sexualization of culture’ to # MeToo. Sexualities. 2018;21(8):1313–1324. doi:10.1177/1363460718794647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjak JS, Sidorenko J, Robinson MR, Thornton KR, Visscher PM. Evidence of directional and stabilizing selection in contemporary humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(1):151–156. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707227114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broussard KA, Harton HC. Tattoo or taboo? Tattoo stigma and negative attitudes toward tattooed individuals. J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):521–540. doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1373622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoda K, Oswald F, Brown K, Hesse C, Pedersen CL. Showing skin: tattoo visibility status, egalitarianism, and personality are predictors of sexual openness among women. Sex Cult. 2020;24(6):1935–1956. doi:10.1007/s12119-020-09729-1
   Google Scholar
• Sevi B, Aral T, Eskenazi T. Exploring the hook-up app: low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;133:17–20. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zestcott CA, Tompkins TL, Kozak Williams M, Livesay K, Chan KL. What do you think about ink? An examination of implicit and explicit attitudes toward tattooed individuals. J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(1):7–22. doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1297286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks MJ, Young TM, Zaikman Y. The sexual double standard in the real world: evaluations of sexually active friends and acquaintances. Soc Psychol. 2019;50(2):67–79. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggleton NK, Tarran SR, Fincher CL. Who punishes promiscuous women? Both women and men are prejudiced towards sexually-accessible women, but only women inflict costly punishment. Evol Hum Behav. 2019;40(3):259–268. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Fuentes M, Moyano N, Gómez-Berrocal C, Sierra JC. Invariance of the sexual double standard scale: a cross-cultural study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1569. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafra AL, Varella MAC, Defelipe RP, Anchieta NM, de Almeida CAG, Valentova JV. Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personal Individ Differ. 2020;163:110042. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell R, Batres C, Courrèges S, et al. Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. Br J Psychol. 2019;110(1):87–100. doi:10.1111/bjop.12337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batres C, Kramer SS, DeAngelis CG, Russell R. Examining the ‘cosmetics placebo effect. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210238. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borau S, Bonnefon JF. Gendered products act as the extended phenotype of human sexual dimorphism: they increase physical attractiveness and desirability. J Bus Res. 2020;120:498–508. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard P, Content J, Servais L, Wollast R, Gervais S. An initial test of the cosmetics dehumanization hypothesis: heavy makeup diminishes attributions of humanness-related traits to women. Sex Roles. 2020;83(5–6):315–327. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01115-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarosh D. Perception and deception: human beauty and the brain. Behav Sci. 2019;9(4):34. doi:10.3390/bs9040034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnocky S, Locke A. Jealousy mediates the link between women’s upward physical appearance comparison and mate retention behavior. Evol Psychol. 2020;18(4):147470492097399. doi:10.1177/1474704920973990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsay K, Knoll J, Matthes J. Sexualizing media use and self-objectification: a meta-analysis. Psychol Women Q. 2018;42(1):9–28. doi:10.1177/0361684317743019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnish M, Morgan HM, Barnish J. The 2016 HIGh Heels: health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4573-4
   Google Scholar
• Kellie D, Blake K, Brooks R. Behind the makeup: the effects of cosmetics on women’s self-objectification, and their objectification by others. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2021;51(4–5):703–721. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard P, Gervais SJ, Klein O. Objectifying objectification: when and why people are cognitively reduced to their parts akin to objects. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2018;29(1):82–121. doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1471949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake KR, Brooks R, Arthur LC, Denson TF. In the context of romantic attraction, beautification can increase assertiveness in women. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0229162. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogoni C, Carnaghi A, Silani G. Reduced empathic responses for sexually objectified women: an fMRI investigation. Cortex. 2018;99:258–272. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard P, Rizzo T, Hoonhorst I, et al. The neural correlates of cognitive objectification: an ERP study on the body inversion effect associated with sexualized bodies. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018;9(5):550–559. doi:10.1177/1948550617714582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaes J, Cristoforetti G, Ruzzante D, Cogoni C, Mazza V. Assessing neural responses towards objectified human targets and objects to identify processes of sexual objectification that go beyond the metaphor. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6699. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42928-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meltzer AL. Women can benefit from sexual and physical valuation in the context of a romantic relationship. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020;46(2):243–257. doi:10.1177/0146167219854443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi D, DeLong M. Defining female self sexualization for the twenty-first century. Sex Cult. 2019;23(4):1350–1371. doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09617-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake KR, Bastian B, Denson TF, Grosjean P, Brooks RC. Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(35):8722–8727. doi:10.1073/pnas.1717959115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redaelli A, Siddiqui Syed S, Liu X, et al. Two multinational, observational surveys investigating perceptions of beauty and attitudes and experiences relating to aesthetic medical procedures. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(11):3020–3031. doi:10.1111/jocd.13349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolery-Lloyd H, Tolbert D, Onumah N. Lasers for ethnic skin. In: Nouri K, editor. Handbook of Lasers in Dermatology. Springer London; 2014:387–400. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5322-1
   Google Scholar
• Sobanko JF, Taglienti AJ, Wilson AJ, et al. Motivations for seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in an academic outpatient setting. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35(8):1014–1020. doi:10.1093/asj/sjv094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharethy SE. Trends and demographic characteristics of Saudi cosmetic surgery patients. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(7):738–741. doi:10.15537/smj.2017.7.18528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri L, Galadari H, Al Mugaddam F, Souid A, Stip E, Javaid S. Perception of cosmetic procedures among middle eastern youth. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2021;14(12):E74–E83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin X, Twayigira M, Zhang W, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of minimally invasive facial cosmetic surgery in Chinese college students. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03676-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon SH, Lao WWK, Lee CH, et al. Experiences and attitudes toward aesthetic procedures in East Asia: a cross-sectional survey of five geographical regions. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(06):660–669. doi:10.5999/aps.2020.02565
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pikoos TD, Rossell SL, Tzimas N, Buzwell S. Assessing unrealistic expectations in clients undertaking minor cosmetic procedures: the development of the aesthetic procedure expectations scale. Facial Plast Surg Aesthetic Med. 2021;23(4):263–269. doi:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal H, Agrawal S. Impact of social media and photo-editing practice on seeking cosmetic dermatology care. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:1377–1385. doi:10.2147/CCID.S322859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Chow A, Fadavi D, et al. The zoom boom: how video calling impacts attitudes towards aesthetic surgery in the COVID-19 era. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(12):NP2086–NP2093. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs MJ, Jones A. Perceptions of individuals who engage in age concealment. Evol Behav Sci. 2022. doi:10.1037/ebs0000305
   Google Scholar
• Dobosz M, Rogowska P, Sokołowska E, Szczerkowska‐Dobosz A. Motivations, demography, and clinical features of body dysmorphic disorder among people seeking cosmetic treatments: a study of 199 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;jocd.14890. doi:10.1111/jocd.14890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabi S, Dover JS, Tanzi E, Bowes LE, Tsai Fu F, Odusan A. A 12‐week, prospective, non‐comparative, non‐randomized study of magnetic muscle stimulation for improvement of body satisfaction with the abdomen and buttocks. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53(1):79–88. doi:10.1002/lsm.23348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh CL, Ho S. Lasers for tattoo removal. In: Lahiri K, De A, Sarda A, editors. Textbook of Lasers in Dermatology. Jaypee; 2016:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman L, Fabi S. Look better, feel better, live better? The impact of minimally invasive aesthetic procedures on satisfaction with appearance and psychosocial wellbeing. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2022;15(5):47–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang S, Blissett G, Pei BA, Balac N, Bogner J, Reilly JM. A descriptive analysis of the epidemiology and motivations for laser tattoo removal in an underserved population. J Community Health. 2022;47(1):127–135. doi:10.1007/s10900-021-01024-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khunger N, Pant H. Cosmetic procedures in adolescents: what’s safe and what can wait. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol. 2021;22(1):12. doi:10.4103/ijpd.IJPD_53_20
   Google Scholar
• Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, et al. Self-reported patient motivations for seeking cosmetic procedures. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10):1167. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-González MC, Martínez-González RA, Guerra-Tapia A. Aesthetic dermatology and emotional well-being questionnaire. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(4):336–345. doi:10.1111/jocd.12109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown DJ. Impact of minimally invasive aesthetic procedures on the psychological and social dimensions of health. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;9(4):e3578. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merianos A, Vidourek R, King K. Medicalization of female beauty: a content analysis of cosmetic procedures. Qual Rep. 2015. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearlman RL, Wilkerson AH, Cobb EK, et al. Factors associated with likelihood to undergo cosmetic surgical procedures among young adults in the United States: a narrative review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:859–877. doi:10.2147/CCID.S358573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez S, Scherz G, Smith H. Characteristics of patients seeking and proceeding with non-surgical facial aesthetic procedures. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:197–207. doi:10.2147/CCID.S296970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwer DB. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019;31:302–308. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah P, Rangel LK, Geronemus RG, Rieder EA. Cosmetic procedure use as a type of substance-related disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(1):86–91. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman A, Maisel A, Weil A, et al. Patients believe that cosmetic procedures affect their quality of life: an interview study of patient-reported motivations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1671–1681. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker CE, Krumhuber EG, Dayan S, Furnham A. Effects of social media use on desire for cosmetic surgery among young women. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(7):3355–3364. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00282-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdandoost RY, Hayatbini N, Farid AAA, Gharaee B, Latifi NA. The body image dissatisfaction and psychological symptoms among invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic surgery patients. World J Plast Surg. 2016;5(2):148–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollast R, Puvia E, Bernard P, Tevichapong P, Klein O. How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in western and eastern cultures: a comparison between Belgium and Thailand. Swiss J Psychol. 2018;77(2):69–82. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede Insight. Compare countries. Helsinki: Hofstede insight; 2022. Available from: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/fi/product/compare-countries. Accessed October 13, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Bareket O, Kahalon R, Shnabel N, Glick P. The Madonna-Whore dichotomy: men who perceive women’s nurturance and sexuality as mutually exclusive endorse patriarchy and show lower relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles. 2018;79(9–10):519–532. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0895-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff DL. Comparing mating motivations, social processes, and personality as predictors of women’s cosmetics use. Evol Behav Sci. 2018;12(4):367–380. doi:10.1037/ebs0000119
   Google Scholar
• Morris KL, Goldenberg J, Boyd P. Women as animals, women as objects: evidence for two forms of objectification. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018;44(9):1302–1314. doi:10.1177/0146167218765739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi AM, Wilson B, Hibler BP, Drake LA. Nonphysician practice of cosmetic dermatology: a patient and physician perspective of outcomes and adverse events. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(4):588–597. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imadojemu S, Sarwer DB, Percec I, et al. Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1325. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimoni S. ‘Third Age’ under neoliberalism: from risky subjects to human capital. J Aging Stud. 2018;47:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2018.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar