Analysis of Adverse Reactions of Cosmetics in Chinese Han Population in Recent Five Years

References

• Alani JI, Davis MD, Yiannias JA. Allergy to cosmetics: a literature review. Dermatitis. 2013;24(6):283–290. doi:10.1097/DER.0b013e3182a5d8bc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cosmetics | FDA [WWW Document]; 2018. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics. Accessed January 6, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lucca JM, Joseph R, Hussain Al Kubaish Z, Mohammad Al-Maskeen S, Ali Alokaili Z. An observational study on adverse reactions of cosmetics: the need of practice the Cosmetovigilance system. Saudi Pharm J. 2020;28(6):746–753. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2020.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. Annual growth of the global cosmetics market from 2004 to 2021; 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/297070/growth-rate-of-The-global-cosmetics-market. Accessed August 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Panico A, Serio F, Bagordo F, et al. Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products. J Prev Med Hyg. 2019;60(1):E50–E57. doi:10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1080
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolopoulou-Stamati P, Hens L, Sasco AJ. Cosmetics as endocrine disruptors: are they a health risk? Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015;16(4):373–383. doi:10.1007/s11154-016-9329-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris SAV, Bobbitt JR, Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Kasting GB. The effect of prolonged exposure on sodium dodecyl sulfate penetration into human skin. Toxicol in Vitro. 2021;77:105246. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman A, Aerts O, de Montjoye L, Tromme I, Goossens A, Baeck M. Isothiazolinone derivatives and allergic contact dermatitis: a review and update. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(2):267–276. doi:10.1111/jdv.15267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransway AF, Fransway PJ, Belsito DV, et al. Parabens. Dermatitis. 2019;30(1):3–31. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nicola MR, Pontara A, Kass GEN, et al. Vipers of Major clinical relevance in Europe: taxonomy, venom composition, toxicology and clinical management of human bites. Toxicology. 2021;453:152724. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2021.152724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond M, Gamal A, Mukherjee PK, et al. Cutaneous dysbiosis may amplify barrier dysfunction in patients with atopic dermatitis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:944365. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.944365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain K. A survey on usage of personal care products especially cosmetics among university students in Saudi Arabia. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):271–277. doi:10.1111/jocd.12773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salverda JG, Bragt PJ, de Wit-Bos L, et al. Results of a cosmetovigilance survey in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68(3):139–148. doi:10.1111/cod.12005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Chen M, Meng X, et al. [Research progress in sample pretreatment and analytical techniques for cosmetics]. Se Pu. 2020;38(2):151–161. Chinese. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.06031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wetter DA, Yiannias JA, Prakash AV, Davis MD, Farmer SA, el-Azhary RA. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(5):789–798. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw EM, Buonomo M, DeKoven JG, et al. Importance of Supplemental Patch Testing Beyond a Screening Series for Patients With Dermatitis: the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(12):1456–1465. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu TH, Suresh R, Warshaw E, et al. The Medical Necessity of Comprehensive Patch Testing. Dermatitis. 2018;29(3):107–111. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(4):195–221. doi:10.1111/cod.12432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefeller O, Pfahlberg AB, Uter W. What can be learnt from nothing? - A statistical perspective. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(6):350–354. doi:10.1111/cod.12112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A, et al. S3 guidelines: epicutaneous patch testing with contact allergens and drugs - Short version, Part 1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019;17(10):1076–1093. doi:10.1111/ddg.13956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza-Ninet V, Blasco Encinas R, Vilata-Corell JJ, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis due to cosmetics: a clinical and epidemiological study in a tertiary hospital. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107(4):329–336. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2015.12.007.7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao J, Li LF. Contact sensitization to cosmetic series of allergens in a general population in Beijing. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;13(1):68–71. doi:10.1111/jocd.12078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner MFS, Rodrigues AC, Lazzarini R. Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics: retrospective analysis of a population subjected to patch tests between 2004 and 2017. An Bras Dermatol. 2020;95(6):696–701. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2020.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Hu Y, Wang D, et al. Photopatch testing in Chinese patients: a 5-year experience. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(1):78–84. doi:10.1111/cod.13808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WH, Li LF, Lu XY, Wang J. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(6):314–319. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00717.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons FE. Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2 Suppl 2):S161–81. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan S, Goudoulas TB, Jeevanandam J, Tan KX, Chowdhury S, Danquah MK. Therapeutic Applications of Metal and Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles: dermato-Cosmetic Perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:724499. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.724499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiani G, Eggenhöffner R, Pigatto PDM, Bragazzi NL. Nanotechnology meets atopic dermatitis: current solutions, challenges and future prospects. Insights and implications from a systematic review of the literature. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:380–386. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiani G, Pacifico A, Linder DM, et al. Nanodermatology-based solutions for psoriasis: state-of-The art and future prospects. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(6):e13113. doi:10.1111/dth.13113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton F, Ermler S, Kugathas S, Rosivatz E, Scholze M, Kortenkamp A. Mixture effects at very low doses with combinations of anti-androgenic pesticides, antioxidants, industrial pollutant and chemicals used in personal care products. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;278(3):201–208. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2013.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot AC, White IR, Flyvholm MA, Lensen G, Coenraads PJ. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62(1):2–17. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01615.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar